Cancer of the CervixPhase 2NCT03403465
Intratreatment FDG-PET During Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic and Gastrointestinal Cancers
A Phase 2 study testing FDG PET scan in people with Cancer of the Cervix and Vulvar Cancer, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study expands on protocol (NCT01908504"PET adaptive RT") designed to evaluate the utility of adaptive PET-CT planning for radiation therapy (RT). Radiation therapy is used in many malignant diseases as a curative treatment modality. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer of the Cervix, Vulvar Cancer, Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- FDG PET scan
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Mar 2018to 5 Apr 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of cervical, vulvar, esophageal and anal canal cancer
- Patients with local or regional nodal disease are eligible
- Zubrod Performance Status 0, 1, or 2
- Age ≥ 18
- Negative serum pregnancy test for women of child bearing potential
- Patient must sign study-specific informed consent prior to study entry
Who cannot join
- No gross disease visible on imaging at the start of radiotherapy
- Contraindication to PET
- Complete response by PET achieved with pre-radiation therapy treatment (surgery or chemotherapy)
- Breast feeding
- Positive serum pregnancy test
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
About this study
Official title: Intratreatment FDG-PET During Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic and Gastrointestinal Cancers ( Adaptive PET II)
This study expands on protocol (NCT01908504"PET adaptive RT") designed to evaluate the utility of adaptive PET-CT planning for radiation therapy (RT). Radiation therapy is used in many malignant diseases as a curative treatment modality. However, critical normal tissue is often in close approximation to disease, and portions of such tissue must receive high doses of radiation for appropriate treatment.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) adapted radiation therapy, as defined in the current protocol, may allow for a means of determining the eventual response to therapy, at a time point when adaptation of treatment plan may be possible to improve outcomes. This protocol will build upon the findings the previous protocol (NCT01908504 "PET adaptive RT") that evaluated the utility of intra-treatment PET imaging in multiple types of cancers. The current focus will be more specific to certain types of gastrointestinal and gynecologic cancers treated with RT, identified from the prior study to warrant further research.
Read the detailed description
Intra-treatment PETs have only recently been studied in small pilot series. In rectal cancer, a prospective trial from MSKCC demonstrated that a PET-CT obtained in the second week of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was able to discriminate sub-optimal responders with a sensitivity of 94% and an accuracy of 78%, though the most useful metric was a novel "visual response score" based on interpreting radiologists scoring rather than more established objective data available from PET, like SUV. A study from China in non-small cell lung cancer found that decreases in SUV and MTV on intra-treatment PET-CTs after 40Gy of chemoradiation therapy were significantly greater in patients responding to treatment by post-treatment RECIST criteria. For head and neck cancers, a Belgian study found that intra-treatment SUVmax at 47Gy was associated with significant differences in overall survival. Therefore, there is emerging evidence that an intra-treatment PET may also be of significant prognostic utility, at an early enough time point to potentially alter treatment accordingly.
All participants will be required to complete two research PET scans in addition to standard of care planning CT's for radiation therapy. For all subjects with cancer of the cervix and vulva an intra-treatment PET-CT will be obtained and used to develop a volume adaptive treatment plan for the remainder of the course. Subjects with esophageal and anal canal cancer will have an adapted plan if the treating radiation oncologist determines an adapted plan is clinically relevant.
