Rotator Cuff TendinopathyNCT03013192
Three Month Automated Messaging Intervention
A study testing Text message reminder in people with Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy, run by St. Louis University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Patients who are prescribed physical therapy exercises for their shoulder will have increased compliance to their PT exercises, an increased ASES score, and will have increased range of motion (or reach maximum range of motion earlier) at the end of the 3 month EpxPhysicalTherapy intervention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Text message reminder
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2017to 19 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Anterior or lateral shoulder tenderness
- Positive clinical signs of rotator cuff impingement
- X-ray with no fractures, glenohumeral arthritis, or dislocation
- Prescribed shoulder PT for their shoulder
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effect of a Three Month Automated Messaging Intervention on Patient Compliance to Physical Therapy Regimens and on Clinical Outcomes
Patients who are prescribed physical therapy exercises for their shoulder will have increased compliance to their PT exercises, an increased ASES score, and will have increased range of motion (or reach maximum range of motion earlier) at the end of the 3 month EpxPhysicalTherapy intervention.
Read the detailed description
Patient compliance to their prescribed physical therapy (PT) exercises is reported to be 22-40% in various studies. Further, Vasey et al. found that about 8% of patients do not even schedule a follow up PT appointment after it is prescribed. Low adherence presents a problem since long term completion of prescribed home exercises has been correlated with improved health outcomes. Sluijs et al. found that low adherence to PT exercises can be primarily attributed to three factors: (1) the barriers patients perceive and encounter, (2) the lack of positive feedback, and (3) the degree of helplessness. An automated phone/texting system can help with these three points by increasing positive feedback, increasing compliance, and monitoring patient progress. The system can continually remind the patient that their end goal is possible, which will decrease their feeling of helplessness in their condition.
Provide an introduction and background information. Describe past experimental and/or clinical findings leading to the formulation of the study, if applicable. Investigator Initiated studies must cite references in the response provided or attach a bibliography. *?HELP?*
Patient compliance to their prescribed physical therapy (PT) exercises is reported to be 22-40% in various studies [1-4]. Further, Vasey et al. found that about 8% of patients do not even schedule a follow up PT appointment after it is prescribed [5]. Low adherence presents a problem since long term completion of prescribed home exercises has been correlated with improved health outcomes. Sluijs et al. found that low adherence to PT exercises can be primarily attributed to three factors: (1) the barriers patients perceive and encounter, (2) the lack of positive feedback, and (3) the degree of helplessness [2]. An automated phone/texting system can help with these three points by increasing positive feedback, increasing compliance, and monitoring patient progress. The system can continually remind the patient that their end goal is possible, which will decrease their feeling of helplessness in their condition.
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) created a survey form that evaluates the shoulder function of a patient. The survey is scored out of 100 points (100 being best possible shoulder function and 0 being worst possible shoulder function). The form can be filled out on an iPad online, and the score recorded by a member of the medical team. This screening form has been validated by numerous studies, and has been specifically validated for patients with non-operative rotator cuff pain/abnormalities (the population that this study is proposing to study).
Telemedicine shows promise in improving the outcomes of orthopedic interventions. Medication adherence and patient outcomes have been shown to improve in interventions that include reminders. Also, because the adoption of cell phones is nearly ubiquitous worldwide and the vast majority of cell phone users text message, a text-message-based intervention seems particularly promising.
Many studies have shown that SMS text messaging has increased treatment compliance. PT adherence to prescribed exercises seems to be limited by compliance, so Epharmix along with several orthopedic surgeons set out to develop an intervention. The result, EpxPhysicalTherapy (EpxPT), is an automated system that ensures that patients have both scheduled their physical therapy appointment and have performed their home exercises. It also sends motivational text messages to the patient to encourage the participant to perform their exercises since a lack of positive reinforcement has been correlated with decreased compliance. When a patient identifies that they have been unable to schedule a PT appointment or have not completed their exercises for multiple days in a row, an alert is sent to the healthcare team.
