ST-segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionPhase 2/3RECONSIDERNCT03371784
The Effect of Glucocorticoid Therapy on Left Ventricular Remodelling in Acute Myocardial Infarction (RECONSIDER)
A Phase 2/3 study testing Hydrocortisone in people with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Remodeling, run by Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy at 1 site in Romania.
Trial summary
Introduction: In the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) coronary wedge pressure (CWP) emerges as a new marker for the advanced form of pre-procedural microvascular obstruction (MVO), which is associated with inflammatory interstitial edema. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Left Ventricular Remodeling
- What is being tested?
- Hydrocortisone
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 77 participants
- Where
- 1 siteRomania
- Study dates
- 8 Mar 2018to Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age: 18-85 years
- first episode of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- candidates for primary PCI (typical cardiac chest pain, within 12h of symptom onset, with ST-segment elevation of more than 1 mm in at least two contiguous leads)
- left anterior descending artery culprit lesion
Who cannot join
- cardiogenic shock
- previous PCI and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
- left bundle branch block
- active bleeding
- administration of thrombolytic agents for the current episode
- recent stroke (during last month)
Show all 9Show fewer
- indication for oral anticoagulant therapy
- severe or untreated infection
- the impossibility of CWP measurement.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Glucocorticoid Therapy on Left Ventricular Remodelling in Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (RECONSIDER)
Introduction: In the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) coronary wedge pressure (CWP) emerges as a new marker for the advanced form of pre-procedural microvascular obstruction (MVO), which is associated with inflammatory interstitial edema. Through its anti-inflammatory effects, glucocorticoid therapy may prove beneficial in patients with high CWP.
Aim: To identify the presence of the advanced form of MVO before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) by CWP measurement and to test the benefit of cortisol therapy, in terms of infarct size and left ventricular remodeling, in patients with raised CWP.
Read more
Methods: 50 patients with a first STEMI, candidates for PPCI, with proximal coronary occlusion, will undergo CWP measurement followed by percutaneous revascularization. Cardiac MRI will be performed 3-5 days after the procedure. A cutoff for CWP in predicting MVO, interstitial oedema and intramyocardial haemorrhage will be derived.Based on the above mentioned cutoff, 180 patients with continuous elevation of the pressure line will be randomized, by a 1:1 model, either to cortisol therapy or to placebo. Inflammatory parameters will be determined from peripheral blood samples. Patients will undergo cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging 3 to 5 days after revascularization.
Study endpoints: The primary endpoint will be the extent of MVO, interstitial edema and hemorrhage. Secondary endpoints will include infarct size, myocardial salvage, left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. The clinical endpoints of all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis and stroke will be recorded at 6 months.
Read the detailed description
PATIENT POPULATION Consecutive patients with first STEMI, candidates for PPCI (typical cardiac chest pain, within 12h of symptom onset, with ST segment elevation of more than 1 mm in at least two contiguous leads) and proximal coronary artery culprit lesion will be considered for randomization.
Exclusion criteria are cardiogenic shock. previous myocardial infraction, previous PCI and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), left bundle branch block, active bleeding, administration of thrombolytic agents for the current episode, recent stroke (during last month), indication for oral anticoagulant therapy, severe or untreated infections and the impossibility of CWP measurement.
Verbal assent will be obtained, with the agreement of two qualified cardiologists. Full consent will be obtained after the procedure, in accord with the protocols followed by several recent studies.
This is a triple-blind clinical study. The physicians performing the procedure, the subjects and the biostatistician will be blinded to the treatment administered.
The study will take place in a high-volume university hospital center that provides 24-hours emergency cardiac care in a region with 1.3M inhabitants: "Niculae Stãncioiu" Heart Institute - Cardiology Department. The hospital is affiliated to "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca.
STUDY PROTOCOL Patients will receive a standard dual antiplatelet therapy regimen protocol with ticagrelor (180mg) and aspirin (300 mg) loading before PPCI and will be treated with intravenous heparin 100UI/kg during the procedure. Coronary catheterization and intervention will be performed using a 6-F guiding catheter via radial or femoral access.
According to the type of the culprit lesion, three different techniques will be used:
- Coronary occlusion: the lesion is crossed with a pressure guidewire (Verrata Pressure Guide Wire, Volcano Corporation) - CWP is recorded if TIMI flow remains 0.
