AzTrials
AzTrials

AmputationNCT03097978

Comparison of Pattern Recognition Control and Direct Control in TMR

A study testing Commercial system, RIC arm system and Pattern Recognition in people with Amputation and Amputation; Traumatic, Arm, Upper, run by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation increases the control signals available for commercial arm systems. A new type of control, pattern recognition, has been developed into a form that allows use with commercially available arm system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 95 years
Conditions the study is for
Amputation, Amputation; Traumatic, Arm, Upper
What is being tested?
Commercial system, RIC arm system and Pattern Recognition
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
11 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2013to 29 Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 95 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A upper limb amputation at the transhumeral or shoulder-disarticulation level
  • Successful TMR surgery
  • Previous success at operating a myoelectric prosthesis using surface EMG signals from reinnervated muscles (not necessarily current prosthesis usage, although current prosthesis users may be more likely to use their trial prostheses).

Who cannot join

  • Significant new injury that would prevent use of a prosthesis: The ability to consistently wear a prosthesis and perform activities of daily living and specific performance tasks is necessary to evaluate the relative benefits of the interventions.
  • Cognitive impairment sufficient to adversely affect understanding of or compliance with study requirements, ability to communicate experiences, or ability to give informed consent: The ability to understand and comply with requirements of the study is essential in order for the study to generate useable, reliable data. The ability to obtain relevant user feedback through questionnaires and informal discussion adds significant value to this study. Of note, all TMR patients to date have normal cognitive function and we are not aware of any new brain injuries that would preclude participation
  • Significant other co morbidity: Any other medical issues or injuries that would preclude completion of the study, use of the prostheses, or that would otherwise prevent acquisition of useable data by researchers.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Trials of Pattern Recognition, Electrode Grid, RIC Arm in TMR Subjects

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation increases the control signals available for commercial arm systems. A new type of control, pattern recognition, has been developed into a form that allows use with commercially available arm system. The goal of this project is a home trial, in which people who have had TMR will try the new controls and the new arm to find out if they are better than what is currently available. Home trials will also allow us to see what needs to be done to make our inventions work even better.

Read the detailed description

Subjects who participate return to RIC several times (approximately 6-8 times) to undergo any necessary training and testing. Each visit will last from 2-5 days. The study will include use of up to three different prosthesis control systems at home for approximately 6 weeks each. The order of the systems will be randomized.

The first visit will allow us to cast the subject's residual limb for a socket and measure for a gel liner to be made with embedded electrode contacts prior to the next return. The socket interface will be fit for optimal comfort and a suspension sleeve and/or other straps, fasters, etc to best hold the prosthesis securely on the residual limb for the activities required. Unless changes are needed due to changes in limb volume, the same socket can be used for all phases of the study. During the initial and subsequent visits, subjects may practice the various control methods using a virtual reality system. EMG data and virtual "games" will be used to practice the control and will provide quantitative data that can be used to assess the various control methods mathematically, without the prosthesis.

Each phase of the study (up to 4 phases), will include preliminary training and testing at RIC lasting for 1-5 days, followed by approximately 6 weeks of at-home use of the system. After this time subjects will return to the RIC for 2-3 days of testing. They will then be trained and pre-tested in use of the next control during the same visit or at a later date. These systems include a commercially available myoelectric prosthesis with standard control, a commercially available device with advanced control (called pattern recognition), a commercially available device with pattern recognition and a new electrode configuration. Photographs or video recordings will be made during participation in this research study. These pictures and video recordings are essential for proper data analysis.

During the at-home use periods subjects will go about their daily business using the test prosthesis and will be asked document the experience with the prosthesis via weekly phone communication with study staff. Dates/times will be coordinated during normal business hours At the end of the at-home use period subjects will return to RIC for 3-5 days, where they will be asked to complete a questionnaire about how the prosthesis worked, and will undergo some non-invasive testing to see how well they can control and use the prosthesis.

