AzTrials
AzTrials

CholestasisPhase 2NCT02966834

Dose Response Study of GSK2330672 for the Treatment of Pruritus in Participants With Primary Biliary Cholangitis

A Phase 2 study testing GSK2330672 in people with Cholestasis, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 66 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSK2330672 administration for the treatment of pruritus (itch) in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Cholestasis
What is being tested?
GSK2330672
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
147 participants
Where
66 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
11 Jan 2017to 15 Apr 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant must be 18 to 80 years of age inclusive, at the time of signing the informed consent.
  • Participants who have proven PBC, as demonstrated by having at least 2 of the following: History of sustained increased ALP levels >ULN first recognized at least 6 months prior to the Screening Visit (Sustained ALP elevations at the time of Screening is not required, recognizing that the ALP may have decreased after institution of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy as described in inclusion number 4). Documented positive anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) titer (>1:40 titer on immunofluorescence or M2 positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) or PBC-specific antinuclear antibodies (antinuclear dot and/or nuclear rim positive). Liver biopsy (at any time in the past) consistent with PBC.
  • Participants must rate their itch severity as being >=4 on a 0 to 10 point scale for the majority of time (at least half the days, as recalled by the participant) during the 8 weeks prior to the Screening Visit. Periods of low itch or no itch are acceptable as long as the worst daily itch score is >=4 on the majority of days.
  • Participants who are currently taking UDCA should be on stable doses of UDCA for >8 weeks at time of screening. Participants not taking UDCA due to intolerance may be enrolled 8 weeks after their last dose of UDCA. No changes or discontinuation is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period.
  • Male and/or female: Female participants- A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant, not breastfeeding, and at least one of the following conditions applies: Not a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) or a WOCBP who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and until at least 4 weeks after the last dose of study treatment.
  • Capable of giving signed informed consent, which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Screening total bilirubin >2x ULN. Total bilirubin >2x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35 percent (%).
  • Screening ALT or AST >6x ULN.
  • Screening eGFR <45 milliliter (mL)/minute/1.73 square meter (m^2) based on the CKD-EPI.
  • History or presence of hepatic decompensation (e.g., variceal bleeds, encephalopathy or ascites).
  • Presence of actively replicating viral hepatitis due to hepatitis B or C virus (HBV, HCV) infection, and/or confirmed hepatocellular carcinoma or biliary cancer. Other hepatic conditions ( e.g., primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC], alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis [NASH] ) are permitted if PBC is the dominant liver injury in the investigator's opinion.
  • Current diarrhea.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Current symptomatic cholelithiasis or inflammatory gall bladder disease. Participants with history of cholecystectomy >=3 months before screening may be eligible for enrolment.
  • Any current medical condition (e.g. psychiatric disorder, senility or dementia), which may affect the participant's ability to comply with the protocol specified procedures.
  • Initiation or increase in dose of colchicine, methotrexate, azathioprine, or systemic corticosteroids in the 2 months prior to screening. If a change in dose in any of these medications is anticipated during the course of the study, the participant should be excluded.
  • Initiation or increase in dose of bezafibrate or fenofibrate at any time during the 3 months prior to screening. Participants may join the study on stable doses of these medications, but no change or discontinuation is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period.
  • Initiation or increase in dose of any of the following in the 8 weeks prior to screening: rifampicin, naltrexone, naloxone, nalfurafine, or sertraline. Participants may join the study on stable or decreased doses of these medications, but no change in dose is permitted until completion of the Main Study Period.
  • Bile acid binding resin use: a participant must discontinue use of cholestyramine, colesevelam, colestipol or colestimide prior to the start of the Initial Study Period (no later than Day-2). Note: these drugs may be administered after completion of the Main Study Period, if clinically indicated.
  • Obeticholic acid use: a participant must discontinue use of obeticholic acid at least 8 weeks prior to the start of the Initial Study Period and may not restart until after the end of the study.
  • Administration of any other Inhibitor of the Human Ileal Bile Acid Transporter (IBAT) in the 3 months prior to screening.
  • Current enrolment or participation within the 8 weeks before start of the Initial Study Period, in any other clinical study involving an investigational study treatment.
  • QT interval corrected for heart rate QTc >480 millisecond (msec).
  • History of sensitivity to the study treatment or components thereof or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Medical Monitor, contraindicates their participation in the study.
  • History of regular alcohol consumption within 6 months of the study defined as an average weekly intake of >21 units for males or >14 units for females. One unit is equivalent to 8 gram of alcohol: a half-pint (approximately 240 mL) of beer, 1 glass (125 mL) of wine or 1 measure (25 mL) of spirits.

