Contraception BehaviorNCT03486743
Assessment of Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population
A study testing Educational video on LARC in people with Contraception Behavior, run by University of Pittsburgh at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Preliminary data from our work with teen mothers suggest that many women would benefit from contraception but do not actually make visits nor initiate conversations regarding contraception unless the subject is raised by the clinician. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Contraception Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Educational video on LARC
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 437 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2018to 1 Aug 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Between age of 18 and 45
- Not currently pregnant
- Did not participate in phase I of the study
Who cannot join
- Below 18 years or above 45
- Currently pregnant
- Participated in Phase I of the study
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites
Latterman Family Health Center
McKeesport, Pennsylvania, 15132
New Kensington Family Health Center
New Kensington, Pennsylvania, 15068
UPMC Matilda Theiss Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Squirrel Hill Family Practice
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15217
UPMC Bloomfiled-Garfield FHC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Lawrenceville Family Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Shadyside Family Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
About this study
Preliminary data from our work with teen mothers suggest that many women would benefit from contraception but do not actually make visits nor initiate conversations regarding contraception unless the subject is raised by the clinician. Those coming for primary care visits discuss their conditions and care with family and friends, spreading health care information. A substantial proportion of citizens obtain their health information from friends, family, internet, social media and other non-clinicians. Thus, educating women, even when not coming expressly for contraceptive services, increases more accurate health information throughout their communities and actually identifies fertility needs, ultimately increasing use of contraception.
Read the detailed description
Seven clinical family medicine health centers will be included in the study. Target participants are women aged 18-45 years old. These clinical sites are community-based health centers within the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) system in greater Pittsburgh that serve as teaching sites for medical, pharmacy and social work students enrolled at the University of Pittsburgh and/or UPMC Family Medicine or clinical pharmacy residents. In 2015, these sites served nearly 32,000 patients of whom more than 60% are women. More than 10,000 females were in the target age group of 18-45 years old and more than half were from underrepresented minority groups. The patients served by these family health centers are diverse across race and ethnicity, family income level, neighborhoods and literacy level . All are managed and documented in the EpicCare electronic medical record system.
We target women aged 18-45 years because this study is designed to assess cultural beliefs regarding Long Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) in women in general and not specifically those who are seeking contraception. Preliminary data from our work with teen mothers suggest that many women would benefit from contraception but do not actually make visits nor initiate conversations regarding contraception unless the subject is raised by the clinician. Those coming for primary care visits discuss their conditions and care with family and friends, spreading health care information. A substantial proportion of citizens obtain their health information from friends, family, and other non-clinicians. Thus, educating women, even when not coming expressly for contraceptive services, increases more accurate health information throughout their communities and actually identifies fertility needs, ultimately increasing use of contraception.
Seven clinical sites (UPMC Family Health Centers) will be included in the study. The best and low-cost recruitment strategy will be to reach women aged 18-45 years who attend our health centers for womens' health services. Our project team will engage personnel in these health centers and inform them about the proposed study. We will place postcards at the check-in desk, and encourage target women to take a postcards and follow up with the research team if they are interested in participating.
Participants of the project will be identified by the nurses performing initial intakes of patients presenting for care - also called "rooming" the patient. Research assistants will also try to approach patients in the waiting room in the case they were not able to approach them in the examination rooms. Those recruited from each site will be stratified to one of two groups - one for those identifying contraception as the focus of their physician visit and the other group for those seeking other women's health services at the physician visit.
In an effort to improve recruitment, we will work with the clinical staff to understand particular hours during which potential participants are likely to present to the clinic. Flyers will be placed in all seven health centers, In addition, a research assistant will be on site at projected high utilization times. The research assistants will provide information on the study to clinical staff, and will be available to distribute study postcards and answer questions from potential participants. Interested young women will meet with the research assistants for eligibility determination, completion of Institutional Review Board (IRB) consents, and enrollment in the study. Incentives will be provided to all participants enrolled in the study.
Three health centers received a substantial volume of the female patients who were in the specific age group being targeted in the study will be invited to comprise the intervention arm. The rest of the health centers will form the control arm.
