AzTrials
AzTrials

Diet ModificationWRAPPED2NCT03573973

Women's Responses to Adjusted Product Placement and Its Effects on Diet - 2

A study testing Improved product placement of fresh fruit and vegetables in people with Diet Modification, run by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is the largest supermarket trial internationally and will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of improving the placement of fresh fruit and vegetables in discount supermarkets in improving the fresh fruit and vegetable purchasing of women aged 18-45 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Diet Modification
What is being tested?
Improved product placement of fresh fruit and vegetables
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
667 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
9 May 2018to 31 Oct 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women aged 18-60 years
  • Hold a store loyalty card
  • Shop regularly in a study store
  • Shoppers who choose items in-store but opt for home delivery

Who cannot join

  • Women under the age of 18 or over 60 years
  • Males or children
  • Irregular shopper or online-only shopper
  • Do not hold store loyalty card

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Univeristy of Southampton

    Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Nudging Healthier Dietary Habits: Evaluation of a Supermarket Placement Strategy in the WRAPPED Study

This study is the largest supermarket trial internationally and will assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of improving the placement of fresh fruit and vegetables in discount supermarkets in improving the fresh fruit and vegetable purchasing of women aged 18-45 years.

Read the detailed description

WRAPPED2 (Women's Responses to Adjusted Product Placement and its Effects on Diet - 2) is a natural experiment with a prospective matched controlled cluster design. The setting is a discount supermarket chain in the United Kingdom regularly used by disadvantaged families for their main shop. The intervention is a store refurbishment programme that involves creation of a new fresh fruit and vegetable section in the store entrance. Control stores keep the existing layout with a limited range of fresh fruit and vegetables and placement of fresh fruit and vegetables at the back of the store.

A total of 45 participants will be recruited from each of 18 intervention and 18 matched control stores through the retailer's loyalty card scheme (postal letter) and shop floor recruitment; these methods proved effective during the pilot. Participants will be women aged 18-45 years who shopped at a study store in the 12 weeks before recruitment. This study is unique in its collection of individual level sales data, as well as demographic and dietary information, and is the first to collect outcome data for more than one family member. Participant's weekly sales data will be obtained through the retailer's loyalty card scheme and will cover 3 months before refurbishment, plus 0-3 months and 3-6 months after. Change in women's fresh fruit and vegetable purchasing from baseline to 3 months is the primary outcome. Secondary outcome data about women's diets, their young child's diet (2-6 years), food shopping habits, perceptions of supermarket environment, and psychosocial and demographic characteristics will be collected by telephone survey before refurbishment, and 1, 3 and 6 months after. Weekly sales data for study stores will be provided by the retailer.

Cost-effectiveness will be assessed from individual, retailer and societal perspectives. Process evaluation will assess implementation, mechanisms of impact and context.

This study is politically and scientifically important being one of the first field studies of this kind. The findings could provide strong evidence for future public health policy interventions to help address inequalities in diet and non-communicable disease risk by supporting development of a healthy store layout that could be adopted more widely in food retail outlets.

Being tested
Improved product placement of fresh fruit and vegetables, Sham comparator
Keywords
Dietary inequalities, Public Health, Choice architecture, Supermarkets

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Improved product placement of fresh fruit and vegetablesOther

    The intervention includes the creation of a new fresh fruit and vegetable section at the store entrance with expanded range thus improving the placement (availability and position) of fresh fruit and vegetables.

  • Sham comparatorOther

    The control condition is the existing store layout with a limited range of fresh fruit and vegetables that are placed at the back of the store.

Study groups in NCT03573973
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fresh fruit and vegetable placement interventionExperimentalThe intervention is a store refurbishment programme that includes the creation of a new fresh fruit and vegetable section at the store entrance with expanded range thus improving the availability and position of fresh fruit and vegetables.
Receives: Other: Improved product placement of fresh fruit and vegetables
ControlSham comparatorThe control condition is the existing store layout with a limited range of fresh fruit and vegetables that are placed at the back of the store.
Receives: Other: Sham comparator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participant's weekly fruit and vegetable purchasing patterns

    These data will be obtained through the retailer's loyalty card scheme and provide information about the number of items of each product purchased at each store visit.

