Functional ConstipationPhase 3NCT03639142
Dried Plums (Prunes) vs. Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children
A Phase 3 study testing Prunus domestica and Polyethylene Glycol 4000 in people with Functional Constipation, run by Medical University of Warsaw.
Trial summary
Children with functional constipation according to the Rome IV criteria will be randomly assigned to receive prunes at dose 3.5 g/kg/d (prune group) or Polyethylene Glycol 4000 (PEG group) at dose 0.5 g/kg/d for 4 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Functional Constipation
- What is being tested?
- Prunus domestica and Polyethylene Glycol 4000
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 1 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- children with constipation diagnosed with ROME IV criteria
Who cannot join
- diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, mental retardation, endocrine disease (eg, Hyperthyroidism), an organic cause of defecation disorders (eg, Hirshsprung disease, spinal anomalies, anorectal pathology, a history of gastrointestinal surgery), functional nonretentive fecal incontinence, or intake of medications influencing gastrointestinal motility
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Dried Plums (Prunes) vs. Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children - Randomised Controlled Trial
Children with functional constipation according to the Rome IV criteria will be randomly assigned to receive prunes at dose 3.5 g/kg/d (prune group) or Polyethylene Glycol 4000 (PEG group) at dose 0.5 g/kg/d for 4 weeks. Before treatment children with impaction will receive PEG 4000 at the dose 1.5 g/kg for 3-5 consecutive days. The primary outcome measure will be treatment success, defined as ≥3 BM per week with no fecal soiling during last week of the intervention.
Read the detailed description
We will conduct a randomized open-label trial at the Department of Paediatrics of the Medical University of Warsaw. The trial will be initiated by the investigators and conducted independently of any commercial entities. The aim will be to assess the effectiveness of dried prunes in the management of functional constipation in children in comparison to PEG 4000. Patients will be included into our study when functional constipation will be diagnosed according to ROME IV criteria. Those patients which will meet inclusion criteria will be assigned randomly to receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile) or PEG 4000 at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks. Parents of the children allocated to the prunes group will receive written information from dietician how to introduce prunes into child's diet (i.e. prunes should be introduced every day in three meals; prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them; prunes can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is prefered version); prunes can be introduced with yoghurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal). All patients will be asked to discontinue any laxatives if they used them previously. In case of rectal impaction noted on physical examination, PEG 4000 at dose of 1.5 g/kg for 3-5 consecutive days will be recommended. All subjects parents will receive a stool diary to record the frequency of bowel movements; stool consistency according to Bristol Stool Form Scale (which refers to 7 pictures of different forms of stool; 1 for hard lumps to 7 for watery stools); frequency of episodes of fecal soiling, pain during defecation, or abdominal pain or flatulence; use of additional laxative treatment; and adverse effects during the 4 weeks of the intervention. All patients or their parents (if child is too young) will be asked to write down selfreported 3 day food diaries on non-consecutive days, 2 d during the week and 1 d during the weekend to assess fiber intake during the study period .. All patients will be informed of rescue therapy -when there will be no defecation for 3 consecutive days during ongoing trail, PEG 4000 will be allowed at the dose of 1.5 g/kg/d until the child will pass a stool.
During the study period, every week investigator will call the patients parents to assess compliance with the study protocol.
Second visit will take place at the end of the trial (4th week). During this visit, investigators will collect stool diaries. Prunes used in the study will be purchased by parents of the children. It will be advised for parents to buy prunes under the trade mark of "Makar" in order to avoid product composition variability bias. Choice of the trade mark was taken considering the price of a product.
This study is designed as a randomized, open label controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. In order to obtain comparable groups, block randomisation will be performed (each block will contain four patients: two in the intervention group and two in the control group). The randomisation list will be generated using the statistical program StatsDirect by an independent person and will be kept by a staff member not involved in the trial.
Based on available data in the literature, we assume that a clinically significant difference in the effectiveness is 15%. To detect such a difference between the study groups with a power of 80% and alpha of 5%, a sample of 100 children is needed. Assuming approximately 10% loss to follow-up, we aim to recruit a total of 110 children for this study.
The Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw will be asked for approval for the study before recruitment commenced. Any modifications to the protocol that may affect the conduct of the study will be presented to the Ethical Committee. Verbal and written information regarding informed consent will be presented to the caregivers.
All analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, including all patients in the groups to which they are randomized for whom outcomes are available (including drop-outs and withdrawals). Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline characteristics. The Student t test will be used to compare mean values of continuous variables for approximating a normal distribution. For non normally distributed variables, the Mann-Whitney U test will be used. The chi-square or Fisher exact test will be used, when appropriate, to compare percentages. For continuous outcomes, differences in means or differences in medians (depending on the distribution of the data), and for dichotomous outcomes, the RR and number needed to treat, all with a 95% CI, will be calculated. The difference between study groups will be considered significant when the 95% CI for RR does not include 1.0, or when the 95% CI for MD does not include 0. All statistical tests will be 2-tailed and performed at the 5% level of significance.
- Conditions
- Functional Constipation
- Being tested
- Prunus domestica, Polyethylene Glycol 4000
- Keywords
- constipation, prunes, children
- Medical subject headings
- Constipation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prunus domesticaOther
Patients will receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d (max.100mg/day) in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile). Prunes should be introduced every day in three meals. Prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them. They can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is preferred version). Prunes can be introduced with yogurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal.
Polyethylene Glycol 4000Drug
Patients will receive PEG at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Plum group | Experimental | Children will receive plums at dose 3,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation. Receives: Other: Prunus domestica |
| Polyethylene glycol group | Active comparator | Children will receive PEG at dose 0,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation. Receives: Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 4000 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome measure will be treatment success
≥3 spontaneous stools per week, without episodes of fecal soiling (in toilet-trained children), in the last week of the intervention (week 4).
Measured: up to 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (7)
stool consistency (according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale) during whole study period
Scale ranges from 1 to 7 where types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 being the ideal stools as they are easy to defecate while not containing excess liquid, 5 tending towards diarrhoea, and 6 and 7 indicate diarrhoea.
Measured: up to 4 weeks
frequency of defecation per week
Measured: up to 4 weeks
frequency of fecal soiling per week
Measured: up to 4 weeks
frequency of pain during defecation per week
Measured: up to 4 weeks
frequency of abdominal pain or flatulence per week
Measured: up to 4 weeks
need for intake of additional laxative treatment during whole study period
Measured: up to 4 weeks
adverse events
Measured: up to 4 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Nov 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Functional ConstipationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of WarsawThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Warsaw
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Piotr Dziechciarz, MD, Medical University of Warsaw
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03639142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1/2018
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 14 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 23 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Attaluri A, Donahoe R, Valestin J, Brown K, Rao SS. Randomised clinical trial: dried plums (prunes) vs. psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr;33(7):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04594.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
PubMed 21323688Benninga MA, Faure C, Hyman PE, St James Roberts I, Schechter NL, Nurko S. Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Neonate/Toddler. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 15:S0016-5085(16)00182-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.016. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 27144631Chmielewska A, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan is not effective for the treatment of functional constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;30(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
PubMed 21320737Dehghani SM, Kulouee N, Honar N, Imanieh MH, Haghighat M, Javaherizadeh H. Clinical Manifestations among Children with Chronic Functional Constipation. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2015 Jan;7(1):31-5.
PubMed 25628851Dziechciarz P, Horvath A, Szajewska H. Polyethylene glycol 4000 for treatment of functional constipation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Jan;60(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000543.
PubMed 25162362Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children: a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 28;19(20):3062-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3062.
PubMed 23716985Koppen IJ, Nurko S, Saps M, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA. The pediatric Rome IV criteria: what's new? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;11(3):193-201. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1282820. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
PubMed 28092724Lever E, Cole J, Scott SM, Emery PW, Whelan K. Systematic review: the effect of prunes on gastrointestinal function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct;40(7):750-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12913. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
PubMed 25109788Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;25(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010.
PubMed 21382575Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, Staiano A, Vandenplas Y, Benninga MA; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb;58(2):258-74. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266.
