AzTrials
AzTrials

PolypharmacyNCT03354845

Deprescribing of Symptomatic Medications in Rehabilitative or Subacute Care Patients

A study testing Deprescribing intervention in people with Polypharmacy and Adverse Drug Reaction, run by Bright Vision Hospital.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Deprescribing is a systematic method of withdrawing potentially inappropriate or unnecessary medications and is warranted in the elderly due to the high prevalence of polypharmacy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Polypharmacy, Adverse Drug Reaction
What is being tested?
Deprescribing intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
5 Apr 2016to 31 Jan 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients, regardless of age, who were on at least one of the following target symptomatic control medications for deprescribing: acid suppressants/proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), laxatives, analgesics (paracetamol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), codeine, tramadol) and antiemetics

Who cannot join

  • Patients with terminal illness or cancer and patients with documented clinically significant dementia and had no accompanying caregiver

About this study

Official title: Deprescribing of Symptomatic Medications in Patients Receiving Rehabilitative or Subacute Care

Deprescribing is a systematic method of withdrawing potentially inappropriate or unnecessary medications and is warranted in the elderly due to the high prevalence of polypharmacy. In particular, symptomatic control medications, such as acid suppressants, laxatives and painkillers, are frequently prescribed and continued, though such medications are rarely needed on a long-term basis.

Therefore, the study objectives were to determine the cost savings, effects and feasibility of implementing a systematic process of deprescribing medications for symptomatic management, namely, acid suppressants, laxatives, analgesics, and antiemetics.

Read the detailed description

Deprescribing is a systematic process of identifying and withdrawing drugs, which are potentially or currently causing more harm than benefit to patients, based on each individual patient's condition, treatment goals and level of functioning. Deprescribing needs to be patient-centric with shared decision-making between patients or caregivers and the multidisciplinary care team. Five distinct steps of deprescribing have been elucidated, and they comprise: 1) performing a comprehensive patient medical/medication history; 2) considering the overall risk and appropriateness of drugs; 3) assessing possibility of and planning drug discontinuation; 4) initiating and documenting drug discontinuation; and 5) monitoring effects and providing patient support.

Deprescribing is necessary in elderly aged 65 years and above due to the higher prevalence of polypharmacy and unnecessary and inappropriate medication use, compared to younger age groups. In Singapore, statistics from an acute restructured hospital in 2013 showed that 50 percent or more of inpatients were discharged with at least five chronic medications.

The discontinuation of medications has been trialled in earlier studies without causing significant adverse effects or symptom recurrence. Positive outcomes demonstrated include enhanced cognition, improved health and reduced falls. However, it is necessary to investigate the effects and feasibility of deprescribing in the present local setting, where healthcare perceptions, and associations between medication discontinuation and patient clinical outcomes may be different from other studied populations.

Therefore, this randomized controlled intervention study was conducted in a community hospital in Singapore to determine the cost savings, effects and feasibility of implementing a systematic process of deprescribing medications for symptomatic management, namely, acid suppressants, laxatives, analgesics, and antiemetics.

Being tested
Deprescribing intervention
Medical subject headings
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Deprescribing interventionOther

    Also called Systematic deprescribing, Deprescribing algorithm, Five-step patient-centred deprescribing process

    Pharmacists assessed the appropriateness of target symptomatic medications and potential for discontinuation. After discussion with pharmacists and consideration of patients' and caregivers' preferences regarding discontinuation or dose reduction, doctors would deprescribe these symptomatic medications. Symptom recurrence, adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs), and the need for drug re-initiation or initiation of new symptomatic control medications after deprescribing were monitored and documented in the 1st, 2nd and 6th weeks.

Study groups in NCT03354845
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control (usual care) groupNo interventionIn the control group, doctors maintained the usual practice of medication review, altering and discontinuing medications as necessary, without receiving deprescribing recommendations from pharmacists.
Deprescribing intervention groupOtherThe five-step patient-centred deprescribing process was utilized in the intervention group.
Receives: Other: Deprescribing intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cost savings

    Reduction in the cost of one month of medications

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Number of medications

    Reduction in the total number of medications

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Change in bowel movement following deprescribing

    Adverse effect of constipation indicated by no bowel movement in the past two days (BNO ≥2/7)

    Measured: 6 weeks

  3. Adverse consequences of deprescribing

    Symptom recurrence, adverse drug withdrawal events (ADWEs), and the need for deprescribed medications to be restarted or initiation of new symptomatic control medications after deprescribing

    Measured: 6 weeks

  4. Feasibility of implementation

    Time required to complete the deprescribing process and the limitations and challenges encountered

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Nov 2017
  2. Study start5 Apr 2016
  3. Primary completion21 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The study was conducted as an open trial with two parallel groups. A total of 200 patients were randomized to an intervention (deprescribing) or control (usual care) group in a 1:1 ratio. Randomization of patients was performed after recruitment by an independent administrator using GraphPad randomization sequence software ©2017. Doctors were free to make any changes to patients' medication regimens as they wished in both groups.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03354845
Sponsor's protocol ID
2016/2149
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
22 Nov 2017
Last updated
28 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, Potter K, Le Couteur D, Rigby D, Gnjidic D, Del Mar CB, Roughead EE, Page A, Jansen J, Martin JH. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):827-34. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324.

    PubMed 25798731
  • Reeve E, Shakib S, Hendrix I, Roberts MS, Wiese MD. Review of deprescribing processes and development of an evidence-based, patient-centred deprescribing process. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;78(4):738-47. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12386.

    PubMed 24661192
  • Garfinkel D, Zur-Gil S, Ben-Israel J. The war against polypharmacy: a new cost-effective geriatric-palliative approach for improving drug therapy in disabled elderly people. Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Jun;9(6):430-4.

    PubMed 17642388
  • Reeve E, Andrews JM, Wiese MD, Hendrix I, Roberts MS, Shakib S. Feasibility of a patient-centered deprescribing process to reduce inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors. Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Jan;49(1):29-38. doi: 10.1177/1060028014558290. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

    PubMed 25385826

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Deprescribing intervention in people with Polypharmacy and Adverse Drug Reaction, run by Bright Vision Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cost savings (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03354845, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in