ContraceptionNCT02945670
Using Focus Group to Explore Cultural Acceptability of Contraception
An observational study of Contraception, run by University of Pittsburgh at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to learn what women of childbearing age think of Long Acting Reversible Contraception. A variety of myths regarding LARCs have been described in the literature. This study is designed to asses women's cultural belief's regarding LARCs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Contraception
- What is being tested?
- Focus Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Jan 2017to 30 Mar 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Women age 18-45 years and not pregnant at the time of enrollment
Who may be able to join
- Female
- Age 18-45 years
- Not pregnant
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Male
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites
Latterman Family Health Center
McKeesport, Pennsylvania, 15132
New Kensington Family Health Center
New Kensington, Pennsylvania, 15068
UPMC Matilda Theiss Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Squirrel Hill Family Practice
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15217
UPMC Bloomfiled-Garfield FHC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Lawrenceville Family Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Shadyside Family Health Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
About this study
Official title: Using Focus Group to Explore Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population.
The purpose of this study is to learn what women of childbearing age think of Long Acting Reversible Contraception. A variety of myths regarding LARCs have been described in the literature. This study is designed to asses women's cultural belief's regarding LARCs. Investigators are looking to collect information from women in general, rather than solely who are seeking contraception. Investigators will be recruiting women ages 18-45 years from seven family health centers affiliated with UPMC. Participants will be asked to a attend a 60-90 minutes focus group session. During the session the facilitator will try to engage participants in a discussion about contraception in general. They will also be asked to complete a short demographic survey of 8-12 questions. Data from focus groups will be assessed for recurring themes which will be used to create a cultural survey instrument that will be used in the second phase of the study.
Read the detailed description
Following approval by the University of Pittsburgh institutional review board (IRB), female participants between 18 and 45 years of age seeking care for contraception or other women's health services were recruited from seven Family Health Centers (FHCs) partnered with the Department of Family Medicine. The participants agreed to participate in one 2 hour facilitated focus group session (recorded for later transcription) to discuss their perceptions about contraception.
Recordings were transcribed and de-identified. The resulting texts were coded by a team. Concepts and themes that arose from the coding were analyzed to inform the development of a survey on the topic of perspectives on contraception.
Qualitative analysis of the transcripts and coding was carried out and results were shared in pubic fora.
- Conditions
- Contraception
- Being tested
- Focus Group
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Focus GroupBehavioural
We had recruited 64 women and completed 7 focus group sessions
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of acceptance of contraception among diverse women
Level of acceptance: 1-Totally not accepted 2-May accept 3-Neither accept/not accept 4-Accept with preservation 5-Totally accept
Measured: Three months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Study start2 Jan 2017
- Primary completion30 Mar 2017
- Study completion30 Mar 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ContraceptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jeannette E. South-Paul, University of Pittsburgh
- Investigators
- Jeannette E. South-Paul, MD, Principal investigator, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02945670
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Merck IIS# 55000
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Oct 2016
- Last updated
- 8 May 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
PubMed 22018123Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
PubMed 20541171Romero L, Pazol K, Warner L, Gavin L, Moskosky S, Besera G, Loyola Briceno AC, Jatlaoui T, Barfield W; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services-United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Apr 10;64(13):363-9.
PubMed 25856258Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, Darney PD, Speidel JJ, Policar M, Drey EA. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1359-69. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173fd83.
PubMed 18515520Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1417-22. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0.
PubMed 17138775Whitaker AK, Sisco KM, Tomlinson AN, Dude AM, Martins SL. Use of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
PubMed 23763968Damle LF, Gohari AC, McEvoy AK, Desale SY, Gomez-Lobo V. Early initiation of postpartum contraception: does it decrease rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Feb;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 5.
PubMed 25555302Okpo E, Allerton L, Brechin S. 'But you can't reverse a hysterectomy!' Perceptions of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) among young women aged 16-24 years: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2014 Oct;128(10):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
PubMed 25369357Greenberg KB, Makino KK, Coles MS. Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):372-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.003.
PubMed 23427785Rubin SE, Davis K, McKee MD. New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):130-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1450.
PubMed 23508599Russo JA, Miller E, Gold MA. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.003.
PubMed 23535052Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Berenson AB. The use of effective contraception among young Hispanic women: the role of acculturation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb;25(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
PubMed 22051784Doescher MP, Saver BG, Franks P, Fiscella K. Racial and ethnic disparities in perceptions of physician style and trust. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;9(10):1156-63. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.10.1156.
PubMed 11115223Kissling E, Valenciano M, Larrauri A, Oroszi B, Cohen JM, Nunes B, Pitigoi D, Rizzo C, Rebolledo J, Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Jimenez-Jorge S, Horvath JK, Daviaud I, Guiomar R, Necula G, Bella A, O'Donnell J, Gluchowska M, Ciancio BC, Nicoll A, Moren A. Low and decreasing vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H3) in 2011/12 among vaccination target groups in Europe: results from the I-MOVE multicentre case-control study. Euro Surveill. 2013 Jan 31;18(5):20390. doi: 10.2807/ese.18.05.20390-en.
