Difference, IndividualTUS-STRATNCT03212248
CRP and Thoracic Emergency Ultrasound in Pneumonia
An observational study of Difference, Individual and Community-acquired Pneumonia, run by Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This preliminary study investigates in patients with possible clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, clues and biomarker assessed at Emergency Department (ED) triage, potentially predicting detection of lung consolidation by Thoracic-ultrasound (TUS) and/or by Chest-X-Rays. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Difference, Individual, Community-acquired Pneumonia, Ultrasound
- What is being tested?
- Thoracic Ultrasound (TUS)
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2016to 30 Jun 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Criteria of exclusion: severe respiratory failure - pulse oxymetry ≥92%, myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary edema or severe heart failure, excluded on clinical basis, severe COPD excluded by patient's history and by subsequent CXR, CURB65 ≥3.
Who may be able to join
- presence of history and symptoms, signs at physical examination and early laboratory clues of CAP According to the preliminary triage, in all patients, as a routine assessment, breath frequency, blood pressure and heart rate, pulse oxymetry, serum and blood analysis including creatinine and urea, CRP, blood cell counts and hemoglobin assay, were performed, also for CURB65 staging. ECG was preliminary done in all patients with chest pain, dyspnea and/or fever.
Who cannot join
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: CRP (C-Reactive-Protein) and Pneumonia Biomarkers Stratification for Selectively Addressing Priorities in Thoracic Emergency Ultrasound in Pneumonia
This preliminary study investigates in patients with possible clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, clues and biomarker assessed at Emergency Department (ED) triage, potentially predicting detection of lung consolidation by Thoracic-ultrasound (TUS) and/or by Chest-X-Rays. Cough and high admission CRP levels will be defined according to the cutoff defined by ROC analysis, will be challenged if independently associated with TUS lung consolidation detection High level of the chosen biomarker, and any of the considered symptoms, in otherwise not extremely critical patients (CURB65≤3), should prompt to immediate confirm by TUS, during the physical examination. This may limit the need of further radiological investigations allowing targeted workup.
Read the detailed description
Chest-X-Rays (CXR), Computerized Tomography (CT) or Thoracic Ultrasound (TUS) provide images deemed consistent with acute lung consolidation and suitable to confirm the diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Patients which may be affected by CAP are many , but diagnosis is not straightforward because we are managing "a disease characterized by educated guesswork" . Comprehensive imaging workup may be not regularly affordable in busy emergency rooms. Point-of-care TUS allows reliable diagnosis of lung consolidation and of pleural effusion. Regretfully, adequate TUS expertise is more warranted than actually available in most medical departments. Even not specifically investigated, a delay or even an impairment of appropriate TUS or CXR evaluation for several patients may occur due to time- or resource-limiting factors.
Clinical clues of lung consolidation are many. Key symptoms are cough, fever, chest pain and dyspnea with tachypnea, while the major physical signs are chest crackles and dullness. Surrogate biomarkers more easily obtainable in emergency facilities are C-reactive-protein (CRP), peripheral non-invasive pulse-oxymetry and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) which is an index of systemic inflammation associated also with pneumonia and subsequent outcome.
The aim of this preliminary study is to evaluate if any clue and which biomarker, including NLR, assessed at Emergency Department (ED) triage, is predictive of the subsequent detection of lung consolidation by TUS and/or by CXR.
The minimal groups' size, with and without TUS or CXR lung consolidation, was calculated according to the difference of the averages of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the reference the study of Yoon et al. Accepting alpha 0.01, for the probability of type 1 error, and power 80% for probability of type 2 error, a minimum sample size of 19 participants in each group (total 38) was required. Student's t-tests assessed the differences of CRP, WBC - white blood cells count - (TLC), neutrophil count (TNC) and NLR, between the groups with TUS and, separately, with CXR lung consolidation.Thereafter, by ROC (receiver operating curve) analysis, a cutoff of NLR, total leucocytes count (TLC), total Neutrophil count (TNC) and of CRP was calculated vs. the optimal reliability for the detection of TUS consolidation; sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (The proportion of all tests that are correct), and relative Odds Ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) of the individual symptoms, and ORs of so defined laboratory assay cut-offs were calculated separately vs. TUS and CXR consolidation.