- Being tested
- FDG PET scan
- Medical subject headings
- Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Vulvar Neoplasms, Esophageal Neoplasms, Anal Canal Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FDG PET scanOther
Also called PET scan
At radiation planning subjects will have a PET-CT. The CT scan - also called computerized tomography or just CT - combines a series of X-ray views taken from many different angles to produce cross-sectional images of the bones and soft tissues inside the body. CT scans in planning radiation therapy are standard of care. A PET is a highly specialized imaging technique that uses short-lived radioactive substances (such as FDG a simple sugar labeled with a radioactive atom) to produce three-dimensional colored images of those substances functioning within the body. These images are called PET scans and the technique is termed PET scanning. PET scanning provides information about the body's chemistry not available through other procedures. Unlike CT or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), techniques that look at anatomy or body form, PET studies metabolic activity or body function.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single arm interventional study | Other | Research FDG-PET scan obtained before radiation therapy; a second research FDG-PET scan is obtained at about 3-5 weeks after treatment has started. Receives: Other: FDG PET scan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The number of subjects with benefit from an intra-treatment PET-CT
This benefit lies in the potential to adapt the treatment plan based on an intratreatment PET-CT. This may also be of significant prognostic utility, at an early enough time point to potentially alter treatment accordingly
Measured: 4 years
Pathologic complete response
Pathologic complete response will be collected from pathology reports for subjects who have surgical resection after radiation therapy.
Measured: 4 years
Locoregional control
This study will evaluate the prognostic value of intra-treatment functional imaging on clinical relevant tumor endpoints (i.e. locoregional control, freedom from distant metastases, and overall survival).Comparison of intra-treatment FDG-PET indices will identify two groups of responses: PET responses and PET non-responses, which will correlate with prognosis.
Measured: Day of intra treatment PET-CT/ approx 2-4 hours
Freedom from distant metastases
Subjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with repeat imaging as per the standard of care, or at the treating investigator's discretion. Frequency of follow up will be determined by the standard practice for the disease site and stage.
Measured: 4 years
Measure overall survival (OS)
Subjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with the investigators according to the standard of care for each disease site
Measured: 4 years
Progression free survival (PFS)
Subjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with repeat imaging as per the standard of care for each disease site
Measured: 4 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Measure the potential sparing of radiation dose to critical normal tissue
An intra-treatment PET volume adaptive treatment plan may allow for additional sparing of normal tissue by identifying regions of tumor response and corresponding reduction in the target volumes i.e. dosimetric differences in normal tissue will be compared between the initial plan and the adapted plan.
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2018
- Study start27 Mar 2018
- Primary completion5 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Apr 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cancer of the CervixStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Junzo Chino, MD, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03403465
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00089619
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 11 Jan 2018
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Intratreatment FDG-PET During Radiation Therapy for Gynecologic and Gastrointestinal Cancers ( Adaptive PET II)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03403465
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00089619
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study expands on protocol (NCT01908504"PET adaptive RT") designed to evaluate the utility of adaptive PET-CT planning for radiation therapy (RT). Radiation therapy is used in many malignant diseases as a curative treatment modality. However, critical normal tissue is often in close approximation to disease, and portions of such tissue must receive high doses of radiation for appropriate treatment.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) adapted radiation therapy, as defined in the current protocol, may allow for a means of determining the eventual response to therapy, at a time point when adaptation of treatment plan may be possible to improve outcomes. This protocol will build upon the findings the previous protocol (NCT01908504 "PET adaptive RT") that evaluated the utility of intra-treatment PET imaging in multiple types of cancers. The current focus will be more specific to certain types of gastrointestinal and gynecologic cancers treated with RT, identified from the prior study to warrant further research.
Detailed description
Intra-treatment PETs have only recently been studied in small pilot series. In rectal cancer, a prospective trial from MSKCC demonstrated that a PET-CT obtained in the second week of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was able to discriminate sub-optimal responders with a sensitivity of 94% and an accuracy of 78%, though the most useful metric was a novel "visual response score" based on interpreting radiologists scoring rather than more established objective data available from PET, like SUV. A study from China in non-small cell lung cancer found that decreases in SUV and MTV on intra-treatment PET-CTs after 40Gy of chemoradiation therapy were significantly greater in patients responding to treatment by post-treatment RECIST criteria. For head and neck cancers, a Belgian study found that intra-treatment SUVmax at 47Gy was associated with significant differences in overall survival. Therefore, there is emerging evidence that an intra-treatment PET may also be of significant prognostic utility, at an early enough time point to potentially alter treatment accordingly.