The system was designed to deliver either voice or text-based automated messages to patients in a way that avoids an additional burden on the healthcare team. EpxPT offers numerous advantages to strictly app-based or text message-based systems in both older and underprivileged patient populations. Older patients, who may be more comfortable with voice messages, have that option, and patients without a smartphone will still be able to receive the intervention.
Patients identified to be eligible for this study and have consented will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 will receive the standard of care alone (control) and Group 2 will receive the EpxPT intervention. In Group 2, EpxPT will remind the patient to schedule their first PT appointment. Group 2 patients will also be asked if they have completed their prescribed PT exercises every other day. They will then be sent a motivational text messages or voice call in order to highlight the importance of completing their PT regimen. Group 2 patient compliance will be tracked through the text responses recorded in the Epharmix database. Both Group 1 and Group 2 patients will be seen at a follow up appointment once a month for three months. At this appointment, patients in both groups will be asked about their PT compliance (this will be the measurement of compliance for Group 1), and range of motion and a ASES score will be measured.
- Aim 1: To compare control and intervention group compliance to their prescribed physical therapy home exercise regimen
- Aim 2: To compare control and intervention group shoulder range of motion after a 3 month intervention
- Aim 3: To compare control and intervention group ASES scores after a 3 month intervention
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
- Being tested
- Text message reminder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Text message reminderOther
Patients will receive automated text message reminders regarding their physical therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | No text message reminders, usual patient protocol |
| Intervention (text messaging) | Experimental | Text message reminders for PT Receives: Other: Text message reminder |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compliance with PT
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons Score
Measured: 3 months
Shoulder range of motion
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Study start1 Sep 2017
- Primary completion19 Dec 2018
- Study completion19 Dec 2018
Why it stopped: IRB and institutional re-assessment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Rotator Cuff TendinopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Louis University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Scott Kaar, MD, St. Louis University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03013192
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 27655
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Jan 2017
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of a Three Month Automated Messaging Intervention on Patient Compliance to Physical Therapy Regimens and on Clinical Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03013192
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 27655
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: IRB and institutional re-assessment
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Louis UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2017 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients who are prescribed physical therapy exercises for their shoulder will have increased compliance to their PT exercises, an increased ASES score, and will have increased range of motion (or reach maximum range of motion earlier) at the end of the 3 month EpxPhysicalTherapy intervention.
Detailed description
Patient compliance to their prescribed physical therapy (PT) exercises is reported to be 22-40% in various studies. Further, Vasey et al. found that about 8% of patients do not even schedule a follow up PT appointment after it is prescribed. Low adherence presents a problem since long term completion of prescribed home exercises has been correlated with improved health outcomes. Sluijs et al. found that low adherence to PT exercises can be primarily attributed to three factors: (1) the barriers patients perceive and encounter, (2) the lack of positive feedback, and (3) the degree of helplessness. An automated phone/texting system can help with these three points by increasing positive feedback, increasing compliance, and monitoring patient progress. The system can continually remind the patient that their end goal is possible, which will decrease their feeling of helplessness in their condition.
Provide an introduction and background information. Describe past experimental and/or clinical findings leading to the formulation of the study, if applicable. Investigator Initiated studies must cite references in the response provided or attach a bibliography. *?HELP?*
Patient compliance to their prescribed physical therapy (PT) exercises is reported to be 22-40% in various studies [1-4]. Further, Vasey et al. found that about 8% of patients do not even schedule a follow up PT appointment after it is prescribed [5]. Low adherence presents a problem since long term completion of prescribed home exercises has been correlated with improved health outcomes. Sluijs et al. found that low adherence to PT exercises can be primarily attributed to three factors: (1) the barriers patients perceive and encounter, (2) the lack of positive feedback, and (3) the degree of helplessness [2]. An automated phone/texting system can help with these three points by increasing positive feedback, increasing compliance, and monitoring patient progress. The system can continually remind the patient that their end goal is possible, which will decrease their feeling of helplessness in their condition.