Trial locations and contacts

66 sites in 10 countries.

66 sites in 10 countries

Japan13 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chiba, 270-1694

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fukui, 918-8503

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gunma, 371-8511

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hiroshima, 730-8619

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hokkaido, 006-8555

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kagawa, 760-8557

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kanagawa, 252-0375

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nagasaki, 856-8562

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 545-8586

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Osaka, 591-8025

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 105-8471

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 173-8606

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tokyo, 181-8611

Other trials in Japan

United Kingdom11 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Basingstoke, RG24 9NA

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Edgbaston, B15 2GW

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Glasgow, G31 2ER

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Liverpool, L7 8XP

  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, NW3 2QG

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Manchester, M13 9WU

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nottingham, NG7 2UH

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Plymouth, PL6 8DH

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sheffield, S5 7AU

Other trials in United Kingdom

United States9 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75390-8887

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Manhasset, New Jersey, 11030

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New York, New York, 10032

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Novi, Michigan, 48377

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85054

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seattle, Washington, 981104

Other trials in United States

Canada6 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C8

  • GSK Investigational Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4

Other trials in Canada

France5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Grenoble, 38043

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Lille, 59037

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Paris, 75571

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Pessac, 33604

Other trials in France

Italy5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Florence, Tuscany, 50134

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Milan, Lombardy, 20142

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Monza (MB), Lombardy, 20900

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Padova, Veneto, 35128

Other trials in Italy

Poland5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Częstochowa, 42-217

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Katowice, 40-506

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Mysłowice, 41-400

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 00-332

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wroclaw, 50-349

Other trials in Poland

Spain5 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Barcelona, 08036

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madrid, 28007

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Madrid, 28034

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Seville, 41013

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

Australia4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Herston, Queensland, 4029

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Prahran, Victoria, 3181

Other trials in Australia

Germany3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Erlangen, Bavaria, 91054

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hamburg, 20246

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Homburg, Saarland, 66421

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-dose, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of GSK2330672 Administration for the Treatment of Pruritus in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (GLIMMER: GSK2330672 triaL of IBAT Inhibition With Multidose Measurement for Evaluation of Response)

This study is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of GSK2330672 administration for the treatment of pruritus (itch) in participants with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Participants will receive either placebo or one of the 4 dose regimens of GSK2330672 (20 milligram [mg], 90 mg or 180 mg taken once daily or 90 mg twice daily). Participants on GSK2330672 will also receive placebo tablets to maintain blinding. The study has a prospectively defined adaptive design that will utilize interim data to further inform and potentially optimize the doses under investigation. Hence, additional dose regimen may be added during study. The total duration of a participant in the study will be up to 45 days of screening and 24 weeks of study including follow-up.

Conditions
Cholestasis
Being tested
Placebo, GSK2330672
Keywords
linerixibat, PBC, itch, GSK2330672, GLIMMER, primary biliary cholangitis, pruritus
Medical subject headings
Cholestasis, Pruritus, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    GSK2330672 matching placebo will be supplied as white film-coated tablets.

  • GSK2330672Drug

    GSK2330672 will be supplied in 2 dose strengths of 10 mg and 45 mg white film-coated tablets.