It is important that the survey questions reflect the target population's perspectives of using LARC or any contraceptive devices. Both the demographic and cultural surveys will be distributed to women, 18-45 years of age, seeking womens' health services in participating family health centers who expressed interest in the study. Surveys will be completed on a tablet provided by a research assistant or on the participant's own mobile device or personal computer. Participants will be given the option to complete the surveys at the family health center or elsewhere at another time. Women participating in the focus groups are ineligible for participation in the survey.
Participants in the intervention arm will complete both the demographic and the cultural survey. After participating in the survey, the participants in the intervention arm will be asked to watch an educational video on LARC to be taped by a professional team in the Center for Instructional Development \& Distance Education (CIDDE) at the University of Pittsburgh. In this video, a family physician skilled in contraceptive education will provide useful and easily understandable information on LARC. The video will include, but is not limited to, the following key topics:
- What types of LARC are available?
- How each LARC method works?
- How and where the LARC method is inserted?
- How long LARC works?
- What are the risks and benefits of each LARC method?
- Can LARC be removed at any time, how it is removed and are there any potential side effects such as slow return of fertility?
A short survey will be distributed to all participants who watched the video in the intervention arm. The survey will include questions on LARC that were similar to the questions included in the survey before watching the video. We will then evaluate both surveys before and after watching the video. The participants will be given the option to complete all study activities at the family health center or elsewhere at another time.
With improved understanding regarding how LARC is perceived through data obtained from the cultural assessment, more targeted education for both clinicians, clinical staff, and patients of childbearing age is possible. Therefore, if the cultural assessment (via focus group feedback and/or survey responses) reveals that patients fear permanent sterilization or believe use of LARC violates religious mores, patient education can be modified to address their specific concerns. These study results may lead to further investigation to change approaches to the target population and allow us to provide better clinical care
Following (1) assessment of historical data on LARC use in the seven health centers prior to this study; (2) perceptions elicited from the focus groups(from phase one of the study); (3) results of the group completing both demographic and cultural surveys; and (4) results of the group completing demographic and cultural surveys and watching the informational video, the final step involves assessing changes in LARC use. Electronic medical records and billing data from the seven health centers will be reviewed to determine LARC utilization across the targeted population served by these health centers and the impact of the interventions on LARC usage.
- Conditions
- Contraception Behavior
- Being tested
- Educational video on LARC
- Keywords
- LARC contraception cultural acceptance
- Medical subject headings
- Contraception Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educational video on LARCBehavioural
Participants will watch a short educational video on long acting reversible contraceptive or LARC
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Participants in the intervention arm will be asked to watch a short educational video on LARC (Long acting reversible contraceptive) and to complete a survey before and after watching the video. Receives: Behavioral: Educational video on LARC |
| Control arm | No intervention | Participants in the intervention arm will only be asked to complete a survey. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determine cultural factors that affect women choosing their contraception.
Racial and ethnic minority women are less likely to use LARC than majority women. No studies have primarily focused on contraceptive cultural beliefs of older teens and young women. Potential factors influencing the low LARC usage among teens are inadequate education regarding safety of these methods, misconceptions among clinicians regarding safety of LARC in teens, fewer than ideal numbers of clinicians trained to insert these devices, barriers to obtaining reimbursement for LARC in hospital settings postpartum
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Changes in LARC uptake among women seeking contraception.
A variety of myths regarding LARC have been described. Patient myths and misconceptions include that Intra Uterine Devices (IUDs) cause abortions, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancies, weight gain, hair loss, and cancer, among others. Multiple factors affect women in choosing contraception. Each of these potential factors exists in parallel to and may be influenced by the patient's culture (as defined by age, race, ethnicity, religion, family, nationality, language, education, socioeconomic status, and disability.
Measured: 2 years
Studying the effects of using contraception educational video on rates of different contraception methods.
