AzTrials
AzTrials

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryNCT03419169

Light Load Blood Flow Restriction Training in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patient Rehabilitation

A study testing Light load BFR resistance training and Heavy load resistance training in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, run by University College London Hospitals at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is examining the post-operative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction patients within the National Health Service (NHS). It will compare the effectiveness of two resistance training protocols, light load blood flow restriction (BFR) training and heavy load training, on improving… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury
What is being tested?
Light load BFR resistance training and Heavy load resistance training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Feb 2016to 1 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Registered patient of University College London Hospitals
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Present with a unilateral ACL tear
  • 5. Scheduled for reconstructive surgery 6. Have the mental capacity to make informed decisions

Who cannot join

  • Multiple ligamentous ruptures or trauma
  • Rheumatoid arthritis or significant comorbidities
  • Presence or history of cardiovascular, pulmonary, respiratory of neurological disease
  • Intraarticular injections into the knee in the preceding 6 months
  • History of deep vein thrombosis or vascular pathology in any lower limb
  • Current use of anticoagulant medications or other medications that may affect blood flow or fluid exchange
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Hypertension (>140/80 mmHg)
  • Inability to follow instructions for rehabilitation classes (e.g. advanced dementia)
  • Scheduling for post-operative leg bracing

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Luke Hughes, MSc contact

luke.hughes@stmarys.ac.uk

Bruce Paton, PhD contact

bruce.paton@nhs.net

United Kingdom2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • University College London Hospitals

    London, NW1 2BU

    Luke Hughes, MSc, luke.hughes@nhs.net

    Bruce Paton, PhD, bruce.paton@nhs.net

    Recruiting
  • St. Mary's University

    London, TW14SX

    Luke Hughes, MSc, luke.hughes@stmarys.ac.uk

    Stephen Patterson, PhD, stephen.patterson@stmarys.ac.uk

    Recruiting

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Light Load Blood Flow Restriction Versus Heavy Load Resistance Training in the Post-operative Rehabilitation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients

This study is examining the post-operative rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction patients within the National Health Service (NHS). It will compare the effectiveness of two resistance training protocols, light load blood flow restriction (BFR) training and heavy load training, on improving multiple aspects important to the rehabilitation process in this patient demographic, whilst also examining the feasibility of this novel training modality. It is hypothesised that light load BFR training will be equally effective as heavy load training, but more tolerable for patients.

Read the detailed description

Light load BFR training is an effective rehabilitation tool for improving strength in individuals suffering clinical muscle weakness (Hughes et al. 2017). This is a single blinded, randomised controlled clinical trial, comprised of a two (group) by five (time) between-subjects repeated measures design. This study will place within the NHS at University College London Hospital (UCLH). Eligible patients from the orthopaedic department theatre lists of four orthopaedic surgeons at UCLH will be contacted prior to surgery via phone call and sent the patient information sheet and schematic outlining the study. Patient clinical history and documentation will be screened initially by the principle researcher followed by screening over the phone upon contact. Patients who are willing to participate will then be invited to the hospital for a full health screening appointment following provision of written informed consent, in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki, 7th version, October 2013.

Baseline assessment of all outcome measures will take place at the pre-surgery screening appointment. Patient will then undergo their surgery. Following two weeks of recovery, repeat assessment of outcome measures will take place once patients achieve the following criteria for beginning strength rehabilitation, as developed by Cavanaugh and Powers (2017): 1) Able to unilaterally weight bear without pain; 2) Able to perform a single leg raise without quadriceps lag; 3) Have a range of motion (ROM) of 0-90 degrees; and 4) Have minimal swelling. Patients will then be allocated to one f the two training intervention groups and undergo eight weeks of twice weekly unilateral leg press training. Training sessions include five minutes of light cycling at a free cadence on a stationary ergometer for both groups, followed by the respective leg press protocols. Repeat assessment of outcome measures will take place mid-training (between weeks four and five) and post-training. Ratings of perceived pain and exertion, blood pressure and any adverse events will be recorded at all training and assessment sessions. All outcomes will also be assessed at 3 and 6 month follow up assessments. Pain will also be assessed 24 hours after every training session. During the study, all participants will see their assigned physiotherapist fortnightly (as per standard hospital protocol) and receive individualised programmes focussing on improving ROM, balance and minimising swelling.