PubMed 23399425Lin C, South-Paul JE, Maier JS, deBorja L, Al Aaraj Y, Burley C, Mena J,.Using Focus Group to Explore Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population. North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting - NOV 2017 / Montreal, QB (https://www.napcrg.org/conferences/43/sessions/20937)
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Focus Group to Explore Cultural Acceptability of Long Acting Contraception in a Diverse, Urban Population.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02945670
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Merck IIS# 55000
- Conditions
- Contraception
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to learn what women of childbearing age think of Long Acting Reversible Contraception. A variety of myths regarding LARCs have been described in the literature. This study is designed to asses women's cultural belief's regarding LARCs. Investigators are looking to collect information from women in general, rather than solely who are seeking contraception. Investigators will be recruiting women ages 18-45 years from seven family health centers affiliated with UPMC. Participants will be asked to a attend a 60-90 minutes focus group session. During the session the facilitator will try to engage participants in a discussion about contraception in general. They will also be asked to complete a short demographic survey of 8-12 questions. Data from focus groups will be assessed for recurring themes which will be used to create a cultural survey instrument that will be used in the second phase of the study.
Detailed description
Following approval by the University of Pittsburgh institutional review board (IRB), female participants between 18 and 45 years of age seeking care for contraception or other women's health services were recruited from seven Family Health Centers (FHCs) partnered with the Department of Family Medicine. The participants agreed to participate in one 2 hour facilitated focus group session (recorded for later transcription) to discuss their perceptions about contraception.
Recordings were transcribed and de-identified. The resulting texts were coded by a team. Concepts and themes that arose from the coding were analyzed to inform the development of a survey on the topic of perspectives on contraception.
Qualitative analysis of the transcripts and coding was carried out and results were shared in pubic fora.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Women age 18-45 years and not pregnant at the time of enrollment
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Female
- Age 18-45 years
- Not pregnant
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Male
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Focus GroupWe had recruited 64 women and completed 7 focus group sessions | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Level of acceptance of contraception among diverse women
Time frame: Three months
Level of acceptance: 1-Totally not accepted 2-May accept 3-Neither accept/not accept 4-Accept with preservation 5-Totally accept
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2020.
- Background: PubMed 22018123Mestad R, Secura G, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception. 2011 Nov;84(5):493-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Apr 27.
- Background: PubMed 20541171Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;203(2):115.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 25856258Romero L, Pazol K, Warner L, Gavin L, Moskosky S, Besera G, Loyola Briceno AC, Jatlaoui T, Barfield W; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: trends in use of long-acting reversible contraception among teens aged 15-19 years seeking contraceptive services-United States, 2005-2013. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 Apr 10;64(13):363-9.
- Background: PubMed 18515520Harper CC, Blum M, de Bocanegra HT, Darney PD, Speidel JJ, Policar M, Drey EA. Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1359-69. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318173fd83.
- Background: PubMed 17138775Stanwood NL, Bradley KA. Young pregnant women's knowledge of modern intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1417-22. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000245447.56585.a0.
- Background: PubMed 23763968Whitaker AK, Sisco KM, Tomlinson AN, Dude AM, Martins SL. Use of the intrauterine device among adolescent and young adult women in the United States from 2002 to 2010. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Sep;53(3):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
- Background: PubMed 25555302Damle LF, Gohari AC, McEvoy AK, Desale SY, Gomez-Lobo V. Early initiation of postpartum contraception: does it decrease rapid repeat pregnancy in adolescents? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015 Feb;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 25369357Okpo E, Allerton L, Brechin S. 'But you can't reverse a hysterectomy!' Perceptions of long acting reversible contraception (LARC) among young women aged 16-24 years: a qualitative study. Public Health. 2014 Oct;128(10):934-9. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
- Background: PubMed 23427785Greenberg KB, Makino KK, Coles MS. Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Mar;52(3):372-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.11.003.
- Background: PubMed 23508599Rubin SE, Davis K, McKee MD. New york city physicians' views of providing long-acting reversible contraception to adolescents. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Mar-Apr;11(2):130-6. doi: 10.1370/afm.1450.
- Background: PubMed 23535052Russo JA, Miller E, Gold MA. Myths and misconceptions about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). J Adolesc Health. 2013 Apr;52(4 Suppl):S14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.003.
- Background: PubMed 22051784Roncancio AM, Ward KK, Berenson AB. The use of effective contraception among young Hispanic women: the role of acculturation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012 Feb;25(1):35-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Contraception
Enrolling by invitation
Flo Digital Contraceptive Study
Contraception Use
Recruiting
Estimating the Impact of Sexuality Education and Mobile Health Services on Reproductive Health and Empowerment Among Adolescents in Sierra Leone for the Family Planning Impact Lab
Reproductive Health, Sexual Health
RecruitingPhase 4
Clinical and Biomarker Effects of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Females With Sickle Cell Disease
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), Vaso-Occlusive Pain Episode in Sickle Cell Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
FLOW: Influence of the Menstrual Cycle on Alcohol Use in Women
Alcohol Use, Alcohol Consumption
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Gender-Transformative Interventions on Contraceptive Use and Reproductive Autonomy in Somalia
Contraceptive Behavior, Social Norms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeannette E. South-Paul, MD principal investigator
University of Pittsburgh
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Contraception, run by University of Pittsburgh at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of acceptance of contraception among diverse women (time frame: Three months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02945670, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2020.