Educating patients about contraception in general, and LARC in specific,is very crucial. In this study we will ask participants to watch a short educational video on LARC and complete a survey before and after the video. This will enable us to understand how educating patients and providing them with information about contraception might affect their perspectives on LARC.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2018
- Study start15 Apr 2018
- Primary completion1 Aug 2019
- Study completion1 Aug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Contraception BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- different sites of participant recruitment will be randomized between the use of an informational video during the survey process and no video. The primary focus of the study is the survey that is designed to collect information about cultural perspectives on LARC in the participants.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 437 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeannette E. South-Paul, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- Jeannette E. South-Paul, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03486743
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Merck IIS# 55000 phase II
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2018
- Last updated
- 8 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
PubMed 22018123Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
PubMed 20541171Romero L, Pazol K, Warner L, Gavin L, Moskosky S, Besera G, Loyola Briceno AC, Jatlaoui T, Barfield W; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services-United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Apr 10;64(13):363-9.
PubMed 25856258Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, Darney PD, Speidel JJ, Policar M, Drey EA. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1359-69. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173fd83.
PubMed 18515520Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1417-22. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0.
PubMed 17138775Whitaker AK, Sisco KM, Tomlinson AN, Dude AM, Martins SL. Use of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
PubMed 23763968Damle LF, Gohari AC, McEvoy AK, Desale SY, Gomez-Lobo V. Early initiation of postpartum contraception: does it decrease rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Feb;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 5.
PubMed 25555302Okpo E, Allerton L, Brechin S. 'But you can't reverse a hysterectomy!' Perceptions of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) among young women aged 16-24 years: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2014 Oct;128(10):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
PubMed 25369357Greenberg KB, Makino KK, Coles MS. Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):372-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.003.
PubMed 23427785Rubin SE, Davis K, McKee MD. New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):130-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1450.
PubMed 23508599Russo JA, Miller E, Gold MA. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.003.
PubMed 23535052Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Berenson AB. The use of effective contraception among young Hispanic women: the role of acculturation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb;25(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
PubMed 22051784Doescher MP, Saver BG, Franks P, Fiscella K. Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(10):1156-63. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.10.1156.
PubMed 11115223Kissling E, Valenciano M, Larrauri A, Oroszi B, Cohen JM, Nunes B, Pitigoi D, Rizzo C, Rebolledo J, Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Jimenez-Jorge S, Horvath JK, Daviaud I, Guiomar R, Necula G, Bella A, O'Donnell J, Gluchowska M, Ciancio BC, Nicoll A, Moren A. Low and decreasing vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3) in 2011/12 among vaccination target groups in Europe: results from the I-MOVE multicentre case-control study. Euro Surveill. 2013 Jan 31;18(5):20390. doi: 10.2807/ese.18.05.20390-en.
PubMed 23399425deBorja L, Lin C, Maier J, South-Paul JE, Lewis E. Assessment of Cultural Acceptability of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population: Phase II of a Two Phase Study.North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting - NOV 2018 / Chicago, IL (https://www.napcrg.org/conferences/46/sessions/23230)
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03486743
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Merck IIS# 55000 phase II
- Conditions
- Contraception Behavior
- Keywords
- LARC contraception cultural acceptance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 437 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Preliminary data from our work with teen mothers suggest that many women would benefit from contraception but do not actually make visits nor initiate conversations regarding contraception unless the subject is raised by the clinician. Those coming for primary care visits discuss their conditions and care with family and friends, spreading health care information. A substantial proportion of citizens obtain their health information from friends, family, internet, social media and other non-clinicians. Thus, educating women, even when not coming expressly for contraceptive services, increases more accurate health information throughout their communities and actually identifies fertility needs, ultimately increasing use of contraception.
Detailed description
Seven clinical family medicine health centers will be included in the study. Target participants are women aged 18-45 years old. These clinical sites are community-based health centers within the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) system in greater Pittsburgh that serve as teaching sites for medical, pharmacy and social work students enrolled at the University of Pittsburgh and/or UPMC Family Medicine or clinical pharmacy residents. In 2015, these sites served nearly 32,000 patients of whom more than 60% are women. More than 10,000 females were in the target age group of 18-45 years old and more than half were from underrepresented minority groups. The patients served by these family health centers are diverse across race and ethnicity, family income level, neighborhoods and literacy level . All are managed and documented in the EpicCare electronic medical record system.
