AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Biliary CirrhosisPhase 3ELATIVENCT04526665

Study of Elafibranor in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)

A Phase 3 study testing Elafibranor 80mg in people with Primary Biliary Cirrhosis, run by Ipsen at 115 sites in 14 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The participants of this study will have confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (which is a medication used in the management and treatment of cholestatic liver disease). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
What is being tested?
Elafibranor 80mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
161 participants
Where
115 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
24 Sep 2020to 1 Dec 2028
Phase
Phase 3

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males or females age of 18 to 75 years (inclusive)
  • Definite or probable Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) diagnosis
  • Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥ 1.67x upper limit of normal (ULN)
  • Total bilirubin (TB) ≤ 2x ULN
  • Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for at least 12 months (stable dose ≥ 3 months) prior to screening, or unable to tolerate UDCA treatment (no UDCA for ≥ 3 months) prior to screening (per country standard-of-care dosing)
  • Must have PBC Worst Itch Numeric rating scale (NRS) collected prior to randomization
  • Females participating in this study must be of non-child bearing potential or must be using highly efficient contraception for the full duration of the study and for 1 month after the last drug intake

Who cannot join

  • History or presence of other concomitant liver disease
  • Clinically significant hepatic decompensation, including patients with complications of cirrhosis/portal hypertension
  • Medical conditions that may cause non-hepatic increases in ALP (e.g., Paget's disease) or which may diminish life expectancy to < 2 years, including known cancers
  • Patient has a positive test for HIV Type 1 or 2 at screening, or patient is known to have tested positive for HIV
  • Evidence of any other unstable or untreated clinically significant disease
  • History of alcohol abuse
Show all 24Show fewer
  • For female patients: known pregnancy or lactating
  • Use of fibrates and glitazones within 2 months prior to screening
  • Use of Obeticholic acid (OCA), azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, pentoxifylline, budesonide and other systemic corticosteroids (parenteral and oral chronic administration only); potentially hepatotoxic drugs
  • (including α-methyl-dopa, sodium valproic acid isoniazid, or nitrofurantoin) within 3 months prior to screening
  • Use of antibodies or immunotherapy directed against interleukins (ILs) or other cytokines or chemokines within 12 months prior to screening
  • For patients with previous exposure to OCA, OCA should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening
  • Patients who are currently participating in, plan to participate in, or have participated in an investigational drug study or medical device study containing active substance within 30 days or five half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to screening; for patients with previous exposure to seladelpar, seladelpar should be discontinued 3 months prior to screening
  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) values > 5 x ULN
  • For patients with AT or TB>ULN at SV1, variability of AT or TB > 40% (see section 3.5.1)
  • Albumin<3.0 g/dl
  • Severely advanced patients according to Rotterdam criteria (TB > ULN and albumin <LLN)
  • INR > 1.3 due to altered hepatic function
  • CPK > 2 x ULN
  • Screening serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dl
  • Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (defined as patients with markers of kidney failure damage or eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m^2) calculated by Modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD)
  • Platelet count < 150 x 10^3/μL
  • AFP > 20 ng/mL with 4-phase liver CT or MRI imaging suggesting presence of liver cancer
  • Known hypersensitivity to the investigational product or to any of the formulation excipients of the elafibranor or placebo tablet Mental instability or incompetence, such that the validity of informed consent or ability to be compliant with the study is uncertain

Trial locations and contacts

115 sites in 14 countries.

115 sites in 14 countries

United States46 sites
  • Texas Clinical Research Institute, LLC

    Arlington, Texas, 76012

  • Digestive Healthcare of Georgia

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30309

  • University of Colorado Denver and Hospital

    Aurora, Colorado, 840045

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC)

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • The Institute for Liver Health

    Chandler, Arizona, 85224

  • Medical University of South Carolina- College of Medicine

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • University of Virginia Medical Center

    Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908

  • Consultants for Clinical Research

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45249

  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210-1240

  • The Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75203

  • Liver Center of Texas, PLLC

    Dallas, Texas, 75234

  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center-IDS Aston Pharmacy

    Dallas, Texas, 75390-8575

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • South Denver Gastroenterology, P.C.

