Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderNCT03416504
Methods for Managing Intrusive Thoughts
A study testing Gradual Exposure (EXP-G) and Variable Exposure (EXP-V) in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The current study sought to translate laboratory research on learning and memory to better understand the mechanisms and methods for implementing exposure therapy for unwanted obsessional thoughts. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Gradual Exposure (EXP-G) and Variable Exposure (EXP-V)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Sep 2015to 4 Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years old
- Willing to attend and audiotape all study sessions
- Fluent in English
- Presence of one or more obsessional thoughts that cause marked distress
- If on a psychiatric medication (e.g., SSRI), willing to remain at a fixed dose while participating in the study (and stabilized on medication for 30 days before beginning the intervention).
Who cannot join
- Previous cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety
- Current suicidal ideation
- Current substance use disorder
- Current mania or psychosis
- Currently taking an anxiolytic (e.g., Ativan) or stimulant (e.g., Ritalin) medication
- Heart, respiratory, or neurological condition
- Current pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
About this study
Official title: A Translational Study of the Mechanisms of Exposure Therapy for Obsessions: Gradual vs. Variable Exposure Intensity
The current study sought to translate laboratory research on learning and memory to better understand the mechanisms and methods for implementing exposure therapy for unwanted obsessional thoughts. Specifically, we compared the processes and the short- and long-term outcomes of: (a) gradual exposure (EXP-G), emphasizing hierarchical exposure completion, versus (b) variable exposure (EXP-V), emphasizing variability in exposure intensity.
Read the detailed description
Although preliminary research suggests that learning to tolerate varying levels of fear during exposure enhances outcomes for some anxiety-related problems, no previous study has examined this possibility in the context of unwanted obsessions. Adults with a moderately distressing obsessional thought were randomly assigned to four twice-weekly sessions of either: (a) gradual exposure (EXP-G), emphasizing hierarchical exposure completion, or (b) variable exposure (EXP-V), emphasizing variability in exposure intensity.
- Conditions
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- Being tested
- Gradual Exposure (EXP-G), Variable Exposure (EXP-V)
- Keywords
- OCD
- Medical subject headings
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gradual Exposure (EXP-G)Behavioural
In EXP-G, exposure proceeded hierarchically from mildly, to moderately, to highly intense stimuli so that exposure intensity gradually built between (but not within) sessions.
Variable Exposure (EXP-V)Behavioural
In EXP-V, exposure stimuli were chosen at random (i.e., pieces of paper with exposure stimuli written on them were pulled randomly from an opaque container) so that mild, moderate, and high intensity exposures could occur in any order during any of the sessions (the participant was not informed which level was coming next). This aimed to maximize (a) uncertainty, (b) variability in exposure intensity, and (c) variability in corresponding physiological arousal.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Gradual Exposure Group | Experimental | The gradual exposure group received the Gradual Exposure (EXP-G) Intervention. Receives: Behavioral: Gradual Exposure (EXP-G) |
| Variable Exposure Group | Experimental | The variable exposure group received the Variable Exposure (EXP-V) Intervention. Receives: Behavioral: Variable Exposure (EXP-V) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
The Y-BOCS is a clinician-administered interview that assesses obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom severity over the past week. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change from baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score at post-treatment (week 2)
The Y-BOCS is a clinician-administered interview that assesses obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom severity over the past week. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Changes from baseline in Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Unacceptable Thoughts (DOCS-UT) at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
The DOCS-UT is a self-report measure of the clinical severity of the unwanted thoughts (UT) OCD symptom dimension. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Changes from baseline in Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Unacceptable Thoughts (DOCS-UT) at post-treatment (week 2)
The DOCS-UT is a self-report measure of the clinical severity of the unwanted thoughts (UT) OCD symptom dimension. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Mean Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
The BAT is an in vivo measure of participants' behavioral responses to their target obsession. Participant SUDS were collected for 5 increasingly difficult steps participants completed related to their obsessional thought. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Mean Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) at post-treatment (week 2)
The BAT is an in vivo measure of participants' behavioral responses to their target obsession. Participant SUDS were collected for 5 increasingly difficult steps participants completed related to their obsessional thought. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Number of Steps Completed at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
The BAT is an in vivo measure of participants' responses to their target obsession. The number of steps participants were able to complete without performing a ritual were calculated. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Number of Steps Completed at post-treatment (week 2)
The BAT is an in vivo measure of participants' responses to their target obsession. The number of steps participants were able to complete without performing a ritual were calculated. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
Measured: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2018
- Study start22 Sep 2015
- Primary completion4 Oct 2016
- Study completion4 Oct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants were randomly assigned to either gradual or variable exposure
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT), American Psychological Association (APA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jon Abramowitz, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Investigators
- Jonathan S Abramowitz, PhD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03416504
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14-3310
- Other IDs
- 5101599, 5103050
- Status last verified
- Jan 2018
- First submitted
- 21 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 31 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jacoby RJ, Abramowitz JS, Blakey SM, Reuman L. Is the hierarchy necessary? Gradual versus variable exposure intensity in the treatment of unacceptable obsessional thoughts. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;64:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
PubMed 30851653
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Translational Study of the Mechanisms of Exposure Therapy for Obsessions: Gradual vs. Variable Exposure Intensity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03416504
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 14-3310
- Conditions
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- Keywords
- OCD
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies (ABCT), American Psychological Association (APA)
- Study start
- 22 Sep 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current study sought to translate laboratory research on learning and memory to better understand the mechanisms and methods for implementing exposure therapy for unwanted obsessional thoughts. Specifically, we compared the processes and the short- and long-term outcomes of: (a) gradual exposure (EXP-G), emphasizing hierarchical exposure completion, versus (b) variable exposure (EXP-V), emphasizing variability in exposure intensity.
