Osteoarthritis, KneeNCT03540667
Study of Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in South Africa
An observational study of Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by University of Cape Town at 9 sites in South Africa.
Trial summary
This multi-site, observational, prospective study aims to investigate current practice and associated outcomes for patients scheduled for elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty in South Africa.This information will provide baseline values, against which effects of implementing a multidisciplinary enhanced… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- How many people
- 206 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesSouth Africa
- Study dates
- 7 May 2018to 30 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty.
Who may be able to join
- All patients scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty in the 10 week study period at the 10 participating study sites in South Africa.
- Patients must accept to be contacted telephonically 30 days and 12 months after surgery.
Who cannot join
- Patients who do not have a mobile telephone.
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
South Africa9 sites
Universitas Academic Hospital
Bloemfontein, Free State, 9300
Mitchells Plain Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7599
Somerset Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7599
Victoria Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7599
Groote Schuur Hospital
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7700
Albert Luthuli Central Hospital
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4058
Paarl Hospital
Paarl, Western Cape, 7599
Grey's Hospital
Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, 3200
Steve Biko Academic Hospital
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0001
About this study
Official title: Prospective Observational Study of Current Perioperative Care for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in South Africa, and Associated Outcomes
This multi-site, observational, prospective study aims to investigate current practice and associated outcomes for patients scheduled for elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty in South Africa.This information will provide baseline values, against which effects of implementing a multidisciplinary enhanced care protocol for arthroplasty patients will be compared (the subsequent study).
Read the detailed description
RESEARCH PROBLEM:
In the past 20 years, enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have become increasingly integrated into most surgical fields as standard care in high income countries, as is exemplified by national priority programs and the widespread acceptance of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society network. ERPs represent a fundamental shift towards a patient-centred, multidisciplinary-driven continuity of care that aim to attenuate surgical stress and expedite recovery. Studies on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for both hips and knees have shown that implementation of an evidence-based, structured approach to patient care decreases postoperative morbidity and consequently length of stay without increasing readmission rate.
However, in low- and middle-income countries, the value of implementing ERPs is yet to be explored. This may be because: i) the perception that current hospital resources may make it difficult to develop and implement structured and sustainable protocols to enhance postoperative recovery, and ii) short and long-term data collection on the quality of the work provided is scarce, inhibiting the ability to benchmark clinical results and improve the service provided to patients. Despite these challenges, a healthcare system in a middle-income country such as South Africa may benefit from the implementation of ERPs through reduced postoperative morbidity and the associated cost reductions, as has been demonstrated in high-income countries.
STUDY RATIONAL:
Documentation of current perioperative interventions with associated postoperative outcomes is crucial before implementing a new model for perioperative care. As such, this study will give the investigators baseline values against which the perioperative results achieved from instituting a multidisciplinary enhanced care programme for South African arthroplasty patients will be analyzed.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a 10-week prospective observational audit of patients scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty at 9 District, Regional and Central hospitals in South Africa.
PATIENT RECRUITMENT, DATA COLLECTION AND CONFIDENTIALITY:
The patients will be recruited consecutively by the orthopaedic surgeons in the preoperative arthroplasty clinic or when presenting for admission before surgery (minimum 1 day before surgery). Staff from the departments of orthopaedic surgery, physiotherapy and anaesthesia will be responsible for in-hospital data capture. Telephonic follow-up interviews 30 days and 12 months after surgery will be conducted by the Principal Investigator or dedicated research assistants. The patients will be informed that they can choose to leave the study at any time during the study period.
Each individual center will collect and record data on either an electronic or paper case record form (CRF) for every patient recruited. Access to the data entry system will be protected by username and password delivered during the registration process for individual local investigators. All electronic data transfer between participating centres and the coordinating center will be encrypted using a secure protocol (HTTPS/SSL 3.0 or better).
TIME FRAME:
The study will run for 10 weeks at each enrolled site. The in-hospital and 30 day data collection is expected to be completed in 2018.
RISK AND BENEFITS:
Participation in the study will not add any risk to the patient, why the patient's safety is intact. Principles of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice will be adhered to.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
As knowledge on current postoperative outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa is scarce, this study is a descriptive hypothesis generating study to establish baseline data for future studies, and hence there is no formal power calculation for this study's primary outcome; Days alive and at home 30 days after surgery (DAH30). However, in the study by Myles and colleagues (Myles et al. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(8): e015828. Published online 2017 Aug 18. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015828) patient cohorts of approximately 200 patients resulted in clinically relevant and acceptable 95% CI, why we aim to enrol minimum 200 patients. The data are expected to be non-parametric and will be presented as median with interquartile range (25-75 percentile).
As the investigators are unaware of any publications of South African orthopaedic patients which report the specified secondary outcomes, the data will be used to establish a baseline incidence in South African arthroplasty patients for HRQoL (preoperative, 30 days and 12 months postoperative), TUG (in-hospital day 3), mortality (12 months postoperative) and prosthetic joint infection and joint revision (12 months postoperative). These data will be used to power future interventional studies.
