Advanced DementiaNCT03548142
Advanced Dementia and End-of-life
A study testing provision of relevant information in people with Advanced Dementia, run by Technical University of Munich at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Palliative and hospice care in advanced dementia: experiences of care givers and benefit of a brochure serving as a decision-making aid Aims: 1. Designing a brochure serving as an information tool and decision-making aid used to answer questions concerning palliative and hospice care for care-givers of persons with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Dementia
- What is being tested?
- provision of relevant information
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 11 Jul 2017to 1 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Person with dementia + caregiver live in the Munich area
- Person with dementia lives in a nursing home or at home
- Person with dementia is in an advanced stage of the disease (moderate to severe dementia)
- Informed consent of the caregiver and the person with powers of attorney
- Caregiver is German-speaking and able to read
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Palliative and Hospice Care in Advanced Dementia: Experiences of Care Givers and Benefit of a Brochure Serving as a Decision-making Aid
Palliative and hospice care in advanced dementia: experiences of care givers and benefit of a brochure serving as a decision-making aid
Aims:
Read more
- Designing a brochure serving as an information tool and decision-making aid used to answer questions concerning palliative and hospice care for care-givers of persons with advanced dementia. The brochure shall demonstrate the possibilities and offerings of palliative and hospice care and shall serve to inform about the advanced stages of dementia, the legal basic principles in decision making and ethical problems, treatment options and (palliative) treatment goals.
- Survey of the palliative, palliative medical and hospice care of persons with advanced dementia in ambulatory settings, as well as in residential geriatric care and the experiences of the care-givers. By examining persons with dementia and inspecting the care documents and where applicable the medical files it is to be evaluated:
- which procedures of palliative and hospice care are practically implemented in ambulatory care and in residential geriatric care,
- which symptoms the persons with dementia suffer from and how those symptoms are (or are not) treated,
- to what extend caregivers are informed about relevant aspects
- how caregivers assess care and which problems, needs and requests exist.
- Piloting phase for the brochure. To test the comprehensibility and the acceptance of the brochure a study is planned. The caregivers are asked for their opinion whether the brochure is helpful. It is recorded if the reading of the brochure gets the caregivers to engage actively in the participative decision making process.
Read the detailed description
Two visits at home or in the residential geriatric care at intervals of eight to twelve weeks are scheduled.
The following data is collected at enrollment:
- Informed consent of the caregiver and of the patient or rather the caregiver with powers of attorney
- Sociodemographic data (caregiver and person with dementia), e.g. age, sex, education, degree of relationship
- Interview of the caregiver using standardized
- Examination of the person with dementia, recording of the treatment and the care situation, cognitive status: Mini-Mental-Status-Test, severity of dementia: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, performance in basic activities of daily living: Barthel-Index,communication competence, diagnosis, (palliative) medical and hospice care (including specialists in palliative care, specialists in hospice care, general practioners, domiciliary care services, Allgemeine Ambulante Palliativversorgung [AAPV], Spezielle Ambulante Palliativversorgung [SAPV], AAPV and SAPV both being a specific ambulatory palliative care of the statutory health insurance system in Germany, cognitive/neurological/physical symptoms, symptom Management including pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, interventions, existence and phrasing of advanced directives and durable power of attorney.
After enrollment the brochure is handed and explained to the caregivers and they are encouraged to read it. It is pointed out that they are contacted after two to three months to answer questions concerning comprehensibility, acceptance, practical consequences and to give a personnel review.
At study end after two to three months standardized interviews are conducted to gather information about comprehensibility and acceptance of the brochure, how it is reviewed by the caregivers and if the reading had direct consequences with regard to knowledge of the caregiver, communicating with nursing staff/physicians, decision making and implementing those decisions.
- Conditions
- Advanced Dementia
- Being tested
- provision of relevant information
- Keywords
- Palliative Care, advanced dementia, life-prolonging treatment, patient will, advanced care planning
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
provision of relevant informationBehavioural
caregivers are provided with brochure that informs about end-of-life issues for persons with advanced dementia
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale
Involvement is expected, when caregiver at study end achieve one point more in the sum score (sum score maximum is eight points)
Measured: two to three months
Secondary outcomes (1)
family caregivers´satisfaction with care
the adapted version of End of life in dementia-Satisfaction with Care, (SWC-EOLD)
Measured: Assessment A (inclusion/baseline, before reading the brochure) and Assessment B (after reading the brochure, two to three months after Assessment A)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Jun 2018
- Study start11 Jul 2017
- Primary completion1 Sep 2018
- Study completion1 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Technical University of MunichThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Technical University of Munich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care, German Alzheimer Society
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Technical University of Munich
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03548142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- palliative study
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Nov 2017
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
PubMed 1202204Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. No abstract available.
PubMed 8232972MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.
PubMed 14258950Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;5(1):29-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02602306.
PubMed 2299426Vohra JU, Brazil K, Hanna S, Abelson J. Family Perceptions of End-of-Life Care in long-term care facilities. J Palliat Care. 2004 Winter;20(4):297-302.
PubMed 15690832Biola H, Sloane PD, Williams CS, Daaleman TP, Williams SW, Zimmerman S. Physician communication with family caregivers of long-term care residents at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jun;55(6):846-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01179.x.
PubMed 17537084Ryan RE, Connolly M, Bradford NK, Henderson S, Herbert A, Schonfeld L, Young J, Bothroyd JI, Henderson A. Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
PubMed 35802350Riedl L, Bertok M, Hartmann J, Fischer J, Rossmeier C, Dinkel A, Ortner M, Diehl-Schmid J. Development and testing of an informative guide about palliative care for family caregivers of people with advanced dementia. BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 12;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0533-3.
