PneumoniaNCT03630380
Accuracy of Clinical and Diagnostic Studies for Pneumonia in Children
An observational study of Pneumonia, run by Patan Academy of Health Sciences at 1 site in Nepal.
Trial summary
Pneumonia continues to be a leading cause of death in children under five years of age worldwide. Many studies have evaluated clinical signs and symptoms that may predict pneumonia. A recent meta-analysis found that no singular physical exam finding predicted pneumonia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 59 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Clinical History, Physical Exam Findings and Laboratory Findings
- How many people
- 1,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNepal
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2018to 31 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 59 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Located in the Kathmandu valley, Patan Hospital is a large urban hospital with a 35-bed emergency department. The emergency department has an annual volume of approximately 48,000 patients, including approximately 8,000 pediatric visits. The admission rate is 20%.
Who may be able to join
- Patients presenting under age 5 years
- Presence of fever, respiratory complaints, or concern for pneumonia
- Receiving chest x-ray imaging
Who cannot join
- Children not receiving chest x-ray imaging as part of their workup for possible pneumonia
- Patients 5 years of age and older
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Nepal1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Patan Academy of Health Sciences
Kathmandu
Yogendra Amatya, MDGP
Yogendra Amatya, MD GP
About this study
Official title: Accuracy of History, Physical Exam, Laboratory Findings and Lung Ultrasound Compared to Chest Radiograph for the Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Pediatric Patients Presenting to Patan Hospital in Nepal
Pneumonia continues to be a leading cause of death in children under five years of age worldwide. Many studies have evaluated clinical signs and symptoms that may predict pneumonia. A recent meta-analysis found that no singular physical exam finding predicted pneumonia. The World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria diagnose pneumonia based on fast breathing; however, tachypnea has not been shown to strongly predict pneumonia. This study will evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam and WHO criteria, laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound compared with chest radiograph for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children under five years of age in a resource limited setting. Determining diagnostic accuracy of these findings may help derive a clinical decision rule that may more accurately predict which children have pneumonia than current WHO guidelines.
Read the detailed description
Background Pneumonia is the leading cause of death in children under five years of age worldwide.1 These deaths may be prevented by early detection and targeted antibiotic therapy.2 However, the diagnosis is not always clear on presentation to health care facilities. Missed diagnosis may lead to increased morbidity and mortality, while over-diagnosis may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use, which may further lead to increased antibiotic resistance, cause allergic reactions, and create unnecessary costs for patients. Therefore, using clinical tools and diagnostic capabilities to better improve diagnosis is critical.
Many studies have evaluated clinical signs and symptoms that may predict pneumonia.3-6 A recent meta-analysis found that no singular physical exam finding predicted pneumonia.5 The World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria diagnose pneumonia based on fast breathing; however, tachypnea has not been shown to strongly predict pneumonia.7 Additionally, most children with fever have compensatory tachypnea as a result, making the criteria of fast breathing difficult to diagnose pneumonia alone.8 In Nepal, one study evaluating the WHO criteria for pneumonia found a sensitivity of only 69.6% and specificity of 59.6%.9 Despite this, many providers rely on clinical exam findings and the WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia.
When available, diagnostic imaging is used regularly to confirm suspected pneumonia. Chest x-ray has been the standard for diagnosis in most facilities worldwide. However, remote facilities in resource-limited settings often lack radiographic imaging capabilities. Many facilities have bedside ultrasound available as it is easily portable, repeatable, and not associated with radiation. Ultrasound has been shown to be sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of pneumonia, yet few studies have evaluated the accuracy of lung ultrasound for pneumonia in pediatric patients in a resource-limited setting.10-14
The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical history, physical exam, laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound compared to chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia in pediatric patients in a resource-limited setting. Determining diagnostic accuracy of these findings may help derive a clinical decision rule that may more accurately predict which children have pneumonia than current WHO guidelines.
Study Design
A prospective observational cross-sectional study of pediatric patients presenting for fever or respiratory complaints to the emergency department and outpatient department at Patan Hospital in Lalitpur, Nepal will be done over one year. Ethical approval will be obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council Ethical Review Board.