Study groups in NCT02966834
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive matching placebo
Receives: Drug: Placebo
GSK2330672 20 mg once dailyExperimentalParticipants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: GSK2330672
GSK2330672 90 mg once dailyExperimentalParticipants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: GSK2330672
GSK2330672 180 mg once dailyExperimentalParticipants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: GSK2330672
GSK2330672 40 mg twice dailyExperimentalParticipants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: GSK2330672
GSK2330672 90 mg twice dailyExperimentalParticipants will receive GSK2330672 and matching placebo to maintain blind
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: GSK2330672

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score

    Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (Visit 3 [V3]). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was done using Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) including treatment group and centered Mean Worst Daily Itch score at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

Secondary outcomes (31)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Primary Biliary Cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) Scale

    PBC-40 is a disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaire for use in PBC participants. It consists of 40 questions arranged in 6 domains with 3 to 11 questions in each domain. Each question is scored from 1 (least impact) to 5 (greatest impact). All questions within a domain are summed to obtain individual domain score. Domains were: Symptoms (7 questions) with score range 7-35, Itch (3 questions) with score range 3-15, Fatigue (11 questions) with score range 11-55, Cognitive (6 questions) with score range 6-30, Emotional (3 questions) with score range 3-15, and Social (10 questions) with score range 10-50. Higher scores for individual domains represent a poor quality of life. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3) which is conducted prior to first dosing of randomized medication that evening. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  2. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Concentrations, in Participants With High Risk of PBC Progression

    Criteria for high risk of PBC progression is defined as serum ALP concentrations more than or equal to (>=)1.67 times upper limit of normal (ULN) range and/or total bilirubin concentrations more than (>)ULN at Day 1. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 (Day 1) or Visit 1 (Screening), excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  3. Number of Participants With Serum ALP Concentrations Less Than (<)1.67 Times ULN and Total Bilirubin Concentrations Less Than or Equal to (<=) ULN at Week 16

    Number of participants with ALP < 1.67 times ULN and total bilirubin <= ULN at Week 16 is presented. The endpoint was analyzed in Restricted High Risk Population.

    Measured: At Week 16

  4. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression

    Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including Treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  5. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression

    Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including Treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  6. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression

    Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  7. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Total Bilirubin Concentration, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression

    Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  8. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Albumin Concentration, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression

    Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  9. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Prothrombin International Normalized Ratio (INR), Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression

    Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  10. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Prothrombin Time, Among Those With a High Risk of PBC Progression

    Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  11. Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events (Non-SAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) -Main Study Period

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.

    Measured: Up to 12 weeks

  12. Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs -Final Study Period

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.

    Measured: Up to 4 weeks

  13. Number of Participants With Non-SAEs and SAEs - Follow-up Period

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of a study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. Any untoward event resulting in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persisting disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment is categorized as SAE.

    Measured: Up to 4 weeks

  14. Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Data of Potential Clinical Importance

    Blood samples were collected to measure analyze the following parameters: albumin, calcium, Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from creatinine, glucose, potassium and sodium. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, within range [w/in] or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (for example [e.g.], high to high), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100 percent (%). Only "To Low" and/or "To High" categories with potential clinical importance data have been presented.

    Measured: At Weeks 8, 12, 16 and 20

  15. Number of Participants With Hematology Data of Potential Clinical Importance

    Blood samples were collected to analyze the following parameters: hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelets. Participants were counted in the worst case category that their value changes to (low, w/in or no change, or high), unless there is no change in their category. Participants whose laboratory value category was unchanged (e.g., high to high), or whose value became within range, were recorded in the "To w/in Range or No Change" category. Participants were counted twice if the participant had values that changed "To Low" and "To High", so the percentages may not add to 100%. Only "To Low" and/or "To High" categories with potential clinical importance data have been presented.

    Measured: At Weeks 8, 12, 16 and 20

  16. Number of Participants With Abnormal 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters

    A 12-lead ECG was recorded with the participant in a semi-supine position. 12-lead ECGs were obtained by using an automated ECG machine. Data for abnormal, not clinically significant (NCS) and clinically significant (CS) ECG findings are presented. CS abnormal findings are those which are not associated with the underlying disease, unless judged by the investigator to be more severe than expected for the participant's condition.

