Biliary Tract CancerPhase 2FBI-TRACNCT03291899
Trial of Infusional FOLFIRINOX in First Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers
A Phase 2 study testing FOLFIRINOX in people with Biliary Tract Cancer, run by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
This study is to evaluate the response rate and toxicity profile of infusional 5 fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) in first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers and also to assess progression free survival and overall survival of FOLFIRINOX in first line treatment of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Biliary Tract Cancer
- What is being tested?
- FOLFIRINOX
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- 3 Jan 2017to 9 Feb 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed locally advanced (irresectable) or metastatic biliary tract cancers.
- Measurable disease. Defined as tumor that have uni or bi dimensional measurement not less than 1.5 cm on any dimension.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Signed written informed consent before enrolment.
- No prior chemotherapy or anti-neoplastic therapy other than radiotherapy more than 4 weeks prior to enrolment and to areas other than the measurable disease.
- Patients of either sex or child bearing age must be willing to use adequate contraceptive measures during the study and for 6 months after treatment.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Life expectancy of 6 months or more.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1.
- Adequate renal function: creatinine within normal institutional range.
- Adequate hepatic function: Total bilirubin within normal institutional limits, serum aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels ≤2.5 times the institutional upper limit of normal or ≤ 5 times the institutional upper limit of normal of elevated because of liver involvement.
- Adequate hematological values: leukocyte count ≥3.0 x 109/L, an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 x 109/L, a platelet count ≥100 x 109/L.
Who cannot join
- Known or suspected dihydropyrimidine deficiency.
- Presence of central nervous system metastasis.
- Previous malignancy within 5 years, except adequately treated non melanomatous skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer.
- Severe cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class three or four, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction or significant arrhythmias).
- Psychiatric or mental disorder, precluding understanding of the information of the trial related topics and giving valid informed consent.
- Active uncontrolled infection.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Pregnant patients (confirmed by β-Human chorionic gonadotrophin test where appropriate).
- Serious underlying medical condition (in the judgement of the investigator) which could impair the ability of the patient to participate in the trial.
- Any psychological, familial, geographic or social circumstances which could impair the patient's ability to participate in the trial and comply with follow up.
- Treatment with other experimental drugs within 30 days of entry into the trial.
- Treatment with other anti-cancer therapy.
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs.
- Breast feeding
- Legal incapacity.
- Patients with a known diagnosis of HIV infection.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site
king Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center
Riyadh, 11211
About this study
Official title: Phase II Trial of Infusional 5 FLUOROURACIL, LEUCOVORIN, OXALIPLATIN AND IRINOTECAN (FOLFIRINOX) in First Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers
This study is to evaluate the response rate and toxicity profile of infusional 5 fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) in first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers and also to assess progression free survival and overall survival of FOLFIRINOX in first line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers
Read the detailed description
Biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) are invasive adenocarcinomas that arise from the epithelial cells of the biliary tree, which comprises intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, and the gallbladder. Even though BTCs are considered as rare tumors, they represent about 30% of the total primary liver cancers with an incidence rate close to that of hepatocellular carcinoma. Approximately 1200 new cases in the United Kingdom and 9000 in the United States are diagnosed annually. The Saudi Cancer Registry reported 911 case of gall bladder cancer, 318 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 574 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 1994 and 2009. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients diagnosed with these aggressive tumors present at an early resectable stage, and disease recurrence rates are high despite curative-intent surgery
The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancers is poor and median survival for those undergoing supportive care alone is short. Systemic chemotherapy is increasingly being applied in cases of advanced biliary tract cancers. A benefit for chemotherapy over best supportive care alone was suggested in a trial that randomly assigned 90 patients with advanced pancreatic or biliary cancer (37 with bile duct cancer) to fluorouracil (FU)-based systemic chemotherapy or best supportive care alone with median survival of 6 months for chemotherapy versus 2.5 months for best supportive care.
Different drugs has demonstrated activity in BTCs, including fluoropyrimidines, gemcitabine, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin. A pooled analysis from Eckel et al. that evaluated 104 trials with 2810 patients, has established gemcitabine combined with platinum compounds as the provisional standard of chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.