- Coronary occlusion: the lesion can not be crossed with the pressure guidewire - the lesion is crossed with a standard coronary guidewire, a dual-lumen microcatheter (NHancer Rx Dual Lumen Micro Catheter, Interventional Medical Device Solutions) is positioned distal to the occlusion, backflow is obtained and CWP measurement is performed, through the micro-catheter only if the occlusion persists. A pressure guidewire is introduced through the over-the-wire lumen of the micro-catheter and CWP is again recorded.
- Coronary stenosis (circulated vessel): the lesion is crossed with a pressure guidewire and CWP is measured during the inflation of the predilatation balloon or during stent balloon inflation in case of a direct stenting procedure.
Following CWP measurement, blood samples are collected from a peripheral vein for hsCRP, IL-6, IL-18 and IL-1Ra determination.
The first 50 patients will not receive study treatment. They will undergo CWP measurement followed by percutaneous revascularization. Cardiac MRI will be performed 3-5 days after the procedure. A cutoff for CWP in predicting MVO, interstitial oedema and intramyocardial haemorrhage will be derived.
Based on the above mentioned cutoff, 188 patients with continuous elevation of the pressure line will be randomized, by a 1:1 model, either to cortisol therapy or to placebo.
Group A (GA) will be randomized to hydrocortisone during the first 5 days, and Group B (GB) will be randomized to placebo. Following CWP determination, patients in GA will have an intravenous injection of 500 mg of hydrocortisone followed by an intravenous infusion of 500 mg of hydrocortisone in 250 ml of 5% sugar solution over eight to ten hours. This treatment will be repeated daily for the next five days. This protocol was used by Barzilai et al. which reported a significant mortality reduction with therapy.
PCI will be performed according to standard practice, at the discretion of the operator, following CWP measurement. Heparin will be given as an initial bolus of 100 U/kg during the procedure and if necessary, additional boluses will be administered to achieve an activated clotting time of 300sec.
Appropriate secondary prevention will be performed with statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers and dual anti platelet therapy for 1 year.
CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE (CMR) IMAGE AQUISITION AND ANALYSIS Patients will undergo CMR three to five days after randomization for the evaluation of the primary endpoint (MVO, interstitial edema and hemorrhage) and selected secondary endpoints (infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes). A standard protocol will be used on a 1.5T scanner.
In brief, infarct size and MVO will be assessed by late enhancement in short-axis images covering the left ventricle approximately 15 min after injection of gadolinium chelate. An inversion-recovery turbo gradient-echo sequence will be used for image acquisition. A hypo-intense core within the hyper-enhanced infarcted area will be defined as MVO. For determination of infarct-related myocardial edema/area at risk, short-axis slices covering the LV using a T2-weighted triple- inversion recovery turbo spin-echo sequence before contrast administration will be obtained. Assessment of LV function and volumes will be performed in short-axis slices from base to apex acquired by a standard steady-state free precession technique.
MVO and infarct size will be expressed as percentage of LV mass, given by the sum of the mass of MVO and late gadolinium enhancement regions for all slices divided by the overall mass of the LV myocardial cross-section slices. If present, myocardial salvage index will be calculated as area at risk minus infarct size divided by area at risk multiplied by100.
STUDY ENDPOINTS The primary endpoint will be the extent of MVO, interstitial edema and hemorrhage assessed by CMR in the modified intention-to-treat population. The correlation between CWP, interstitial edema and surrogate parameters of inflammation from peripheral blood samples will be analyzed. Secondary CMR endpoints will include infarct size, myocardial salvage, LV volumes and ejection fraction. LV ejection fraction and volumes will be determined both at discharge and 6 months after the procedure. For enzymatic infarct size determination, high-sensitivity troponin T after 24 and 48 h will be measured. Clinical endpoints of all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis and stroke will be recorded at 6 months.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The number of patients that would be needed to detect a difference of 21% between GA and GB for the clinical end-point, with a α of 0.05, a β of 0.20 and a 1:1 ratio was calculated using the formula provided by Whitley and Ball. The necessary number of patients, under the risk of dropout of 10%, led to a number of 94 patients per arm.
Intention-to-treat analysis will be applied in the analysis of both primary and secondary end-points. Statistical analyses will be performed using "Statistical" software (StatSoft v.8, OK, USA). Quantitative variables will be summarized as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed data and median and interquartile range for abnormally distributed data. Groups will be compared with the Student-t test for independent samples in case of normally distributed quantitative variables. Otherwise, the comparison will be performed with the Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentage with 95% associated confidence intervals. Groups will be compared with the Chi-square or Fischer exact test, as appropriate. Statistical analysis will be conducted at a significance level of 5%.
