Primary Biliary CirrhosisPhase 3ELATIVENCT04526665
Study of Elafibranor in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)
A Phase 3 study testing Elafibranor 80mg in people with Primary Biliary Cirrhosis, run by Ipsen at 115 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
The participants of this study will have confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (which is a medication used in the management and treatment of cholestatic liver disease). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
- What is being tested?
- Elafibranor 80mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 161 participants
- Where
- 115 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 24 Sep 2020to 1 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Males or females age of 18 to 75 years (inclusive)
- Definite or probable Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) diagnosis
- Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 1.67x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Total bilirubin (TB) ≤ 2x ULN
- Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for at least 12 months (stable dose ≥ 3 months) prior to screening, or unable to tolerate UDCA treatment (no UDCA for ≥ 3 months) prior to screening (per country standard-of-care dosing)
- Must have PBC Worst Itch Numeric rating scale (NRS) collected prior to randomization
- Females participating in this study must be of non-child bearing potential or must be using highly efficient contraception for the full duration of the study and for 1 month after the last drug intake
Who cannot join
- History or presence of other concomitant liver disease
- Clinically significant hepatic decompensation, including patients with complications of cirrhosis/portal hypertension
- Medical conditions that may cause non-hepatic increases in ALP (e.g., Paget's disease) or which may diminish life expectancy to < 2 years, including known cancers
- Patient has a positive test for HIV Type 1 or 2 at screening, or patient is known to have tested positive for HIV
- Evidence of any other unstable or untreated clinically significant disease
- History of alcohol abuse
Show all 24Show fewer
- For female patients: known pregnancy or lactating
- Use of fibrates and glitazones within 2 months prior to screening
- Use of Obeticholic acid (OCA), azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, pentoxifylline, budesonide and other systemic corticosteroids (parenteral and oral chronic administration only); potentially hepatotoxic drugs
- (including α-methyl-dopa, sodium valproic acid isoniazid, or nitrofurantoin) within 3 months prior to screening
- Use of antibodies or immunotherapy directed against interleukins (ILs) or other cytokines or chemokines within 12 months prior to screening
- For patients with previous exposure to OCA, OCA should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening
- Patients who are currently participating in, plan to participate in, or have participated in an investigational drug study or medical device study containing active substance within 30 days or five half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening; for patients with previous exposure to seladelpar, seladelpar should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values > 5 x ULN
- For patients with AT or TB>ULN at SV1, variability of AT or TB > 40% (see section 3.5.1)
- Albumin<3.0 g/dl
- Severely advanced patients according to Rotterdam criteria (TB > ULN and albumin <LLN)
- INR > 1.3 due to altered hepatic function
- CPK > 2 x ULN
- Screening serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl
- Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (defined as patients with markers of kidney failure damage or eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2) calculated by Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD)
- Platelet count < 150 x 10^3/μL
- AFP > 20 ng/mL with 4-phase liver CT or MRI imaging suggesting presence of liver cancer
- Known hypersensitivity to the investigational product or to any of the formulation excipients of the elafibranor or placebo tablet Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of informed consent or ability to be compliant with the study is uncertain
Trial locations and contacts
115 sites in 14 countries.
115 sites in 14 countries
United States46 sites
Texas Clinical Research Institute, LLC
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Digestive Healthcare of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
University of Colorado Denver and Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 840045
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
The Institute for Liver Health
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Medical University of South Carolina- College of Medicine
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Consultants for Clinical Research
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45249
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240
The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75203
Liver Center of Texas, PLLC
Dallas, Texas, 75234
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center-IDS Aston Pharmacy
Dallas, Texas, 75390-8575
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
South Denver Gastroenterology, P.C.
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
Texas Digestive Disease Consultants dba GI Alliance
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Investigational Drug Service Pharmacy Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Liver Associates of Texas, P.A.
Houston, Texas, 77030
St. Luke's Health-Baylor St Luke's Medical center - Advanced Liver Therapies Research
Houston, Texas, 77030
Carolinas Centre for Liver disease/ Atrium Health
Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078
Encore Borland-Groover Clinical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Keck Medical Center of USC
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Ruane Clinical Research Group Inc.