    Englewood, Colorado, 80113

  • Texas Digestive Disease Consultants dba GI Alliance

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • Investigational Drug Service Pharmacy Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033

  • Liver Associates of Texas, P.A.

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • St. Luke's Health-Baylor St Luke's Medical center - Advanced Liver Therapies Research

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Carolinas Centre for Liver disease/ Atrium Health

    Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078

  • Encore Borland-Groover Clinical Research

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • Keck Medical Center of USC

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Ruane Clinical Research Group Inc.

    Los Angeles, California, 90036

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

  • Schiff Center for Liver Diseases/University of Miami

    Miami, Florida, 33136

  • Intermountain Medical Center - Transplant Services

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Vanderbilt Digestive Disease Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

  • Yale School of Medicine, Digestive Diseases

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510

  • UPMC Center for Liver Diseases

    New Hyde Park, New York, 11042-11114

  • NYU Langone Health / NYU Grossman School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10016

  • Columbia University Medical Center - Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation

    New York, New York, 10032

  • The New York-Presbyterian Hospital, David H. Koch Center

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Maryview Hospital Inc, Bon Secours Liver Institute of Hampton Roads

    Newport News, Virginia, 23602

  • Henry Ford Health System

    Novi, Michigan, 48377

  • Thomas Jefferson University

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107

  • Richmond Community Hospital LLC, Bon Secours Liver Institute of Richmond

    Richmond, Virginia, 23226

  • Virginia Commonwealth University Clinical Research Services Unit (CRSU)

    Richmond, Virginia, 23298

  • University of California, Davis Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • University of Utah Hospital-Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • American Research Corporation

    San Antonio, Texas, 78215

  • California Pacific Medical Center - Sutter Pacific Medical Foundation

    San Francisco, California, 94109

  • Liver Institute Northwest

    Seattle, Washington, 98105

  • Saint Louis University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63104

  • Gastro health & Nutrition-Victoria

    Victoria, Texas, 77904

Other trials in United States

France10 sites
  • CHU Amiens Picardie

    Amiens, 80054

  • Hôpital Henri Mondor

    Créteil, 94000

  • CHU Grenoble Alpes - Hôpital Albert Michallon

    Grenoble, 38043

  • Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

    Orléans, 45067

  • Hôpital Saint-Antoine

    Paris, 75012

  • Hôpital Cochin

    Paris, 75014

  • Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière

    Paris, 75651

  • Hôpital Haut Lévêque

    Pessac, 33604

  • Hôpital Robert Debré - CHU de Reims

    Reims, 51092

  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg - Hôpital de Hautepierre

    Strasbourg, 67200

Other trials in France

Spain9 sites
  • Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro -Madrid

    Madrid, C.P 28222

  • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra

    Pontevedra, 36071

  • Hospital Universitario Donostia

    San Sebastián, 20014

  • Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla

    Santander, 39010

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom8 sites
  • Belfast Health and Social Care Trust-Royal Victoria Hospital

    Belfast, BT12 6BA

  • Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust - Frimley Park Hospital

    Camberley, GU16 7UJ

  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust - Addenbrookes Hospital

    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

  • Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust , Hull Royal Infirmary

    Hull, HU32J

  • King's College Hospital. King's College NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SE5 9RS

  • The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust-Freeman Hospital

    Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, NE7 7DN

  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust - Queen's Medical Centre (QMC)

    Nottingham, NG72UH

  • Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Derriford Hospital

    Plymouth, PL6 8DH

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany7 sites
  • Gastro - Sudien

    Berlin, 10825

  • Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin- CVK - Medizinische Klinik

    Berlin, 13353

  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt

    Frankfurt, 60590

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

    Hanover, 30625

  • Center for Gastroenterology and Hepatology (GHZ) Kiel

    Kiel, 24146

  • EUGASTRO GmbH

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz

    Mainz, 55131

Other trials in Germany

Argentina6 sites
  • Hospital Alemán

    Caba, Buenos Aires, C1118AAT

  • Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

    CABA, Buenos Aires, 1199

  • Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires

    CABA, Buenos Aires, C1280AEB

  • Hospital Espanol De Mendoza

    Godoy Cruz, Mendoza Province, 5547

  • Hospital Italiano de La Plata

    La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900

  • Hospital Provincial del Centenario

    Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2002KDS

Other trials in Argentina

Italy6 sites
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi

    Bologna, 40138

  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Dipartimento di Scienza della Salute, UO Medicina VI e Pathologia e Gastroenterologia