PubMed 24345831Zeevenhooven J, Koppen IJ, Benninga MA. The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(1):1-13. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
PubMed 28401050
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dried Plums (Prunes) vs. Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children - Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03639142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1/2018
- Conditions
- Functional Constipation
- Keywords
- constipation, prunes, children
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of WarsawUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Children with functional constipation according to the Rome IV criteria will be randomly assigned to receive prunes at dose 3.5 g/kg/d (prune group) or Polyethylene Glycol 4000 (PEG group) at dose 0.5 g/kg/d for 4 weeks. Before treatment children with impaction will receive PEG 4000 at the dose 1.5 g/kg for 3-5 consecutive days. The primary outcome measure will be treatment success, defined as ≥3 BM per week with no fecal soiling during last week of the intervention.
Detailed description
We will conduct a randomized open-label trial at the Department of Paediatrics of the Medical University of Warsaw. The trial will be initiated by the investigators and conducted independently of any commercial entities. The aim will be to assess the effectiveness of dried prunes in the management of functional constipation in children in comparison to PEG 4000. Patients will be included into our study when functional constipation will be diagnosed according to ROME IV criteria. Those patients which will meet inclusion criteria will be assigned randomly to receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile) or PEG 4000 at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks. Parents of the children allocated to the prunes group will receive written information from dietician how to introduce prunes into child's diet (i.e. prunes should be introduced every day in three meals; prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them; prunes can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is prefered version); prunes can be introduced with yoghurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal). All patients will be asked to discontinue any laxatives if they used them previously. In case of rectal impaction noted on physical examination, PEG 4000 at dose of 1.5 g/kg for 3-5 consecutive days will be recommended. All subjects parents will receive a stool diary to record the frequency of bowel movements; stool consistency according to Bristol Stool Form Scale (which refers to 7 pictures of different forms of stool; 1 for hard lumps to 7 for watery stools); frequency of episodes of fecal soiling, pain during defecation, or abdominal pain or flatulence; use of additional laxative treatment; and adverse effects during the 4 weeks of the intervention. All patients or their parents (if child is too young) will be asked to write down selfreported 3 day food diaries on non-consecutive days, 2 d during the week and 1 d during the weekend to assess fiber intake during the study period .. All patients will be informed of rescue therapy -when there will be no defecation for 3 consecutive days during ongoing trail, PEG 4000 will be allowed at the dose of 1.5 g/kg/d until the child will pass a stool.
During the study period, every week investigator will call the patients parents to assess compliance with the study protocol.
Second visit will take place at the end of the trial (4th week). During this visit, investigators will collect stool diaries. Prunes used in the study will be purchased by parents of the children. It will be advised for parents to buy prunes under the trade mark of "Makar" in order to avoid product composition variability bias. Choice of the trade mark was taken considering the price of a product.
This study is designed as a randomized, open label controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. In order to obtain comparable groups, block randomisation will be performed (each block will contain four patients: two in the intervention group and two in the control group). The randomisation list will be generated using the statistical program StatsDirect by an independent person and will be kept by a staff member not involved in the trial.
Based on available data in the literature, we assume that a clinically significant difference in the effectiveness is 15%. To detect such a difference between the study groups with a power of 80% and alpha of 5%, a sample of 100 children is needed. Assuming approximately 10% loss to follow-up, we aim to recruit a total of 110 children for this study.
The Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw will be asked for approval for the study before recruitment commenced. Any modifications to the protocol that may affect the conduct of the study will be presented to the Ethical Committee. Verbal and written information regarding informed consent will be presented to the caregivers.
All analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, including all patients in the groups to which they are randomized for whom outcomes are available (including drop-outs and withdrawals). Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline characteristics. The Student t test will be used to compare mean values of continuous variables for approximating a normal distribution. For non normally distributed variables, the Mann-Whitney U test will be used. The chi-square or Fisher exact test will be used, when appropriate, to compare percentages. For continuous outcomes, differences in means or differences in medians (depending on the distribution of the data), and for dichotomous outcomes, the RR and number needed to treat, all with a 95% CI, will be calculated. The difference between study groups will be considered significant when the 95% CI for RR does not include 1.0, or when the 95% CI for MD does not include 0. All statistical tests will be 2-tailed and performed at the 5% level of significance.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Plum group | Experimental | Other: Prunus domesticaChildren will receive plums at dose 3,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation. |
| Polyethylene glycol group | Active comparator | Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 4000Children will receive PEG at dose 0,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- children with constipation diagnosed with ROME IV criteria
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, mental retardation, endocrine disease (eg, Hyperthyroidism), an organic cause of defecation disorders (eg, Hirshsprung disease, spinal anomalies, anorectal pathology, a history of gastrointestinal surgery), functional nonretentive fecal incontinence, or intake of medications influencing gastrointestinal motility
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prunus domesticaPatients will receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d (max.100mg/day) in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile). Prunes should be introduced every day in three meals. Prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them. They can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is preferred version). Prunes can be introduced with yogurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal. | Other | Plum group |
| Polyethylene Glycol 4000Patients will receive PEG at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks. | Drug | Polyethylene glycol group |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome measure will be treatment success
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
≥3 spontaneous stools per week, without episodes of fecal soiling (in toilet-trained children), in the last week of the intervention (week 4).
7 secondary outcomes
stool consistency (according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale) during whole study period
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
frequency of defecation per week
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
frequency of fecal soiling per week
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
frequency of pain during defecation per week
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
frequency of abdominal pain or flatulence per week
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
need for intake of additional laxative treatment during whole study period
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
adverse events
Time frame: up to 4 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Aug 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21323688Attaluri A, Donahoe R, Valestin J, Brown K, Rao SS. Randomised clinical trial: dried plums (prunes) vs. psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr;33(7):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04594.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 27144631Benninga MA, Faure C, Hyman PE, St James Roberts I, Schechter NL, Nurko S. Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Neonate/Toddler. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 15:S0016-5085(16)00182-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.016. Online ahead of print.
- Background: PubMed 21320737Chmielewska A, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan is not effective for the treatment of functional constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;30(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 25628851Dehghani SM, Kulouee N, Honar N, Imanieh MH, Haghighat M, Javaherizadeh H. Clinical Manifestations among Children with Chronic Functional Constipation. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2015 Jan;7(1):31-5.
- Background: PubMed 25162362Dziechciarz P, Horvath A, Szajewska H. Polyethylene glycol 4000 for treatment of functional constipation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Jan;60(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000543.
- Background: PubMed 23716985Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children: a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 28;19(20):3062-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3062.
- Background: PubMed 28092724Koppen IJ, Nurko S, Saps M, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA. The pediatric Rome IV criteria: what's new? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;11(3):193-201. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1282820. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 25109788Lever E, Cole J, Scott SM, Emery PW, Whelan K. Systematic review: the effect of prunes on gastrointestinal function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct;40(7):750-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12913. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
- Background: PubMed 21382575Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;25(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010.
- Background: PubMed 24345831Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, Staiano A, Vandenplas Y, Benninga MA; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb;58(2):258-74. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266.
- Background: PubMed 28401050Zeevenhooven J, Koppen IJ, Benninga MA. The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(1):1-13. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Functional Constipation
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Constipation (IBS-C)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
This is a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Parallel-group Study of the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Weight-based Treatment Groups of Plecanatide Versus Placebo in Children and Adolescent Participants 6 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With FC
Functional Constipation (FC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Rifaximin Treatment in Bloating Predominant Functional Bowel Disorders
Bloating, Rifaximin
Recruiting
Effects of Connective Tissue Massage Plus Biofeedback for Dyssynergic Defecation
Dyssynergic Defecation
RecruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Interoception and Postural Control in Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Constipation, Irritable Bowel Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Prunus domestica and Polyethylene Glycol 4000 in people with Functional Constipation, run by Medical University of Warsaw.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Krzysztof Zakościelny (+48 507137840, krzysztof_zakoscielny@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome measure will be treatment success (time frame: up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03639142, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2018.