AzTrials
AzTrials

Gall StonesNCT03482375

Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP

An observational study of Gall Stones, run by Northwell Health at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Gallstone disease affects over 20 million Americans. Among patients with gallbladder disease, the prevalence of choledocholithiasis (stones in the bile duct) is estimated to be 10-20%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gall Stones
How many people
140 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
17 Dec 2015to 10 Feb 2019
How long will I take part?
3 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients who are undergoing ERCP as their standard of care for treatment of their gall stones.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient receiving ERCP as standard of care for suspected or documented choledocholithiasis as assessed by one or more of the following:
  • Abnormal imaging on ultrasound, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), CT scan, or MRCP suggestive of choledocholithiasis
  • Clinical signs and symptoms suggestive of choledocholithiasis such as jaundice, abdominal pain, pruritis, pancreatitis, and/or cholangitis
  • Abnormal liver function tests suggestive of choledocholithiasis (eg: serum bilirubin > 1.5 and/or elevated alkaline phosphatase levels)
  • In addition to one or more of the above inclusion criteria, patient must also satisfy one or more of the following:
  • Mechanical lithotripsy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy, or laser lithotripsy performed for therapy of bile duct stones.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Bile duct > 12mm on prior tests (any portion of duct)
  • History of recurrent abnormal LFTs with negative cholangiogram.
  • Positive EUS or MRCP for biliary stones with a negative cholangiogram

Who cannot join

  • Patients less than 18 years of age.
  • Patients not undergoing ERCP as their standard of care.
  • Patients who had the following surgeries - Billroth II surgery, Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass surgery, and Whipple's surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • North Shore University Hospital

    Manhasset, New York, 11030

  • LIJ Medical Center- NSLIJ Health System

    New Hyde Park, New York, 11040

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone Detection by Peroral Cholangioscopy That Is Missed With Conventional ERCP and Cholangiogram

Gallstone disease affects over 20 million Americans. Among patients with gallbladder disease, the prevalence of choledocholithiasis (stones in the bile duct) is estimated to be 10-20%. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered the standard of care for removing stones in the bile duct utilizing a variety of conventional methods including biliary sphincterotomy, sphincteroplasty, extraction balloon, retrieval basket, and mechanical lithotripsy. After removal of stones from the bile duct, an occlusion cholangiogram is usually performed to confirm complete bile duct clearance. However, cholangiogram can miss residual stones in 11- 30% of cases - especially in the setting of a dilated bile duct, large stones, severe pneumobilia, juxtapapillary diverticulum, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and after lithotripsy (mechanical, electrohydraulic, or laser). The approach to patients with choledocholithiasis requires careful attention because missed bile duct stones can cause recurrent biliary symptoms, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and has significant cost implication with the need for repeat imaging and/or procedures.

Read the detailed description

Peroral cholangioscopy (POC) provides direct visualization of the bile duct during ERCP and its benefits are well documented in numerous published studies. POC has been described for therapy of difficult to remove biliary stones utilizing electrohydraulic lithotripsy or laser lithotripsy with success rates of >90%. POC has also been used for evaluation of indeterminate filling defects and to assess for residual stones missed with cholangiogram. In a multicenter study evaluating POC for a variety of indications, 11% (7/66) of patients had bile duct stones identified only by POC that were missed on ERCP. In a study of patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis, 30% (7/23) of patients were found to have stones with POC that were missed with cholangiography. Takao et al. assessed residual bile duct stones found with POC in comparison to balloon-cholangiography; they found that 24% (26/108) of patients had residual stones seen with POC that were missed with balloon-cholangiography.

Although POC has been available for over thirty years, it has not become a widespread technique due to the fact that traditional cholangioscopes are fragile, cumbersome to use, and usually require two endoscopists to perform the procedure. A recent single operator semi-disposable cholangioscope, SpyGlass (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts), has addressed those concerns and has been shown in a studies to be a useful tool in visualizing the bile ducts and performing therapeutic maneuvers for biliary stones. Both ERCP and Cholangioscopy are standard of care procedures to treat gall stones.

The primary goal of the study is to assess if POC will enhance the diagnostic yield in the detection of residual biliary stones that are missed during conventional ERCP. Residual bile duct stones can especially be seen in the setting of bile duct dilation, history of recurrent abnormal liver function tests, and after lithotripsy (mechanical, electrohydraulic, or laser). Missed biliary stones can lead to recurrent biliary symptoms, pancreatitis, and cholangitis. POC after conventional ERCP can be a useful diagnostic tool to confirm complete extraction of bile duct stones, and thus lead to decreased morbidity and decreased cost by avoiding unnecessary tests and repeat procedures.

