AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Low Back PainModulate-LBPNCT03470766

Sham-Controlled RCT on 10kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain (Modulate-LBP)

A study testing Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy) in people with Chronic Low Back Pain and Neuropathic Pain, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
41 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
14 Aug 2018to 20 Oct 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults over the age of 18
  • Onset of low back pain > 12 months
  • Low back pain intensity > 60 out of 100mm on pain visual analogue scale (VAS)
  • Presence of clear component of neuropathic pain based on a PainDETECT Questionnaire score of >19 (we will monitor this inclusion criteria in the early stage of the trial and revise if necessary)
  • Degenerative disc disease confirmed by imaging or internal disc disruption as confirmed by discography
  • On stable pain medications, as determined by the Investigator, for at least 28 days prior to enrolling in this study and not change medication dosage without consulting Investigator
  • Legally able to provide informed consent
  • Able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures and visits

Who cannot join

  • Had previous spinal surgery
  • Chronic widespread pain
  • Subject has an active implanted device, whether turned on or off (e.g. pacemaker, intrathecal pump, deep brain stimulator etc.)
  • A current diagnosis of a progressive neurological disease such as multiple sclerosis, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, rapidly progressive arachnoiditis, rapidly progressive diabetic peripheral neuropathy, brain or spinal cord tumour, or severe/critical central or foraminal spinal stenosis
  • Mechanical spine instability detected by a clinician (validation by flexion/extension films of lumbar spine within the past 6 months showing 4 mm or more translational movement or excessive angular movement manifested by >5 degrees segmental angular movement) e.g. any forms of spondylolisthesis
  • A medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Bleeding diathesis such as coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia
  • Immunocompromised and at an increased risk for infection
  • Systemic infection or local infection that would contraindicate SCS placement
  • Metastatic malignant disease or active local malignant disease
  • Pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of contraception, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal)
  • Active alcohol, marijuana, recreational or prescription drug abuse or dependence or unwilling to stop/reduce excessive inappropriate medication.
  • Evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the Investigator
  • Concomitant participation in another clinical trial (surgery, device or drug)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Guy's and St Thomas Hospital

    London, SE1 7EH

  • South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Multicentre, Double Blind, Randomised Sham-Controlled Trial of 10kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain (Modulate-LBP)

Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months.

Read the detailed description

The prevalence of chronic low back pain in the population is estimated to range between at 12% and 28% (1-4). Within this group an estimated 12-15% of adults suffer from chronic neuropathic lower back pain (CNLBP), have relatively greater pain severity, and account for more of the costs of this condition (5,6). This subgroup of people with CNLBP are the focus of the proposed trial.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends SCS for refractory neuropathic pain (TA159) (7). It is routinely used for people with predominant, neuropathic, radicular pain typically resulting from, or persisting after, spinal surgery (so-called failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) (8-10). SCS has been shown to be cost effective for this indication (11).

Conventional SCS consists of the insertion of a medical wire (lead) introduced into the epidural space through a needle puncture. The lead is then positioned to target the pain by passing current into the lead from an external power source to generate a pins and needles sensation (paraesthesias) over the painful area. Analgesia occurs when the paraesthesia overlaps and therefore masks the painful area. Once pain reduction is demonstrated, the battery is implanted under the skin of the abdomen, flank or buttock. SCS is most commonly used in the treatment of leg pain of FBSS. However, due to lack of existing evidence and the difficulty of obtaining paraesthesia over the low back, SCS has traditionally not been recommended for treating patients with back pain without previous back surgery (10, 12).

High frequency 10kHz-SCS is a recent major advance in SCS technology. The current is delivered at 10kHz frequency as opposed to the 40 to 60Hz generated by the conventional SCS (13). The key advantages of a higher frequency current are:

10kHz-SCS has been shown to be superior (14) to conventional SCS in targeting residual low back pain following back surgery. Moreover, it does not generate any stimulation related sensations or paraesthesia so is preferred by patients as they are saved from needing to experience these distracting and occasional shocking sensations of conventional SCS. Therefore, 10kHz-SCS allows to smoothly conduct sham controlled or double blind studies in the field of SCS without the need for device modifications.

The lead applicant conducted an uncontrolled, multicentre, single arm study with 83 people with significant low back pain with or without leg pain, implanted with a 10kHz-SCS. At 24 months, the mean reported VAS score for back pain was 3.3 (SD 0.3), compared with 8.4 (SD 0.1) at baseline (pre-implant) and 2.7 (SD 0.3) at 6 months with 60% of subjects reporting >50% back pain relief. Similar improvements were observed in leg pain, disability, sleep and marked reductions in medication intake (15).

In a more recent multicentre RCT, 10kHz-SCS therapy demonstrated superiority to conventional low-frequency SCS in the treatment of post-surgical neuropathic pain. A total of 198 subjects with both back and leg pain were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to a 10 KHz-SCS or conventional SCS. 10kHz-SCS decreased back pain intensity by 67% compared to 44% in the conventional SCS arm (16). This decrease was sustained at 24 months (17).

