RehabilitationMIPANCT03125538
Motor Imagery Practice on Amputees (MIPA)
A study testing Motor Imagery in people with Rehabilitation, run by Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Motor imagery practice (MIP), which is the repeated internal representation of a movement without engaging its physical execution and which shares a neurofunctional equivalence with physical practice, has been show to contribute to promote motor recovery and pain alleviation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rehabilitation
- What is being tested?
- Motor Imagery
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 25 Feb 2017to 30 Oct 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Suffering from acute transtibial or transfemoral lower-limb amputation
- Having signed informed consent for an clinical study
- Having a score above 24/30 at the Mini Mental Status Examination
Who cannot join
- Persons under any administrative/judicial measure
- Participants refusing to be informed of the results of the experiment
- Persons with other motor impairments
- Persons with neurologic and/or psychiatric disorders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre Médico-Chirirgical de Réadaptation des Massues
Lyon, Rhône, 69322
Isabelle Laroyenne, Doctor, +33 472 38 46 18, i-laroyenne@cmcr-massues.com
Elodie Saruco, Master, +33 626 38 49 50, elodie.saruco@univ-lyon1.fr
About this study
Official title: Therapeutic Effects of Motor Imagery Practice Following Lower-limb Amputation
Motor imagery practice (MIP), which is the repeated internal representation of a movement without engaging its physical execution and which shares a neurofunctional equivalence with physical practice, has been show to contribute to promote motor recovery and pain alleviation. Despite the extensive body of evidence concerning MIP therapeutic effects, the impact of mental training during lower-limb amputees' rehabilitation process remains to be investigated. This study was designed to assess MIP effects on the relearning of walking and the frequency and intensity of phantom-limb pain among acute lower-limb amputees. Data should contribute to scale up the tools made available to therapists and extend the scope of MIP application. Moreover, results may contribute to directly provide patients recovering from a lower-limb amputation with a cost-effective and adaptable technique that could considerably improve their quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Arms:
Arm label: Experimental
Arm type: Experimental
Arm description: Participants from the experimental group will perform MIP concomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program.
Intervention type: Other
Intervention name: Motor Imagery Practice of locomotor tasks
Intervention Description: Together with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the experimental group will mentally rehearse 3 different locomotor exercises that they already physically performed beforehand.
Exercise 1: 10m Walk
Exercise 2: Timed Up and Go test (rise up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, come back to the chair, turn around and sit down)
Exercise 3: Stairs climbing test (climb up 4 stairs, turn around, climb down the for stairs)
Two min of MIP will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of MIP per day.
Locomotor capacities and phantom-limb pain intensity will be assessed at 5 different moments of the functional rehabilitation:
Evaluation 1: first day of functional rehabilitation Evaluation 2: right after prosthesis fitting and when patients are able to walk with it during 10min Evaluation 3: three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 4: one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 5: six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment
Arm label: Control
Arm type: Active comparator
Arm description: Concomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program, participants from the control group will perform a cognitive task that has no impact on motor rehabilitation (word scramble game).
Intervention type: Other
Intervention name: Control cognitive task
Intervention Description: Together with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the control group will spend equivalent time focusing on a cognitive task without impact on motor rehabilitation.
Two min of this cognitive task will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of control task per day.
As for patients of the experimental group, locomotor capacities and phantom-limb pain intensity of participants from the control group will be assessed at 5 different moments of the functional rehabilitation:
Evaluation 1: first day of functional rehabilitation Evaluation 2: right after prosthesis fitting and when patients are able to walk with it during 10min Evaluation 3: three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 4: one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 5: six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation
- Being tested
- Motor Imagery, Control Task
- Keywords
- Motor Imagery, Amputation, Functional rehabilitation, Locomotion, Phantom-limb pain
- Medical subject headings
- Phantom Limb
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Motor ImageryOther
Together with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the experimental group will mentally rehearse 3 different locomotor exercises that they already physically performed beforehand.
Exercise 1: 10m Walk
Exercise 2: Timed Up and Go test (rise up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, come back to the chair, turn around and sit down)
Exercise 3: Stairs climbing test (climb up 4 stairs, turn around, climb down the for stairs)
Two min of MIP will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of MIP per day.
Control TaskOther
Together with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the control group will spend equivalent time focusing on a cognitive task without impact on motor rehabilitation ((word scramble game).
Two min of this cognitive task will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of control task per day.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Imagery | Experimental | Participants from the experimental group will perform MIP concomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program. Receives: Other: Motor Imagery |
| Control task | Active comparator | Concomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program, participants from the control group will perform a cognitive task that has no impact on motor rehabilitation (word scramble game). Receives: Other: Control Task |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MIP effects on simple walking
Duration required to perform a 10m walk will be assessed at 1) patients first day of functional rehabilitation, 2) right after prosthesis fitting and when they are able to walk with it during 10min, 3) three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all the patients), 4) one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients), and 5) six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment.