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Schiff Center for Liver Diseases/University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Intermountain Medical Center - Transplant Services
Murray, Utah, 84107
Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Yale School of Medicine, Digestive Diseases
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
UPMC Center for Liver Diseases
New Hyde Park, New York, 11042-11114
NYU Langone Health / NYU Grossman School of Medicine
New York, New York, 10016
Columbia University Medical Center - Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation
New York, New York, 10032
The New York-Presbyterian Hospital, David H. Koch Center
New York, New York, 10065
Maryview Hospital Inc, Bon Secours Liver Institute of Hampton Roads
Newport News, Virginia, 23602
Henry Ford Health System
Novi, Michigan, 48377
Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Richmond Community Hospital LLC, Bon Secours Liver Institute of Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, 23226
Virginia Commonwealth University Clinical Research Services Unit (CRSU)
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
University of California, Davis Medical Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
University of Utah Hospital-Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
American Research Corporation
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
California Pacific Medical Center - Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation
San Francisco, California, 94109
Liver Institute Northwest
Seattle, Washington, 98105
Saint Louis University
St Louis, Missouri, 63104
Gastro health & Nutrition-Victoria
Victoria, Texas, 77904
France10 sites
CHU Amiens Picardie
Amiens, 80054
Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94000
CHU Grenoble Alpes - Hôpital Albert Michallon
Grenoble, 38043
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
Orléans, 45067
Hôpital Saint-Antoine
Paris, 75012
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, 75014
Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, 75651
Hôpital Haut Lévêque
Pessac, 33604
Hôpital Robert Debré - CHU de Reims
Reims, 51092
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg - Hôpital de Hautepierre
Strasbourg, 67200
Spain9 sites
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
Madrid, 28007
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro -Madrid
Madrid, C.P 28222
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra
Pontevedra, 36071
Hospital Universitario Donostia
San Sebastián, 20014
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, 39010
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41013
United Kingdom8 sites
Belfast Health and Social Care Trust-Royal Victoria Hospital
Belfast, BT12 6BA
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust - Frimley Park Hospital
Camberley, GU16 7UJ
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Addenbrookes Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Hull Royal Infirmary
Hull, HU32J
King's College Hospital. King's College NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE5 9RS
The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust-Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, NE7 7DN
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - Queen's Medical Centre (QMC)
Nottingham, NG72UH
Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital
Plymouth, PL6 8DH
Germany7 sites
Gastro - Sudien
Berlin, 10825
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin- CVK - Medizinische Klinik
Berlin, 13353
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
Frankfurt, 60590
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover, 30625
Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology (GHZ) Kiel
Kiel, 24146
EUGASTRO GmbH
Leipzig, 04103
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Mainz, 55131
Argentina6 sites
Hospital Alemán
Caba, Buenos Aires, C1118AAT
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
CABA, Buenos Aires, 1199
Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1280AEB
Hospital Espanol De Mendoza
Godoy Cruz, Mendoza Province, 5547
Hospital Italiano de La Plata
La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900
Hospital Provincial del Centenario
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2002KDS
Italy6 sites
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, 40138
Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Dipartimento di Scienza della Salute, UO Medicina VI e Pathologia e Gastroenterologia
Milan, 20142
Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara-Struttura Complessa di Medicina ad indririzzo Metabolico Nutrizionale
Modena, Località Baggiovara, 41126
ASST Monza - Ospedale San Gerardo, Gastroenterologia
Monza, 20900
Azienda Ospedale- Università degli Studi di Padova UOC Gastroenterologia
Padova, 35128
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico P. Giaccone, UOC di Gastroenterologia-Dip.Medicina Interna e Specialistica
Palermo, 90127
Chile5 sites
Hospital de La Serena
La Serena, Coquimbo Region, 1700000
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8320000
Centro de Investigacion Clinica Universidad Catolica CICUC
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8330034
Clínica Universidad de los Andes
Santiago, 7550000
Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas (CIC)
Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 2540364
Belgium4 sites
Hôpital Erasme
Brussels, 1070
Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, 2650
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
University Hospital Leuven
Leuven, 3000
Canada4 sites
University of Calgary Liver Unit - Heritage Medical Research Clinic (HMRC)
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM)
Montreal, H2X 0A9
Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Division of Gastroenterology
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z IM9
Shared Health Inc.-Operating as Health Sciences Centre-John Buhler Research Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4
South Africa3 sites
Tiervlei Trial Centre
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7530
Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town - Clinical Research Centre
Cape Town, Western Cap, 7925
Mediclinic Constantiaberg, North Suites
Cape Town, 7800
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Hacette Universitesi Hastenesi IC, Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Gastronenteroloji Bilim Dali, Mithapasa Cad. Hacettepe Mah.