    Milan, 20142

  • Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara-Struttura Complessa di Medicina ad indririzzo Metabolico Nutrizionale

    Modena, Località Baggiovara, 41126

  • ASST Monza - Ospedale San Gerardo, Gastroenterologia

    Monza, 20900

  • Azienda Ospedale- Università degli Studi di Padova UOC Gastroenterologia

    Padova, 35128

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico P. Giaccone, UOC di Gastroenterologia-Dip.Medicina Interna e Specialistica

    Palermo, 90127

Other trials in Italy

Chile5 sites
  • Hospital de La Serena

    La Serena, Coquimbo Region, 1700000

  • Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8320000

  • Centro de Investigacion Clinica Universidad Catolica CICUC

    Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 8330034

  • Clínica Universidad de los Andes

    Santiago, 7550000

  • Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas (CIC)

    Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 2540364

Other trials in Chile

Belgium4 sites
  • Hôpital Erasme

    Brussels, 1070

  • Antwerp University Hospital

    Edegem, 2650

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • University Hospital Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Canada4 sites
  • University of Calgary Liver Unit - Heritage Medical Research Clinic (HMRC)

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6

  • Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montreal (CRCHUM)

    Montreal, H2X 0A9

  • Gordon and Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre, Division of Gastroenterology

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z IM9

  • Shared Health Inc.-Operating as Health Sciences Centre-John Buhler Research Centre

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3E 3P4

Other trials in Canada

South Africa3 sites
  • Tiervlei Trial Centre

    Cape Town, Western Cape, 7530

  • Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town - Clinical Research Centre

    Cape Town, Western Cap, 7925

  • Mediclinic Constantiaberg, North Suites

    Cape Town, 7800

Other trials in South Africa

Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
  • Hacette Universitesi Hastenesi IC, Hastaliklari Anabilim Dali, Gastronenteroloji Bilim Dali, Mithapasa Cad. Hacettepe Mah.

    Ankara, 06230

  • Marmara Universitesi Pendik Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Gastroentoloji Bilim Dali

    Istanbul, Pendik, 34890

  • Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi

    Izmir, Bornova, 35100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Brazil2 sites
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903

  • Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo-HCFMUSP

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-000

Other trials in Brazil

Switzerland2 sites
  • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern Universitätsklinik für Viszerale chirurgie und Medizin Hepatologie

    Bern, 3010

  • Fondazione Epatocentro Ticino

    Lugano, 6900

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study and Open-label Long Term Extension to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor 80 mg in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis With Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

The participants of this study will have confirmed Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) with inadequate response or intolerance to ursodeoxycholic acid (which is a medication used in the management and treatment of cholestatic liver disease).

PBC is a slowly progressive disease characterized by damage of the bile ducts in the liver, leading to a buildup of bile acids which causes further damage. The liver damage in PBC may lead to scarring (cirrhosis). PBC may also be associated with multiple symptoms. Many patients with PBC may require liver transplant or may die if the disease progresses and a liver transplant is not done.

Read more

The main aim of this study is to determine if elafibranor (the study drug) is better than placebo (a dummy treatment) at decreasing the levels of a specific blood test (alkaline phosphatase) that provides information about participant's disease. This study will also evaluate the safety of long-term treatment with elafibranor, as well as the impact on symptoms such as itchy skin (pruritus) and tiredness (fatigue).

This study has two main parts:

Part 1 will compare a daily dose of elafibranor to a daily dose of placebo and will last between a minimum of one year and a maximum of two years.

Part 2, all participants will receive elafibranor for a period of up to 5 years or until the total treatment duration (part 1 and part 2) reaches 6 years, whichever occurs first.