PubMed 32164707
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Palliative and Hospice Care in Advanced Dementia: Experiences of Care Givers and Benefit of a Brochure Serving as a Decision-making Aid
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03548142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- palliative study
- Conditions
- Advanced Dementia
- Keywords
- Palliative Care, advanced dementia, life-prolonging treatment, patient will, advanced care planning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Technical University of MunichUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care, German Alzheimer Society
- Study start
- 11 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Palliative and hospice care in advanced dementia: experiences of care givers and benefit of a brochure serving as a decision-making aid
Aims:
- Designing a brochure serving as an information tool and decision-making aid used to answer questions concerning palliative and hospice care for care-givers of persons with advanced dementia. The brochure shall demonstrate the possibilities and offerings of palliative and hospice care and shall serve to inform about the advanced stages of dementia, the legal basic principles in decision making and ethical problems, treatment options and (palliative) treatment goals.
- Survey of the palliative, palliative medical and hospice care of persons with advanced dementia in ambulatory settings, as well as in residential geriatric care and the experiences of the care-givers. By examining persons with dementia and inspecting the care documents and where applicable the medical files it is to be evaluated:
- which procedures of palliative and hospice care are practically implemented in ambulatory care and in residential geriatric care,
- which symptoms the persons with dementia suffer from and how those symptoms are (or are not) treated,
- to what extend caregivers are informed about relevant aspects
- how caregivers assess care and which problems, needs and requests exist.
- Piloting phase for the brochure. To test the comprehensibility and the acceptance of the brochure a study is planned. The caregivers are asked for their opinion whether the brochure is helpful. It is recorded if the reading of the brochure gets the caregivers to engage actively in the participative decision making process.
Detailed description
Two visits at home or in the residential geriatric care at intervals of eight to twelve weeks are scheduled.
The following data is collected at enrollment:
- Informed consent of the caregiver and of the patient or rather the caregiver with powers of attorney
- Sociodemographic data (caregiver and person with dementia), e.g. age, sex, education, degree of relationship
- Interview of the caregiver using standardized
- Examination of the person with dementia, recording of the treatment and the care situation, cognitive status: Mini-Mental-Status-Test, severity of dementia: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, performance in basic activities of daily living: Barthel-Index,communication competence, diagnosis, (palliative) medical and hospice care (including specialists in palliative care, specialists in hospice care, general practioners, domiciliary care services, Allgemeine Ambulante Palliativversorgung [AAPV], Spezielle Ambulante Palliativversorgung [SAPV], AAPV and SAPV both being a specific ambulatory palliative care of the statutory health insurance system in Germany, cognitive/neurological/physical symptoms, symptom Management including pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, interventions, existence and phrasing of advanced directives and durable power of attorney.
After enrollment the brochure is handed and explained to the caregivers and they are encouraged to read it. It is pointed out that they are contacted after two to three months to answer questions concerning comprehensibility, acceptance, practical consequences and to give a personnel review.
At study end after two to three months standardized interviews are conducted to gather information about comprehensibility and acceptance of the brochure, how it is reviewed by the caregivers and if the reading had direct consequences with regard to knowledge of the caregiver, communicating with nursing staff/physicians, decision making and implementing those decisions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Person with dementia + caregiver live in the Munich area
- Person with dementia lives in a nursing home or at home
- Person with dementia is in an advanced stage of the disease (moderate to severe dementia)
- Informed consent of the caregiver and the person with powers of attorney
- Caregiver is German-speaking and able to read
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| provision of relevant informationcaregivers are provided with brochure that informs about end-of-life issues for persons with advanced dementia | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale
Time frame: two to three months
Involvement is expected, when caregiver at study end achieve one point more in the sum score (sum score maximum is eight points)
1 secondary outcome
family caregivers´satisfaction with care
Time frame: Assessment A (inclusion/baseline, before reading the brochure) and Assessment B (after reading the brochure, two to three months after Assessment A)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2019.
- Background: PubMed 1202204Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8232972Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 14258950MAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 2299426Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;5(1):29-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02602306.
- Background: PubMed 15690832Vohra JU, Brazil K, Hanna S, Abelson J. Family Perceptions of End-of-Life Care in long-term care facilities. J Palliat Care. 2004 Winter;20(4):297-302.
- Background: PubMed 17537084Biola H, Sloane PD, Williams CS, Daaleman TP, Williams SW, Zimmerman S. Physician communication with family caregivers of long-term care residents at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Jun;55(6):846-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01179.x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35802350Ryan RE, Connolly M, Bradford NK, Henderson S, Herbert A, Schonfeld L, Young J, Bothroyd JI, Henderson A. Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32164707Riedl L, Bertok M, Hartmann J, Fischer J, Rossmeier C, Dinkel A, Ortner M, Diehl-Schmid J. Development and testing of an informative guide about palliative care for family caregivers of people with advanced dementia. BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Mar 12;19(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-0533-3.
- legal basis for AAPV and SAPVLink provided by the sponsor.
- Preparation for decision making scaleLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Advanced Dementia
Recruiting
A Culturally Adapted Decision Aid Intervention to Support Chinese American Dementia Caregivers in Feeding-Related Decisions
Dementia Caregivers, End of Life Decision Making
Recruiting
Motor Learning in Health and Movement Disorders: Role of Physical Activity and Advanced Devices
Healthy Individuals (Controls), Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
Clinical Applications of Advanced Ophthalmic Imaging
Multiple Sclerosis, Dry Eye Syndromes
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of FEED@Home Intervention
Dementia, Dementia Severe
Not yet recruiting
Dyadic Life Review Intervention for Older Patients With Advanced Cancer and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Their Caregivers
Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing provision of relevant information in people with Advanced Dementia, run by Technical University of Munich at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (time frame: two to three months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03548142, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2019.