- Being tested
- Thoracic Ultrasound (TUS)
- Medical subject headings
- Community-Acquired Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Thoracic Ultrasound (TUS)Diagnostic test
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Odds of detecting lung consolidation by TUS according to symptoms or biomarkers' cutoffs
ultrasound
Measured: ten minutes
Secondary outcomes (1)
Odds of detecting lung consolidation by Chest X Rays (CXR) according to symptoms or biomarkers' cutoffs
radiology
Measured: ten minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2017
- Study start2 Jan 2016
- Primary completion30 Apr 2016
- Study completion30 Jun 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Difference, IndividualStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ospedale Civile di Ragusa, Italy
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guglielmo Trovato, MD, PhD, Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele
- Investigators
- GUGLIELMO TROVATO, MD, Study chair, medint
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03212248
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TUS-STRAT
- Acronym
- TUS-STRAT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2017
- Last updated
- 11 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Interrigi MC, Trovato FM, Catalano D, Trovato GM. Emergency thoracic ultrasound and clinical risk management. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Feb 9;13:151-160. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S126770. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28223817Sperandeo M, Rea G, Grimaldi MA, Trovato F, Dimitri LM, Carnevale V. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound does not discriminate between community acquired pneumonia and lung cancer. Thorax. 2017 Feb;72(2):178-180. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208913. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
PubMed 27742872Trovato FM, Catalano D, Trovato GM. Thoracic ultrasound: An adjunctive and valuable imaging tool in emergency, resource-limited settings and for a sustainable monitoring of patients. World J Radiol. 2016 Sep 28;8(9):775-784. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.775.
PubMed 27721940Trovato FM, Catalano D. Diagnosis of Pneumonia by Lung Ultrasound in Children and Limited Resources Subsets: A Valuable Medical Breakthrough. Chest. 2016 Jul;150(1):258-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.032. No abstract available.
PubMed 27396790Waterer GW. The Diagnosis of Community-acquired Pneumonia. Do We Need to Take a Big Step Backward? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct 15;192(8):912-3. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1460ED. No abstract available.
PubMed 26469839Cataudella E, Giraffa CM, Di Marca S, Pulvirenti A, Alaimo S, Pisano M, Terranova V, Corriere T, Ronsisvalle ML, Di Quattro R, Stancanelli B, Giordano M, Vancheri C, Malatino L. Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio: An Emerging Marker Predicting Prognosis in Elderly Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1796-1801. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14894. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
PubMed 28407209Yoon NB, Son C, Um SJ. Role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in the differential diagnosis between pulmonary tuberculosis and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Lab Med. 2013 Mar;33(2):105-10. doi: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.2.105. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
PubMed 23482854
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CRP (C-Reactive-Protein) and Pneumonia Biomarkers Stratification for Selectively Addressing Priorities in Thoracic Emergency Ultrasound in Pneumonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03212248
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TUS-STRAT / TUS-STRAT
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio EmanueleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ospedale Civile di Ragusa, Italy
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This preliminary study investigates in patients with possible clinical diagnosis of pneumonia, clues and biomarker assessed at Emergency Department (ED) triage, potentially predicting detection of lung consolidation by Thoracic-ultrasound (TUS) and/or by Chest-X-Rays. Cough and high admission CRP levels will be defined according to the cutoff defined by ROC analysis, will be challenged if independently associated with TUS lung consolidation detection High level of the chosen biomarker, and any of the considered symptoms, in otherwise not extremely critical patients (CURB65≤3), should prompt to immediate confirm by TUS, during the physical examination. This may limit the need of further radiological investigations allowing targeted workup.
Detailed description
Chest-X-Rays (CXR), Computerized Tomography (CT) or Thoracic Ultrasound (TUS) provide images deemed consistent with acute lung consolidation and suitable to confirm the diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia (CAP). Patients which may be affected by CAP are many , but diagnosis is not straightforward because we are managing "a disease characterized by educated guesswork" . Comprehensive imaging workup may be not regularly affordable in busy emergency rooms. Point-of-care TUS allows reliable diagnosis of lung consolidation and of pleural effusion. Regretfully, adequate TUS expertise is more warranted than actually available in most medical departments. Even not specifically investigated, a delay or even an impairment of appropriate TUS or CXR evaluation for several patients may occur due to time- or resource-limiting factors.
Clinical clues of lung consolidation are many. Key symptoms are cough, fever, chest pain and dyspnea with tachypnea, while the major physical signs are chest crackles and dullness. Surrogate biomarkers more easily obtainable in emergency facilities are C-reactive-protein (CRP), peripheral non-invasive pulse-oxymetry and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) which is an index of systemic inflammation associated also with pneumonia and subsequent outcome.
The aim of this preliminary study is to evaluate if any clue and which biomarker, including NLR, assessed at Emergency Department (ED) triage, is predictive of the subsequent detection of lung consolidation by TUS and/or by CXR.
