AzTrials
AzTrials

IUD Insertion ComplicationNCT03587077

Pain Relief During IUD Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Elective Cesarean Section

A study testing Misoprostol and isosorbide mononitrate in people with IUD Insertion Complication, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the work is to assess the effect of combined misoprostol 200 mcg and isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg versus misoprostol 200 mcg and placebo as local vaginal tablet on the successful IUD insertion. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
IUD Insertion Complication
What is being tested?
Misoprostol and isosorbide mononitrate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
113 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2018to May 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Nonpregnant women,
  • aged 18-45 years, .delivered before only by elective CS and did not receive any analgesics in the 24 h prior to IUD insertion.

Who cannot join

  • Women with any uterine abnormalities as congenital anomalies,
  • Women with endometrial lesions,
  • Women with adenomyosis,
  • Women with fibroids,
  • Women with intrauterine adhesions,
  • Women with chronic pelvic pain,
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Women with spasmodic dysmenorrhea,
  • Women with abnormal uterine bleeding,
  • Women with history of cervical surgery, .Women with allergy to misoprostol or isosorbide mononitrate or any medical disease that contraindicates its use and those who refused to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Eman I. Ramadan, BSc contact

00201063959596

emanelmelwany@yahoo.com

About this study

Official title: Effect of Adding Vaginal Isosorbide Mononitrate to Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Device Insertion in Women Delivered Only by Elective Cesarean Section: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial

The aim of the work is to assess the effect of combined misoprostol 200 mcg and isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg versus misoprostol 200 mcg and placebo as local vaginal tablet on the successful IUD insertion.

Read the detailed description

Fear of pain during insertion of an IUD may deter women from choosing the IUD as a method of contraception. According to Hubacher et al. predictors of increased pain during IUD insertion include nulliparity, age greater than 30 years, lengthier time since last pregnancy or last menses, and not currently breastfeeding. Allen et al. predicted pain to be greater based on history of no previous vaginal delivery, and difficulty of the procedure. Pharmacological interventions for pain control during IUD insertion include analgesics, local anesthetics, and the use of prostaglandins to soften the cervix; however, there is wide variation in the use of these methods . Misoprostol has also been proposed as an agent to ease IUD insertion and decrease procedure-associated pain .

Nitrous oxide has been used for years for procedural analgesia in outpatient settings and has recently been investigated as an approach to pain management in the context of IUD insertion .

Sewell and Vincent have been offering nitrous oxide for reducing the pain of IUD insertion and have had a positive response.

Being tested
Misoprostol, Placebos, isosorbide mononitrate

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MisoprostolDrug

    vaginal application

  • PlacebosDrug

    vaginal application

  • isosorbide mononitrateDrug

    vaginal application

Study groups in NCT03587077
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
study groupExperimentalWomen will receive vaginally one tablet misoprostol 200 mcg(Misotac; Sigma Pharma, SAE, EGYPT) plus one tablet isosorbide mononitrate 40 mg(Effox 40 mg; Minapharm). A trained clinical nurse will introduce the tablets, digitally without using speculum, 3 hours before IUD insertion into the posterior vaginal fornix of the woman while lying in the lithotomy position.
Receives: Drug: Misoprostol; Drug: isosorbide mononitrate
control groupPlacebo comparatorWomen will receive vaginally one tablet misoprostol 200 mcg Plus one tablet placebo.A trained clinical nurse will introduce the tablets, digitally without using speculum, 3 hours before IUD insertion into the posterior vaginal fornix of the woman while lying in the lithotomy position.
Receives: Drug: Misoprostol; Drug: Placebos

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. rate of successful IUD insertion

    Defined by a distance from the IUD to the endometrial end of less than 25 mm

    Measured: 10 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2018
  2. Study startSep 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionApr 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
113 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03587077
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pain during IUD insertion
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
9 Apr 2018
Last updated
16 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Akintomide H, Sewell RD, Stephenson JM. The use of local anaesthesia for intrauterine device insertion by health professionals in the UK. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013 Oct;39(4):276-80. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100486. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

    PubMed 23385310
  • Allen RH, Bartz D, Grimes DA, Hubacher D, O'Brien P. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD007373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub2.

    PubMed 19588429
  • Allen RH, Carey MS, Raker C, Goyal V, Matteson K. A prospective cohort study of pain with intrauterine device insertion among women with and without vaginal deliveries. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Apr;34(3):263-7. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2013.868424. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

    PubMed 24483244
  • Allen RH, Raker C, Goyal V. Higher dose cervical 2% lidocaine gel for IUD insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2013 Dec;88(6):730-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

    PubMed 24012096
  • Asker C, Stokes-Lampard H, Beavan J, Wilson S. What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006 Apr;32(2):89-94. doi: 10.1783/147118906776276170.

    PubMed 16824298
  • Bahamondes L, Mansour D, Fiala C, Kaunitz AM, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Practical advice for avoidance of pain associated with insertion of intrauterine contraceptives. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014 Jan;40(1):54-60. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100636. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

    PubMed 24076534
  • Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, Pettker CM, Funai EF, Illuzzi JL. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):29-38. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821e5f65.

    PubMed 21646928
  • Carusi, D. A., & Goldberg, A. B. (2015). Intrauterine contraceptive device: insertion and removal. In: M. Zieman (Ed), UpToDate. Retrieved from http://www.uptodate.com/home .

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013: Adapted from the World Health Organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/rr/rr6205.pdf

  • d'Arcangues C. Worldwide use of intrauterine devices for contraception. Contraception. 2007 Jun;75(6 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.024. Epub 2007 Apr 19.

    PubMed 17531612
  • Edmunds, M. W., & Mayhew, M. S. (2014). Pharmacology for the primary care provider (4th ed.). St. Louis, MI: Elsevier Mosby.

  • Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009. Fertil Steril. 2012 Oct;98(4):893-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

    PubMed 22795639
  • Fox MC, Krajewski CM. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks' gestation: SFP Guideline #2013-4. Contraception. 2014 Feb;89(2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.11.001. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

    PubMed 24331860
  • Heikinheimo O, Inki P, Kunz M, Parmhed S, Anttila AM, Olsson SE, Hurskainen R, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study on the effect of misoprostol on ease of consecutive insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Contraception. 2010 Jun;81(6):481-6. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.01.020. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

    PubMed 20472114
  • Hubacher D, Reyes V, Lillo S, Zepeda A, Chen PL, Croxatto H. Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1272-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.022.

    PubMed 17074548

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Misoprostol and isosorbide mononitrate in people with IUD Insertion Complication, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eman I. Ramadan, BSc (00201063959596, emanelmelwany@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

rate of successful IUD insertion (time frame: 10 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03587077, which also lists 22 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in