BFR will be achieved using the Delfi Easy-fit variable contour tourniquet cuff (11.5 cm x 86 cm x 5 mm) connected to the automatic personalised tourniquet system (PTS) device (Delfi Medical, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). The Delfi PTS for BFR is equipped with the capability of automatically measuring limb occlusive pressure (LOP) and calculating the personalised tourniquet pressure, comprised of a dual-purpose personalised tourniquet cuff and a personalised tourniquet instrument containing LOP calculation sensors and software. The PTS system connected to the tourniquet cuff increases the cuff pressure in stepwise increments, analyses the pneumatic pressure pulsations in the cuff bladder by the arterial pressure pulsations at each cuff pressure increment, and uses these characteristics to determine LOP.

The primary outcome measure of muscle strength was used for calculating the required sample size. Based on previous data regarding muscle strength increases in light load BFR resistance training studies in clinical populations, to achieve a power of 80% at an alpha level 0.05, a total of 28 participants is required to detect a meaningful effect. Based on hospital record of rehabilitation programmes, a drop-out rate of 10% can be expected during the course of rehabilitation programmes. Therefore, a total of 30 participants will be recruited.

All data will be stored on the NHS password protected server at UCLH as per hospital and NHS ethical requirements. Data from drop-outs will not be included in the final analysis. Descriptive statistics (mean ± standard deviation) will be used to summarise adherence rates, exercise session attendance, training volume any adverse events. All statistical analysis will be performed with IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Chicago Illinois, United States of America). All data will be presented as means ± standard deviation with 95% confidence intervals unless stated otherwise. Normal distribution of data will be assessed using Shapiro-Wilks test (p>0.05). Ten repetition maximum strength, muscle size measures, self-reported physical function measures and functional performance will each be analysed using 2 x 5 (rehabilitation intervention x TP) repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA)s. Isokinetic strength and knee ligament laxity will be assessed using 2 x 3 (rehabilitation intervention x TP) repeated measures ANOVAs. Perceptual responses for ratings of perceived exertion and pain will be assessed using 2 x 16 (rehabilitation intervention x exercise session) repeated measures ANOVAs. For any statistically significant two-way interaction, one-way repeated measures ANOVAs with Bonferroni correction will be used to examine simple main effects. Non-normally distributed data will be analysed using the non-parametric Friedman test. Alpha significance will be set a priori p<0.05.

Being tested
Light load BFR resistance training, Heavy load resistance training
Keywords
Patient, Rehabilitation, Ligament reconstruction, Surgery
Medical subject headings
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Light load BFR resistance trainingDevice

    A novel training light load resistance training modality.

  • Heavy load resistance trainingProcedure or surgery

    A common form of resistance training used for rehabilitation within the National Health Service.

Study groups in NCT03419169
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Light load BFR resistance trainingExperimentalThis arm of the clinical trial will involve eight weeks of twice weekly light load resistance training with BFR. Patients in this arm will complete four sets (30, 15, 15 and 15 repetitions, respectively) of unilateral leg press exercise at 30% of predicted one repetition maximum. BFR will be applied at 80% of total limb arterial occlusive pressure. Both legs will be trained, with the affected limb trained first and the unaffected limb matched for volume at a relative percentage of one repetition maximum. Both legs will be trained with BFR.
Receives: Device: Light load BFR resistance training
Heavy load resistance trainingActive comparatorThis arm of the clinical trial will involve eight weeks of twice weekly heavy load resistance training. Patients in this arm will complete three sets of ten repetitions of unilateral leg press exercise at 70% of predicted one repetition maximum. Both legs will be trained, with the affected limb trained first and the unaffected limb matched for volume at a relative percentage of one repetition maximum.
Receives: Procedure: Heavy load resistance training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in ten repetition maximum strength

    Unilateral isotonic muscle strength, measured in kilograms.

