AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiogenic ShockNCT03635840

The Effects of IABP Prior to Revascularization on Mortality of ACS Patients Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock

A study testing Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in people with Cardiogenic Shock, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prevalence of cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome patients is reported at about 5-8% with high fatality. Revascularization approach has already known as the standard of care, but the usage of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as mechanical circulatory support is still a controversy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Cardiogenic Shock
What is being tested?
Intra Aortic Balloon Pump
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteIndonesia
Study dates
4 Jan 2018to 4 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age greater than 18 years old
  • Myocardial infarction patients complicated with shock
  • Willing to enroll in the study (signed consent)

Who cannot join

  • Age greater than 80 years old
  • Heart and lung resuscitation for more than 30 minutes
  • Cardiogenic shock onset >12 hours (if known) or >18 hours (if not known/patient presented in emergency department already with shock)
  • Mechanical complication of myocardial infarction
  • Moderate and severe aorta regurgitation
  • Peripheral artery disease making IABP unfeasible
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Patients not receiving revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention
  • Patients who died before IABP insertion
  • Care termination requested by family

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Indonesia1 site

  • National Cradiovascular Center Harapan Kita Hospital

    Jakarta, 11420

Other trials in Indonesia

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Intra Aortic Balloon Pump Prior to Revascularization on Mortality of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Complicated With Cardiogenic Shock

Prevalence of cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome patients is reported at about 5-8% with high fatality. Revascularization approach has already known as the standard of care, but the usage of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as mechanical circulatory support is still a controversy. IABP SHOCK II trial revealed that short-term mortality did not improved by IABP but there are several essential variabels related to mortality that are not considered in the study which are IABP initiation time and weaning protocol.This study aim to evalute the effect of IABP prior to revascularization on mortality of patients with myocardial infarction complicated with shock.

92 subjects will be enrolled in this randomized controlled trial into two groups, with and without IABP. IABP group will be receiving the intervention prior to revascularization. The primary outcomes to be sought are in-hospital and 30-day mortality after revascularization. IABP effects measured by various indicators such as Global Longitudinal Strain by echocardiography on the 1st and 3rd day, NTproBNP and ST2 level on the 1st, 3rd and 5th day, effective lactate clearance and ureum creatinine level on the 1st and 3rd day and will be compared between two groups. Continous variabel will be presented in mean ± deviation standard or median, and analized with Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.

Being tested
Intra Aortic Balloon Pump
Keywords
IABP, Cardiogenic Shock, Myocardial Infarction
Medical subject headings
Shock, Cardiogenic, Myocardial Infarction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intra Aortic Balloon PumpDevice

    Also called IABP

    Intra Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) is a circulatory mechanical support device, placed in descending aorta, distally from left subclavian artery and proximally from renal artery. IABP works with counterpulsation concept, synchronized with heart cycle. It is indicated as supportive therapy for patients undergoing revascularization, cardiogenic shock and mechanical complication.

    Balloon dilatation during dyastolic phase increasing dyastolic pressure in aorta, improving coronary vascularization and myocardial oxygen supply. In systolic phase, the balloon deflates, reducing the left ventricle afterload hence decreasing myocardial oxygen demand.

Study groups in NCT03635840
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionGroup of patients not receiving IABP
Intra Aortic Balloon PumpExperimentalGroup of patients receiving Intra Aortic Balloon Pump prior to revascularization
Receives: Device: Intra Aortic Balloon Pump

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 30-day-Mortality

    Mortality of patients 30 day after hospitalization

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2018
  2. Study start4 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion4 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03635840
Sponsor's protocol ID
IABP18
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
15 Aug 2018
Last updated
8 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Nabel EG, Braunwald E. A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 5;366(1):54-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1112570. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22216842

  • Lindholm MG, Kober L, Boesgaard S, Torp-Pedersen C, Aldershvile J; Trandolapril Cardiac Evaluation study group. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction; prognostic impact of early and late shock development. Eur Heart J. 2003 Feb;24(3):258-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00429-3.

    PubMed 12590903

  • Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J. Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective. Circulation. 2009 Mar 10;119(9):1211-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947. Epub 2009 Feb 23.

    PubMed 19237658

  • Barron HV, Every NR, Parsons LS, Angeja B, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Chou TM; Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J. 2001 Jun;141(6):933-9. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115295.

    PubMed 11376306

  • Acharji S, Mathur A, Lakshmanadoss U, Prasad H, Singh M, Kaluski E. Have we given up on intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in post-myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock? Clin Cardiol. 2013 Nov;36(11):704-10. doi: 10.1002/clc.22184. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

    PubMed 24105878

  • Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Dzavik V, Buller CE, Aylward P, Col J, White HD; SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2511-5. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.21.2511.

    PubMed 16757723

  • Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation. 2008 Feb 5;117(5):686-97. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613596. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18250279

  • Werdan K, Russ M, Buerke M, Delle-Karth G, Geppert A, Schondube FA; German Cardiac Society; German Society of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine; German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery; (Austrian Society of Internal and General Intensive Care Medicine; German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine; Austrian Society of Cardiology; German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine; German Society of Preventive Medicine and Rehabilitation. Cardiogenic shock due to myocardial infarction: diagnosis, monitoring and treatment: a German-Austrian S3 Guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012 May;109(19):343-51. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2012.0343. Epub 2012 May 11.

    PubMed 22675405

  • Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1726-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208943. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24171518

  • Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, McKinlay SM, LeJemtel TH. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901.

    PubMed 10460813

  • Jeger RV, Urban P, Harkness SM, Tseng CH, Stauffer JC, Lejemtel TH, Sleeper LA, Pfisterer ME, Hochman JS. Early revascularization is beneficial across all ages and a wide spectrum of cardiogenic shock severity: A pooled analysis of trials. Acute Card Care. 2011 Mar;13(1):14-20. doi: 10.3109/17482941.2010.538696. Epub 2011 Jan 18.

    PubMed 21244231

  • Overgaard CB, Dzavik V. Inotropes and vasopressors: review of physiology and clinical use in cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2008 Sep 2;118(10):1047-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.728840. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18765387

  • Abraham WT, Adams KF, Fonarow GC, Costanzo MR, Berkowitz RL, LeJemtel TH, Cheng ML, Wynne J; ADHERE Scientific Advisory Committee and Investigators; ADHERE Study Group. In-hospital mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring intravenous vasoactive medications: an analysis from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.051.

    PubMed 15992636

  • Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Hansen C, Muncy D. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation before primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty reduces catheterization laboratory events in high-risk patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jul 1;84(1):18-23. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00185-x.

    PubMed 10404845

  • Sjauw KD, Engstrom AE, Vis MM, van der Schaaf RJ, Baan J Jr, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Piek JJ, Tijssen JG, Henriques JP. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intra-aortic balloon pump therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: should we change the guidelines? Eur Heart J. 2009 Feb;30(4):459-68. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn602. Epub 2009 Jan 23.

    PubMed 19168529

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Intra Aortic Balloon Pump in people with Cardiogenic Shock, run by Universitas Indonesia at 1 site in Indonesia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

30-day-Mortality (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03635840, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2024.

AzTrials uses cookies for analytics and advertising. You can accept or reject them; the site works either way. Privacy Policy.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in