Ankara, 06230
Marmara Universitesi Pendik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Gastroentoloji Bilim Dali
Istanbul, Pendik, 34890
Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi
Izmir, Bornova, 35100
Brazil2 sites
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo-HCFMUSP
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000
Switzerland2 sites
Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern Universitätsklinik für Viszerale chirurgie und Medizin Hepatologie
Bern, 3010
Fondazione Epatocentro Ticino
Lugano, 6900
About this study
Official title: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study and Open-label Long Term Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor 80 mg in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Ursodeoxycholic Acid
The participants of this study will have confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (which is a medication used in the management and treatment of cholestatic liver disease).
PBC is a slowly progressive disease characterized by damage of the bile ducts in the liver, leading to a buildup of bile acids which causes further damage. The liver damage in PBC may lead to scarring (cirrhosis). PBC may also be associated with multiple symptoms. Many patients with PBC may require liver transplant or may die if the disease progresses and a liver transplant is not done.
Read more
The main aim of this study is to determine if elafibranor (the study drug) is better than placebo (a dummy treatment) at decreasing the levels of a specific blood test (alkaline phosphatase) that provides information about participant's disease. This study will also evaluate the safety of long-term treatment with elafibranor, as well as the impact on symptoms such as itchy skin (pruritus) and tiredness (fatigue).
This study has two main parts:
Part 1 will compare a daily dose of elafibranor to a daily dose of placebo and will last between a minimum of one year and a maximum of two years.
Part 2, all participants will receive elafibranor for a period of up to 5 years or until the total treatment duration (part 1 and part 2) reaches 6 years, whichever occurs first.
- Conditions
- Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
- Being tested
- Elafibranor 80mg, Placebo
- Keywords
- Primary Biliary Cholangitis, PBC, Elafibranor
- Medical subject headings
- Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Elafibranor 80mgDrug
Also called Iqirvo®
Elafibranor 80mg daily
PlaceboDrug
Placebo daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg double-blind | Experimental | Study participants will take 1 tablet per day orally before breakfast with a glass of water each morning Receives: Drug: Elafibranor 80mg |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Study participants will take 1 tablet per day orally before breakfast with a glass of water each morning Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Elafibranor 80mg open label | Experimental | Study participants will take 1 tablet per day orally before breakfast with a glass of water each morning Receives: Drug: Elafibranor 80mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52
Cholestasis response was defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 1.67 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin (TB) <= ULN and ALP decrease from baseline >= 15% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced intercurrent events (ICEs) (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Secondary outcomes (46)
Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52
Response to treatment based on normalization of ALP at Week 52 was defined as percentage of participants with ALP =<1.0× ULN and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 52
Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of ALP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52
Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52
ALP response was defined as ALP decrease from baseline >= 10%; ALP decrease from baseline >= 20% and ALP decrease from baseline >= 40% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP decrease from baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP < 3x ULN, AST < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris I) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to TB decrease of 15% change from baseline at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to TB (TB =< ULN) and/or albumin (ALB >= LLN) (Rotterdam) at week 52. Participant was considered as responder at Week 52 only if total bilirubin and albumin were normal. The endpoint was analyzed in participants with abnormal total bilirubin (TB > ULN) or albumin (ALB < LLN) at baseline. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52
Response to treatment was according to no worsening of TB, which was defined as level of TB <ULN or no increase from baseline of more than 0.1 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52
Response to treatment according to complete biochemical response which was defined as <= ULN values of ALP, TB, AST, ALT and ALB, and international normalized ratio (INR) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.
Measured: At Week 52
PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52
The UK-PBC risk score was defined by the mean percentage risk that a PBC participant treated with UDCA would develop liver failure requiring liver transplantation in 5, 10, and 15 years from diagnosis. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: UK-PBC score = 0.0287854*(alpEPxULN-1.722136304) - 0.0422873*([{altastEP x ULN/10}^-1] - 8.675729006) + 1.4199 * (LN(bilEPxULN /10)+2.709607778) - 1.960303*(alb x LLN -1.17673001)-0.4161954*(plt x LLN -1.873564875). The survival S(t) for any given participants was then calculated by S(t) = S0(t) exp(UK-PBC score). Here, alpEP x ULN=ALP /Upper Level Normal ALP at the timepoint, altastEPxULN=(ALT, AST or TA) /upper level normal of the value at the timepoint, bilEP x ULN=bilirubin /upper level normal bilirubin at the timepoint, alb x LLN=alb /alb lower level normal at baseline and plt x LLN=plt/plt lower level normal at baseline. Lower UK-PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.