Continuous variables will be described using sample mean and standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables using sample median and interquartile range (IQR). Where statistical comparisons are to be made between continuous variables, the unpaired t-test or Mann Whitney U test will be used as appropriate. Categorical data will be compared using the χ2 test.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis Knee, Arthritis of Hip
- Keywords
- Total hip arthroplasty, Total knee arthroplasty, Total joint arthroplasty, Low middle income country, Enhanced recovery pathway
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single group study | The study population will include patients presenting for primary elective unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
"Days alive and at home 30 days after surgery" (DAH30)
A patient centered measure which integrates length of hospital stay, readmission due to postoperative complications, discharge destination and early death after surgery . This outcome is an overall measure of the recovery profile as it captures much of the surgical experience, integrating efficacy, quality and safety thus reflecting value based care and actions. As such, DAH30 is transparent and can be used for benchmarking performance of quality of perioperative care.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
Timed Up and Go test
Timed Up and Go (TUG) is a clinical performance based measure of lower extremity function, mobility and fall risk. It measures how long it takes a patient to get up from a chair, walk 3 meters and return to sitting in the chair. The Physiotherapist will perform TUG on day 3 after surgery. If the patient is discharged earlier, the TUG test will be performed on discharge. If the TUG test can't be performed (ex. lack of personnel on week-ends) the TUG will be performed on day 5 after surgery, unless the patient is discharged earlier than day 5 - in that case the TUG will be performed on discharge.
Measured: 2-5 days after surgery
EQ-5D
Defines health based on 5 dimensions; mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Measured: 30 days and 1 year after surgery
EQ-VAS
Visual analogue scale (VAS) generates a self-rated Health Related Quality of Life score.
Measured: 30 days and 1 year after surgery
Satisfaction with surgery
To assess overall patient satisfaction with the surgery we will ask the question: "To better understand how satisfied you are with the operation, we would like to know if you would have this operation again, if it were required on the other joint"? (yes/no).
Measured: 30 days and 1 year after surgery
1-year incidence of mortality
Incidence of mortality 1 year after surgery
Measured: 1 year follow up
Prosthetic joint infection rate
Incidence of prosthetic joint infection 1 year after surgery
Measured: 1 year follow up
Joint revision
Incidence of joint revision 1 year after surgery
Measured: 1 year follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2018
- Study start7 May 2018
- Primary completion30 Jan 2019
- Study completion30 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cape Town
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Margot Flint, University of Cape Town
- Investigators
- Ulla Plenge, MD, Principal investigator, University of Cape Town
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03540667
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- The BETTER care protocol - 1
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 4 May 2018
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Plenge U, Parker R, Davids S, Davies GL, Fullerton Z, Gray L, Groenewald P, Isaacs R, Kauta N, Louw FM, Mazibuko A, North DM, Nortje M, Nunes GM, Pebane N, Rajah C, Roos J, Ryan P, September WV, Shanahan H, Siebritz RE, Smit RW, Sombili S, Torborg A, van der Merwe JF, van der Westhuizen N, Biccard B. Quality of recovery after total hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa: a national prospective observational cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 5;21(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03752-x.
PubMed 33153453
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Observational Study of Current Perioperative Care for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in South Africa, and Associated Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03540667
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- The BETTER care protocol - 1
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthritis Knee, Arthritis of Hip
- Keywords
- Total hip arthroplasty, Total knee arthroplasty, Total joint arthroplasty, Low middle income country, Enhanced recovery pathway
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 206 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cape TownUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 May 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multi-site, observational, prospective study aims to investigate current practice and associated outcomes for patients scheduled for elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty in South Africa.This information will provide baseline values, against which effects of implementing a multidisciplinary enhanced care protocol for arthroplasty patients will be compared (the subsequent study).
Detailed description
RESEARCH PROBLEM:
In the past 20 years, enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) have become increasingly integrated into most surgical fields as standard care in high income countries, as is exemplified by national priority programs and the widespread acceptance of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society network. ERPs represent a fundamental shift towards a patient-centred, multidisciplinary-driven continuity of care that aim to attenuate surgical stress and expedite recovery. Studies on total joint arthroplasty (TJA) for both hips and knees have shown that implementation of an evidence-based, structured approach to patient care decreases postoperative morbidity and consequently length of stay without increasing readmission rate.
However, in low- and middle-income countries, the value of implementing ERPs is yet to be explored. This may be because: i) the perception that current hospital resources may make it difficult to develop and implement structured and sustainable protocols to enhance postoperative recovery, and ii) short and long-term data collection on the quality of the work provided is scarce, inhibiting the ability to benchmark clinical results and improve the service provided to patients. Despite these challenges, a healthcare system in a middle-income country such as South Africa may benefit from the implementation of ERPs through reduced postoperative morbidity and the associated cost reductions, as has been demonstrated in high-income countries.
