Advanced Gastric CancerPhase 2NCT03564834
Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Elderly Local Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Laparoscopic gastrectomy and Open gastrectomy in people with Advanced Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. With the rapid aging of global population, the number of elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer is increasing. Surgery is the essential treatment for local advanced gastric cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Gastric Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Laparoscopic gastrectomy and Open gastrectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 23 Aug 2018to 30 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ambulatory male or female aged 70 and above
- Karnofsky score≥70%
- Histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma in biopsy (including Lauren classification) Proven clinical stage of cT2-4aNanyM0 by baseline ultrasound endoscope, enhanced CT/MRI examination, or diagnostic laparoscopy using Habermann Standards
- No past chemotherapy or radiotherapy before diagnosis
- Primary tumor located at stomach, achievable naked-eye complete resection (R0/1) via distal subtotal or total gastrectomy plus lymphadenectomy
- Haematology and biochemistry index meet the following: hemoglobin≥80g/L, absolute neutrophils count (ANC)≥1.5×109/L, platelet≥100×109/L, ALT、AST≤2.5 times the upper limit of normal value, ALP≤2.5 times the upper limit of normal value, serum total bilirubin<1.5 times the upper limit of normal value, serum creatinine<1 times the upper limit of normal value, serum albumin≥30g/L
Show all 9Show fewer
- Heart and lung function can withstand surgery
- No severe concomitant disease that leads to survival<3 years
- Willing and able to comply with study protocol Written agreement consent before enrolment and full aware of the right to quit the study at any time with no loss
Who cannot join
- Uncontrolled seizure, central nervous system diseases, or mental disorders;
- Past history of upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
- Past history of gastric surgery (including diagnosis procedure such as ESD and EMR)
- Other malignant diseases in 5 years (except for cured skin carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ)
- Clinical severe or active heart diseases, such as symptomatic coronary heart disease, NYHA grade II or above congestive heart failure, severe arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction in 6 months
- Cerebral hemorrhage or infarction in 6 months
Show all 12Show fewer
- Organ transplant recipients under immunosuppressive therapy
- Severe uncontrolled repeated infection or other severe uncontrolled concomitant diseases
- Medium or severe renal damage (creatinine clearance rate≤50ml/min or serum creatinine> upper limit of normal value)
- Other diseases requiring synchronous surgery
- Requiring emergent surgery due to oncologic emergent (e.g. bleeding, perforation, obstruction)
- FEV1<50% of expected value Participated in other studies 4 weeks before the randomization.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Fei Shan, M.D., 86-010-8819-6606, shanfei@hsc.pku.edu.cn
Ziyu Li, M.D., 86-010-8819-6605, ziyu_li@hsc.pku.edu.cn
About this study
Official title: Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Elderly Local Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: a Phase II Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. With the rapid aging of global population, the number of elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer is increasing. Surgery is the essential treatment for local advanced gastric cancer. However, because of the degeneration of physiological organs, cell functions, compensatory ability, immunity, and physiological reserve ability, elderly patients often face great safety issues when having surgery. Therefore, how to treat the elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer with safe and effective surgery is one of the important problems in the field of gastric cancer treatment. With the introduction of minimally invasive treatment concepts and techniques, the role of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in the treatment of early gastric cancer, as well as the advantages of trauma control and postoperative accelerated rehabilitation have been confirmed, however, there is still a lack of sufficient high-level clinical evidence in the elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. The current study therefore aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients, using a randomized parallel controlled study design. The investigators hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy is superior to open gastrectomy in terms of perioperative safety for local advanced gastric cancer patients aged 70 and above.
Read the detailed description
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancer and cause of cancer death worldwide. With the rapid aging of global population, the number of elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer has been continuously increasing. Surgery is the essential treatment for local advanced gastric cancer. However, elderly patients are at high risk of postoperative complications due to reduced functional reserve and increased comorbidities. Studies have shown that elder patients can have postoperative complication incidence up to 18%-32% and surgery-related mortality rate to 3.8%-9.5%. Therefore, elderly patients usually require more restrict operative injury control compared to the younger population. Surgical safety and effectiveness has become a crucial research focus for local advanced gastric cancer among elderly patients.
Laparoscopic gastrectomy is one of the standard treatments for early gastric cancer and has demonstrated its application value in local advanced gastric cancer. Two recent meta-analysis on observational studies have shown the feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients. Compared to conventional open resections, elderly patients may benefit from the advantages of laparoscopic approach such as less trauma, less blood loss, faster bowel movement recovery, earlier food intake, and shorter hospitalization. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy raises issues such as prolonged operation time and disturbance of circulatory and respiratory dynamics by carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during the procedure. Nonetheless, all currently available evidence comes from observational studies that are susceptible to bias and evidence on long-term survival is scarce. The investigators therefore proposed to conduct this randomized controlled trial comparing the feasibility and survival benefit of laparoscopic with open gastrectomy for elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer. The investigators hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy is superior to open gastrectomy in terms of perioperative safety for local advanced gastric cancer patients aged 70 and above.