Conditions
Gall Stones
Keywords
Gall Stones, ERCP, Cholangioscopy
Medical subject headings
Gallstones

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03482375
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No Stones on POC after ERCPThis is a cohort in which there are no stones seen on Cholangioscopy after ERCP and cholangiogram to treat gall stones.
Stones seen on POC after ERCPThis is a cohort in which there are no stones seen on Cholangioscopy after ERCP and cholangiogram to treat gall stones.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Missed stones found on Cholangioscopy

    The primary outcome of this study is to assess if digital peroral cholangioscopy (POC) will enhance the diagnostic yield in the detection of residual biliary stones that are missed during conventional ERCP. The primary outcome will be assessed at the time of the procedure (i.e. residual stone seen with POC vs. no residual stone seen with POC). We will enroll approximately 100 patients over a 2-year period. At study completion, the primary outcome measure for all patients will be analyzed and data will be reported.

    Measured: We will enroll approximately 100 patients over a 2-year period.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Mar 2018
  2. Study start17 Dec 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2018
  4. Study completion10 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
140 participants (actual)
Target duration
3 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03482375
Sponsor's protocol ID
HS15-0674
Status last verified
Feb 2019
First submitted
8 Mar 2018
Last updated
19 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be shared.

Publications

  • Everhart JE, Khare M, Hill M, Maurer KR. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology. 1999 Sep;117(3):632-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70456-7.

    PubMed 10464139
  • Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Hoffmann W, Siewert JR, Classen M. Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy. 1992 Nov;24(9):745-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010576.

    PubMed 1468389
  • Lacaine F, Corlette MB, Bismuth H. Preoperative evaluation of the risk of common bile duct stones. Arch Surg. 1980 Sep;115(9):1114-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380090080019.

    PubMed 7416958
  • Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KF, Hawes RH, Pleskow DK, Slivka A, Haluszka O, Petersen BT, Sherman S, Deviere J, Meisner S, Stevens PD, Costamagna G, Ponchon T, Peetermans JA, Neuhaus H. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):805-14. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

    PubMed 21762903
  • Awadallah NS, Chen YK, Piraka C, Antillon MR, Shah RJ. Is there a role for cholangioscopy in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis? Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Feb;101(2):284-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00383.x.

    PubMed 16454832
  • Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Shinohara Y, Moriyasu F, Tsuchida A. Evaluation of residual bile duct stones by peroral cholangioscopy in comparison with balloon-cholangiography. Dig Endosc. 2010 Jul;22 Suppl 1:S85-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.00954.x.

    PubMed 20590779
  • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MA, Appalaneni V, Banerjee S, Cash BD, Fisher L, Harrison ME, Fanelli RD, Fukami N, Ikenberry SO, Jain R, Khan K, Krinsky ML, Strohmeyer L, Dominitz JA. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jan;71(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.041. No abstract available.

    PubMed 20105473
  • Piraka C, Shah RJ, Awadallah NS, Langer DA, Chen YK. Transpapillary cholangioscopy-directed lithotripsy in patients with difficult bile duct stones. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Nov;5(11):1333-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.05.021. Epub 2007 Jul 23.

    PubMed 17644045
  • Arya N, Nelles SE, Haber GB, Kim YI, Kortan PK. Electrohydraulic lithotripsy in 111 patients: a safe and effective therapy for difficult bile duct stones. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec;99(12):2330-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40251.x.

    PubMed 15571578
  • Farrell JJ, Bounds BC, Al-Shalabi S, Jacobson BC, Brugge WR, Schapiro RH, Kelsey PB. Single-operator duodenoscope-assisted cholangioscopy is an effective alternative in the management of choledocholithiasis not removed by conventional methods, including mechanical lithotripsy. Endoscopy. 2005 Jun;37(6):542-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861306.

    PubMed 15933927
  • Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 May;65(6):832-41. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.01.025.

    PubMed 17466202
  • Sejpal DV, Trindade AJ, Lee C, Miller LS, Benias PC, Inamdar S, Singh G, Stewart M, George BJ, Vegesna AK. Digital cholangioscopy can detect residual biliary stones missed by occlusion cholangiogram in ERCP: a prospective tandem study. Endosc Int Open. 2019 Apr;7(4):E608-E614. doi: 10.1055/a-0842-6450. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

    PubMed 30993165

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gall Stones, run by Northwell Health at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Missed stones found on Cholangioscopy (time frame: We will enroll approximately 100 patients over a 2-year period.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03482375, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in