AzTrials
AzTrials

Refractory EpilepsyPERLYONNCT02876289

Retrospective Evaluation of Perampanel in a French Neurology and Epileptology Department (Hospices Civil de Lyon)

An observational study of Refractory Epilepsy, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Perampanel is a non-competitive antagonist of the AMPA ( 2-amino-3-(5-méthyl-3-hydroxy-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)) propanoïc acid receptors which was approved by the European Medicines Agency as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures in patients 12 years and older, in 2012. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 86 years
Conditions the study is for
Refractory Epilepsy
What is being tested?
Perampanel
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
May 2014to Sep 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 86 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with refractory focal epilepsy in which Perampanel were introduced between May 2014 and April 2015

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with refractory focal epilepsy
  • Initiation of perampanel between 05/2014 and 04/2015

Who cannot join

  • Exact date of initiation of Perampanel not defined
  • Patients without follow-up data

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital neurologique

    Lyon, 69002

Other trials in France

About this study

Perampanel is a non-competitive antagonist of the AMPA ( 2-amino-3-(5-méthyl-3-hydroxy-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)) propanoïc acid receptors which was approved by the European Medicines Agency as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures in patients 12 years and older, in 2012. The aim of this study is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of perampanel as add-on treatment in patients with refractory epilepsy.

The investigators retrospectively collected and analyzed the data of patients with refractory epilepsy who had been treated with perampanel between May of 2014 and April of 2015. In total, one hundred and ten patients were included (mean age 41 [SD = 15.2]). The mean duration of epilepsy was 25 years (SD = 14.4). The mean perampanel dose was 5.7 mg/d (SD = 2.3). The retention rate was 77% at 6 months and 61% at 12 months. After 6 months, the responder rate was 35.5%. Eight patients (7.3%) became seizure free. Adverse effects were reported in 60 patients (54.5%). Most common side effects were behaviour disturbance (22.7%), dizziness (15.5%), asthenia (11.8), somnolence (10%) and ataxia (9.1).

Being tested
Perampanel
Medical subject headings
Drug Resistant Epilepsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PerampanelDrug

Study groups in NCT02876289
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients treated with PerampanelNot described
Receives: Drug: Perampanel

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Retention rate

    Proportion of patient still treated with Perampanel 6 months after its initiation

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Retention rate

    Proportion of patients still treated with Perampanel 12 months after its initiation

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Seizure freedom

    Proportion of seizure-free patients during at least 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Responder rates

    Responder rates is defined as a reduction in seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with the three months before the initiation of perampanel.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Responder rates

    Responder rates is defined as a reduction in seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with the three months before the initiation of perampanel.

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Total withdrawal rate

    Discontinuation rates at 6 months due to inefficiency or adverse effects

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Total withdrawal rate

    Discontinuation rates at 12 months due to inefficiency or adverse effects

    Measured: 12 months

  7. Observed adverse effects during the observation period

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Aug 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionSep 2015
  4. Study completionSep 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02876289
Sponsor's protocol ID
69HCL16_0556
Acronym
PERLYON
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
18 Aug 2016
Last updated
24 Aug 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Refractory Epilepsy, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Retention rate (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in