AzTrials
AzTrials

Functional ConstipationPhase 3NCT03639142

Dried Plums (Prunes) vs. Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children

A Phase 3 study testing Prunus domestica and Polyethylene Glycol 4000 in people with Functional Constipation, run by Medical University of Warsaw.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Children with functional constipation according to the Rome IV criteria will be randomly assigned to receive prunes at dose 3.5 g/kg/d (prune group) or Polyethylene Glycol 4000 (PEG group) at dose 0.5 g/kg/d for 4 weeks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Functional Constipation
What is being tested?
Prunus domestica and Polyethylene Glycol 4000
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2018to 1 Nov 2020
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • children with constipation diagnosed with ROME IV criteria

Who cannot join

  • diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome, mental retardation, endocrine disease (eg, Hyperthyroidism), an organic cause of defecation disorders (eg, Hirshsprung disease, spinal anomalies, anorectal pathology, a history of gastrointestinal surgery), functional nonretentive fecal incontinence, or intake of medications influencing gastrointestinal motility

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Krzysztof Zakościelny contact

+48 507137840

krzysztof_zakoscielny@yahoo.com

Piotr Dziechciarz\ contact

+48 501493839

piotrdz@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: Dried Plums (Prunes) vs. Polyethylene Glycol 4000 for Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children - Randomised Controlled Trial

Children with functional constipation according to the Rome IV criteria will be randomly assigned to receive prunes at dose 3.5 g/kg/d (prune group) or Polyethylene Glycol 4000 (PEG group) at dose 0.5 g/kg/d for 4 weeks. Before treatment children with impaction will receive PEG 4000 at the dose 1.5 g/kg for 3-5 consecutive days. The primary outcome measure will be treatment success, defined as ≥3 BM per week with no fecal soiling during last week of the intervention.

Read the detailed description

We will conduct a randomized open-label trial at the Department of Paediatrics of the Medical University of Warsaw. The trial will be initiated by the investigators and conducted independently of any commercial entities. The aim will be to assess the effectiveness of dried prunes in the management of functional constipation in children in comparison to PEG 4000. Patients will be included into our study when functional constipation will be diagnosed according to ROME IV criteria. Those patients which will meet inclusion criteria will be assigned randomly to receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile) or PEG 4000 at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks. Parents of the children allocated to the prunes group will receive written information from dietician how to introduce prunes into child's diet (i.e. prunes should be introduced every day in three meals; prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them; prunes can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is prefered version); prunes can be introduced with yoghurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal). All patients will be asked to discontinue any laxatives if they used them previously. In case of rectal impaction noted on physical examination, PEG 4000 at dose of 1.5 g/kg for 3-5 consecutive days will be recommended. All subjects parents will receive a stool diary to record the frequency of bowel movements; stool consistency according to Bristol Stool Form Scale (which refers to 7 pictures of different forms of stool; 1 for hard lumps to 7 for watery stools); frequency of episodes of fecal soiling, pain during defecation, or abdominal pain or flatulence; use of additional laxative treatment; and adverse effects during the 4 weeks of the intervention. All patients or their parents (if child is too young) will be asked to write down selfreported 3 day food diaries on non-consecutive days, 2 d during the week and 1 d during the weekend to assess fiber intake during the study period .. All patients will be informed of rescue therapy -when there will be no defecation for 3 consecutive days during ongoing trail, PEG 4000 will be allowed at the dose of 1.5 g/kg/d until the child will pass a stool.

During the study period, every week investigator will call the patients parents to assess compliance with the study protocol.

Second visit will take place at the end of the trial (4th week). During this visit, investigators will collect stool diaries. Prunes used in the study will be purchased by parents of the children. It will be advised for parents to buy prunes under the trade mark of "Makar" in order to avoid product composition variability bias. Choice of the trade mark was taken considering the price of a product.

This study is designed as a randomized, open label controlled trial with 1:1 allocation. In order to obtain comparable groups, block randomisation will be performed (each block will contain four patients: two in the intervention group and two in the control group). The randomisation list will be generated using the statistical program StatsDirect by an independent person and will be kept by a staff member not involved in the trial.

Based on available data in the literature, we assume that a clinically significant difference in the effectiveness is 15%. To detect such a difference between the study groups with a power of 80% and alpha of 5%, a sample of 100 children is needed. Assuming approximately 10% loss to follow-up, we aim to recruit a total of 110 children for this study.

The Ethical Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw will be asked for approval for the study before recruitment commenced. Any modifications to the protocol that may affect the conduct of the study will be presented to the Ethical Committee. Verbal and written information regarding informed consent will be presented to the caregivers.

All analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis, including all patients in the groups to which they are randomized for whom outcomes are available (including drop-outs and withdrawals). Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline characteristics. The Student t test will be used to compare mean values of continuous variables for approximating a normal distribution. For non normally distributed variables, the Mann-Whitney U test will be used. The chi-square or Fisher exact test will be used, when appropriate, to compare percentages. For continuous outcomes, differences in means or differences in medians (depending on the distribution of the data), and for dichotomous outcomes, the RR and number needed to treat, all with a 95% CI, will be calculated. The difference between study groups will be considered significant when the 95% CI for RR does not include 1.0, or when the 95% CI for MD does not include 0. All statistical tests will be 2-tailed and performed at the 5% level of significance.