Study Setting and Population
Located in the Kathmandu valley, Patan Hospital is a large urban hospital with a 35-bed emergency department. The emergency department has an annual volume of approximately 48,000 patients, including approximately 8,000 pediatric visits. The admission rate is 20%.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients presenting under age 5 years of age with fever, respiratory complaints, or concern for pneumonia and receiving chest x-ray imaging.
Study Protocol
Parents will be consented for inclusion of child in the study (See consent form). Data will be collected on pediatric patients meeting the above inclusion criteria. Data will include demographics (age, gender), duration of symptoms, symptoms (presence or absence of fever, cough, chest pain, difficulty breathing, or vomiting), vital signs (temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation), other physical exam findings (grunting, nasal flaring, retractions or indrawing of chest, crepitations, wheezing, or diminished breath sounds). These will be collected on the data collection form (see Appendix 1). Additionally, white cell counts with neutrophil counts and c-reactive protein will be collected if ordered by the clinician.
As a part of the evaluation, a bedside lung ultrasound will be performed by a clinician trained to perform lung ultrasounds. The bedside lung ultrasound is provided free for patients. Sonographers will be blinded to clinical information and results of any chest imaging. A Sonosite M Turbo (Fujifilm Sonosite, Inc.) ultrasound machine with a curvilinear probe will be used. In accordance with previous literature, the ultrasound examination will include ten views: two anterior views and two lateral views (one including the costophrenic angle), and one posterior view on each hemithorax. The physician will record ultrasound findings and interpretation directly after the ultrasound is complete. An ultrasound diagnosis of pneumonia is defined as the presence of unilateral B lines or subpleural lung consolidation. All ultrasounds will be reviewed for accuracy by a medical sonographer.
All patients will have a single posterioranterior (PA) chest x-ray as a part of the standard evaluation. The chest x-ray will be read by a board-certified radiologist, who is blinded to the clinical presentation and the results of any other imaging. Chest x-ray readings will be recorded on the standardized data form.
- Conditions
- Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Clinical History, Physical Exam Findings, Laboratory Findings, Lung Ultrasound
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clinical HistoryOther
We will collect clinical history for each patient (days of illness, history of fever, cough, difficulty breathing, vomiting, chest pain).
Physical Exam FindingsOther
We will collect physical exam findings including vital signs, WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia, and lung auscultation findings.
Laboratory FindingsOther
We will collect laboratory findings (white blood cell counts, differential, and c-reactive protein) if ordered by the clinician.
Lung UltrasoundOther
We will perform lung ultrasound on all patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | All children under five years of age with clinical suspicion of pneumonia (fever or respiratory complaints) who have a chest radiograph ordered will be consented. Clinical history, physical exam findings (temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and lung auscultation findings), laboratory findings (white blood cell count, differential, and CRP) will be recorded. Lung ultrasound will be performed on all patients. Receives: Other: Clinical History; Other: Physical Exam Findings; Other: Laboratory Findings; Other: Lung Ultrasound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sensitivity
We will follow patients during their acute visit to evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam findings (including WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia), laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound using chest radiographs as the standard for diagnosing pneumonia. We will determine the sensitivity and specificity, and area under the receiver operator curve and determine if there are better combination of clinical and diagnostic predictors for diagnosis of pneumonia in children.
Measured: 1 day
Specificity
We will follow patients during their acute visit to evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam findings (including WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia), laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound using chest radiographs as the standard for diagnosing pneumonia. We will determine the sensitivity and specificity, and area under the receiver operator curve and determine if there are better combination of clinical and diagnostic predictors for diagnosis of pneumonia in children.
Measured: 1 day
Area under the receiver operator curve (ROC)
We will follow patients during their acute visit to evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam findings (including WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia), laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound using chest radiographs as the standard for diagnosing pneumonia. We will determine the sensitivity and specificity, and area under the receiver operator curve and determine if there are better combination of clinical and diagnostic predictors for diagnosis of pneumonia in children.
