AzTrials
AzTrials

Brain MetastasasesPhase 2ERASERNCT03288272

Evaluation of Repeated Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Multiple Brain Metastases.

A Phase 2 study testing Whole Brain Radiotherapy in people with Brain Metastasases, run by Stephanie Combs at 1 site in Germany.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) has been established as the treatment standard in patients with multiple cerebral metastases from solid tumors. However, intracerebral recurrence is possible and a repeated WBRT may be indicated to improve intracerebral tumor control. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Brain Metastasases
What is being tested?
Whole Brain Radiotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
Apr 2016to May 2018
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • histologically confirmed malignancy
  • previous WBRT
  • MR-imaging confirmed cerebral metastases (>1)
  • age ≥ 18 years of age
  • Karnofsky Performance Score ³60
  • For women with childbearing potential, (and men) adequate contraception.
  • Ability of subject to understand character and individual consequences of the clinical trial
  • Written informed consent (must be available before enrolment in the trial)

Who cannot join

  • refusal of the patients to take part in the study
  • Patients who have not yet recovered from acute high-grade toxicities of prior therapies
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Participation in another clinical study or observation period of competing trials, respectively

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr. contact

+49-89-4140- ext. 4501

stephanie.combs@tum.de

Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar

    Munich, 81675

    Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr., +49-89-4140- ext. 4501, stephanie.combs@tum.de

    Carmen Kessel, MA, +49-89-4140- ext. 4501, carmen.kessel@tum.de

    Recruiting

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Repeated Whole Brain Radiotherapy Versus Best Supportive Care for Multiple Brain Metastases - the Randomized Trial ERASER.

Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) has been established as the treatment standard in patients with multiple cerebral metastases from solid tumors. However, intracerebral recurrence is possible and a repeated WBRT may be indicated to improve intracerebral tumor control. Each institutsion offers different dosing regimens, which have all been published to be safe and effective. Some favor best supportive care only.

The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.

Read the detailed description

According to Nussbaum et al., 24-45% of cancer patients develop cerebral metastases during the course of the disease. Brain metastases are generally associated with a poor prognosis and high morbidity. Published median survival rates after WBRT are between 2 and 7 months. Standard of care in multiple BM is WBRT delivered as 30 Gy in 10 fractions, leading to modest palliation with a median survival of 3 to 5 months. Prognostic factors include the RPA-classification, performance status, response to steroids and evidence of systemic disease.

Unfortunately, intracerebral recurrence happens. For example, in the cohort of Meyners et al.(2010) on WBRT in relatively radioresistant tumors, median time to recurrence was 4.5months and the local control rates at 6 and 12 months post radiationem were 37% and 15%, respectively. Furthermore, the treatment of intracerebral recurrence after previous WBRT is challenging. In case of </= 3 recurrent BM, surgery or radiosurgery (RS) are options. One other option, especially in case of >3 recurrent BM is repeated WBRT. In this setting, one of the first reports on repeated WBRT was published by Cooper et al. in 1990. The authors reported on repeated WBRT (n=52) consisting of 25 Gy in 10 fractions. Response to reirradiation was seen in 42% of the patients. Furthermore, the patients improved by at least one level in their neurologic function status. Survival after second therapy averaged 5 months. In the report by Wong et al. (1996) median dose of retreatment (n=86) was 20 Gy. Resolution of symptoms was achieved in 27% of patients, partial improvement in 43% and no improvement or worsening of symptoms was seen in 29% of patients. The majority of patients had no significant toxicity secondary to re-irradiation. Five patients had radiographic abnormalities of their brain consistent with radiation-related changes. One patient had symptoms of dementia that was thought to be caused by radiotherapy. Sadikov et al. (2007) reported on 72 patients who underwent repeated WBRT for recurrent or progressive BM. The median survival after re-irradiation was 4.1 months. One patient was reported as having memory impairment and pituitary insufficiency after 5 months of progression-free survival.

In the report by Mayer et al. on re-irradiation tolerance of the human brain -in this analysis focused on recurrent glioma-, the authors concluded that radiation-induced brain tissue necrosis is found to occur at normalized tolerance doses of cumulative > 100 Gy.

The current study protocol is aimed at evaluating primarily the toxicity as well as secondarily the local and loco-regional tumor control, overall survival and QoL after repeated WBRT using 2 different dose concepts (20 Gy in 10 Fx vs. 30 Gy in 15 Fx) compared to BSC.

In the present trial, the primary endpoint toxicity as well as the secondary endpoints QoL, loco-regional progression-free survival, overall survival and imaging response in patients previously treated with WBRT requiring repeated WBRT for intracerebral tumor progression will be evaluated.

Being tested
Whole Brain Radiotherapy, Best Supportive Care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Whole Brain RadiotherapyRadiation

    Radiotherapy of the whole brain

  • Best Supportive CareOther

    Best Supportive Care including nutrition, pain medication, steroids as needed

Study groups in NCT03288272
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 GyActive comparatorArm 1 - WBRT 10 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 20 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy
Receives: Radiation: Whole Brain Radiotherapy
Arm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 GyActive comparatorArm 2 - WBRT 15 x 2 Gy Whole brain radiotherapy with a total dose of 30 Gy in single fractions of 2 Gy
Receives: Radiation: Whole Brain Radiotherapy
Arm 3 - Best Supportive CareActive comparatorSymptomatic treatment includes steroids, pain medication, nutritional support etc.
Receives: Other: Best Supportive Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Toxicity

    The primary endpoint is toxicity according to CTCAE after whole brain radiotherapy.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. loco-regional progression-free survival

    follow-up and local control of brain metastases as well as loco-regional control

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Quality of Life (QOL)

    QOL

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Survival

    survival after radiotherapy

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2017
  2. Study startApr 2016
  3. Primary completionMay 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomization Best Supportive Care, Two Radiotherapy Dosing Regimens
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03288272
Sponsor's protocol ID
ERASER
Acronym
ERASER
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
15 May 2016
Last updated
20 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Scharp M, Hauswald H, Bischof M, Debus J, Combs SE. Re-irradiation in the treatment of patients with cerebral metastases of solid tumors: retrospective analysis. Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 3;9:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-4.

    PubMed 24387239

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Whole Brain Radiotherapy in people with Brain Metastasases, run by Stephanie Combs at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Stephanie E Combs, Prof. Dr. (+49-89-4140- ext. 4501, stephanie.combs@tum.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Toxicity (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03288272, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in