STUDY RATIONAL:
Documentation of current perioperative interventions with associated postoperative outcomes is crucial before implementing a new model for perioperative care. As such, this study will give the investigators baseline values against which the perioperative results achieved from instituting a multidisciplinary enhanced care programme for South African arthroplasty patients will be analyzed.
STUDY DESIGN:
This is a 10-week prospective observational audit of patients scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty at 9 District, Regional and Central hospitals in South Africa.
PATIENT RECRUITMENT, DATA COLLECTION AND CONFIDENTIALITY:
The patients will be recruited consecutively by the orthopaedic surgeons in the preoperative arthroplasty clinic or when presenting for admission before surgery (minimum 1 day before surgery). Staff from the departments of orthopaedic surgery, physiotherapy and anaesthesia will be responsible for in-hospital data capture. Telephonic follow-up interviews 30 days and 12 months after surgery will be conducted by the Principal Investigator or dedicated research assistants. The patients will be informed that they can choose to leave the study at any time during the study period.
Each individual center will collect and record data on either an electronic or paper case record form (CRF) for every patient recruited. Access to the data entry system will be protected by username and password delivered during the registration process for individual local investigators. All electronic data transfer between participating centres and the coordinating center will be encrypted using a secure protocol (HTTPS/SSL 3.0 or better).
TIME FRAME:
The study will run for 10 weeks at each enrolled site. The in-hospital and 30 day data collection is expected to be completed in 2018.
RISK AND BENEFITS:
Participation in the study will not add any risk to the patient, why the patient's safety is intact. Principles of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice will be adhered to.
SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:
As knowledge on current postoperative outcomes after hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa is scarce, this study is a descriptive hypothesis generating study to establish baseline data for future studies, and hence there is no formal power calculation for this study's primary outcome; Days alive and at home 30 days after surgery (DAH30). However, in the study by Myles and colleagues (Myles et al. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(8): e015828. Published online 2017 Aug 18. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015828) patient cohorts of approximately 200 patients resulted in clinically relevant and acceptable 95% CI, why we aim to enrol minimum 200 patients. The data are expected to be non-parametric and will be presented as median with interquartile range (25-75 percentile).
As the investigators are unaware of any publications of South African orthopaedic patients which report the specified secondary outcomes, the data will be used to establish a baseline incidence in South African arthroplasty patients for HRQoL (preoperative, 30 days and 12 months postoperative), TUG (in-hospital day 3), mortality (12 months postoperative) and prosthetic joint infection and joint revision (12 months postoperative). These data will be used to power future interventional studies.
Continuous variables will be described using sample mean and standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables using sample median and interquartile range (IQR). Where statistical comparisons are to be made between continuous variables, the unpaired t-test or Mann Whitney U test will be used as appropriate. Categorical data will be compared using the χ2 test.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single group study | – | –The study population will include patients presenting for primary elective unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All patients scheduled for primary elective unilateral total hip or knee arthroplasty in the 10 week study period at the 10 participating study sites in South Africa.
- Patients must accept to be contacted telephonically 30 days and 12 months after surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who do not have a mobile telephone.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
"Days alive and at home 30 days after surgery" (DAH30)
Time frame: 30 days
A patient centered measure which integrates length of hospital stay, readmission due to postoperative complications, discharge destination and early death after surgery . This outcome is an overall measure of the recovery profile as it captures much of the surgical experience, integrating efficacy, quality and safety thus reflecting value based care and actions. As such, DAH30 is transparent and can be used for benchmarking performance of quality of perioperative care.
7 secondary outcomes
Timed Up and Go test
Time frame: 2-5 days after surgery
EQ-5D
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year after surgery
EQ-VAS
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year after surgery
Satisfaction with surgery
Time frame: 30 days and 1 year after surgery
1-year incidence of mortality
Time frame: 1 year follow up
Prosthetic joint infection rate
Time frame: 1 year follow up
Joint revision
Time frame: 1 year follow up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33153453Plenge U, Parker R, Davids S, Davies GL, Fullerton Z, Gray L, Groenewald P, Isaacs R, Kauta N, Louw FM, Mazibuko A, North DM, Nortje M, Nunes GM, Pebane N, Rajah C, Roos J, Ryan P, September WV, Shanahan H, Siebritz RE, Smit RW, Sombili S, Torborg A, van der Merwe JF, van der Westhuizen N, Biccard B. Quality of recovery after total hip and knee arthroplasty in South Africa: a national prospective observational cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 5;21(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03752-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ulla Plenge, MD principal investigator
University of Cape Town
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by University of Cape Town at 9 sites in South Africa.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
"Days alive and at home 30 days after surgery" (DAH30) (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03540667, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2020.