Detailed description
Although preliminary research suggests that learning to tolerate varying levels of fear during exposure enhances outcomes for some anxiety-related problems, no previous study has examined this possibility in the context of unwanted obsessions. Adults with a moderately distressing obsessional thought were randomly assigned to four twice-weekly sessions of either: (a) gradual exposure (EXP-G), emphasizing hierarchical exposure completion, or (b) variable exposure (EXP-V), emphasizing variability in exposure intensity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants were randomly assigned to either gradual or variable exposure
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Gradual Exposure Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Gradual Exposure (EXP-G)The gradual exposure group received the Gradual Exposure (EXP-G) Intervention. |
| Variable Exposure Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Variable Exposure (EXP-V)The variable exposure group received the Variable Exposure (EXP-V) Intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- At least 18 years old
- Willing to attend and audiotape all study sessions
- Fluent in English
- Presence of one or more obsessional thoughts that cause marked distress
- If on a psychiatric medication (e.g., SSRI), willing to remain at a fixed dose while participating in the study (and stabilized on medication for 30 days before beginning the intervention).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Previous cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety
- Current suicidal ideation
- Current substance use disorder
- Current mania or psychosis
- Currently taking an anxiolytic (e.g., Ativan) or stimulant (e.g., Ritalin) medication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gradual Exposure (EXP-G)In EXP-G, exposure proceeded hierarchically from mildly, to moderately, to highly intense stimuli so that exposure intensity gradually built between (but not within) sessions. | Behavioural | Gradual Exposure Group |
| Variable Exposure (EXP-V)In EXP-V, exposure stimuli were chosen at random (i.e., pieces of paper with exposure stimuli written on them were pulled randomly from an opaque container) so that mild, moderate, and high intensity exposures could occur in any order during any of the sessions (the participant was not informed which level was coming next). This aimed to maximize (a) uncertainty, (b) variability in exposure intensity, and (c) variability in corresponding physiological arousal. | Behavioural | Variable Exposure Group |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
The Y-BOCS is a clinician-administered interview that assesses obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom severity over the past week. This measure will be used to assess change over the course of the intervention at four time-points throughout the study (over approximately 3.5 months total).
7 secondary outcomes
Change from baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score at post-treatment (week 2)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Changes from baseline in Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Unacceptable Thoughts (DOCS-UT) at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Changes from baseline in Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Unacceptable Thoughts (DOCS-UT) at post-treatment (week 2)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Mean Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Mean Subjective Units of Distress (SUDS) at post-treatment (week 2)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Number of Steps Completed at 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)
Changes from baseline in Behavioral Approach Test (BAT) Number of Steps Completed at post-treatment (week 2)
Time frame: Baseline (week 0) and post-treatment (week 2)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Jan 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30851653Jacoby RJ, Abramowitz JS, Blakey SM, Reuman L. Is the hierarchy necessary? Gradual versus variable exposure intensity in the treatment of unacceptable obsessional thoughts. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;64:54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Linear Accelerator Radiosurgical Anterior Capsulotomy With Task-based fMRI Identification of PERSonalized and PrEdictiVE Biomarkers of REsponse in Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (PERSEVERE Trial)
Treatment-refractory Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (trOCD)
Recruiting
tDCS Associated With Symptom Provocation in the Management of Patients With Resistant Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
tDCS and Symptom Provocation in Treatment-Resistant OCD
Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 2
SONATA Dose Duration LIFU for OCD
Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
Recruiting
Gamified Combined Cognitive Bias Modification in Adults Diagnosed With OCD: Randomized Controlled Trial
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jonathan S Abramowitz, PhD principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Gradual Exposure (EXP-G) and Variable Exposure (EXP-V) in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score at 3-month follow-up (week 14) (time frame: Baseline (week 0) and 3-month follow-up (week 14)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03416504, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jan 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.