Measured: At Week 52
Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52
The GLOBE score was a validated risk assessment tool providing an estimate of transplant-free survival for participants with PBC. It was developed by the Global PBC Study Group using Cox regression model on over 4,000 participants with PBC. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: GLOBE score = 0.044378 * age at start of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy + 0.93982 * LN (TB x ULN) + 0.335648 * LN (ALP x ULN) - 2.266708 * ALB x LLN - 0.002581 * platelet count per 10^9/L) + 1.216865; where TB x ULN = bilirubin/ULN at the timepoint, ALP x ULN = ALP/ULN at the timepoint, ALB x LLN = ALB/LLN at the timepoint, platelet count per 10^9/L = platelet count per 10^9/L at the timepoint. The Lower GLOBE PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.
Measured: At Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by AST, ALT, GGT, 5'-NT, and fractionated ALP (hepatic) (H1 and H2). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by total and conjugated bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by albumin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52
Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by INR. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52
Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52
Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by fibrinogen and haptoglobin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52
Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by TNF-alpha. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52
Immune response was assessed as measured by IgG and IgM. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52
Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by ELF: hyaluronic acid [HA], type 2 procollagen peptide [PIINP], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1[TIMP-1]) and PAI-1. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52
Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by CK-18 (M30 and M65). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52
Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by TGF-beta. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52
FibroScan® TE device (Echosens, Paris, France) is a non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness, which correlated with fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of FPG. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by C4. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by Fibroblast Growth Factor 19. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Response to PBC Worst Itch NRS was according to clinically meaningful change at least 30% reduction; one point, two points or three points decrease in score from baseline in participants with a baseline NRS score ≥4. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).
Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 52
Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52
The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). A worsening of Pruritus was defined by a positive change from baseline in PBC Worst Itch NRS score greater than 2 at week 24 and 52.
Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 54
Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52
The 5-D Itch scale is a questionnaire that has been validated in several different diseases. It assesses symptoms in terms of 5 domains: duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) to 5 (all day); degree: score range 1 (not present) to 5 (unbearable); duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) and 5 (all day); direction: score range 1(completely resolved) and 5 (getting worse); disability: score range 1 (never affects or not applicable) and 5 (delays falling asleep and frequently wakes up at night or always affects this activity) and distribution: where the question was to mark where itching is present in body parts over the last two weeks. Participants rated their symptoms over preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. The 5-D Itch total score ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline= last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52
The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a consists of seven items that measure both the experience of fatigue and the interference of fatigue on daily activities over the past week. Participants completed the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a and answered following questions on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) : "How often did you feel tired"; "How often did you experience extreme exhaustion"; "How often did you run out of energy"; "How often did your fatigue limit you at work"; "How often were you too tired to think clearly"; "How often were you too tired to take a bath or shower" and 'How often did you have enough energy to exercise strenuously". T-score values include mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score ranged from 29.4 (best) to 83.2 (worst). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52
The ESS is a short, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 8 questions asking to rate how likely it is to fall asleep in everyday situations (each question can be scored from 0 to 3 points; '0' indicates no chance of dozing and '3' indicates high chance of dozing). It provides a total score which has been shown to relate to the participant's level of daytime sleepiness (total score range 0 [no sleepiness] to 24 points [significant sleepiness]). The total score is the sum of all item scores and ranged from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Higher scores indicated more chances of sleepiness. Participants were asked to complete the ESS with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the past 7 days. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52