We target women aged 18-45 years because this study is designed to assess cultural beliefs regarding Long Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) in women in general and not specifically those who are seeking contraception. Preliminary data from our work with teen mothers suggest that many women would benefit from contraception but do not actually make visits nor initiate conversations regarding contraception unless the subject is raised by the clinician. Those coming for primary care visits discuss their conditions and care with family and friends, spreading health care information. A substantial proportion of citizens obtain their health information from friends, family, and other non-clinicians. Thus, educating women, even when not coming expressly for contraceptive services, increases more accurate health information throughout their communities and actually identifies fertility needs, ultimately increasing use of contraception.
Seven clinical sites (UPMC Family Health Centers) will be included in the study. The best and low-cost recruitment strategy will be to reach women aged 18-45 years who attend our health centers for womens' health services. Our project team will engage personnel in these health centers and inform them about the proposed study. We will place postcards at the check-in desk, and encourage target women to take a postcards and follow up with the research team if they are interested in participating.
Participants of the project will be identified by the nurses performing initial intakes of patients presenting for care - also called "rooming" the patient. Research assistants will also try to approach patients in the waiting room in the case they were not able to approach them in the examination rooms. Those recruited from each site will be stratified to one of two groups - one for those identifying contraception as the focus of their physician visit and the other group for those seeking other women's health services at the physician visit.
In an effort to improve recruitment, we will work with the clinical staff to understand particular hours during which potential participants are likely to present to the clinic. Flyers will be placed in all seven health centers, In addition, a research assistant will be on site at projected high utilization times. The research assistants will provide information on the study to clinical staff, and will be available to distribute study postcards and answer questions from potential participants. Interested young women will meet with the research assistants for eligibility determination, completion of Institutional Review Board (IRB) consents, and enrollment in the study. Incentives will be provided to all participants enrolled in the study.
Three health centers received a substantial volume of the female patients who were in the specific age group being targeted in the study will be invited to comprise the intervention arm. The rest of the health centers will form the control arm.
It is important that the survey questions reflect the target population's perspectives of using LARC or any contraceptive devices. Both the demographic and cultural surveys will be distributed to women, 18-45 years of age, seeking womens' health services in participating family health centers who expressed interest in the study. Surveys will be completed on a tablet provided by a research assistant or on the participant's own mobile device or personal computer. Participants will be given the option to complete the surveys at the family health center or elsewhere at another time. Women participating in the focus groups are ineligible for participation in the survey.
Participants in the intervention arm will complete both the demographic and the cultural survey. After participating in the survey, the participants in the intervention arm will be asked to watch an educational video on LARC to be taped by a professional team in the Center for Instructional Development \& Distance Education (CIDDE) at the University of Pittsburgh. In this video, a family physician skilled in contraceptive education will provide useful and easily understandable information on LARC. The video will include, but is not limited to, the following key topics:
- What types of LARC are available?
- How each LARC method works?
- How and where the LARC method is inserted?
- How long LARC works?
- What are the risks and benefits of each LARC method?
- Can LARC be removed at any time, how it is removed and are there any potential side effects such as slow return of fertility?
A short survey will be distributed to all participants who watched the video in the intervention arm. The survey will include questions on LARC that were similar to the questions included in the survey before watching the video. We will then evaluate both surveys before and after watching the video. The participants will be given the option to complete all study activities at the family health center or elsewhere at another time.