Measured: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
MIP effects on the Timed Up and Go test (complex walking task involving turning, and raise and sit movements)
Duration required to perform the test Timed Up and Go will be assessed at 1) patients first day of functional rehabilitation, 2) right after prosthesis fitting and when they are able to walk with it during 10min, 3) three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all the patients), 4) one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients), and 5) six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment.
Measured: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
MIP effects on a climbing locomotor task
Duration required to perform 4 stairs climbing test (up and down) will be assessed at 1) patients first day of functional rehabilitation, 2) right after prosthesis fitting and when they are able to walk with it during 10min, 3) three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all the patients), 4) one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients), and 5) six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment.
Measured: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Phantom-limb pain
Patients will rate from 0 (no pain at all) to 100 (the worst pain possible), the intensity of the phantom-limb pain they experienced during the last 24h. Assessment will be performed during the 5 evaluations, as described for the primary outcome measure.
Measured: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Motor imagery time
The time required to imagine the three locomotor tasks (walking, Timed Up and Go and stairs climbing tests) and a simple movement (hip abduction) will be recorded. Assessment will be performed during the 5 evaluations, as described for the primary outcome measure.
Measured: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Motor imagery vividness
The capacity of patients to perform vivid MI (clear images and intense kinesthetic sensations while imaging) will be measured with the Kinesthetic and Visual Motor Imagery Questionnaire. Assessment will be performed during the 5 evaluations, as described for the primary outcome measure.
Measured: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2017
- Study start25 Feb 2017
- Primary completion30 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- To avoid group contamination, a first group of 10 control participants will be completed. Then, an experimental group of 10 patients will be assessed. In order to complete a 40 persons cohort, this will be repeated one time (other 10 control then 10 experimental participants).
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Aymeric Guillot, Professor, Principal investigator, Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03125538
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Libm
- Acronym
- MIPA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2017
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Saruco E, Saimpont A, Di Rienzo F, De Witte B, Laroyenne I, Mateo F, Lapenderie M, Solard SG, Perretant I, Frenot C, Jackson PL, Guillot A. Towards efficient motor imagery interventions after lower-limb amputation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 15;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01348-3.
PubMed 38622634
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Therapeutic Effects of Motor Imagery Practice Following Lower-limb Amputation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03125538
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MIPA / Libm
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- Motor Imagery, Amputation, Functional rehabilitation, Locomotion, Phantom-limb pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la MotricitéUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Feb 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Motor imagery practice (MIP), which is the repeated internal representation of a movement without engaging its physical execution and which shares a neurofunctional equivalence with physical practice, has been show to contribute to promote motor recovery and pain alleviation. Despite the extensive body of evidence concerning MIP therapeutic effects, the impact of mental training during lower-limb amputees' rehabilitation process remains to be investigated. This study was designed to assess MIP effects on the relearning of walking and the frequency and intensity of phantom-limb pain among acute lower-limb amputees. Data should contribute to scale up the tools made available to therapists and extend the scope of MIP application. Moreover, results may contribute to directly provide patients recovering from a lower-limb amputation with a cost-effective and adaptable technique that could considerably improve their quality of life.
Detailed description
Arms:
Arm label: Experimental
Arm type: Experimental
Arm description: Participants from the experimental group will perform MIP concomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program.
Intervention type: Other
Intervention name: Motor Imagery Practice of locomotor tasks
Intervention Description: Together with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the experimental group will mentally rehearse 3 different locomotor exercises that they already physically performed beforehand.
Exercise 1: 10m Walk
Exercise 2: Timed Up and Go test (rise up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, come back to the chair, turn around and sit down)
Exercise 3: Stairs climbing test (climb up 4 stairs, turn around, climb down the for stairs)
Two min of MIP will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of MIP per day.
Locomotor capacities and phantom-limb pain intensity will be assessed at 5 different moments of the functional rehabilitation:
Evaluation 1: first day of functional rehabilitation Evaluation 2: right after prosthesis fitting and when patients are able to walk with it during 10min Evaluation 3: three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 4: one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 5: six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment
Arm label: Control
Arm type: Active comparator
Arm description: Concomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program, participants from the control group will perform a cognitive task that has no impact on motor rehabilitation (word scramble game).
Intervention type: Other
Intervention name: Control cognitive task
Intervention Description: Together with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the control group will spend equivalent time focusing on a cognitive task without impact on motor rehabilitation.