Being tested
Elafibranor 80mg, Placebo
Keywords
Primary Biliary Cholangitis, PBC, Elafibranor
Medical subject headings
Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Elafibranor 80mgDrug

    Also called Iqirvo®

    Elafibranor 80mg daily

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo daily

Study groups in NCT04526665
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Elafibranor 80mg double-blindExperimentalStudy participants will take 1 tablet per day orally before breakfast with a glass of water each morning
Receives: Drug: Elafibranor 80mg
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorStudy participants will take 1 tablet per day orally before breakfast with a glass of water each morning
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Elafibranor 80mg open labelExperimentalStudy participants will take 1 tablet per day orally before breakfast with a glass of water each morning
Receives: Drug: Elafibranor 80mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on Cholestasis Response at Week 52

    Cholestasis response was defined as alkaline phosphatase (ALP) < 1.67 x upper limit of normal (ULN) and total bilirubin (TB) <= ULN and ALP decrease from baseline >= 15% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced intercurrent events (ICEs) (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

Secondary outcomes (46)
  1. Key Secondary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment Based on ALP Normalization at Week 52

    Response to treatment based on normalization of ALP at Week 52 was defined as percentage of participants with ALP =<1.0× ULN and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  2. Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 52

    The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).

    Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 52

  3. Key Secondary Endpoint: Change From Baseline in Pruritus Based on PBC Worst Itch NRS Score in Participants With Baseline PBC Worst Itch NRS Score ≥4 to Week 24

    The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).

    Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in ALP at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of ALP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Weeks 4, 13, 26, 39 and 52

  5. Percentage of Participants With ALP Response From Baseline at Week 52

    ALP response was defined as ALP decrease from baseline >= 10%; ALP decrease from baseline >= 20% and ALP decrease from baseline >= 40% at Week 52 and based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  6. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP Decrease From Baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to ALP < 1.5x ULN, ALP decrease from baseline >= 40% and TB =<ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: At Week 52

  7. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP < 3x ULN, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 Milligrams Per Deciliter (mg/dL) (Paris I) at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to ALP < 3x ULN, AST < 2x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris I) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  8. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to ALP =< 1.5x ULN, AST =< 1.5x ULN and TB =< 1 mg/dL (Paris II) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  9. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB Decrease of 15% Change From Baseline at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to TB decrease of 15% change from baseline at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: At Week 52

  10. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Normalization of TB (TB =< ULN) and/or Albumin (ALB >= Lower Limit of Normal [LLN]) (Rotterdam) at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to TB (TB =< ULN) and/or albumin (ALB >= LLN) (Rotterdam) at week 52. Participant was considered as responder at Week 52 only if total bilirubin and albumin were normal. The endpoint was analyzed in participants with abnormal total bilirubin (TB > ULN) or albumin (ALB < LLN) at baseline. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  11. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to TB ≤0.6 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  12. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to ALP ≤1.67 x ULN and TB ≤1 mg/dL (Momah/ Lindor) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  13. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to no Worsening of TB at Week 52

    Response to treatment was according to no worsening of TB, which was defined as level of TB <ULN or no increase from baseline of more than 0.1 x ULN at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  14. Percentage of Participants With Response to Treatment According to Complete Biochemical Response at Week 52

    Response to treatment according to complete biochemical response which was defined as <= ULN values of ALP, TB, AST, ALT and ALB, and international normalized ratio (INR) at Week 52. It was based on the composite strategy imputing non-response for participants who experienced ICEs (study treatment discontinuation or use of rescue therapy for PBC) prior to Week 52.

    Measured: At Week 52

  15. PBC 5-, 10- and 15-year Risk Scores Based on United Kingdom (UK)-PBC Score at Week 52

    The UK-PBC risk score was defined by the mean percentage risk that a PBC participant treated with UDCA would develop liver failure requiring liver transplantation in 5, 10, and 15 years from diagnosis. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: UK-PBC score = 0.0287854*(alpEPxULN-1.722136304) - 0.0422873*([{altastEP x ULN/10}^-1] - 8.675729006) + 1.4199 * (LN(bilEPxULN /10)+2.709607778) - 1.960303*(alb x LLN -1.17673001)-0.4161954*(plt x LLN -1.873564875). The survival S(t) for any given participants was then calculated by S(t) = S0(t) exp(UK-PBC score). Here, alpEP x ULN=ALP /Upper Level Normal ALP at the timepoint, altastEPxULN=(ALT, AST or TA) /upper level normal of the value at the timepoint, bilEP x ULN=bilirubin /upper level normal bilirubin at the timepoint, alb x LLN=alb /alb lower level normal at baseline and plt x LLN=plt/plt lower level normal at baseline. Lower UK-PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.