- Conditions
- Advanced Gastric Cancer
- Being tested
- Laparoscopic gastrectomy, Open gastrectomy
- Keywords
- Elderly patients, Open gastrectomy, Laparoscopic gastrectomy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laparoscopic gastrectomyProcedure or surgery
Patients will receive laparoscopic gastrectomy within one week after randomization.
Open gastrectomyProcedure or surgery
Patients will receive open gastrectomy within one week after randomization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic gastrectomy | Experimental | A standard laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy will be performed by two experienced surgeons, according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2014 (version 4) and the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (3rd English edition). Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic gastrectomy |
| Open gastrectomy | Active comparator | A standard open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy will be performed by two experienced surgeons, according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2014 (version 4) and the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (3rd English edition). Receives: Procedure: Open gastrectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative complication rate
Surgery related complications include incision complications (infection, effusion, dehiscence, poor healing), peritoneal effusion or abscess formation, hemorrhage (inside abdominal cavity, inside digestive tract), ileus, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, intestinal fistula, lymphatic leakage, pancreatic fistula, gastroparesis, pancreatitis, lung infection, pleural effusion, urinary tract infection, renal failure, liver failure, cardio-cerebrovascular events (both lower extremities thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, cerebral infarction, etc.), and others. Complications will be reported and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications.
Measured: within 30 days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (5)
Length of postoperative hospitalization stay
Postoperative hospitalization stay refers to the time interval between the day of surgery and discharge, and will be recorded by the investigators.
Measured: within 30 days after surgery
Postoperative life quality
Will be assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life questionnaires (i.e. QLQ-C30), which contains both QLQ-STO22 and ELD14 modules. This is a questionnaire developed to assess the generic and disease-specific quality of life for elderly gastric cancer patients by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. The Summary Score will be calculated from the mean of scales. Prior to calculating the mean, the symptom scales will need to be reversed to obtain a uniform direction of all scales. The summary score should only be calculated if all of the required scale scores are available (using scale scores based on the completed items, provided that at least 50% of the items in that scale have been completed.
Measured: one-year after surgery
Three-year overall survival rate
Overall survival is defined as the time interval from the time of the radical gastrectomy to the date of all-cause death or the last follow-up. Three-year overall survival rate will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Methods.
Measured: Three-year after surgery
Three-year disease-free survival rate
Disease-free survival is defined as the time interval from the time of the radical gastrectomy to the date of the detection of cancer recurrence or the last follow-up. Three-year disease-free survival rate will be calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Methods.
Measured: Three-year after surgery
Postoperative pain
Postoperative pain will be measured using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) which is an 11-point scale for patient self-reporting of pain. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain. Pain level will be graded into four levels for analysis: "0: No Pain", "1-3: Mild Pain", "4-6 Moderate Pain", and "7-10 Severe Pain".
Measured: within 2 weeks after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2018
- Study start23 Aug 2018
- Primary completion30 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced Gastric CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ziyu Li, MD, Peking University
- Investigators
- Ziyu Li, MD, Principal investigator, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03564834
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SF2018-4-2156
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 14 May 2018
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The deidentified datasets generated during the current study will be publicly available via an appropriate data archive 6 months after the completion of the trial.
Publications
Li Z, Shan F, Ying X, Xue K, Ji J. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for elderly local advanced gastric cancer patients: study protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):1118. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5041-y.
PubMed 30445943
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Elderly Local Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: a Phase II Randomized Parallel Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03564834
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SF2018-4-2156
- Conditions
- Advanced Gastric Cancer
- Keywords
- Elderly patients, Open gastrectomy, Laparoscopic gastrectomy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Aug 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. With the rapid aging of global population, the number of elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer is increasing. Surgery is the essential treatment for local advanced gastric cancer. However, because of the degeneration of physiological organs, cell functions, compensatory ability, immunity, and physiological reserve ability, elderly patients often face great safety issues when having surgery. Therefore, how to treat the elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer with safe and effective surgery is one of the important problems in the field of gastric cancer treatment. With the introduction of minimally invasive treatment concepts and techniques, the role of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy in the treatment of early gastric cancer, as well as the advantages of trauma control and postoperative accelerated rehabilitation have been confirmed, however, there is still a lack of sufficient high-level clinical evidence in the elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer. The current study therefore aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer in elderly patients, using a randomized parallel controlled study design. The investigators hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy is superior to open gastrectomy in terms of perioperative safety for local advanced gastric cancer patients aged 70 and above.