- Being tested
- Hydrocortisone, Placebo
- Keywords
- Acute myocardial infarction, Left ventricular remodeling, Coronary wedge pressure, Glucocorticoid therapy
- Medical subject headings
- ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, Ventricular Remodeling
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HydrocortisoneDrug
Also called no other name
I.V. administration
PlaceboDrug
Also called sodium chloride 0.9%
I.V. administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocortisone | Active comparator | Patients who meet the inclusion criteria, with a CWP above the derived cutoff, with continuous elevation of the pressure line, who are randomized to i.v hydrocortisone administration. Receives: Drug: Hydrocortisone |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Patients who meet the inclusion criteria, with a CWP above the derived cutoff, with continuous elevation of the pressure line, who are randomized to placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%). Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The extent of interstitial edema
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment (% of left ventricular end-diastolic mass)
Measured: 3-5 days
Secondary outcomes (7)
The extent of microvascular obstruction
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment (% of left ventricular end-diastolic mass)
Measured: 3-5 days
The extent of intramyocardial haemorrhage
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment (% of left ventricular end-diastolic mass)
Measured: 3-5 days
Infarct size
CMR assessment (% of left ventricular end-diastolic mass)
Measured: 3-5 days
Myocardial salvage
CMR assessment (area at risk minus infarct size divided by area at risk multiplied by100)
Measured: 3-5 days
Left ventricular ejection fraction
CMR and echocardiographic assessment (%)
Measured: 3-5 days and 6 months after the procedure
Left ventricular end-systolic volume
CMR and echocardiographic assessment (ml)
Measured: 3-5 days and 6 months after the procedure
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
CMR and echocardiographic assessment (ml)
Measured: 3-5 days and 6 months after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Dec 2017
- Study start8 Mar 2018
- Primary completion31 Dec 2019
- Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 1:1 model randomization
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Romanian Governmental Funding (UEFISCDI)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adrian Corneliu Iancu, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
- Investigators
- Adrian Corneliu Iancu, M.D, Ph.D, Principal investigator, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03371784
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0393
- Acronym
- RECONSIDER
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Westman PC, Lipinski MJ, Luger D, Waksman R, Bonow RO, Wu E, Epstein SE. Inflammation as a Driver of Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 3;67(17):2050-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.073.
PubMed 27126533Kramer MC, van der Wal AC, Koch KT, Ploegmakers JP, van der Schaaf RJ, Henriques JP, Baan J Jr, Rittersma SZ, Vis MM, Piek JJ, Tijssen JG, de Winter RJ. Presence of older thrombus is an independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2008 Oct 28;118(18):1810-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.780734. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
PubMed 18852369Patel N, Petraco R, Dall'Armellina E, Kassimis G, De Maria GL, Dawkins S, Lee R, Prendergast BD, Choudhury RP, Forfar JC, Channon KM, Davies J, Banning AP, Kharbanda RK. Zero-Flow Pressure Measured Immediately After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Provides the Best Invasive Index for Predicting the Extent of Myocardial Infarction at 6 Months: An OxAMI Study (Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1410-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.029.
PubMed 26404192Iancu AC, Rafiroiu D, Marc M. Is Coronary Wedge Pressure a Technique to Identify High-Risk Patients Who May Benefit From Alternative Treatment in Acute Myocardial Infarction?: Is This The Next Step? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):104-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.018. No abstract available.
PubMed 26762918Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Fusaro M, Keta D, Seyfarth M, Byrne RA, Pache J, Alger P, Mehilli J, Schomig A, Kastrati A. 5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 25;55(21):2383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.054.
PubMed 20488311Iancu A, Ober C, Bondor CI, Cadis H. Microvascular effect of intracoronary eptifibatide in acute myocardial infarction. Cardiology. 2012;123(1):46-53. doi: 10.1159/000341197. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
PubMed 22986471Giugliano GR, Giugliano RP, Gibson CM, Kuntz RE. Meta-analysis of corticosteroid treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2003 May 1;91(9):1055-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00148-6.
PubMed 12714146Barzilai D, Plavnick J, Hazani A, Einath R, Kleinhaus N, Kanter Y. Use of hydrocortisone in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Summary of a clinical trial in 446 patients. Chest. 1972 May;61(5):488-91. doi: 10.1378/chest.61.5.488. No abstract available.
