AzTrials
AzTrials

Acetabular FracturesDRCNCT02904681

Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation of the Surgical Management of Spinal Growth Dystrophy

An observational study of Acetabular Fractures and Hip Replacement, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spinal growth dystrophy (CRD), also called Scheuermann's disease, corresponding to impaired vertebral structure occurring in children and adolescents with involvement of the growth cartilage causing impaired growth and kyphosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acetabular Fractures, Hip Replacement
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Dec 2014to 15 Apr 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients operated on for an arthrodesis Dystrophy Spinal Growth (DRC)

Who may be able to join

  • patients operated on for an arthrodesis Dystrophy Spinal Growth (DRC)
  • Age> 10 years
  • monitoring of minimum one year

Who cannot join

  • deformation in the frontal plane
  • kyphosis malformation
  • osteoporotic or degenerative kyphosis
  • post laminectomy kyphosis
  • constitutional bone disease
  • connective Tissue Disease
  • myopathy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint Joseph

    Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014

Other trials in France

About this study

Spinal growth dystrophy (CRD), also called Scheuermann's disease, corresponding to impaired vertebral structure occurring in children and adolescents with involvement of the growth cartilage causing impaired growth and kyphosis.

There are forms thoracolumbar and thoracic conventional forms of DRC with variable clinical expressions; the most important being kyphosis with spinal stiffness associated with painful elements.

Read more

The radiographic definition according Sorenson is uniformisation 5 ° affecting at least three adjacent vertebrae.

Scheuermann's disease and three problems. First, the thoracic kyphosis generates back pain which may be thoracic or lumbar indirectly attributed to compensatory lordosis. Moreover disruption sagittal balance frequently causes a significant aesthetic discomfort. Finally, scalability because the curvature may increase the likelihood of degenerative lesions disc degeneration or lumbar spinal stenosis for example.

When the disease is diagnosed early, treatment is most often associated with orthopedic physiotherapy. However, for patients with active deformation, despite an orthopedic brace treatment with chronic pain, neurological deficit or for aesthetic reasons, surgical decision can be taken.

The goal of surgical treatment of DRC is a correction of the thoracic kyphosis. It goes through a spinal fusion must be released from his column stiffness in a bad position, changing the equilibrium profile and ensure that it remains in a good position.

This surgery usually requires a prior operative time (thoracic surgery to remove the intervertebral discs) and a posterior surgical time (blockage of the vertebrae together with a bone graft and osteosynthesis). Currently different surgical strategies are practiced there is no real consensus between the teams.

Read the detailed description

objectives:

  1. Evaluation of the rate and type of complications in different age categories and surgical strategies.
  2. Evaluation of clinical results based on surgical strategies.
  3. Evaluation of sagittal balance and correction obtained based surgical strategies

Methodology and duration of the research

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort on the assessment of surgical practices cited objectives. Also, this research is in Chapter X of the Data Protection Act and allows the collection of personal data for the purpose of evaluation of care and prevention practices with authorization request to the CNIL; the opinion of CCTIRS therefore not required in this case.

This study concerns the data of patients operated with the techniques mentioned in addition with a decline of more than 20 years.

Patients are aware of the potential use of their data in their files for medical research through oral information provided by the doctor at the signing by the patient's consent related to the surgery and most recently contained in the Home booklet setting for patients.

Nature of the data collected

The data is anonymous and not identifiable (for each subject a number of inclusion is given). The name of the surgeon is also anonymized.

The data collected concern the characteristics of the patient, as well as its history, the operating data including technical, suites and possible post-operative complications and patient monitoring.

Data collection will be done on the basis KEOPS https://www.keops-spine.fr

Being tested
No intervention. Observational and descriptive study

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No intervention. Observational and descriptive studyOther

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Surgery complication type

    Statement from the database keops

    Measured: Day 30

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Assessment od the clinical results based on surgical strategies

    Evaluation of clinical results based on surgical strategies. Statement from the database keops :

    • Worse,
    • Acceptable,
    • Good

    Measured: Day 30

  2. Assessment of sagittal balance and correction Score obtained

    Evaluation of sagittal balance score obtained based surgical strategies. Statement from the database keops:

    • Worse,
    • Acceptable,
    • Good

    Measured: Day 30

  3. Assessment of correction Score obtained

    Evaluation of sagittal correction score obtained based surgical strategies. Statement from the database keops:

    • Worse,
    • Acceptable,
    • Good

    Measured: Day 30

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Dec 2014
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2015
  4. Study completion15 Apr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02904681
Sponsor's protocol ID
DRC
Acronym
DRC
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
31 Aug 2016
Last updated
6 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acetabular Fractures and Hip Replacement, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Surgery complication type (time frame: Day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in