PBC-40 assess symptoms across 6 domains:symptoms,itch,fatigue,cognitive,emotional and social. Participants responded on verbal response scale,depending on section options range from 'never'/'not at all'/'strongly disagree' to 'always'/'very much'/'strongly agree'.5 items (3/3 in itch domain and 2/10 in social domain)also included a 'does not apply' option.Domains:Symptoms(7 questions)score range 7-35,Itch(3 questions)score range 3-15,Fatigue(11 questions)score range 11-55,Cognitive(6 questions)score range 6-30,Emotional(3 questions)score range 3-15,Social(10 questions)score range 10-50.Score for each domain was provided(total score was not calculated),with each verbal response scale correlating to score of 1-5 per item(0-5 on items with a 'does not apply' option);5=most affected.Individual item scores are summed to give total domain score.Higher scores=worse outcomes.PBC-40 had 4-week recall period.Baseline=last non-missing value on or before first dose of randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52
The EQ-5D-5L is a 6-item, standardized questionnaire that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and overall health state. The visual analog scale (VAS) of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is numbered from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicated better outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52
DEXA scanning (hip and lumbar) was performed in participants to assess bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar and total hip). T-scores were calculated based on actual measured bone density value. The T-score compared a participant's bone density against that of a healthy 30-year-old adult. T-scores were used to determine primary osteoporosis, which exists on its own without any other cause and were divided into 3 categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk (osteoporosis). T-scores measure the number of minerals in a participant's bone. A participant's level of bone loss was compared to that of a typical, healthy 30-year-old adult. A score ≥-1.0 indicates low risk, medium risk is a score between-2.5 and -1.0, and a high risk/osteoporosis is a score ≤-2.5. A positive change in T-score indicates an improvement in bone mineral density. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, CTX. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, P1NP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52
Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes
Onset of clinical outcomes were described as a composite endpoint composed of the following: model for end stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) >14 for participants with baseline MELD-Na <12; liver transplant; uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment; hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of any including, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy defined as West-Haven score of 2 or more and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; and death.
Measured: From Day 1 up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who was administered an investigational product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE with onset during TEAE assessment period, or any event started prior to first dose of treatment and worsened or became serious during the TEAE assessment period. An SAE was any AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. An AESI was an AE that might not be serious but was of special importance to a particular treatment or class.
Measured: TEAEs were collected from the start of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to DCO date of 01 June 2023, approximately 980 days.
Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to evaluate plasma concentration of Elafibranor and its metabolite GFT1007.
Measured: Week 4: pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1.5 hours, between 2-3 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post-dose
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Aug 2020
- Study start24 Sep 2020
- Primary completion1 Jun 2023
- Study completion1 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Primary Biliary CirrhosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by IpsenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label long term extension (LTE)
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 161 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ipsen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ipsen Medical Director, Study director, Ipsen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04526665
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GFT505B-319-1
- Other IDs
- 2019-004941-34, 2019
- Acronym
- ELATIVE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants.
Publications
Kowdley KV, Bowlus CL, Levy C, Akarca U, Alvares-da-Silva MR, Andreone P, Arrese M, Corpechot C, Elbeshbeshy H, Francque S, Heneghan MA, Invernizzi P, Jacobson IM, Jones D, Kremer AE, Kruger FC, Kugelmas M, Lawitz E, Mayo MJ, Shiffman ML, Sonderup M, Swain MG, Valera JM, Vierling JM, Villagrasa A, Villamil A, Antunes N, Raskino C, Sleiman M, Cranham V, Miller B, Schattenberg JM. Elafibranor in primary biliary cholangitis: two-year placebo-controlled outcomes and long-term open-label data from the ELATIVE(R) phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2026 Aug 27:S0168-8278(26)02859-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.016. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42660235Levy C, Bowlus CL, Lawitz E, Antunes N, Miller B, Shu J, Zein CO, Kowdley KV. Baseline Alkaline Phosphatase Impacts Response Rates in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Exploring Response to Elafibranor in ELATIVE. Liver Int. 2026 May;46(5):e70630. doi: 10.1111/liv.70630.
PubMed 41937506Kowdley KV, Bowlus CL, Levy C, Akarca US, Alvares-da-Silva MR, Andreone P, Arrese M, Corpechot C, Francque SM, Heneghan MA, Invernizzi P, Jones D, Kruger FC, Lawitz E, Mayo MJ, Shiffman ML, Swain MG, Valera JM, Vargas V, Vierling JM, Villamil A, Addy C, Dietrich J, Germain JM, Mazain S, Rafailovic D, Tadde B, Miller B, Shu J, Zein CO, Schattenberg JM; ELATIVE Study Investigators' Group; ELATIVE Study Investigators' Group. Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor in Primary Biliary Cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 29;390(9):795-805. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2306185. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
PubMed 37962077