With improved understanding regarding how LARC is perceived through data obtained from the cultural assessment, more targeted education for both clinicians, clinical staff, and patients of childbearing age is possible. Therefore, if the cultural assessment (via focus group feedback and/or survey responses) reveals that patients fear permanent sterilization or believe use of LARC violates religious mores, patient education can be modified to address their specific concerns. These study results may lead to further investigation to change approaches to the target population and allow us to provide better clinical care
Following (1) assessment of historical data on LARC use in the seven health centers prior to this study; (2) perceptions elicited from the focus groups(from phase one of the study); (3) results of the group completing both demographic and cultural surveys; and (4) results of the group completing demographic and cultural surveys and watching the informational video, the final step involves assessing changes in LARC use. Electronic medical records and billing data from the seven health centers will be reviewed to determine LARC utilization across the targeted population served by these health centers and the impact of the interventions on LARC usage.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- different sites of participant recruitment will be randomized between the use of an informational video during the survey process and no video. The primary focus of the study is the survey that is designed to collect information about cultural perspectives on LARC in the participants.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Behavioral: Educational video on LARCParticipants in the intervention arm will be asked to watch a short educational video on LARC (Long acting reversible contraceptive) and to complete a survey before and after watching the video. |
| Control arm | No intervention | –Participants in the intervention arm will only be asked to complete a survey. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Between age of 18 and 45
- Not currently pregnant
- Did not participate in phase I of the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Below 18 years or above 45
- Currently pregnant
- Participated in Phase I of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educational video on LARCParticipants will watch a short educational video on long acting reversible contraceptive or LARC | Behavioural | Intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Determine cultural factors that affect women choosing their contraception.
Time frame: 2 years
Racial and ethnic minority women are less likely to use LARC than majority women. No studies have primarily focused on contraceptive cultural beliefs of older teens and young women. Potential factors influencing the low LARC usage among teens are inadequate education regarding safety of these methods, misconceptions among clinicians regarding safety of LARC in teens, fewer than ideal numbers of clinicians trained to insert these devices, barriers to obtaining reimbursement for LARC in hospital settings postpartum
2 secondary outcomes
Changes in LARC uptake among women seeking contraception.
Time frame: 2 years
Studying the effects of using contraception educational video on rates of different contraception methods.
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 22018123Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 20541171Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 25856258Romero L, Pazol K, Warner L, Gavin L, Moskosky S, Besera G, Loyola Briceno AC, Jatlaoui T, Barfield W; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services-United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Apr 10;64(13):363-9.
- Background: PubMed 18515520Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, Darney PD, Speidel JJ, Policar M, Drey EA. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1359-69. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173fd83.
- Background: PubMed 17138775Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1417-22. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0.
- Background: PubMed 23763968Whitaker AK, Sisco KM, Tomlinson AN, Dude AM, Martins SL. Use of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 25555302Damle LF, Gohari AC, McEvoy AK, Desale SY, Gomez-Lobo V. Early initiation of postpartum contraception: does it decrease rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Feb;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 25369357Okpo E, Allerton L, Brechin S. 'But you can't reverse a hysterectomy!' Perceptions of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) among young women aged 16-24 years: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2014 Oct;128(10):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 23427785Greenberg KB, Makino KK, Coles MS. Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):372-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.003.
- Background: PubMed 23508599Rubin SE, Davis K, McKee MD. New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):130-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1450.
- Background: PubMed 23535052Russo JA, Miller E, Gold MA. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.003.
- Background: PubMed 22051784Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Berenson AB. The use of effective contraception among young Hispanic women: the role of acculturation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb;25(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Contraception Behavior
Recruiting
Estimating the Impact of Sexuality Education and Mobile Health Services on Reproductive Health and Empowerment Among Adolescents in Sierra Leone for the Family Planning Impact Lab
Reproductive Health, Sexual Health
Not yet recruitingObservational study
FLOW: Influence of the Menstrual Cycle on Alcohol Use in Women
Alcohol Use, Alcohol Consumption
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Gender-Transformative Interventions on Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Autonomy in Somalia
Contraceptive Behavior, Social Norms
Recruiting
Impact of Self-Care Family Planning Services on Health and Development in South Sudan (Family Planning Impact Lab)
Contraceptive Behavior, Self Administration
Recruiting
"Vasectomy: Right for Me?" Decision Support Tool
Vasectomy, Contraception
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeannette E. South-Paul, MD principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educational video on LARC in people with Contraception Behavior, run by University of Pittsburgh at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determine cultural factors that affect women choosing their contraception. (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03486743, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2020.