PubMed 5046847Seropian IM, Toldo S, Van Tassell BW, Abbate A. Anti-inflammatory strategies for ventricular remodeling following ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 29;63(16):1593-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
PubMed 24530674
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Glucocorticoid Therapy on Left Ventricular Remodelling in Acute ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (RECONSIDER)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03371784
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECONSIDER / PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0393
- Keywords
- Acute myocardial infarction, Left ventricular remodeling, Coronary wedge pressure, Glucocorticoid therapy
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Romanian Governmental Funding (UEFISCDI)
- Study start
- 8 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Introduction: In the setting of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) coronary wedge pressure (CWP) emerges as a new marker for the advanced form of pre-procedural microvascular obstruction (MVO), which is associated with inflammatory interstitial edema. Through its anti-inflammatory effects, glucocorticoid therapy may prove beneficial in patients with high CWP.
Aim: To identify the presence of the advanced form of MVO before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) by CWP measurement and to test the benefit of cortisol therapy, in terms of infarct size and left ventricular remodeling, in patients with raised CWP.
Methods: 50 patients with a first STEMI, candidates for PPCI, with proximal coronary occlusion, will undergo CWP measurement followed by percutaneous revascularization. Cardiac MRI will be performed 3-5 days after the procedure. A cutoff for CWP in predicting MVO, interstitial oedema and intramyocardial haemorrhage will be derived.Based on the above mentioned cutoff, 180 patients with continuous elevation of the pressure line will be randomized, by a 1:1 model, either to cortisol therapy or to placebo. Inflammatory parameters will be determined from peripheral blood samples. Patients will undergo cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging 3 to 5 days after revascularization.
Study endpoints: The primary endpoint will be the extent of MVO, interstitial edema and hemorrhage. Secondary endpoints will include infarct size, myocardial salvage, left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. The clinical endpoints of all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis and stroke will be recorded at 6 months.
Detailed description
PATIENT POPULATION Consecutive patients with first STEMI, candidates for PPCI (typical cardiac chest pain, within 12h of symptom onset, with ST segment elevation of more than 1 mm in at least two contiguous leads) and proximal coronary artery culprit lesion will be considered for randomization.
Exclusion criteria are cardiogenic shock. previous myocardial infraction, previous PCI and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), left bundle branch block, active bleeding, administration of thrombolytic agents for the current episode, recent stroke (during last month), indication for oral anticoagulant therapy, severe or untreated infections and the impossibility of CWP measurement.
Verbal assent will be obtained, with the agreement of two qualified cardiologists. Full consent will be obtained after the procedure, in accord with the protocols followed by several recent studies.
This is a triple-blind clinical study. The physicians performing the procedure, the subjects and the biostatistician will be blinded to the treatment administered.
The study will take place in a high-volume university hospital center that provides 24-hours emergency cardiac care in a region with 1.3M inhabitants: "Niculae Stãncioiu" Heart Institute - Cardiology Department. The hospital is affiliated to "Iuliu Haţieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca.
STUDY PROTOCOL Patients will receive a standard dual antiplatelet therapy regimen protocol with ticagrelor (180mg) and aspirin (300 mg) loading before PPCI and will be treated with intravenous heparin 100UI/kg during the procedure. Coronary catheterization and intervention will be performed using a 6-F guiding catheter via radial or femoral access.
According to the type of the culprit lesion, three different techniques will be used:
- Coronary occlusion: the lesion is crossed with a pressure guidewire (Verrata Pressure Guide Wire, Volcano Corporation) - CWP is recorded if TIMI flow remains 0.
- Coronary occlusion: the lesion can not be crossed with the pressure guidewire - the lesion is crossed with a standard coronary guidewire, a dual-lumen microcatheter (NHancer Rx Dual Lumen Micro Catheter, Interventional Medical Device Solutions) is positioned distal to the occlusion, backflow is obtained and CWP measurement is performed, through the micro-catheter only if the occlusion persists. A pressure guidewire is introduced through the over-the-wire lumen of the micro-catheter and CWP is again recorded.
- Coronary stenosis (circulated vessel): the lesion is crossed with a pressure guidewire and CWP is measured during the inflation of the predilatation balloon or during stent balloon inflation in case of a direct stenting procedure.
Following CWP measurement, blood samples are collected from a peripheral vein for hsCRP, IL-6, IL-18 and IL-1Ra determination.
The first 50 patients will not receive study treatment. They will undergo CWP measurement followed by percutaneous revascularization. Cardiac MRI will be performed 3-5 days after the procedure. A cutoff for CWP in predicting MVO, interstitial oedema and intramyocardial haemorrhage will be derived.