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) created a survey form that evaluates the shoulder function of a patient. The survey is scored out of 100 points (100 being best possible shoulder function and 0 being worst possible shoulder function). The form can be filled out on an iPad online, and the score recorded by a member of the medical team. This screening form has been validated by numerous studies, and has been specifically validated for patients with non-operative rotator cuff pain/abnormalities (the population that this study is proposing to study).
Telemedicine shows promise in improving the outcomes of orthopedic interventions. Medication adherence and patient outcomes have been shown to improve in interventions that include reminders. Also, because the adoption of cell phones is nearly ubiquitous worldwide and the vast majority of cell phone users text message, a text-message-based intervention seems particularly promising.
Many studies have shown that SMS text messaging has increased treatment compliance. PT adherence to prescribed exercises seems to be limited by compliance, so Epharmix along with several orthopedic surgeons set out to develop an intervention. The result, EpxPhysicalTherapy (EpxPT), is an automated system that ensures that patients have both scheduled their physical therapy appointment and have performed their home exercises. It also sends motivational text messages to the patient to encourage the participant to perform their exercises since a lack of positive reinforcement has been correlated with decreased compliance. When a patient identifies that they have been unable to schedule a PT appointment or have not completed their exercises for multiple days in a row, an alert is sent to the healthcare team.
The system was designed to deliver either voice or text-based automated messages to patients in a way that avoids an additional burden on the healthcare team. EpxPT offers numerous advantages to strictly app-based or text message-based systems in both older and underprivileged patient populations. Older patients, who may be more comfortable with voice messages, have that option, and patients without a smartphone will still be able to receive the intervention.
Patients identified to be eligible for this study and have consented will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 will receive the standard of care alone (control) and Group 2 will receive the EpxPT intervention. In Group 2, EpxPT will remind the patient to schedule their first PT appointment. Group 2 patients will also be asked if they have completed their prescribed PT exercises every other day. They will then be sent a motivational text messages or voice call in order to highlight the importance of completing their PT regimen. Group 2 patient compliance will be tracked through the text responses recorded in the Epharmix database. Both Group 1 and Group 2 patients will be seen at a follow up appointment once a month for three months. At this appointment, patients in both groups will be asked about their PT compliance (this will be the measurement of compliance for Group 1), and range of motion and a ASES score will be measured.
- Aim 1: To compare control and intervention group compliance to their prescribed physical therapy home exercise regimen
- Aim 2: To compare control and intervention group shoulder range of motion after a 3 month intervention
- Aim 3: To compare control and intervention group ASES scores after a 3 month intervention
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –No text message reminders, usual patient protocol |
| Intervention (text messaging) | Experimental | Other: Text message reminderText message reminders for PT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Anterior or lateral shoulder tenderness
- Positive clinical signs of rotator cuff impingement
- X-ray with no fractures, glenohumeral arthritis, or dislocation
- Prescribed shoulder PT for their shoulder
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Text message reminderPatients will receive automated text message reminders regarding their physical therapy | Other | Intervention (text messaging) |
Primary outcome
Compliance with PT
Time frame: 3 months
2 secondary outcomes
American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons Score
Time frame: 3 months
Shoulder range of motion
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: IRB and institutional re-assessment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects of Cyriax Approach With and Without Mobilization With Movement in Shoulder Restriction With Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Recruiting
Latissimus Dorsi Strengthening Exercises in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Active, not recruiting
Subacromial Corticosteroid Injection Combined With Exercise in Supraspinatus Tendinopathy
Supraspinatus Tendinopathy
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Natural History of Shoulder Pathology in Manual Wheelchair Users
Paraplegia, Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
Effects of Rotator Cuff Drills Versus Progressive Resistance Exercises on Chronic Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Tendinosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Text message reminder in people with Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy, run by St. Louis University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: IRB and institutional re-assessment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compliance with PT (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2019.