AzTrials
AzTrials

Behavioral ProblemsAIDAIINCT02895308

Motivation and Adherence to Psychotherapy Assignments

A study testing Online psychoeducation and Face-to-face psychoeducation in people with Behavioral Problems, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims of this study are to experimentally investigate and compare whether motivation variables can predict adherence to a prescribed assignment in face-to-face and online interventions using a psychotherapy analogue model. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Behavioral Problems
What is being tested?
Online psychoeducation and Face-to-face psychoeducation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Jan 2015to Apr 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • having at least one problematic behavior one wished to understand or change

Who cannot join

  • being below 18 years of age, having no access to a mobile phone and the Internet, reporting elevated levels of depressive symptoms or currently attending psychotherapy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Uppsala University

    Uppsala, Uppsala County, 75105

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Differences in Motivation and Adherence to a Prescribed Assignment After Face-to-face and Online Psychoeducation: an Experimental Study

The aims of this study are to experimentally investigate and compare whether motivation variables can predict adherence to a prescribed assignment in face-to-face and online interventions using a psychotherapy analogue model.

A total of 100 participants are included in this study and randomized to either a face-to-face or online intervention. Participants in both groups receive a psychoeducation session and are given an assignment for the subsequent week.

Read the detailed description

The aims of this study are to investigate (1) participants' different forms of motivations to complete a typical psychotherapy assignment, (2) participants' subsequent adherence to the prescribed assignment and the associations between motivations and adherence and (3) any differences regarding motivations, adherence and their associations between the face-to-face and online conditions.

The hypotheses are that participants in the face-to-face condition will report higher motivation as well as higher adherence to the assignments compared to participants in the online condition, that adherence to the assignment will be positively associated with both autonomous motivation and externally regulated motivation and that adherence to the assignment will be more weakly associated with autonomous motivation in the face-to-face compared to the online condition.

To investigate the association between motivation and adherence to assignments in face-to-face and online settings, this study have a longitudinal randomized design with two conditions. The two conditions are face-to-face psychoeducation with a therapist and online psychoeducation with therapist support. A psychotherapy analogue model with a one-session intervention for a non-clinical population is used. Data is collected at baseline and at seven to nine days follow-up.

Being tested
Online psychoeducation, Face-to-face psychoeducation
Keywords
compliance
Medical subject headings
Problem Behavior, Patient Compliance

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Online psychoeducationBehavioural

    The online intervention consists of a psychoeducation component taken from affect focused psychotherapy. In this model, emotions are physiological patterns that are shaped mainly in the context of previous relations. By using the model, patients are helped to better understand their current emotions, behaviors and cognitions. The aim of the intervention used in this study is to provide information about the six basic affects and how they may influence everyday behaviors and well-being in recurring patterns.

  • Face-to-face psychoeducationBehavioural

    The intervention consists of a psychoeducation component taken from affect focused psychotherapy. In this model, emotions are physiological patterns that are shaped mainly in the context of previous relations. By using the model, patients are helped to better understand their current emotions, behaviors and cognitions. The aim of the intervention used in this study is to provide information about the six basic affects and how they may influence everyday behaviors and well-being in recurring patterns.

Study groups in NCT02895308
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OnlineExperimentalThe Online psychoeducation is presented on on a webpage.
Receives: Behavioral: Online psychoeducation
Face-to-faceActive comparatorThe face-to-face psychoeducation is provided by psychologist and psychology master students.
Receives: Behavioral: Face-to-face psychoeducation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adherence to prescribed behavioral assignment

    The number of prescribed assignments that each participant have completed.

    Measured: Within 3 days after intervention end.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Situational Motivation Scale

    The SIMS is a self-report measure developed based on the Self-determination theory to measure motivation in experimental tasks.

    Measured: Within 3 days after intervention end.

  2. VAS-scale regarding motivation

    A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measuring homework motivation (scale: 0-100)

    Measured: Within 3 days after intervention end.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionNov 2015
  4. Study completionApr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02895308
Sponsor's protocol ID
AIDA-II
Acronym
AIDAII
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
30 Aug 2016
Last updated
13 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Alfonsson S, Johansson K, Uddling J, Hursti T. Differences in motivation and adherence to a prescribed assignment after face-to-face and online psychoeducation: an experimental study. BMC Psychol. 2017 Jan 26;5(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40359-017-0172-5.

    PubMed 28126022

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Online psychoeducation and Face-to-face psychoeducation in people with Behavioral Problems, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adherence to prescribed behavioral assignment (time frame: Within 3 days after intervention end.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02895308, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in