    Measured: At Week 52

  16. Global PBC Study Group (GLOBE) Score at Week 52

    The GLOBE score was a validated risk assessment tool providing an estimate of transplant-free survival for participants with PBC. It was developed by the Global PBC Study Group using Cox regression model on over 4,000 participants with PBC. It is calculated from the following equation at week 52 as follows: GLOBE score = 0.044378 * age at start of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) therapy + 0.93982 * LN (TB x ULN) + 0.335648 * LN (ALP x ULN) - 2.266708 * ALB x LLN - 0.002581 * platelet count per 10^9/L) + 1.216865; where TB x ULN = bilirubin/ULN at the timepoint, ALP x ULN = ALP/ULN at the timepoint, ALB x LLN = ALB/LLN at the timepoint, platelet count per 10^9/L = platelet count per 10^9/L at the timepoint. The Lower GLOBE PBC score predicts lower risk and better prognosis.

    Measured: At Week 52

  17. Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Assessed by AST, ALT, Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT), 5 Prime Nucleotidase (5'-NT), and Fractionated ALP (Hepatic) (H1 and H2) at Week 52

    Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by AST, ALT, GGT, 5'-NT, and fractionated ALP (hepatic) (H1 and H2). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  18. Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Total and Conjugated Bilirubin at Week 52

    Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by total and conjugated bilirubin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  19. Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by Albumin at Week 52

    Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by albumin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  20. Change From Baseline in Hepatobiliary Injury and Liver Function as Measured by INR at Week 52

    Hepatobiliary injury and liver function were assessed as measured by INR. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  21. Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 52

    Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  22. Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Fibrinogen and Haptoglobin at Week 52

    Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by fibrinogen and haptoglobin. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  23. Change From Baseline in Biomarkers of Inflammation as Measured by Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha at Week 52

    Biomarkers of inflammation were assessed as measured by TNF-alpha. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  24. Change From Baseline in Immune Response as Measured by Immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM at Week 52

    Immune response was assessed as measured by IgG and IgM. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  25. Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) and Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) at Week 52

    Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by ELF: hyaluronic acid [HA], type 2 procollagen peptide [PIINP], tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1[TIMP-1]) and PAI-1. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  26. Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Cytokeratin-18 (CK-18) at Week 52

    Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by CK-18 (M30 and M65). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  27. Change From Baseline in Biomarkers and Non-invasive Measures of Hepatic Fibrosis as Measured by Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-beta) at Week 52

    Biomarkers and non-invasive measures of hepatic fibrosis were assessed as measured by TGF-beta. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  28. Change From Baseline in Liver Stiffness Measured by Transient Elastography (TE) at Week 52

    FibroScan® TE device (Echosens, Paris, France) is a non-invasive technique used to measure liver stiffness, which correlated with fibrosis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  29. Change From Baseline in Lipid Parameters at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglycerides (TG). Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  30. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of FPG. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  31. Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  32. Change From Baseline at Week 52 in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured by 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by C4. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  33. Change From Baseline in Bile Acids and Biomarkers of Bile Acid Synthesis as Measured Fibroblast Growth Factor 19 at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment bile acids and biomarkers of bile acid synthesis as measured by Fibroblast Growth Factor 19. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  34. Percentage of Participants With Response in PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52

    The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Response to PBC Worst Itch NRS was according to clinically meaningful change at least 30% reduction; one point, two points or three points decrease in score from baseline in participants with a baseline NRS score ≥4. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake).

    Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 52

  35. Percentage of Participants With no Worsening of Pruritus as Measured by the PBC Worst Itch NRS Score at Weeks 24 and 52

    The PBC Worst Itch NRS is a simple, self-administered PRO questionnaire that measures itch intensity. Participants rate intensity of their worst Itch on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Total score ranged from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst itch imaginable). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data within 14 days prior the day of randomization. Post-baseline data was defined as the average of the daily PBC Worst itch scores on available data in 4-week period intervals (available data every 28 days after the day of first study drug intake). A worsening of Pruritus was defined by a positive change from baseline in PBC Worst Itch NRS score greater than 2 at week 24 and 52.