The above mentioned studies focused on neuropathic back pain in the context of patients with previous spinal surgery. However, a small subset of patients without prior spine surgery that received 10kHz-SCS therapy in both these studies have shown good pain relief and functional improvements in both studies comparable to those with FBSS (14,16).

The investigators hypothesised that patients with CNLBP with no prior spine surgery would benefit from 10kHz-SCS. To evaluate this hypothesis, the investigators initially designed and conducted an open label uncontrolled pilot study in 21 patients with CNLBP and no prior spine surgery. 10kHz-SCS therapy significantly reduced back pain intensity by an average of 5.59 (SD 1.80) (-72.6% vs baseline) at 12 months in medically refractory low back pain patients with no past history of spine surgery. 90% of the implanted patients were classified as responders (i.e. VAS back pain reduction >50%) at 12 months. The investigators also observed a significant increase in physical function scores and health-related quality of life at one year post 10kHz-SCS implant. Mean pain intensity was reduced by 73% and disability measured by the Oswestry Disability Index was reduced by 48%. Opioid medication intake decreased by 64% and mean EQ-5D quality of life scores improved from 0.16 to 0.47. More importantly 75% of patients were able to return to employment(18). This improvement was sustained at 3 years follow up (19).

Following these promising results, the investigators now intend to undertake a fully powered RCT to confirm our hypothesis that 10kHz-SCS is beneficial for CNLBP patients with no prior back surgery.

To date 10kHz-SCS has not been formally tested against a sham control condition in order to isolate the therapeutic effects from those induced by placebo. It is very possible that some of the benefit reported may be due to a placebo effect (enhanced by a surgical procedure) or reporting bias in either the patient or assessor. The investigators have therefore specifically designed this fully powered double blind randomised sham controlled trial of 10kHz-SCS to address this major methodological limitation of previous studies.

Being tested
Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)
Keywords
Neuromodulation, HF10, HF-10, Nevro, High-frequency, 10kHz, Spinal Cord Stimulation, CNLBP, Chronic Neuropathic Low Back Pain, Double blind randomised sham-controlled, PANARC, SCS
Medical subject headings
Neuralgia, Pain, Intractable

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)Device

    Also called Neuromodulation, High-frequency stimulation, Nevro, HF-10

    Nevro 10kHz High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation

Study groups in NCT03470766
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Lead (AL)Active comparatorOne octad lead placed where contacts 4 and 5 span the T9-T10 disc space.
Receives: Device: Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)
Sham Lead (SL)Sham comparatorOne octad lead implanted subcutaneously behind the IPG and will serve to dissipate the current from the battery
Receives: Device: Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean VAS Back Pain (7 Day Subject VAS Pain Diary)

    Changes in mean VAS back pain between intervention and control at 6 months post-randomisation

    Measured: 6 months post randomisation

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Oswestry disability index (v2.1a)

    To compare disability between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation

  2. PHQ-9 Questionnaire

    To compare depression between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation

  3. PSQI Questionnaire

    To compare sleep quality between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation

  4. PGIC Questionnaire

    To compare patients' global impression of change between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation

  5. EQ-5D Questionnaire

    To compare health-related quality of life between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation

  6. Medication Usage

    To compare medication usage between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation

  7. Sensation Map

    To compare sensation maps between intervention and control at 1, 3, and 6 months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 1, 3, and 6 months post randomisation

  8. Healthcare utilisation, work status, work absence, and out of pocket expenses

    To compare the cost-effectiveness of 10kHz-SCS between intervention and control at six months post-randomisation.

    Measured: 6 months post randomisation

  9. Safety/Adverse Events

    To compare complications and adverse events at 6-months post-randomisation between intervention and control.

    Measured: 6 months post randomisation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2018
  2. Study start14 Aug 2018
  3. Primary completion20 Oct 2022
  4. Study completion20 Oct 2022

Why it stopped: Study terminated early at the request of Sponsors.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial with parallel economic evaluation. Patients will be allocated 1:1 to activated 10kHz SCS plus usual care (intervention) or sham 10kHz SCS plus usual care (control) and followed up to 6 months.
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
41 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03470766
Sponsor's protocol ID
Modulate-LBP
Acronym
Modulate-LBP
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
13 Mar 2018
Last updated
12 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.

    PubMed 34854473
  • Al-Kaisy A, Royds J, Palmisani S, Pang D, Wesley S, Taylor RS, Cook A, Eldabe S, McCracken L, Duarte R, Fairbank J. Multicentre, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled trial of 10 khz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic neuropathic low back pain (MODULATE-LBP): a trial protocol. Trials. 2020 Jan 28;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3831-4.

    PubMed 31992344

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Nevro Senza System (HF10 Therapy) in people with Chronic Low Back Pain and Neuropathic Pain, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Study terminated early at the request of Sponsors.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean VAS Back Pain (7 Day Subject VAS Pain Diary) (time frame: 6 months post randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03470766, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in