All participants will be required to complete two research PET scans in addition to standard of care planning CT's for radiation therapy. For all subjects with cancer of the cervix and vulva an intra-treatment PET-CT will be obtained and used to develop a volume adaptive treatment plan for the remainder of the course. Subjects with esophageal and anal canal cancer will have an adapted plan if the treating radiation oncologist determines an adapted plan is clinically relevant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single arm interventional study | Other | Other: FDG PET scanResearch FDG-PET scan obtained before radiation therapy; a second research FDG-PET scan is obtained at about 3-5 weeks after treatment has started. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of cervical, vulvar, esophageal and anal canal cancer
- Patients with local or regional nodal disease are eligible
- Zubrod Performance Status 0, 1, or 2
- Age ≥ 18
- Negative serum pregnancy test for women of child bearing potential
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- No gross disease visible on imaging at the start of radiotherapy
- Contraindication to PET
- Complete response by PET achieved with pre-radiation therapy treatment (surgery or chemotherapy)
- Breast feeding
- Positive serum pregnancy test
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FDG PET scanAlso: PET scanAt radiation planning subjects will have a PET-CT. The CT scan - also called computerized tomography or just CT - combines a series of X-ray views taken from many different angles to produce cross-sectional images of the bones and soft tissues inside the body. CT scans in planning radiation therapy are standard of care. A PET is a highly specialized imaging technique that uses short-lived radioactive substances (such as FDG a simple sugar labeled with a radioactive atom) to produce three-dimensional colored images of those substances functioning within the body. These images are called PET scans and the technique is termed PET scanning. PET scanning provides information about the body's chemistry not available through other procedures. Unlike CT or MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), techniques that look at anatomy or body form, PET studies metabolic activity or body function. | Other | Single arm interventional study |
Primary outcome
The number of subjects with benefit from an intra-treatment PET-CT
Time frame: 4 years
This benefit lies in the potential to adapt the treatment plan based on an intratreatment PET-CT. This may also be of significant prognostic utility, at an early enough time point to potentially alter treatment accordingly
Pathologic complete response
Time frame: 4 years
Pathologic complete response will be collected from pathology reports for subjects who have surgical resection after radiation therapy.
Locoregional control
Time frame: Day of intra treatment PET-CT/ approx 2-4 hours
This study will evaluate the prognostic value of intra-treatment functional imaging on clinical relevant tumor endpoints (i.e. locoregional control, freedom from distant metastases, and overall survival).Comparison of intra-treatment FDG-PET indices will identify two groups of responses: PET responses and PET non-responses, which will correlate with prognosis.
Freedom from distant metastases
Time frame: 4 years
Subjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with repeat imaging as per the standard of care, or at the treating investigator's discretion. Frequency of follow up will be determined by the standard practice for the disease site and stage.
Measure overall survival (OS)
Time frame: 4 years
Subjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with the investigators according to the standard of care for each disease site
Progression free survival (PFS)
Time frame: 4 years
Subjects will be evaluated in regular follow up with repeat imaging as per the standard of care for each disease site
1 secondary outcome
Measure the potential sparing of radiation dose to critical normal tissue
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cancer of the Cervix
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Induction Pembrolizumab and Chemotherapy Followed by Pembrolizumab Before Chemoradiation and Pembrolizumab Maintenance Compared to Standard Chemoradiation With Pembrolizumab Followed by Pembrolizumab Maintenance in High-Risk Cervical Cancer
Locally Advanced Cervical Adenocarcinoma, Locally Advanced Cervical Adenosquamous Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Use of cfDNA in Monitoring and Guiding Treatment for Cervical Cancer
Cervical Cancer Screening
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Junzo Chino, MD principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing FDG PET scan in people with Cancer of the Cervix and Vulvar Cancer, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The number of subjects with benefit from an intra-treatment PET-CT (time frame: 4 years). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026.