Based on the above mentioned cutoff, 188 patients with continuous elevation of the pressure line will be randomized, by a 1:1 model, either to cortisol therapy or to placebo.
Group A (GA) will be randomized to hydrocortisone during the first 5 days, and Group B (GB) will be randomized to placebo. Following CWP determination, patients in GA will have an intravenous injection of 500 mg of hydrocortisone followed by an intravenous infusion of 500 mg of hydrocortisone in 250 ml of 5% sugar solution over eight to ten hours. This treatment will be repeated daily for the next five days. This protocol was used by Barzilai et al. which reported a significant mortality reduction with therapy.
PCI will be performed according to standard practice, at the discretion of the operator, following CWP measurement. Heparin will be given as an initial bolus of 100 U/kg during the procedure and if necessary, additional boluses will be administered to achieve an activated clotting time of 300sec.
Appropriate secondary prevention will be performed with statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers and dual anti platelet therapy for 1 year.
CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE (CMR) IMAGE AQUISITION AND ANALYSIS Patients will undergo CMR three to five days after randomization for the evaluation of the primary endpoint (MVO, interstitial edema and hemorrhage) and selected secondary endpoints (infarct size, left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes). A standard protocol will be used on a 1.5T scanner.
In brief, infarct size and MVO will be assessed by late enhancement in short-axis images covering the left ventricle approximately 15 min after injection of gadolinium chelate. An inversion-recovery turbo gradient-echo sequence will be used for image acquisition. A hypo-intense core within the hyper-enhanced infarcted area will be defined as MVO. For determination of infarct-related myocardial edema/area at risk, short-axis slices covering the LV using a T2-weighted triple- inversion recovery turbo spin-echo sequence before contrast administration will be obtained. Assessment of LV function and volumes will be performed in short-axis slices from base to apex acquired by a standard steady-state free precession technique.
MVO and infarct size will be expressed as percentage of LV mass, given by the sum of the mass of MVO and late gadolinium enhancement regions for all slices divided by the overall mass of the LV myocardial cross-section slices. If present, myocardial salvage index will be calculated as area at risk minus infarct size divided by area at risk multiplied by100.
STUDY ENDPOINTS The primary endpoint will be the extent of MVO, interstitial edema and hemorrhage assessed by CMR in the modified intention-to-treat population. The correlation between CWP, interstitial edema and surrogate parameters of inflammation from peripheral blood samples will be analyzed. Secondary CMR endpoints will include infarct size, myocardial salvage, LV volumes and ejection fraction. LV ejection fraction and volumes will be determined both at discharge and 6 months after the procedure. For enzymatic infarct size determination, high-sensitivity troponin T after 24 and 48 h will be measured. Clinical endpoints of all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial re-infarction, target vessel revascularization, stent thrombosis and stroke will be recorded at 6 months.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The number of patients that would be needed to detect a difference of 21% between GA and GB for the clinical end-point, with a α of 0.05, a β of 0.20 and a 1:1 ratio was calculated using the formula provided by Whitley and Ball. The necessary number of patients, under the risk of dropout of 10%, led to a number of 94 patients per arm.
Intention-to-treat analysis will be applied in the analysis of both primary and secondary end-points. Statistical analyses will be performed using "Statistical" software (StatSoft v.8, OK, USA). Quantitative variables will be summarized as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed data and median and interquartile range for abnormally distributed data. Groups will be compared with the Student-t test for independent samples in case of normally distributed quantitative variables. Otherwise, the comparison will be performed with the Mann-Whitney test. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentage with 95% associated confidence intervals. Groups will be compared with the Chi-square or Fischer exact test, as appropriate. Statistical analysis will be conducted at a significance level of 5%.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 1:1 model randomization
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocortisone | Active comparator | Drug: HydrocortisonePatients who meet the inclusion criteria, with a CWP above the derived cutoff, with continuous elevation of the pressure line, who are randomized to i.v hydrocortisone administration. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPatients who meet the inclusion criteria, with a CWP above the derived cutoff, with continuous elevation of the pressure line, who are randomized to placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- age: 18-85 years
- first episode of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
- candidates for primary PCI (typical cardiac chest pain, within 12h of symptom onset, with ST-segment elevation of more than 1 mm in at least two contiguous leads)
- left anterior descending artery culprit lesion
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- cardiogenic shock
- previous PCI and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG)
- left bundle branch block
- active bleeding
- administration of thrombolytic agents for the current episode
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HydrocortisoneAlso: no other nameI.V. administration | Drug | Hydrocortisone |
| PlaceboAlso: sodium chloride 0.9%I.V. administration | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
The extent of interstitial edema
Time frame: 3-5 days
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment (% of left ventricular end-diastolic mass)
7 secondary outcomes
The extent of microvascular obstruction
Time frame: 3-5 days
The extent of intramyocardial haemorrhage
Time frame: 3-5 days
Infarct size
Time frame: 3-5 days
Myocardial salvage
Time frame: 3-5 days
Left ventricular ejection fraction
Time frame: 3-5 days and 6 months after the procedure
Left ventricular end-systolic volume
Time frame: 3-5 days and 6 months after the procedure
Left ventricular end-diastolic volume
Time frame: 3-5 days and 6 months after the procedure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2020.