    Measured: At Weeks 8, 12, 16 and 20

  17. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP)

    SBP and DBP were measured in the semi-supine position with a completely automated device after at least 5 minutes of rest for the participant in a quiet setting without distractions. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 20

  18. Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

    Pulse rate was measured in a semi-supine position after 5 minutes of rest. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 20

  19. Change From Baseline in Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Assessment

    GSRS is a validated scale used to assess gastrointestinal symptoms experienced by participants over the preceding 5 to 7 days. GSRS was measured for all 5 domains: Average Diarrhea Syndrome Score, Average Indigestion Syndrome Score, Average Constipation Syndrome Score, Average Abdominal Pain Syndrome Score, Average Reflux Syndrome Score. All individual domains are scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1(not at all) to 7(extremely). Higher score indicate more severe symptoms. The Average Total GSRS score was mean of these 5 domains and ranges from 1 to 7. Higher score indicates worst possible degree of symptoms. The responses summarized at each visit are those given during the week prior to the visit, with exception of Day 1. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by participant prior to randomization. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Data has been presented for each domain along with the average Total GSRS score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 20

  20. Number of Participants With Mean Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 at Week 16

    Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Number of participants with Mean Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 at Week 16 is presented.

    Measured: At Week 16

  21. Number of Participants With Improvement of >= 30 Percent (%) in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline

    Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Number of participants with improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.

    Measured: Baseline and At Week 16

  22. Number of Participants With Improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline

    Participants were required to score the severity of their itching using a 0-10 NRS where 0 represents no itching and 10 indicates the worst imaginable itching. The Worst Daily Itch Score is the most severe (highest) NRS recorded on a given day. Mean Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as the average of the worst daily itch scores provided in the 7 days prior to the Week 16 visit. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Number of participants with improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.

    Measured: Baseline and At Week 16

  23. Percentage of Responder Days With Worst Daily Itch Score of <4

    Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Percentage of responder days with Worst Daily Itch Score of <4 is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 16

  24. Percentage of Responder Days With Improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline

    Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch score was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Percentage of responder days with improvement of >= 30% in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented..

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  25. Percentage of Responder Days With Improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 From Baseline

    Percentage of Responder Days with Worst Daily Itch was calculated as: (number of days response from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 divided by number of days from Visit 3+1 to Visit 6-1 with worst daily itch scores available) times 100. Days for which no worst daily itch score was available did not contribute to either the numerator or the denominator. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group. Baseline is the most recent assessment completed by the participant prior to randomization. Percentage of responder days with improvement of >=2 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score at Week 16 from Baseline is presented.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  26. Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Sleep Score at Week 16

    Mean Daily Sleep Score is defined as the average of the daily sleep scores provided in the 7 days prior to the relevant visit. Participants sleep quality was recorded in an electronic diary each morning using a 0-10 NRS in which 0: good sleep to 10:worst possible sleep. Higher score indicates worse possible sleep. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (V3) visit. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  27. Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Fatigue Score at Week 16

    Mean Daily Fatigue Score is defined as the average of the daily fatigue scores provided in the 7 days prior to the relevant visit. Participants fatigue level was recorded in an electronic diary each evening using a 0-10 NRS in which 0: no fatigue to 10:worst possible fatigue. Higher score indicates worse possible fatigue. Baseline is the average of the scores in the 7 days prior to the Week 4 (V3) visit. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Analysis was performed using ANCOVA model including treatment group and Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  28. Change From Baseline in the Five-Dimensional (5-D) Itch Scale at Week 16

    The 5-D itch scale had been developed as a brief, single page, instrument for the multidimensional quantification of itch that is sensitive to change over time. It has data to support its validity in a population of participants with pruritus and covers five dimensions of itch experienced by participants: duration, degree, direction, disability and distribution. Each domain was scored on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 (Not present/resolved/never) to 5 (unbearable/getting worse/always), higher scores indicates worst itching. The scores of each of five domains were achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. A total 5-D scores potentially ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus) where higher score indicates worse possible itching. Baseline is assessment performed at Week 4 (V3) which is conducted prior to first dosing of randomized medication that evening. Change from Baseline was calculated as post-Baseline value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  29. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum Total Bile Acid Concentration