Detailed description
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancer and cause of cancer death worldwide. With the rapid aging of global population, the number of elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer has been continuously increasing. Surgery is the essential treatment for local advanced gastric cancer. However, elderly patients are at high risk of postoperative complications due to reduced functional reserve and increased comorbidities. Studies have shown that elder patients can have postoperative complication incidence up to 18%-32% and surgery-related mortality rate to 3.8%-9.5%. Therefore, elderly patients usually require more restrict operative injury control compared to the younger population. Surgical safety and effectiveness has become a crucial research focus for local advanced gastric cancer among elderly patients.
Laparoscopic gastrectomy is one of the standard treatments for early gastric cancer and has demonstrated its application value in local advanced gastric cancer. Two recent meta-analysis on observational studies have shown the feasibility of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly gastric cancer patients. Compared to conventional open resections, elderly patients may benefit from the advantages of laparoscopic approach such as less trauma, less blood loss, faster bowel movement recovery, earlier food intake, and shorter hospitalization. However, laparoscopic gastrectomy raises issues such as prolonged operation time and disturbance of circulatory and respiratory dynamics by carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during the procedure. Nonetheless, all currently available evidence comes from observational studies that are susceptible to bias and evidence on long-term survival is scarce. The investigators therefore proposed to conduct this randomized controlled trial comparing the feasibility and survival benefit of laparoscopic with open gastrectomy for elderly patients with local advanced gastric cancer. The investigators hypothesized that laparoscopic gastrectomy is superior to open gastrectomy in terms of perioperative safety for local advanced gastric cancer patients aged 70 and above.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic gastrectomy | Experimental | Procedure: Laparoscopic gastrectomyA standard laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy will be performed by two experienced surgeons, according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2014 (version 4) and the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (3rd English edition). |
| Open gastrectomy | Active comparator | Procedure: Open gastrectomyA standard open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy will be performed by two experienced surgeons, according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2014 (version 4) and the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (3rd English edition). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Ambulatory male or female aged 70 and above
- Karnofsky score≥70%
- Histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma in biopsy (including Lauren classification) Proven clinical stage of cT2-4aNanyM0 by baseline ultrasound endoscope, enhanced CT/MRI examination, or diagnostic laparoscopy using Habermann Standards
- No past chemotherapy or radiotherapy before diagnosis
- Primary tumor located at stomach, achievable naked-eye complete resection (R0/1) via distal subtotal or total gastrectomy plus lymphadenectomy
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Uncontrolled seizure, central nervous system diseases, or mental disorders;
- Past history of upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy)
- Past history of gastric surgery (including diagnosis procedure such as ESD and EMR)
- Other malignant diseases in 5 years (except for cured skin carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ)
- Clinical severe or active heart diseases, such as symptomatic coronary heart disease, NYHA grade II or above congestive heart failure, severe arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction in 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic gastrectomyPatients will receive laparoscopic gastrectomy within one week after randomization. | Procedure or surgery | Laparoscopic gastrectomy |
| Open gastrectomyPatients will receive open gastrectomy within one week after randomization. | Procedure or surgery | Open gastrectomy |
Primary outcome
Postoperative complication rate
Time frame: within 30 days after surgery
Surgery related complications include incision complications (infection, effusion, dehiscence, poor healing), peritoneal effusion or abscess formation, hemorrhage (inside abdominal cavity, inside digestive tract), ileus, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, intestinal fistula, lymphatic leakage, pancreatic fistula, gastroparesis, pancreatitis, lung infection, pleural effusion, urinary tract infection, renal failure, liver failure, cardio-cerebrovascular events (both lower extremities thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, cerebral infarction, etc.), and others. Complications will be reported and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications.
5 secondary outcomes
Length of postoperative hospitalization stay
Time frame: within 30 days after surgery
Postoperative life quality
Time frame: one-year after surgery
Three-year overall survival rate
Time frame: Three-year after surgery
Three-year disease-free survival rate
Time frame: Three-year after surgery
Postoperative pain
Time frame: within 2 weeks after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30445943Li Z, Shan F, Ying X, Xue K, Ji J. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for elderly local advanced gastric cancer patients: study protocol of a phase II randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Nov 16;18(1):1118. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5041-y.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The deidentified datasets generated during the current study will be publicly available via an appropriate data archive 6 months after the completion of the trial.
Related trials for Advanced Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of CG-7321 Monotherapy or Combination Therapy in Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Breast Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Perioperative Cadonilimab (AK104) in Locally Advanced MSI-H/dMMR Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction and Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
MSI-H/dMMR Gastric Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study With NKT3964 for Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Advanced Solid Tumor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ziyu Li, MD principal investigator
Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Laparoscopic gastrectomy and Open gastrectomy in people with Advanced Gastric Cancer, run by Peking University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fei Shan, MD (0086-10-88196606, shanfei@hsc.pku.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative complication rate (time frame: within 30 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03564834, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2018.