CholangiocarcinomaPhase 2NCT03079427
Adjuvant Capecitabine vs Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Resected Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
A Phase 2 study testing Gemcitabine plus cisplatin and Capecitabine in people with Cholangiocarcinoma and Biliary Tract Cancer, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
There is no proven adjuvant treatment after curative surgical resection in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, although previous meta-analysis suggested potential survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy in patients with lymph node-positive resected cholangiocarcinoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cholangiocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer, Adjuvant Chemotherapy
- What is being tested?
- Gemcitabine plus cisplatin and Capecitabine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 15 May 2017to 15 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 19 years and older
- Histologically documented extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (perihilar or distal bile duct tumor)
- Microscopic or macroscopic surgical resection (ie., R0 or R1 resection)
- Regional lymph node metastasis according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition
- No distant metastasis
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 ~ 1
Show all 12Show fewer
- No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy
- Serum CA 19-9 < 100 U/mL at the time of enrollment
- Adequate bone marrow function as defined by platelets ≥ 100 x 109/L and neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
- Adequate renal function, with serum creatinine < 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Adequate hepatic function with serum total bilirubin < 2 mg/dL, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) < 2.5 x ULN
- No other malignant disease apart from non-melanotic skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix or any other non life-threatening cancer (i.e., prostate or thyroid cancer) except where treated with curative intent > 5 years previously without evidence of relapse Written informed consent to the study
Who cannot join
- Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give informed consent or to complete the protocol or a history of non-compliance
- Histologies other than adenocarcinoma such as mixed hepatocellular carcinoma/cholangiocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma or mixed adenocarcinoma/neuroendocrine carcinoma
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer
- Obstruction of gastrointestinal tract
- Active gastrointestinal bleeding
- Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the study medication, and other clinically significant heart disease (e.g., unstable angina, congestive heart failure or uncontrolled hypertension)
- Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease or any concurrent condition which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study or which would jeopardise compliance with the protocol
- Female subjects who are pregnant or lactating, or males and females of reproductive potential not willing or not able to employ a highly effective method of birth control/contraception to prevent pregnancy from 2 weeks before receiving study drug until 3 months after receiving the last dose of study drug. A highly effective method of contraception is defined as having a low failure rate (< 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
Seoul, 05505
About this study
Official title: Randomized Phase 2 Study of Capecitabine vs Gemcistabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Resected Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Regional Lymph Node Metastasis
There is no proven adjuvant treatment after curative surgical resection in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, although previous meta-analysis suggested potential survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy in patients with lymph node-positive resected cholangiocarcinoma. Despite of lack of level 1 evidence and no data which regimen is optimal, adjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in daily practice setting. Based on this background, the investigators designed the randomized phase 2 trial comparing capecitabine and gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with resected lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
- Conditions
- Cholangiocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer, Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Capecitabine, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin
- Being tested
- Gemcitabine plus cisplatin, Capecitabine
- Keywords
- Cholangiocarcinoma, Adjuvant chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Cholangiocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gemcitabine plus cisplatinDrug
Also called Gemcitabine, Cisplatin
Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks
CapecitabineDrug
Capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 Day 1 to 14, every 3 weeks
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine | Active comparator | Adjuvant Capecitabine Receives: Drug: Capecitabine |
| Gemcitabine plus cisplatin | Experimental | Adjuvant Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin Receives: Drug: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
2-year disease-free survival
Proportion of patients without disease recurrence after 2 years
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Disease-free survival
Median time point that 50% of study patients recur
Measured: 4 years
Toxicities (Adverse events related with chemotherapy)
Adverse events related with chemotherapy
Measured: 4 years
Overall survival
Median time point that 50% of study patients is alive
Measured: 4 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2017
- Study start15 May 2017
- Primary completion15 Dec 2021
- Study completion15 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CholangiocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Asan Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bundang CHA Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Severance Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Baek-Yeol Ryoo, Asan Medical Center
- Investigators
- Baek-Yeol Ryoo, MD, Principal investigator, Asan Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03079427
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Asan-ONCHBP-2017-001
- Status last verified
- Dec 2022
- First submitted
- 9 Mar 2017
- Last updated
- 6 Dec 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, Knox JJ. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1934-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5381. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
PubMed 22529261Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
PubMed 20375404Ramirez-Merino N, Aix SP, Cortes-Funes H. Chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: An update. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Jul 15;5(7):171-6. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.171.
PubMed 23919111Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, Carter R, Tebbutt NC, Dervenis C, Smith D, Glimelius B, Charnley RM, Lacaine F, Scarfe AG, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Lerch MM, Olah A, Rawcliffe CL, Verbeke CS, Campbell F, Buchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):147-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7352.
PubMed 22782416Patt YZ, Hassan MM, Aguayo A, Nooka AK, Lozano RD, Curley SA, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, Schnirer II, Wolff RA, Charnsangavej C, Brown TD. Oral capecitabine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma. Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):578-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20368.
PubMed 15274071Petekkaya I, Gezgen G, Roach EC, Solak M, Gullu I. Long-term advanced cholangiocarcinoma survivor with single-agent capecitabine. J BUON. 2012 Oct-Dec;17(4):796. No abstract available.