- Background: PubMed 27126533Westman PC, Lipinski MJ, Luger D, Waksman R, Bonow RO, Wu E, Epstein SE. Inflammation as a Driver of Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 3;67(17):2050-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.073.
- Background: PubMed 18852369Kramer MC, van der Wal AC, Koch KT, Ploegmakers JP, van der Schaaf RJ, Henriques JP, Baan J Jr, Rittersma SZ, Vis MM, Piek JJ, Tijssen JG, de Winter RJ. Presence of older thrombus is an independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction treated with thrombus aspiration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2008 Oct 28;118(18):1810-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.780734. Epub 2008 Oct 13.
- Background: PubMed 26404192Patel N, Petraco R, Dall'Armellina E, Kassimis G, De Maria GL, Dawkins S, Lee R, Prendergast BD, Choudhury RP, Forfar JC, Channon KM, Davies J, Banning AP, Kharbanda RK. Zero-Flow Pressure Measured Immediately After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Provides the Best Invasive Index for Predicting the Extent of Myocardial Infarction at 6 Months: An OxAMI Study (Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Sep;8(11):1410-1421. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.04.029.
- Background: PubMed 26762918Iancu AC, Rafiroiu D, Marc M. Is Coronary Wedge Pressure a Technique to Identify High-Risk Patients Who May Benefit From Alternative Treatment in Acute Myocardial Infarction?: Is This The Next Step? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Jan 11;9(1):104-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.018. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20488311Ndrepepa G, Tiroch K, Fusaro M, Keta D, Seyfarth M, Byrne RA, Pache J, Alger P, Mehilli J, Schomig A, Kastrati A. 5-year prognostic value of no-reflow phenomenon after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 May 25;55(21):2383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.054.
- Background: PubMed 22986471Iancu A, Ober C, Bondor CI, Cadis H. Microvascular effect of intracoronary eptifibatide in acute myocardial infarction. Cardiology. 2012;123(1):46-53. doi: 10.1159/000341197. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
- Background: PubMed 12714146Giugliano GR, Giugliano RP, Gibson CM, Kuntz RE. Meta-analysis of corticosteroid treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2003 May 1;91(9):1055-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00148-6.
- Background: PubMed 5046847Barzilai D, Plavnick J, Hazani A, Einath R, Kleinhaus N, Kanter Y. Use of hydrocortisone in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Summary of a clinical trial in 446 patients. Chest. 1972 May;61(5):488-91. doi: 10.1378/chest.61.5.488. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24530674Seropian IM, Toldo S, Van Tassell BW, Abbate A. Anti-inflammatory strategies for ventricular remodeling following ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 29;63(16):1593-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
RecruitingPhase 4
Early Single Antiplatelet Therapy After IVUS-Guided PCI in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes, STEMI
RecruitingPhase 2
Prevention of Reperfusion Injury Outcomes Through Effective Cardioprotection Targeting Myocardial Infarction
Myocardial Infarction, Reperfusion Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Incremental Prognostic Utility of CBC-derived Inflammatory Indices After Incomplete Coronary Revascularization: Association With 12-months Cardiovascular Outcomes
STEMI, High Risk NSTEMI
RecruitingObservational study
SuperSaturated Oxygen Comprehensive Observational Registry
STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction, AMI
RecruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of a Half-dose Bolus of r-SAK Prior to Primary PCI in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Adrian Corneliu Iancu, M.D, Ph.D principal investigator
"Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Hydrocortisone in people with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Left Ventricular Remodeling, run by Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy at 1 site in Romania.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Romania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The extent of interstitial edema (time frame: 3-5 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03371784, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.