    Measured: Baseline (up to 14 days pre-dose) and at Week 24 and Week 54

  36. Change From Baseline in 5-D Itch at Week 52

    The 5-D Itch scale is a questionnaire that has been validated in several different diseases. It assesses symptoms in terms of 5 domains: duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) to 5 (all day); degree: score range 1 (not present) to 5 (unbearable); duration: score range 1 (less than 6 hours) and 5 (all day); direction: score range 1(completely resolved) and 5 (getting worse); disability: score range 1 (never affects or not applicable) and 5 (delays falling asleep and frequently wakes up at night or always affects this activity) and distribution: where the question was to mark where itching is present in body parts over the last two weeks. Participants rated their symptoms over preceding 2-week period on a 1 to 5 scale, with 5 being the most affected. The 5-D Itch total score ranged between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline= last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  37. Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Short Form 7a at Week 52

    The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a consists of seven items that measure both the experience of fatigue and the interference of fatigue on daily activities over the past week. Participants completed the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a and answered following questions on a scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always) : "How often did you feel tired"; "How often did you experience extreme exhaustion"; "How often did you run out of energy"; "How often did your fatigue limit you at work"; "How often were you too tired to think clearly"; "How often were you too tired to take a bath or shower" and 'How often did you have enough energy to exercise strenuously". T-score values include mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10. The PROMIS Fatigue T-score ranged from 29.4 (best) to 83.2 (worst). Higher scores indicated worse outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  38. Change From Baseline in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) at Week 52

    The ESS is a short, self-administered questionnaire that consists of 8 questions asking to rate how likely it is to fall asleep in everyday situations (each question can be scored from 0 to 3 points; '0' indicates no chance of dozing and '3' indicates high chance of dozing). It provides a total score which has been shown to relate to the participant's level of daytime sleepiness (total score range 0 [no sleepiness] to 24 points [significant sleepiness]). The total score is the sum of all item scores and ranged from 0 (best) to 24 (worst). Higher scores indicated more chances of sleepiness. Participants were asked to complete the ESS with regard to the level of sleepiness they experienced over approximately the past 7 days. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  39. Change From Baseline in PBC-40 at Week 52

    PBC-40 assess symptoms across 6 domains:symptoms,itch,fatigue,cognitive,emotional and social. Participants responded on verbal response scale,depending on section options range from 'never'/'not at all'/'strongly disagree' to 'always'/'very much'/'strongly agree'.5 items (3/3 in itch domain and 2/10 in social domain)also included a 'does not apply' option.Domains:Symptoms(7 questions)score range 7-35,Itch(3 questions)score range 3-15,Fatigue(11 questions)score range 11-55,Cognitive(6 questions)score range 6-30,Emotional(3 questions)score range 3-15,Social(10 questions)score range 10-50.Score for each domain was provided(total score was not calculated),with each verbal response scale correlating to score of 1-5 per item(0-5 on items with a 'does not apply' option);5=most affected.Individual item scores are summed to give total domain score.Higher scores=worse outcomes.PBC-40 had 4-week recall period.Baseline=last non-missing value on or before first dose of randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  40. Change From Baseline in Health Utility as Measured by the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 Level Version (EQ-5D-5L) at Week 52

    The EQ-5D-5L is a 6-item, standardized questionnaire that assesses mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and overall health state. The visual analog scale (VAS) of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire is numbered from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Higher scores indicated better outcomes. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  41. Change From Baseline in T-Scores for Bone Mineral Density Assessed by Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scanning at Week 52

