AzTrials
AzTrials

Torticollis CongenitalNCT03266224

Digital Analysis of Ultrasonographic Images in Children With Wry Neck

An observational study of Torticollis Congenital and Wryneck, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Torticollis is a clinical sign or symptom that could be the result of a variety of underlying disorders. Among the etiologies, Congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) with impairment of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) is the most frequent cause of torticollis in infants. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 12 months
Conditions the study is for
Torticollis Congenital, Wryneck
How many people
29 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
30 Apr 2013to 15 Aug 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 12 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: primary care clinic

Who may be able to join

  • infants with congenital muscular torticollis and
  • age <12 months at diagnosis

Who cannot join

  • wryneck caused by other known problems, including strabismus, trauma, neurogenic problems, congenital malformation, or bony deformity (e.g., hemivertebrae of the cervical spine)

About this study

Torticollis is a clinical sign or symptom that could be the result of a variety of underlying disorders. Among the etiologies, Congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) with impairment of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) is the most frequent cause of torticollis in infants. CMT is a postural deformity detected at birth or shortly after birth, primarily resulting from unilateral shortening and fibrosis of the SCM. Infants with CMT display head tilt to one side, which is often combined with rotation of the head to the opposite side. In 2002, Chih-Chin Hsu et al. reported that CMT could be classified into four types. The majority of Type I and II fibrosis improved after conservative treatment. However, Type III and Type IV had more probability in need of surgical correction. However, this categorization lacks of objective and quantitative measurement and can be different by subjective judgement of different physicians. The purpose of this study is tried to perform digital analysis of ultrasonography images to establish an objective, quantitative method and to assess its relevance with clinical symptoms and prognosis.

This study will collect the children younger than one year-old who were impressed or suspected to have torticollis in physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic to assess the relationship between digitalization results of ultrasound image and clinical manifestations and prognosis. Digital image analysis of ultrasound which contains both sides of the SCM in transverse and longitudinal view for comparison of lesion side and sound side will be performed after the initial enrollment and every six months later. Evaluation of clinical manifestations includes measurement of side difference of angles in bilateral neck lateral flexion, rotation and habitual head position will performed using an arthrodial protractor by a trained member at the beginning of physical therapy and one month later, then every 2-3 months. All cases will be followed for 1 and a half years. We expect to find some typical characteristics of CMT through digital analysis of the SCM. These characteristics include the muscle thickness and intensity of echogenicity in the region of interest. The Pearson's correlation will be performed to analyze the relevance of quantitative side differences in ultrasonography and clinical manifestations including side differences of neck rotation, lateral flexion and habitual head position between lesion sides and sound sides.

Read the detailed description

Torticollis is a clinical sign or symptom that could be the result of a variety of underlying disorders. Among the etiologies, Congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) with impairment of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) is the most frequent cause of torticollis in infants. CMT is a postural deformity detected at birth or shortly after birth, primarily resulting from unilateral shortening and fibrosis of the SCM muscle. Infants with CMT display head tilt to one side, which is often combined with rotation of the head to the opposite side. CMT is estimated to occur in one infant of every 300 live births. Plagiocephaly is reported as a coexisting impairment in 80% to 90.1% of children with CMT.

The pathophysiology and etiology of SCM impairment in CMT is still unknown. Prominent theories related to the cause of SCM impairment in CMT include intrauterine crowding, muscle trauma during a difficult delivery, soft tissue compression leading to compartment syndrome, and congenital abnormalities of soft tissue differentiation within the SCM muscle.

Children with CMT can be assigned to one of three clinical subgroups: 1) children with a palpable swelling or pseudotumor of the sternocleidomastoid, 2) children with SCM tightness but no tumor, and 3) children with all the features of muscular torticollis without muscle tightness or tumor.