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2018
- Primary completion31 May 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Patan Academy of Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Darlene Rose House, Patan Academy of Health Sciences
- Investigators
- Darlene R House, MD, Principal investigator, Patan Academy of Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03630380
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PAHS2
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: The individual participant data will likely be placed on a data repository site.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Accuracy of History, Physical Exam, Laboratory Findings and Lung Ultrasound Compared to Chest Radiograph for the Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Pediatric Patients Presenting to Patan Hospital in Nepal
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03630380
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAHS2
- Conditions
- Pneumonia
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 1,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Patan Academy of Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pneumonia continues to be a leading cause of death in children under five years of age worldwide. Many studies have evaluated clinical signs and symptoms that may predict pneumonia. A recent meta-analysis found that no singular physical exam finding predicted pneumonia. The World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria diagnose pneumonia based on fast breathing; however, tachypnea has not been shown to strongly predict pneumonia. This study will evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam and WHO criteria, laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound compared with chest radiograph for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children under five years of age in a resource limited setting. Determining diagnostic accuracy of these findings may help derive a clinical decision rule that may more accurately predict which children have pneumonia than current WHO guidelines.
Detailed description
Background Pneumonia is the leading cause of death in children under five years of age worldwide.1 These deaths may be prevented by early detection and targeted antibiotic therapy.2 However, the diagnosis is not always clear on presentation to health care facilities. Missed diagnosis may lead to increased morbidity and mortality, while over-diagnosis may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use, which may further lead to increased antibiotic resistance, cause allergic reactions, and create unnecessary costs for patients. Therefore, using clinical tools and diagnostic capabilities to better improve diagnosis is critical.
Many studies have evaluated clinical signs and symptoms that may predict pneumonia.3-6 A recent meta-analysis found that no singular physical exam finding predicted pneumonia.5 The World Health Organization (WHO) Criteria diagnose pneumonia based on fast breathing; however, tachypnea has not been shown to strongly predict pneumonia.7 Additionally, most children with fever have compensatory tachypnea as a result, making the criteria of fast breathing difficult to diagnose pneumonia alone.8 In Nepal, one study evaluating the WHO criteria for pneumonia found a sensitivity of only 69.6% and specificity of 59.6%.9 Despite this, many providers rely on clinical exam findings and the WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia.
When available, diagnostic imaging is used regularly to confirm suspected pneumonia. Chest x-ray has been the standard for diagnosis in most facilities worldwide. However, remote facilities in resource-limited settings often lack radiographic imaging capabilities. Many facilities have bedside ultrasound available as it is easily portable, repeatable, and not associated with radiation. Ultrasound has been shown to be sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of pneumonia, yet few studies have evaluated the accuracy of lung ultrasound for pneumonia in pediatric patients in a resource-limited setting.10-14
The objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical history, physical exam, laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound compared to chest x-ray for the diagnosis of pneumonia in pediatric patients in a resource-limited setting. Determining diagnostic accuracy of these findings may help derive a clinical decision rule that may more accurately predict which children have pneumonia than current WHO guidelines.
Study Design
A prospective observational cross-sectional study of pediatric patients presenting for fever or respiratory complaints to the emergency department and outpatient department at Patan Hospital in Lalitpur, Nepal will be done over one year. Ethical approval will be obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council Ethical Review Board.
Study Setting and Population
Located in the Kathmandu valley, Patan Hospital is a large urban hospital with a 35-bed emergency department. The emergency department has an annual volume of approximately 48,000 patients, including approximately 8,000 pediatric visits. The admission rate is 20%.
Inclusion Criteria: Patients presenting under age 5 years of age with fever, respiratory complaints, or concern for pneumonia and receiving chest x-ray imaging.
Study Protocol
Parents will be consented for inclusion of child in the study (See consent form). Data will be collected on pediatric patients meeting the above inclusion criteria. Data will include demographics (age, gender), duration of symptoms, symptoms (presence or absence of fever, cough, chest pain, difficulty breathing, or vomiting), vital signs (temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation), other physical exam findings (grunting, nasal flaring, retractions or indrawing of chest, crepitations, wheezing, or diminished breath sounds). These will be collected on the data collection form (see Appendix 1). Additionally, white cell counts with neutrophil counts and c-reactive protein will be collected if ordered by the clinician.