In a randomized phase two study of 51 patients, Kornek et al, established the efficacy of mitomycin in combination with gemcitabine or capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. Mitomycin and capecitabine was associated with superior complete response rate (31% vs 20%), median progression free survival (5.3 months vs 4.2 months), and overall survival (9.25 months and 6.7 months). The EORTC 40955 trial randomized patients with BTCs to high dose 5FU vs combination of 5-FU, Leucovorin and cisplatin. The results showed that cisplatin and fluorouracil was more active than high-dose fluorouracil in terms of overall response rates (19% and 7.1%, respectively) and overall survival (8 months and 5 months, respectively), but progression free surviva; was similar in both treatment arms (3.3 months).
The randomized, controlled, phase three ABC-02 study, which enrolled 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer or ampullary cancer, demonstrated that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin improved overall and progression free survival by 30% over gemcitabine alone. Median overall survival was 11.7 months vs 8.1 months (HR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.80; p˂.001), and progression free survival was 8 months (HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.77; p˂.001), both in favor of the combination arm. Although the rate of neutropenia was higher in the group receiving gemcitabine and cisplatin, there was no significant difference in the rate of neutropenia-associated infections between the 2 arms. Okusaka et al also reported similar findings in a phase two randomized study of 84 patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. Based on these results, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is considered to be the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers.
Triple-drug chemotherapy regimens also have been shown to be effective in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers, albeit in a very small number of patients. The phase three trial that evaluated fluorouracil, leucovorin and etoposide versus fluorouracil cisplatin and epirubicin didn't show one regimen to be significantly superior with respect to overall survival (12 months vs. 9 months, respectively) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers, although the trial was underpowered to detect such a difference.
In a phase two trial, the combination panitumumab, a monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, with gemcitabine and irinotecan showed encouraging efficacy with good tolerability in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma, with 5-month progression free survival rate of 69%.The median progression free survival and overall survival were 9.7 months and 12.9 months, respectively.
Results from the randomized phase three PRODIGE trial evaluating the combination of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status showed dramatic improvements in both median PFS (6.4 vs 3.3 months; P˂ .001) and median OS (11.1 months vs. 6.8 months; P˂ .001). Because of these strong results the National comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) and many other societies added FOLFIRINOX as a preferred, category 1 recommendation for first line treatment of good performance status patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in 2011.
There are, however, some concerns about the toxicity of FOLFIRINOX regimen. In the PRODIGE trial, some of the grade 3 and 4 toxicity rates that were significantly greater in the FOLFIRINOX group than in the gemcitabine group were 45.7% for neutropenia, 12.7% for diarrhea, and 9.1 % for thrombocytopenia and 9% for sensory neuropathy.
Despite the high levels of toxicity, no toxic deaths have been reported. Furthermore, the PRODIGE trial determined that, despite this toxicity, fewer patients in the FOLFIRINOX group than in the gemcitabine group experienced a degradation in their quality of life at 6 months (31% vs. 66%,p ˂ .001). A more detailed analysis of the quality of life of patients in this trial has been published and shows that FOLFIRINOX maintained and even improved quality of life more than gemcitabine did.
Based on the above data, the investigators designed this phase two study of the efficacy and toxicity of FOFIRINOX regimen in first line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. If the investigators achieved encouraging results, this regimen should then be compared with the standard combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in future phase three trials.
- Conditions
- Biliary Tract Cancer
- Being tested
- FOLFIRINOX
- Medical subject headings
- Biliary Tract Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FOLFIRINOXCombination product
combination chemotherapy using Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Leucovorin and Fluorouracil, given every 15 days for a total of 12 cycles
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental single arm | Experimental | Chemotherapy using the FOLFIRINOX regimen will be given every 2 weeks for a total of 12 cycles. FOLFIRINOX consist of:
1. Oxaliplatin-85 mg/m2 IV Day 1
2. Leucovorin-400 mg/m2 IV Day 1
3. Irinotecan-180 mg/m2 IV Day 1
4. Fluorouracil (FU)-400 mg/m2 IV bolus Day 1
5. Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 infused over 46 hours starting day 1 Receives: Combination Product: FOLFIRINOX |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Response rate
Evaluate the response rate using RECIST 1.1 criteria
Measured: 3 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
progression free survival
calculated from day 1 of chemotherapy till either progression, death or date of last follow up whichever comes first
Measured: 4 years
overall survival
calculated from day 1 of chemotherapy till either death or date of last follow up whichever comes first
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Sep 2017
- Study start3 Jan 2017
- Primary completion9 Feb 2023
- Study completion9 Feb 2023
Why it stopped: poor accrual
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Biliary Tract CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Simon 2-stage optimum design Model
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Shouki Bazarbashi, King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center
- Investigators
- Shouki Bazarbashi, Principal investigator, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research cente
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03291899
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RAC 2161 099
- Acronym
- FBI-TRAC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Sep 2017
- Last updated
- 17 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.