In 2002, Chih-Chin Hsu et al. reported that CMT could be classified into four types. Type I denoted a heteroechoic mass in the affected muscles; Type II represented diffuse echogenic dots and lines against the hypoechoic background with no detectable mass. The alignment of perimysium appeared irregular instead of parallel on longitudinal sonograms; Type III indicated diffuse hyperechoic echogenicity along the entire muscle and almost no hypoechoic background could be seen; and Type IV had a hyperechoic band in the involved muscles. The study also evaluated the histology of each type of fibrosis. Type I and II fibrosis revealed hyperplastic fibrous tissue mingled with muscle fiber. Mature fibroblasts with complete absence of normal muscle tissue could be found in Type III fibrosis and the fibrotic bands in Type IV fibrosis. The majority of Type I and II fibrosis improved after conservative treatment. However, Type III and Type IV had more probability in need of surgical correction. However, this categorization lacks of objective and quantitative measurement and can be different by subjective judgement of different physicians. The purpose of this study is tried to perform digital analysis of ultrasonography images to establish an objective, quantitative method and to assess its relevance with clinical symptoms and prognosis.

General Design:

This study is planned to quantify ultrasonography image of wry neck patients by digital analysis.

Subjects:

This study will collect the children younger than 1 y/o who were impressed or suspected to have torticollis in physical medicine and rehabilitation clinic. The case number is estimated around 60 in a 3-year-period enrollment. . Exclusion criteria include torticollis by other known causes like strabismus, trauma, neurogenic problems, congenital malformation or bony deformity (e.g. hemivertebrae of cervical spine). Informed consent will be given to the parents before enrollment.

Investigation Steps:

  1. Ultrasonography examination and digital analysis: Ultrasonography which contains both sides of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in transverse and longitudinal view for comparison of lesion side and sound side will be performed by expert physicians using a 14-megahertz linear-array transducer after the initial enrollment and every six months later. Digital analysis of the images will be carried by a member expert in computer science.
  2. Evaluation of clinical manifestations: Evaluation of clinical manifestations includes measurement of side difference of angles in bilateral neck lateral flexion, rotation and habitual head position will performed using an arthrodial protractor by a trained member at the beginning of physical therapy and one month later, then every 2-3 months. Each measurement will be repeated 3 times to get the mean value. All cases will be followed for 1 and a half years, however, if the symptoms got completely recovery (the neck range of motion and position completely equal to sound side) or any complications resulting from the evaluation, the evaluation will be stopped.
  3. Evaluation of influence of rehabilitation effect:

The parents will be inquired by a questionnaire one month later and then every 2-3 months to realize the treatment effect of the wry neck. The duration and frequency of massage and stretch programs by the therapist or the family or the other methods to treat the problem like wearing a neck collar, proper positioning… etc will be included in the semi-quantitative questionnaire.

Data Analysis:

Some representative image features will be expected to be computed from the SCM ultrasonic images. These features include area, both max and min Feret's diameters, and brightness of echogenicity in the region of interest. The ultrasonic image of the affected side would be compared with that of the sound side from their corresponding texture features. The Pearson's correlation will be performed to analyze the relevance of quantitative side differences of texture features in ultrasonography and clinical manifestations including side differences of neck rotation, lateral flexion and habitual head position between lesion sides and sound sides. Linear regression will be also used to adjust the influence of the treatment effect.

Keywords
congenital muscular torticollis, wryneck, sternocleidomastoid, ultrasonography, digital analysis
Medical subject headings
Congenital torticollis, Torticollis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03266224
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Wryneckthose with a condition

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. cervical passive range of motion

    Measurement with an arthrodial protractor by a trained physiotherapist at the beginning of physical therapy and one month later, then every 2-3 months. Each measurement will be repeated 3 times to get the mean value.. All cases will be followed for 1 and a half years, however, if the symptoms got completely recovery (the neck range of motion and position completely equal to sound side) or any complications resulting from the evaluation, the evaluation will be stopped.

    Measured: From the date of beginning of physical therapy until the date of wryneck condition resolved or date of any complications resulting from the evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Area in cm^2

    Ultrasonography which contains both sides of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in transverse and longitudinal view for comparison of lesion side and sound side will be performed by expert physicians using a 14-megahertz linear-array transducer after the initial enrollment and every six months later. Digital analysis of the images will be carried by a member expert in computer science. The area was measured in pixels on the original image. Thus, dividing by the pixels of one square centimeter on each sonogram, the unit of the area was converted to square centimeter.

    Measured: From the date of initial enrollment until the date of wryneck condition resolved or date of any complications resulting from the evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months.