    DEXA scanning (hip and lumbar) was performed in participants to assess bone mineral density (femoral neck, lumbar and total hip). T-scores were calculated based on actual measured bone density value. The T-score compared a participant's bone density against that of a healthy 30-year-old adult. T-scores were used to determine primary osteoporosis, which exists on its own without any other cause and were divided into 3 categories: low risk, medium risk, and high risk (osteoporosis). T-scores measure the number of minerals in a participant's bone. A participant's level of bone loss was compared to that of a typical, healthy 30-year-old adult. A score ≥-1.0 indicates low risk, medium risk is a score between-2.5 and -1.0, and a high risk/osteoporosis is a score ≤-2.5. A positive change in T-score indicates an improvement in bone mineral density. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  42. Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Carboxy Terminal Crosslinked Telopeptides of Type 1 Collagen [CTX] at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, CTX. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  43. Change From Baseline in Serum Markers of Bone Turnover Type 1 Procollagen Peptide [P1NP]) at Week 52

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for assessment of serum markers of bone turnover, P1NP. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing central value on or before the first dose of the randomized study medication.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and at Week 52

  44. Percentage of Participants With Onset of Clinical Outcomes

    Onset of clinical outcomes were described as a composite endpoint composed of the following: model for end stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) >14 for participants with baseline MELD-Na <12; liver transplant; uncontrolled ascites requiring treatment; hospitalization for new onset or recurrence of any including, variceal bleed, hepatic encephalopathy defined as West-Haven score of 2 or more and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis; and death.

    Measured: From Day 1 up to Week 52

  45. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant who was administered an investigational product, and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A TEAE was defined as any AE with onset during TEAE assessment period, or any event started prior to first dose of treatment and worsened or became serious during the TEAE assessment period. An SAE was any AE that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. An AESI was an AE that might not be serious but was of special importance to a particular treatment or class.

    Measured: TEAEs were collected from the start of study treatment administration (Day 1) up to DCO date of 01 June 2023, approximately 980 days.

  46. Plasma Concentrations of Elafibranor and GFT1007

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints to evaluate plasma concentration of Elafibranor and its metabolite GFT1007.

    Measured: Week 4: pre-dose, 0.5 hour, 1.5 hours, between 2-3 hours, 4 hours and 6 hours post-dose

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2020
  2. Study start24 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a double-blind (DB), randomized, placebo-controlled study followed by an open-label long term extension (LTE)
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
161 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04526665
Sponsor's protocol ID
GFT505B-319-1
Other IDs
2019-004941-34, 2019
Acronym
ELATIVE
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
21 Aug 2020
Last updated
21 Oct 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants.

Publications

  • Kowdley KV, Bowlus CL, Levy C, Akarca U, Alvares-da-Silva MR, Andreone P, Arrese M, Corpechot C, Elbeshbeshy H, Francque S, Heneghan MA, Invernizzi P, Jacobson IM, Jones D, Kremer AE, Kruger FC, Kugelmas M, Lawitz E, Mayo MJ, Shiffman ML, Sonderup M, Swain MG, Valera JM, Vierling JM, Villagrasa A, Villamil A, Antunes N, Raskino C, Sleiman M, Cranham V, Miller B, Schattenberg JM. Elafibranor in primary biliary cholangitis: two-year placebo-controlled outcomes and long-term open-label data from the ELATIVE(R) phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2026 Aug 27:S0168-8278(26)02859-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.016. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42660235
  • Levy C, Bowlus CL, Lawitz E, Antunes N, Miller B, Shu J, Zein CO, Kowdley KV. Baseline Alkaline Phosphatase Impacts Response Rates in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Exploring Response to Elafibranor in ELATIVE. Liver Int. 2026 May;46(5):e70630. doi: 10.1111/liv.70630.

    PubMed 41937506
  • Kowdley KV, Bowlus CL, Levy C, Akarca US, Alvares-da-Silva MR, Andreone P, Arrese M, Corpechot C, Francque SM, Heneghan MA, Invernizzi P, Jones D, Kruger FC, Lawitz E, Mayo MJ, Shiffman ML, Swain MG, Valera JM, Vargas V, Vierling JM, Villamil A, Addy C, Dietrich J, Germain JM, Mazain S, Rafailovic D, Tadde B, Miller B, Shu J, Zein CO, Schattenberg JM; ELATIVE Study Investigators' Group; ELATIVE Study Investigators' Group. Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor in Primary Biliary Cholangitis. N Engl J Med. 2024 Feb 29;390(9):795-805. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2306185. Epub 2023 Nov 13.

    PubMed 37962077

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in