PubMed 21561347Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
PubMed 20375404
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Trial of Infusional 5 FLUOROURACIL, LEUCOVORIN, OXALIPLATIN AND IRINOTECAN (FOLFIRINOX) in First Line Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03291899
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FBI-TRAC / RAC 2161 099
- Conditions
- Biliary Tract Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: poor accrual
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Feb 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Feb 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is to evaluate the response rate and toxicity profile of infusional 5 fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) in first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers and also to assess progression free survival and overall survival of FOLFIRINOX in first line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancers
Detailed description
Biliary tract carcinomas (BTCs) are invasive adenocarcinomas that arise from the epithelial cells of the biliary tree, which comprises intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts, and the gallbladder. Even though BTCs are considered as rare tumors, they represent about 30% of the total primary liver cancers with an incidence rate close to that of hepatocellular carcinoma. Approximately 1200 new cases in the United Kingdom and 9000 in the United States are diagnosed annually. The Saudi Cancer Registry reported 911 case of gall bladder cancer, 318 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and 574 extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 1994 and 2009. Unfortunately, only a minority of patients diagnosed with these aggressive tumors present at an early resectable stage, and disease recurrence rates are high despite curative-intent surgery
The prognosis of patients with advanced biliary tract cancers is poor and median survival for those undergoing supportive care alone is short. Systemic chemotherapy is increasingly being applied in cases of advanced biliary tract cancers. A benefit for chemotherapy over best supportive care alone was suggested in a trial that randomly assigned 90 patients with advanced pancreatic or biliary cancer (37 with bile duct cancer) to fluorouracil (FU)-based systemic chemotherapy or best supportive care alone with median survival of 6 months for chemotherapy versus 2.5 months for best supportive care.
Different drugs has demonstrated activity in BTCs, including fluoropyrimidines, gemcitabine, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin. A pooled analysis from Eckel et al. that evaluated 104 trials with 2810 patients, has established gemcitabine combined with platinum compounds as the provisional standard of chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.
In a randomized phase two study of 51 patients, Kornek et al, established the efficacy of mitomycin in combination with gemcitabine or capecitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. Mitomycin and capecitabine was associated with superior complete response rate (31% vs 20%), median progression free survival (5.3 months vs 4.2 months), and overall survival (9.25 months and 6.7 months). The EORTC 40955 trial randomized patients with BTCs to high dose 5FU vs combination of 5-FU, Leucovorin and cisplatin. The results showed that cisplatin and fluorouracil was more active than high-dose fluorouracil in terms of overall response rates (19% and 7.1%, respectively) and overall survival (8 months and 5 months, respectively), but progression free surviva; was similar in both treatment arms (3.3 months).
The randomized, controlled, phase three ABC-02 study, which enrolled 410 patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer or ampullary cancer, demonstrated that the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin improved overall and progression free survival by 30% over gemcitabine alone. Median overall survival was 11.7 months vs 8.1 months (HR, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.80; p˂.001), and progression free survival was 8 months (HR, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.77; p˂.001), both in favor of the combination arm. Although the rate of neutropenia was higher in the group receiving gemcitabine and cisplatin, there was no significant difference in the rate of neutropenia-associated infections between the 2 arms. Okusaka et al also reported similar findings in a phase two randomized study of 84 patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. Based on these results, the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin is considered to be the standard of care for first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers.
Triple-drug chemotherapy regimens also have been shown to be effective in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers, albeit in a very small number of patients. The phase three trial that evaluated fluorouracil, leucovorin and etoposide versus fluorouracil cisplatin and epirubicin didn't show one regimen to be significantly superior with respect to overall survival (12 months vs. 9 months, respectively) in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers, although the trial was underpowered to detect such a difference.
In a phase two trial, the combination panitumumab, a monoclonal anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, with gemcitabine and irinotecan showed encouraging efficacy with good tolerability in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma, with 5-month progression free survival rate of 69%.The median progression free survival and overall survival were 9.7 months and 12.9 months, respectively.