  2. Brightness of echogenicity in %

    Ultrasonography which contains both sides of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in transverse and longitudinal view for comparison of lesion side and sound side will be performed by expert physicians using a 14-megahertz linear-array transducer after the initial enrollment and every six months later. Digital analysis of the images will be carried by a member expert in computer science. The sonograms were grayscale images, and the mean gray value was measured from 0 to 255 in the image analysis software where zero was designated black and 255 was designated white. Therefore, the mean gray value was divided by 255 and then converted to a percentage. In this study, zero percent was designated black, and 100% was designated white and indicated the brightness of the echogenicity on the sonogram.

    Measured: From the date of initial enrollment until the date of wryneck condition resolved or date of any complications resulting from the evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months.

  3. max Feret's diameter in cm

    Ultrasonography which contains both sides of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in transverse and longitudinal view for comparison of lesion side and sound side will be performed by expert physicians using a 14-megahertz linear-array transducer after the initial enrollment and every six months later. Digital analysis of the images will be carried by a member expert in computer science. The max Feret's diameter was measured in pixels on the original image. Thus, dividing by the pixels of one centimeter on each sonogram, the unit of the max Feret's diameter was converted to centimeter.

    Measured: From the date of initial enrollment until the date of wryneck condition resolved or date of any complications resulting from the evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months.

  4. min Feret's diameter in cm

    Ultrasonography which contains both sides of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in transverse and longitudinal view for comparison of lesion side and sound side will be performed by expert physicians using a 14-megahertz linear-array transducer after the initial enrollment and every six months later. Digital analysis of the images will be carried by a member expert in computer science. The min Feret's diameter was measured in pixels on the original image. Thus, dividing by the pixels of one centimeter on each sonogram, the unit of the min Feret's diameter was converted to centimeter.

    Measured: From the date of initial enrollment until the date of wryneck condition resolved or date of any complications resulting from the evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2017
  2. Study start30 Apr 2013
  3. Primary completion15 Aug 2015
  4. Study completion15 Aug 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
29 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03266224
Sponsor's protocol ID
100-3793A3
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
22 Aug 2017
Last updated
31 Aug 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cheng JC, Tang SP, Chen TM, Wong MW, Wong EM. The clinical presentation and outcome of treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants--a study of 1,086 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Jul;35(7):1091-6. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2000.7833.

    PubMed 10917303
  • Canale ST, Griffin DW, Hubbard CN. Congenital muscular torticollis. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982 Jul;64(6):810-6.

    PubMed 7085709
  • Hollier L, Kim J, Grayson BH, McCarthy JG. Congenital muscular torticollis and the associated craniofacial changes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Mar;105(3):827-35. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200003000-00001. No abstract available.

    PubMed 10724239
  • Cheng JC, Wong MW, Tang SP, Chen TM, Shum SL, Wong EM. Clinical determinants of the outcome of manual stretching in the treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants. A prospective study of eight hundred and twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 May;83(5):679-87. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200105000-00006.

    PubMed 11379737
  • Clarren SK, Smith DW, Hanson JW. Helmet treatment for plagiocephaly and congenital muscular torticollis. J Pediatr. 1979 Jan;94(1):43-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(79)80347-9.

    PubMed 758420
  • Cheng JC, Au AW. Infantile torticollis: a review of 624 cases. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994 Nov-Dec;14(6):802-8.

    PubMed 7814599
  • Dunn PM. Congenital postural deformities. Br Med Bull. 1976 Jan;32(1):71-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071327. No abstract available.

    PubMed 130955
  • Ling CM, Low YS. Sternomastoid tumor and muscular torticollis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972 Jul-Aug;86:144-50. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197207000-00020. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5065412
  • Davids JR, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ. Congenital muscular torticollis: sequela of intrauterine or perinatal compartment syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop. 1993 Mar-Apr;13(2):141-7.

    PubMed 8459000
  • Tang S, Liu Z, Quan X, Qin J, Zhang D. Sternocleidomastoid pseudotumor of infants and congenital muscular torticollis: fine-structure research. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Mar-Apr;18(2):214-8.

    PubMed 9531404
  • Tang SF, Hsu KH, Wong AM, Hsu CC, Chang CH. Longitudinal followup study of ultrasonography in congenital muscular torticollis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Oct;(403):179-85. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200210000-00026.

    PubMed 12360024

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Torticollis Congenital and Wryneck, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

cervical passive range of motion (time frame: From the date of beginning of physical therapy until the date of wryneck condition resolved or date of any complications resulting from the evaluation, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03266224, which also lists 11 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in