As a part of the evaluation, a bedside lung ultrasound will be performed by a clinician trained to perform lung ultrasounds. The bedside lung ultrasound is provided free for patients. Sonographers will be blinded to clinical information and results of any chest imaging. A Sonosite M Turbo (Fujifilm Sonosite, Inc.) ultrasound machine with a curvilinear probe will be used. In accordance with previous literature, the ultrasound examination will include ten views: two anterior views and two lateral views (one including the costophrenic angle), and one posterior view on each hemithorax. The physician will record ultrasound findings and interpretation directly after the ultrasound is complete. An ultrasound diagnosis of pneumonia is defined as the presence of unilateral B lines or subpleural lung consolidation. All ultrasounds will be reviewed for accuracy by a medical sonographer.
All patients will have a single posterioranterior (PA) chest x-ray as a part of the standard evaluation. The chest x-ray will be read by a board-certified radiologist, who is blinded to the clinical presentation and the results of any other imaging. Chest x-ray readings will be recorded on the standardized data form.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arm | – | Other: Clinical History, Other: Physical Exam Findings, Other: Laboratory Findings, Other: Lung UltrasoundAll children under five years of age with clinical suspicion of pneumonia (fever or respiratory complaints) who have a chest radiograph ordered will be consented. Clinical history, physical exam findings (temperature, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and lung auscultation findings), laboratory findings (white blood cell count, differential, and CRP) will be recorded. Lung ultrasound will be performed on all patients. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Located in the Kathmandu valley, Patan Hospital is a large urban hospital with a 35-bed emergency department. The emergency department has an annual volume of approximately 48,000 patients, including approximately 8,000 pediatric visits. The admission rate is 20%.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients presenting under age 5 years
- Presence of fever, respiratory complaints, or concern for pneumonia
- Receiving chest x-ray imaging
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children not receiving chest x-ray imaging as part of their workup for possible pneumonia
- Patients 5 years of age and older
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical HistoryWe will collect clinical history for each patient (days of illness, history of fever, cough, difficulty breathing, vomiting, chest pain). | Other | Single Arm |
| Physical Exam FindingsWe will collect physical exam findings including vital signs, WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia, and lung auscultation findings. | Other | Single Arm |
| Laboratory FindingsWe will collect laboratory findings (white blood cell counts, differential, and c-reactive protein) if ordered by the clinician. | Other | Single Arm |
| Lung UltrasoundWe will perform lung ultrasound on all patients. | Other | Single Arm |
Primary outcome
Sensitivity
Time frame: 1 day
We will follow patients during their acute visit to evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam findings (including WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia), laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound using chest radiographs as the standard for diagnosing pneumonia. We will determine the sensitivity and specificity, and area under the receiver operator curve and determine if there are better combination of clinical and diagnostic predictors for diagnosis of pneumonia in children.
Specificity
Time frame: 1 day
We will follow patients during their acute visit to evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam findings (including WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia), laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound using chest radiographs as the standard for diagnosing pneumonia. We will determine the sensitivity and specificity, and area under the receiver operator curve and determine if there are better combination of clinical and diagnostic predictors for diagnosis of pneumonia in children.
Area under the receiver operator curve (ROC)
Time frame: 1 day
We will follow patients during their acute visit to evaluate accuracy of clinical history, physical exam findings (including WHO criteria for diagnosing pneumonia), laboratory findings, and lung ultrasound using chest radiographs as the standard for diagnosing pneumonia. We will determine the sensitivity and specificity, and area under the receiver operator curve and determine if there are better combination of clinical and diagnostic predictors for diagnosis of pneumonia in children.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. The individual participant data will likely be placed on a data repository site.
Related trials for Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Pivotal Safety and Immunogenicity GBS-NN/NN2 Vaccine Maternal Immunisation Trial
Streptococcus Agalactiae Infection, Neonatal Sepsis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruiting
Expanded Diagnostic Strategy in Older Adults Hospitalized With Community-Acquired Acute Respiratory Infection
Acute Respiratory Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Darlene R House, MD principal investigator
Patan Academy of Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Pneumonia, run by Patan Academy of Health Sciences at 1 site in Nepal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Darlene R House, MD (9810339799, drhouse@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sensitivity (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2019.