Results from the randomized phase three PRODIGE trial evaluating the combination of 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, oxaliplatin and Irinotecan (FOLFIRINOX) versus gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and good performance status showed dramatic improvements in both median PFS (6.4 vs 3.3 months; P˂ .001) and median OS (11.1 months vs. 6.8 months; P˂ .001). Because of these strong results the National comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) and many other societies added FOLFIRINOX as a preferred, category 1 recommendation for first line treatment of good performance status patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer in 2011.
There are, however, some concerns about the toxicity of FOLFIRINOX regimen. In the PRODIGE trial, some of the grade 3 and 4 toxicity rates that were significantly greater in the FOLFIRINOX group than in the gemcitabine group were 45.7% for neutropenia, 12.7% for diarrhea, and 9.1 % for thrombocytopenia and 9% for sensory neuropathy.
Despite the high levels of toxicity, no toxic deaths have been reported. Furthermore, the PRODIGE trial determined that, despite this toxicity, fewer patients in the FOLFIRINOX group than in the gemcitabine group experienced a degradation in their quality of life at 6 months (31% vs. 66%,p ˂ .001). A more detailed analysis of the quality of life of patients in this trial has been published and shows that FOLFIRINOX maintained and even improved quality of life more than gemcitabine did.
Based on the above data, the investigators designed this phase two study of the efficacy and toxicity of FOFIRINOX regimen in first line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancers. If the investigators achieved encouraging results, this regimen should then be compared with the standard combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin in future phase three trials.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Simon 2-stage optimum design Model
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental single arm | Experimental | Combination Product: FOLFIRINOXChemotherapy using the FOLFIRINOX regimen will be given every 2 weeks for a total of 12 cycles. FOLFIRINOX consist of: 1. Oxaliplatin-85 mg/m2 IV Day 1 2. Leucovorin-400 mg/m2 IV Day 1 3. Irinotecan-180 mg/m2 IV Day 1 4. Fluorouracil (FU)-400 mg/m2 IV bolus Day 1 5. Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 infused over 46 hours starting day 1 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Histologically confirmed locally advanced (irresectable) or metastatic biliary tract cancers.
- Measurable disease. Defined as tumor that have uni or bi dimensional measurement not less than 1.5 cm on any dimension.
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Signed written informed consent before enrolment.
- No prior chemotherapy or anti-neoplastic therapy other than radiotherapy more than 4 weeks prior to enrolment and to areas other than the measurable disease.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Known or suspected dihydropyrimidine deficiency.
- Presence of central nervous system metastasis.
- Previous malignancy within 5 years, except adequately treated non melanomatous skin cancer or in situ cervical cancer.
- Severe cardiovascular disease (congestive heart failure New York Heart Association class three or four, unstable angina pectoris, myocardial infarction or significant arrhythmias).
- Psychiatric or mental disorder, precluding understanding of the information of the trial related topics and giving valid informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FOLFIRINOXcombination chemotherapy using Oxaliplatin, Irinotecan, Leucovorin and Fluorouracil, given every 15 days for a total of 12 cycles | Combination product | Experimental single arm |
Primary outcome
Response rate
Time frame: 3 year
Evaluate the response rate using RECIST 1.1 criteria
2 secondary outcomes
progression free survival
Time frame: 4 years
overall survival
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: poor accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jan 2024.
- Results publication: PubMed 21561347Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, Adenis A, Raoul JL, Gourgou-Bourgade S, de la Fouchardiere C, Bennouna J, Bachet JB, Khemissa-Akouz F, Pere-Verge D, Delbaldo C, Assenat E, Chauffert B, Michel P, Montoto-Grillot C, Ducreux M; Groupe Tumeurs Digestives of Unicancer; PRODIGE Intergroup. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.
- Results publication: PubMed 20375404Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Biliary Tract Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Tissue Procurement and Natural History Study of Patients With Malignant Mesothelioma
Thymoma, Stomach Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With Propranolol and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Hepatopancreabiliary Tumors (BLOCKED)
Pancreatic Cancer, Hepatocellular Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Versus Capecitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Resected Biliary Tract Cancer
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Shouki Bazarbashi principal investigator
King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research cente
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing FOLFIRINOX in people with Biliary Tract Cancer, run by King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: poor accrual). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Response rate (time frame: 3 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03291899, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jan 2024.