PubMed 23335544Jeong H, Oh JH, Ahn HS, Ryoo BY, Kim KP, Jeong JH, Park I, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Song KB, Lee W, Kim KH, Moon DB, Song GW, Jung DH, Hong SM, Park CW, Baek IP, Cho YS, Kim K, Sung CO, Yoo C. Proteogenomic profiling predicts outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2026 Jan;84(1):122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.07.031. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
PubMed 40803577Yoo C, Jeong H, Jeong JH, Kim KP, Lee S, Ryoo BY, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Moon DB, Kim KH, Lee SS, Song TJ, Oh D, Lee MA, Chon HJ, Lee JS, Laliotis G, Rivero-Hinojosa S, Spickard E, Renner D, Dutta P, Palsuledesai CC, Sharma S, Malhotra M, Jurdi A, Liu MC. Circulating tumor DNA status and dynamics predict recurrence in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2025 May;82(5):861-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.10.043. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
PubMed 39532185
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Dec 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Phase 2 Study of Capecitabine vs Gemcistabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Resected Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Regional Lymph Node Metastasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03079427
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Asan-ONCHBP-2017-001
- Conditions
- Cholangiocarcinoma, Biliary Tract Cancer, Adjuvant Chemotherapy, Capecitabine, Gemcitabine, Cisplatin
- Keywords
- Cholangiocarcinoma, Adjuvant chemotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Asan Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bundang CHA Hospital, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Severance Hospital
- Study start
- 15 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is no proven adjuvant treatment after curative surgical resection in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, although previous meta-analysis suggested potential survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy in patients with lymph node-positive resected cholangiocarcinoma. Despite of lack of level 1 evidence and no data which regimen is optimal, adjuvant chemotherapy is widely used in daily practice setting. Based on this background, the investigators designed the randomized phase 2 trial comparing capecitabine and gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with resected lymph node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Capecitabine | Active comparator | Drug: CapecitabineAdjuvant Capecitabine |
| Gemcitabine plus cisplatin | Experimental | Drug: Gemcitabine plus cisplatinAdjuvant Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients aged 19 years and older
- Histologically documented extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (perihilar or distal bile duct tumor)
- Microscopic or macroscopic surgical resection (ie., R0 or R1 resection)
- Regional lymph node metastasis according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition
- No distant metastasis
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give informed consent or to complete the protocol or a history of non-compliance
- Histologies other than adenocarcinoma such as mixed hepatocellular carcinoma/cholangiocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma or mixed adenocarcinoma/neuroendocrine carcinoma
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer
- Obstruction of gastrointestinal tract
- Active gastrointestinal bleeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gemcitabine plus cisplatinAlso: Gemcitabine, CisplatinGemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 and cisplatin 25 mg/m2 Day 1 and 8, every 3 weeks | Drug | Gemcitabine plus cisplatin |
| CapecitabineCapecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 Day 1 to 14, every 3 weeks | Drug | Capecitabine |
Primary outcome
2-year disease-free survival
Time frame: 2 years
Proportion of patients without disease recurrence after 2 years
3 secondary outcomes
Disease-free survival
Time frame: 4 years
Toxicities (Adverse events related with chemotherapy)
Time frame: 4 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 4 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Dec 2022.
- Background: PubMed 22529261Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, Knox JJ. Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1934-40. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.5381. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
- Background: PubMed 20375404Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
- Background: PubMed 23919111Ramirez-Merino N, Aix SP, Cortes-Funes H. Chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: An update. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2013 Jul 15;5(7):171-6. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v5.i7.171.
- Background: PubMed 22782416Neoptolemos JP, Moore MJ, Cox TF, Valle JW, Palmer DH, McDonald AC, Carter R, Tebbutt NC, Dervenis C, Smith D, Glimelius B, Charnley RM, Lacaine F, Scarfe AG, Middleton MR, Anthoney A, Ghaneh P, Halloran CM, Lerch MM, Olah A, Rawcliffe CL, Verbeke CS, Campbell F, Buchler MW; European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus folinic acid or gemcitabine vs observation on survival in patients with resected periampullary adenocarcinoma: the ESPAC-3 periampullary cancer randomized trial. JAMA. 2012 Jul 11;308(2):147-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7352.
- Background: PubMed 15274071Patt YZ, Hassan MM, Aguayo A, Nooka AK, Lozano RD, Curley SA, Vauthey JN, Ellis LM, Schnirer II, Wolff RA, Charnsangavej C, Brown TD. Oral capecitabine for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and gallbladder carcinoma. Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):578-86. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20368.
- Background: PubMed 23335544Petekkaya I, Gezgen G, Roach EC, Solak M, Gullu I. Long-term advanced cholangiocarcinoma survivor with single-agent capecitabine. J BUON. 2012 Oct-Dec;17(4):796. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40803577Jeong H, Oh JH, Ahn HS, Ryoo BY, Kim KP, Jeong JH, Park I, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Song KB, Lee W, Kim KH, Moon DB, Song GW, Jung DH, Hong SM, Park CW, Baek IP, Cho YS, Kim K, Sung CO, Yoo C. Proteogenomic profiling predicts outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2026 Jan;84(1):122-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.07.031. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39532185Yoo C, Jeong H, Jeong JH, Kim KP, Lee S, Ryoo BY, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Moon DB, Kim KH, Lee SS, Song TJ, Oh D, Lee MA, Chon HJ, Lee JS, Laliotis G, Rivero-Hinojosa S, Spickard E, Renner D, Dutta P, Palsuledesai CC, Sharma S, Malhotra M, Jurdi A, Liu MC. Circulating tumor DNA status and dynamics predict recurrence in patients with resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2025 May;82(5):861-870. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.10.043. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Cholangiocarcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Liver Cancer Registry Platform
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC), Cholangiocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Baek-Yeol Ryoo, MD principal investigator
Asan Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Gemcitabine plus cisplatin and Capecitabine in people with Cholangiocarcinoma and Biliary Tract Cancer, run by Asan Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
2-year disease-free survival (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03079427, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2022.