    Blood samples were collected for evaluating total bile acid concentration as a biomarker of PBC. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  30. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in Serum 7-alpha Hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4)

    Blood samples were collected for evaluating C4 concentration as a marker of bile acid synthesis. Baseline is the assessment performed at Week 4 (V3), or if missing then Visit 2 or Visit 1, excluding unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline and at Week 16

  31. Plasma Concentration of GSK2330672 After Sparse Sampling

    Blood samples were collected for measurement of plasma GSK2330672 concentration.

    Measured: At Week 4 (between 1 and 3 hours post-dose) and At Weeks 8, 12 and 16 (between 1 and 3 hours post-dose, and between 5 and 8 hours post-dose)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Nov 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Jan 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
147 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02966834
Sponsor's protocol ID
201000
Other IDs
2016-002416-41, 2016
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
15 Nov 2016
Last updated
4 May 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Publications

  • Gelhorn H, Currie BM, Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Fofana F, Karn H, Mayo MJ, Jones DE, McLaughlin MM, von Maltzahn R. Psychometric validation of the Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) and other patient-reported outcome measures for assessing severity and impact of pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 Jul 31;20(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03798-x.

    PubMed 40745549
  • Smith HT, Das S, Fettiplace J, von Maltzahn R, Troke PJF, McLaughlin MM, Jones DE, Kremer AE. Pervasive role of pruritus in impaired quality of life in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: Data from the GLIMMER study. Hepatol Commun. 2025 Feb 19;9(3):e0635. doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000635. eCollection 2025 Mar 1.

    PubMed 39969430
  • von Maltzahn R, Mayo MJ, Smith HT, Thompson A, Das S, de Souza AR, Lisi E, Levy C, McLaughlin MM, Jones D. Relationship between pruritus and sleep in participants with primary biliary cholangitis in the Phase 2b GLIMMER trial. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Jun 12;8(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00722-y.

    PubMed 38862718
  • Karatza E, Swift B, Carreno F, Mukherjee S, Casillas L, Lennie J, Fettiplace J, McLaughlin MM, Kremer AE. Serum bile acid change correlates with improvement in pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis receiving linerixibat. Liver Int. 2024 Sep;44(9):2293-2302. doi: 10.1111/liv.15982. Epub 2024 May 23.

    PubMed 38780109
  • Carreno F, Karatza E, Mehta R, Collins J, Austin D, Swift B. Population Dose-Response-Time Analysis of Itch Reduction and Patient-Reported Tolerability Supports Phase III Dose Selection for Linerixibat. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Feb;115(2):288-298. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3103. Epub 2023 Dec 3.

    PubMed 37953500
  • Tanaka A, Atsukawa M, Tsuji K, Notsumata K, Suyama A, Ito H, Das S, von Maltzahn R, McLaughlin MM. Japanese subgroup analysis of GLIMMER: A global Phase IIb study of linerixibat for the treatment of cholestatic pruritus in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. Hepatol Res. 2023 Jul;53(7):629-640. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13895. Epub 2023 Mar 13.

    PubMed 36852705
  • Levy C, Kendrick S, Bowlus CL, Tanaka A, Jones D, Kremer AE, Mayo MJ, Haque N, von Maltzahn R, Allinder M, Swift B, McLaughlin MM, Hirschfield GM; GLIMMER Study Group. GLIMMER: A Randomized Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Trial of Linerixibat in Primary Biliary Cholangitis Patients With Pruritus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Jul;21(7):1902-1912.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.10.032. Epub 2022 Nov 4.

    PubMed 36343847

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing GSK2330672 in people with Cholestasis, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 66 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 66 sites in Japan, United Kingdom, United States, Canada, France and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 May 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline at Week 16 in the Mean Worst Daily Itch Score (time frame: Baseline and Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02966834, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in