Two min of this cognitive task will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of control task per day.
As for patients of the experimental group, locomotor capacities and phantom-limb pain intensity of participants from the control group will be assessed at 5 different moments of the functional rehabilitation:
Evaluation 1: first day of functional rehabilitation Evaluation 2: right after prosthesis fitting and when patients are able to walk with it during 10min Evaluation 3: three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 4: one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients) Evaluation 5: six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- To avoid group contamination, a first group of 10 control participants will be completed. Then, an experimental group of 10 patients will be assessed. In order to complete a 40 persons cohort, this will be repeated one time (other 10 control then 10 experimental participants).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Motor Imagery | Experimental | Other: Motor ImageryParticipants from the experimental group will perform MIP concomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program. |
| Control task | Active comparator | Other: Control TaskConcomitantly with usual physical rehabilitation program, participants from the control group will perform a cognitive task that has no impact on motor rehabilitation (word scramble game). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Suffering from acute transtibial or transfemoral lower-limb amputation
- Having signed informed consent for an clinical study
- Having a score above 24/30 at the Mini Mental Status Examination
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Persons under any administrative/judicial measure
- Participants refusing to be informed of the results of the experiment
- Persons with other motor impairments
- Persons with neurologic and/or psychiatric disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Motor ImageryTogether with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the experimental group will mentally rehearse 3 different locomotor exercises that they already physically performed beforehand. Exercise 1: 10m Walk Exercise 2: Timed Up and Go test (rise up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn around, come back to the chair, turn around and sit down) Exercise 3: Stairs climbing test (climb up 4 stairs, turn around, climb down the for stairs) Two min of MIP will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of MIP per day. | Other | Motor Imagery |
| Control TaskTogether with physical rehabilitation performed with physiotherapists, participants from the control group will spend equivalent time focusing on a cognitive task without impact on motor rehabilitation ((word scramble game). Two min of this cognitive task will be scheduled 5 times/day, during rest periods, so that patients complete 10min of control task per day. | Other | Control task |
Primary outcome
MIP effects on simple walking
Time frame: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Duration required to perform a 10m walk will be assessed at 1) patients first day of functional rehabilitation, 2) right after prosthesis fitting and when they are able to walk with it during 10min, 3) three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all the patients), 4) one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients), and 5) six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment.
MIP effects on the Timed Up and Go test (complex walking task involving turning, and raise and sit movements)
Time frame: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Duration required to perform the test Timed Up and Go will be assessed at 1) patients first day of functional rehabilitation, 2) right after prosthesis fitting and when they are able to walk with it during 10min, 3) three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all the patients), 4) one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients), and 5) six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment.
MIP effects on a climbing locomotor task
Time frame: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Duration required to perform 4 stairs climbing test (up and down) will be assessed at 1) patients first day of functional rehabilitation, 2) right after prosthesis fitting and when they are able to walk with it during 10min, 3) three weeks after the second evaluation (to have temporally equivalent data for all the patients), 4) one week before leaving the rehabilitation center (to have functionally equivalent data for all patients), and 5) six weeks after patients left the center, for follow-up assessment.
3 secondary outcomes
Phantom-limb pain
Time frame: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Motor imagery time
Time frame: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Motor imagery vividness
Time frame: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2017.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38622634Saruco E, Saimpont A, Di Rienzo F, De Witte B, Laroyenne I, Mateo F, Lapenderie M, Solard SG, Perretant I, Frenot C, Jackson PL, Guillot A. Towards efficient motor imagery interventions after lower-limb amputation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Apr 15;21(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01348-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rehabilitation
Recruiting
Outpatient Physiotherapy vs. mHealth Exercise and Self-Management for Knee Osteoarthritis (MOKneeTOR)
Knee Osteoarthristis
Not yet recruiting
Evidence-based, Customized, Motion-recognition Rehabilitation System Development for Bed-ridden Patients - Validation of Effectiveness: Rehabit: Swim
ICU-acquired Weakness
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
Recruiting
Cycling Within an Interactive and Immersive Virtual Environment During Critical Illness: a Patient-centred Approach for Lower Limb Rehabilitation
Critical Illness
RecruitingObservational study
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
Aphasia, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Aymeric Guillot, Professor principal investigator
Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Motor Imagery in people with Rehabilitation, run by Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Isabelle Laroyenne, Doctor (+33 472 38 46 18, i-laroyenne@cmcr-massues.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
MIP effects on simple walking (time frame: From first day of functional rehabilitation until patients leave the center (approximately from 6 to 10 weeks depending on their ability to recover enough functional autonomy)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03125538, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2017.