    Measured: 0-6 month period post-refurbishment

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Women's dietary quality

    20-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) will be used to create standardised diet quality scores for each woman. A dietary quality score for each woman will be calculated by multiplying their reported frequency of consumption of each of the 20 items from their FFQ by corresponding weightings derived from the appropriate principal components analysis and then summing the results.

    Measured: 3 and 6 month follow-up post intervention commencement

  2. Children's dietary quality

    20-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) will be used to create standardised diet quality scores for each child. Dietary quality scores will be calculated by multiplying the reported frequency of consumption of each of the 20 items from their FFQ by corresponding weightings derived from the appropriate principal components analysis and then summing the results.

    Measured: 3 and 6 month follow-up post intervention commencement

  3. Women's daily fruit and vegetable intake

    2-item tool has been validated against urinary potassium and plasma ascorbic acid to describe high (≥5 portions/day) and low (≤2.5 portions/day) intake.

    Measured: 3 and 6 months follow-up post intervention commencement

  4. Weekly store sales of fresh fruit and vegetables

    Store sales data will be provided from electronic transaction records aggregated to the weekly level

    Measured: 0-3 and 0-6 month periods post-refurbishment

  5. To determine whether change in participants' in fruit and vegetable purchasing patterns (intervention effects) differ according to their level of educational attainment

    To assess interaction on intervention effects according to participants' highest educational qualification attained in 3 groups (low=GCSE/school departure before 16 years of age, medium=A-levels/HND/diploma, high=degree)

    Measured: 0-6 month period post-refurbishment

  6. Economic evaluation to assess the costs and benefits of the intervention from individual, retailer and societal perspectives

    Use participant survey and purchasing data for food expenditure, time spent food shopping, as well as travel costs to and from supermarkets; retailer costs will be estimates generated through discussion with supermarket staff; societal costs will be estimated for resources associated with the capital investment, changes in food expenditure, time and travel costs for individuals and health and social care costs for diet-related health conditions.

    Measured: 6 month period post-refurbishment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2018
  2. Study start9 May 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2023
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Natural experiment with prospective matched controlled cluster design. The setting is a UK discount supermarket chain.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
667 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03573973
Sponsor's protocol ID
20986
Acronym
WRAPPED2
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
25 Apr 2018
Last updated
15 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Vogel C, Crozier S, Dhuria P, Shand C, Lawrence W, Cade J, Moon G, Lord J, Ball K, Cooper C, Baird J. Protocol of a natural experiment to evaluate a supermarket intervention to improve food purchasing and dietary behaviours of women (WRAPPED study) in England: a prospective matched controlled cluster design. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e036758. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036758.

    PubMed 32047023
  • Muir S, Dhuria P, Roe E, Lawrence W, Baird J, Vogel C. UK government's new placement legislation is a 'good first step': a rapid qualitative analysis of consumer, business, enforcement and health stakeholder perspectives. BMC Med. 2023 Jan 26;21(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02726-9.

    PubMed 36703194
  • Muir S, Dhuria P, Vogel C. Government must proceed with landmark anti-obesity regulations in England. BMJ. 2022 Sep 30;378:o2358. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o2358. No abstract available.

    PubMed 36180089
  • Vogel C, Crozier S, Dhuria P, Lord J, Moon G, Lawrence W, Cade J, Ball K, Cooper C, Baird J. Impact of supermarket fruit and vegetable placement on store sales, customer purchasing, diet and household waste: A prospective matched-controlled cluster trial. PLoS Med. 2026 Mar 31;23(3):e1004575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004575. eCollection 2026 Mar.

    PubMed 41915648
  • Baird J, Dhuria P, Payne H, Crozier S, Lawrence W, Vogel C. Implementation of a UK supermarket intervention to increase purchasing of fresh fruit and vegetables: process evaluation of the WRAPPED natural experiment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Nov 11;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01679-3.

    PubMed 39529139

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Improved product placement of fresh fruit and vegetables in people with Diet Modification, run by University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participant's weekly fruit and vegetable purchasing patterns (time frame: 0-6 month period post-refurbishment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03573973, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in