The minimal groups' size, with and without TUS or CXR lung consolidation, was calculated according to the difference of the averages of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the reference the study of Yoon et al. Accepting alpha 0.01, for the probability of type 1 error, and power 80% for probability of type 2 error, a minimum sample size of 19 participants in each group (total 38) was required. Student's t-tests assessed the differences of CRP, WBC - white blood cells count - (TLC), neutrophil count (TNC) and NLR, between the groups with TUS and, separately, with CXR lung consolidation.Thereafter, by ROC (receiver operating curve) analysis, a cutoff of NLR, total leucocytes count (TLC), total Neutrophil count (TNC) and of CRP was calculated vs. the optimal reliability for the detection of TUS consolidation; sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (The proportion of all tests that are correct), and relative Odds Ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CI) of the individual symptoms, and ORs of so defined laboratory assay cut-offs were calculated separately vs. TUS and CXR consolidation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Criteria of exclusion: severe respiratory failure - pulse oxymetry ≥92%, myocardial infarction, acute pulmonary edema or severe heart failure, excluded on clinical basis, severe COPD excluded by patient's history and by subsequent CXR, CURB65 ≥3.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- presence of history and symptoms, signs at physical examination and early laboratory clues of CAP According to the preliminary triage, in all patients, as a routine assessment, breath frequency, blood pressure and heart rate, pulse oxymetry, serum and blood analysis including creatinine and urea, CRP, blood cell counts and hemoglobin assay, were performed, also for CURB65 staging. ECG was preliminary done in all patients with chest pain, dyspnea and/or fever.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Thoracic Ultrasound (TUS) | Diagnostic test | – |
Primary outcome
Odds of detecting lung consolidation by TUS according to symptoms or biomarkers' cutoffs
Time frame: ten minutes
ultrasound
1 secondary outcome
Odds of detecting lung consolidation by Chest X Rays (CXR) according to symptoms or biomarkers' cutoffs
Time frame: ten minutes
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Jul 2017.
- Background: PubMed 28223817Interrigi MC, Trovato FM, Catalano D, Trovato GM. Emergency thoracic ultrasound and clinical risk management. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Feb 9;13:151-160. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S126770. eCollection 2017.
- Background: PubMed 27742872Sperandeo M, Rea G, Grimaldi MA, Trovato F, Dimitri LM, Carnevale V. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound does not discriminate between community acquired pneumonia and lung cancer. Thorax. 2017 Feb;72(2):178-180. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208913. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
- Background: PubMed 27721940Trovato FM, Catalano D, Trovato GM. Thoracic ultrasound: An adjunctive and valuable imaging tool in emergency, resource-limited settings and for a sustainable monitoring of patients. World J Radiol. 2016 Sep 28;8(9):775-784. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i9.775.
- Background: PubMed 27396790Trovato FM, Catalano D. Diagnosis of Pneumonia by Lung Ultrasound in Children and Limited Resources Subsets: A Valuable Medical Breakthrough. Chest. 2016 Jul;150(1):258-60. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.04.032. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26469839Waterer GW. The Diagnosis of Community-acquired Pneumonia. Do We Need to Take a Big Step Backward? Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct 15;192(8):912-3. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1460ED. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28407209Cataudella E, Giraffa CM, Di Marca S, Pulvirenti A, Alaimo S, Pisano M, Terranova V, Corriere T, Ronsisvalle ML, Di Quattro R, Stancanelli B, Giordano M, Vancheri C, Malatino L. Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio: An Emerging Marker Predicting Prognosis in Elderly Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1796-1801. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14894. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 23482854Yoon NB, Son C, Um SJ. Role of the neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in the differential diagnosis between pulmonary tuberculosis and bacterial community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Lab Med. 2013 Mar;33(2):105-10. doi: 10.3343/alm.2013.33.2.105. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Difference, Individual
RecruitingPhase 2
Comparing Different Treatment Lengths for Venetoclax in Older People With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Beamion BCGC-1: A Study to Find a Suitable Dose of Zongertinib Used Alone and in Combination With Other Treatments to Test Whether it Helps People With Different Types of HER2+ Cancer That Has Spread
Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Different Skin Care Approaches to Prevent Skin Reactions in People With Breast Cancer Receiving Radiation Therapy After Mastectomy
Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Female
Not yet recruitingObservational study
SERENITY Study of Chronic Pain Interference in Adults
Chronic Low Back Pain, Spinal Cord Injury
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Test How Different Doses of BI 1703880 in Combination With Ezabenlimab Are Tolerated in People With Different Types of Advanced Cancer (Solid Tumours)
Solid Tumors
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GUGLIELMO TROVATO, MD study chair
medint
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Difference, Individual and Community-acquired Pneumonia, run by Azienda Ospedaliera, Universitaria Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Odds of detecting lung consolidation by TUS according to symptoms or biomarkers' cutoffs (time frame: ten minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03212248, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2017.