Being tested
Commercial system, RIC arm system, Direct Control, Pattern Recognition

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Commercial systemDevice

    Transhumeral amputees who have had TMR will use a commercially available prosthesis with an elbow,wrist, and a hand with custom electronics and software for both direct and pattern recognition - based control.

  • RIC arm systemDevice

    Transhumeral amputees who have had TMR will use the RIC arm system prosthesis with an elbow,wrist, and a hand with custom electronics and software for both direct and pattern recognition - based control.

  • Direct ControlOther

    Transhumeral amputees who have had TMR will use either a commercially available prosthesis or the RIC arm system prosthesis with an elbow,wrist, and a hand with custom electronics and software for both direct control.

  • Pattern RecognitionOther

    Transhumeral amputees who have had TMR will use either a commercially available prosthesis or the RIC arm system prosthesis with an elbow,wrist, and a hand with custom electronics and software for pattern recognition control.

Study groups in NCT03097978
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RIC arm system with pattern recognitionExperimentalSubject will be fit with a custom socket and receive training on pattern recognition with the RIC arm prosthesis. Once appropriate training has occurred, outcome measures will be completed followed by a home trial for at least 6 weeks with the device. Outcome measures will be collected at the conclusion of the 6 week home trial.
Receives: Device: RIC arm system; Other: Pattern Recognition
RIC arm system with direct controlExperimentalSubject will be fit with a custom socket and receive training on direct control with the RIC arm prosthesis. Once appropriate training has occurred, outcome measures will be completed followed by a home trial for at least 6 weeks with the device. Outcome measures will be collected at the conclusion of the 6 week home trial.
Receives: Device: RIC arm system; Other: Direct Control
Commercial system with PR controlExperimentalSubject will be fit with a custom socket and receive training on pattern recognition with a conventional, commercial prosthesis system. Once appropriate training has occurred, outcome measures will be completed followed by a home trial for at least 6 weeks with the device. Outcome measures will be collected at the conclusion of the 6 week home trial.
Receives: Device: Commercial system; Other: Pattern Recognition
Commercial system with Direct ControlExperimentalSubject will be fit with a custom socket and receive training on direct control with a conventional, commercial prosthesis system. Once appropriate training has occurred, outcome measures will be completed followed by a home trial for at least 6 weeks with the device. Outcome measures will be collected at the conclusion of the 6 week home trial.
Receives: Device: Commercial system; Other: Direct Control

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pattern recognition and the RIC arm system will demonstrate a significant improvement over exiting technology.

    Improved control of prosthesis as seen through functional use improvements.

    Measured: 15 months from initial enrollment

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Modified Box and Blocks

    Timed task to assess prosthetic control.

    Measured: At 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months

  2. Jebsen Test of Hand Function

    7 part timed diagnostic test to determine the level of hand function

    Measured: At 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months

  3. Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

    The test consists of the manipulation of a series of both lightweight and heavyweight abstract objects. The procedure is designed to provide a score of functionality.

    Measured: At 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months

  4. ACMC

    Assessment of capacity for myoelectric prosthetic control

    Measured: At 1 month, 2 months, 4 months, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Mar 2017
  2. Study startJun 2013
  3. Primary completion29 Sep 2017
  4. Study completion29 Sep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Enrolment
11 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03097978
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00068547
Status last verified
Feb 2018
First submitted
27 Mar 2017
Last updated
23 Feb 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Hargrove L, Miller L, Turner K, Kuiken T. Control within a virtual environment is correlated to functional outcomes when using a physical prosthesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Sep 5;15(Suppl 1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12984-018-0402-y.

    PubMed 30255800

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Commercial system, RIC arm system and Pattern Recognition in people with Amputation and Amputation; Traumatic, Arm, Upper, run by Shirley Ryan AbilityLab at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pattern recognition and the RIC arm system will demonstrate a significant improvement over exiting technology. (time frame: 15 months from initial enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03097978, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in