Being tested
Prunus domestica, Polyethylene Glycol 4000
Keywords
constipation, prunes, children
Medical subject headings
Constipation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Prunus domesticaOther

    Patients will receive prunes at dose 3,5 g/kg/d (max.100mg/day) in three portions a day, for 4 weeks (amount of prescribed prunes will be calibrated with the weight that child ought to have on WHO growth charts at 50th percentile). Prunes should be introduced every day in three meals. Prunes can be chopped or grinded before eating them. They can be eaten alone or child may eat them as a part of bigger meal (which is preferred version). Prunes can be introduced with yogurt, cereals, nuts and seeds as a morning meal.

  • Polyethylene Glycol 4000Drug

    Patients will receive PEG at dose 0,5 g/kg/d once daily orally, for 4 weeks.

Study groups in NCT03639142
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Plum groupExperimentalChildren will receive plums at dose 3,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation.
Receives: Other: Prunus domestica
Polyethylene glycol groupActive comparatorChildren will receive PEG at dose 0,5g/kg/d as an oral treatment for constipation.
Receives: Drug: Polyethylene Glycol 4000

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome measure will be treatment success

    ≥3 spontaneous stools per week, without episodes of fecal soiling (in toilet-trained children), in the last week of the intervention (week 4).

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. stool consistency (according to the Bristol Stool Form Scale) during whole study period

    Scale ranges from 1 to 7 where types 1 and 2 indicate constipation, with 3 and 4 being the ideal stools as they are easy to defecate while not containing excess liquid, 5 tending towards diarrhoea, and 6 and 7 indicate diarrhoea.

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

  2. frequency of defecation per week

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

  3. frequency of fecal soiling per week

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

  4. frequency of pain during defecation per week

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

  5. frequency of abdominal pain or flatulence per week

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

  6. need for intake of additional laxative treatment during whole study period

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

  7. adverse events

    Measured: up to 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Sep 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
110 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03639142
Sponsor's protocol ID
1/2018
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
14 Aug 2018
Last updated
23 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Attaluri A, Donahoe R, Valestin J, Brown K, Rao SS. Randomised clinical trial: dried plums (prunes) vs. psyllium for constipation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Apr;33(7):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04594.x. Epub 2011 Feb 15.

    PubMed 21323688
  • Benninga MA, Faure C, Hyman PE, St James Roberts I, Schechter NL, Nurko S. Childhood Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Neonate/Toddler. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 15:S0016-5085(16)00182-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.016. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 27144631
  • Chmielewska A, Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan is not effective for the treatment of functional constipation in children: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Clin Nutr. 2011 Aug;30(4):462-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2011.01.012. Epub 2011 Feb 12.

    PubMed 21320737
  • Dehghani SM, Kulouee N, Honar N, Imanieh MH, Haghighat M, Javaherizadeh H. Clinical Manifestations among Children with Chronic Functional Constipation. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2015 Jan;7(1):31-5.

    PubMed 25628851
  • Dziechciarz P, Horvath A, Szajewska H. Polyethylene glycol 4000 for treatment of functional constipation in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Jan;60(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000543.

    PubMed 25162362
  • Horvath A, Dziechciarz P, Szajewska H. Glucomannan for abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children: a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 May 28;19(20):3062-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i20.3062.

    PubMed 23716985
  • Koppen IJ, Nurko S, Saps M, Di Lorenzo C, Benninga MA. The pediatric Rome IV criteria: what's new? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;11(3):193-201. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1282820. Epub 2017 Jan 24.

    PubMed 28092724
  • Lever E, Cole J, Scott SM, Emery PW, Whelan K. Systematic review: the effect of prunes on gastrointestinal function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct;40(7):750-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12913. Epub 2014 Aug 11.

    PubMed 25109788
  • Mugie SM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of constipation in children and adults: a systematic review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;25(1):3-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.12.010.

    PubMed 21382575
  • Tabbers MM, DiLorenzo C, Berger MY, Faure C, Langendam MW, Nurko S, Staiano A, Vandenplas Y, Benninga MA; European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition; North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology. Evaluation and treatment of functional constipation in infants and children: evidence-based recommendations from ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Feb;58(2):258-74. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000266.

    PubMed 24345831
  • Zeevenhooven J, Koppen IJ, Benninga MA. The New Rome IV Criteria for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Infants and Toddlers. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(1):1-13. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2017.20.1.1. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

    PubMed 28401050

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Prunus domestica and Polyethylene Glycol 4000 in people with Functional Constipation, run by Medical University of Warsaw.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Krzysztof Zakościelny (+48 507137840, krzysztof_zakoscielny@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome measure will be treatment success (time frame: up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03639142, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in