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  2. Change in isokinetic strength

    Unilateral peak torque at 60°/second, 150°/second, and 300°/second, measured in newton-metres.

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Muscle thickness, measured in centimetres

    Thickness of the vastus lateralis muscle

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  2. Pennation angle of muscle fibres, measured in degrees (°)

    Angle of fibres in the vastus lateralis muscle

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  3. Fascicle length, measured in centimetres

    Length of fascicles in the vastus lateralis muscle

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  4. International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form

    Used to assess symptoms and function in daily living activities

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  5. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

    Used to assess participant's opinion of their knee and associated problems

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  6. Lower Extremity Functional Scale to assess performance in functional tasks

    Used to assess patient's ability to perform everyday tasks, including walking and stair climbing. It contains 20 questions each with a scoring scale of 0-4 and a test-retest reliability of 0.88 to 0.94. The scores of each question will be summed to get a total score out of 80, with lower scores indicating greater functional disability. The minimal detectable change will be set at 9 scale points.

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  7. Lysholm knee scoring scale to assess performance in functional tasks.

    Used to evaluate outcomes of the surgery. It comprises 8 items, including: limp, support, locking, instability, pain, swelling, stair climbing and squatting. Each item is scored differently - scores will be summed to give a total out of 0-100 (where 100 indicates no symptoms or disability) and categorised as excellent (95-100), good (84-94), fair (65-83), and poor (≤64).

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  8. Tegner activity scale for grading patient activity level

    Used to grade participant activity level. The scale ranges from 0-10, with 0 representing sick leave or disability pension because of knee problems, and 10 corresponding to participation in national and international elite competitive sports. Minimum clinically importance difference will be set at 1.

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  9. Physical functional performance

    Star-excursion balance test of dynamic knee joint stability, measured in centimetres

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  10. Knee ligament laxity

    Laxity of the knee, measured in pounds.

    Measured: Throughout study completion, up to one year

  11. Borg's (1998) rating of perceived pain scale for assessing pain during exercise.

    Used to measured the patient's perceived pain during exercise. The scale ranges from 0 to 10. Patients will be informed that a rating of 0 means they felt no pain, and 10 is their reference point which represents their previous worst felt pain/discomfort, and that they can give a score of 11 if the pain is worse than any they have ever felt before.

    Measured: During all testing sessions, between sets during all training sessions over the eight week training period, and 24 hours post-training for every training session.

  12. Borg's (1998) rating of perceived exertion scale for assessing exertion during exercise.

    Used to measured the patient's perceived exertion during exercise. The scale ranges from 6-20. It will be explained to patients that a rating of 6 meant they felt no exertion, and 20 meant they were giving maximal effort and could not exert themselves any further.

    Measured: During all testing sessions and between sets during all training sessions over the eight week training period.

  13. Blood pressure

    Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, measured in millimetres of mercury using an automatic device.

    Measured: Pre-exercise and 5 minutes post-exercise for all training sessions over the eight week training period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2018
  2. Study start1 Feb 2016
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will be assigned to one of two groups: 1) Light load BFR resistance training; or 2) Heavy load resistance training. An independent member of the research team will carry out block randomisation using opaque envelopes containing slips of paper. Each envelope will contain four slips (Two x BFR group and two x heavy load group), thus patients will be randomised in groups of four.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03419169
Sponsor's protocol ID
16/YH/0066
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
18 Jan 2018
Last updated
9 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hughes L, Paton B, Rosenblatt B, Gissane C, Patterson SD. Blood flow restriction training in clinical musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;51(13):1003-1011. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097071. Epub 2017 Mar 4.

    PubMed 28259850
  • Cavanaugh JT, Powers M. ACL Rehabilitation Progression: Where Are We Now? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Sep;10(3):289-296. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9426-3.

    PubMed 28791612
  • World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24141714

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Light load BFR resistance training and Heavy load resistance training in people with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, run by University College London Hospitals at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Luke Hughes, MSc (luke.hughes@stmarys.ac.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in ten repetition maximum strength (time frame: Throughout study completion, up to one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03419169, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in