HypospadiasNCT02851290
Effect of Caudal and Penile Block on Hypospadias Repair Complications
A study testing Caudal block anesthesia and Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesia in people with Hypospadias, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Hypospadias is one of the most common genitourinary (GU) malformations, seen in approximately 1 of 250 male live births. Common methods of local anesthesia administration for hypospadias surgery include caudal and dorsal penile nerve blocks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 months to 4 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypospadias
- What is being tested?
- Caudal block anesthesia and Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesia
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2016to 19 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 months to 4 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Age 4 months to 4 years
- ASA score I and II
- Primary hypospadias repair in one stage including distal, midshaft, and proximal repairs
Who cannot join
- Age <4 months or >4 years
- ASA score >II
- Genetic syndromes
- Previous hypospadias operations
- Staged hypospadias repair operations
- Spinal dysraphism or other contraindications to caudal block
Show all 9Show fewer
- Infection at the block site
- Refusal of consent by the parents
- Unwillingness of the anesthesiologist or surgeon to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Hypospadias is one of the most common genitourinary (GU) malformations, seen in approximately 1 of 250 male live births. Common methods of local anesthesia administration for hypospadias surgery include caudal and dorsal penile nerve blocks. While both methods are known to be effective with minimal risk, the effect on post-operative complications is not well-established. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate if caudal versus dorsal penile nerve block results in higher rates of post-operative complications.
Read the detailed description
Hypospadias is a one of the most common genitourinary (GU) malformations, seen in approximately 1 of 250 male live births, characterized by proximal location of the urethral meatus, dorsal hooded foreskin with incomplete ventral fusion, and ventral curvature of the penis. Hypospadias repair includes several standard steps including urethroplasty, mobilization of adjacent flaps for urethroplasty coverage, rotation of penile skin flaps and circumcision. In order for the surgeon to operate in a clean and relatively bloodless field, tourniquets and local epinephrine injection have been used. In a rabbit hypospadias repair model, the authors used both tourniquet and local epinephrine infiltration to maintain a clear surgical field, and showed increased apoptotic urethral myocytes on TUNNEL assay and collagen deposition in the epinephrine cohort. The study also showed structural changes in the mitochondria on scanning electron microscopy in the epinephrine cohort. This is the only hypospadias study demonstrating pathologic changes in the urethra after tourniquet or epinephrine injection. While single stage hypospadias surgical techniques have standardized significantly over the two decades, surgical complications can still occur in up to 28% of patients. Complications include urethrocutaneous fistulas, meatal stenosis, glans dehiscence, urethral strictures, and urethral diverticulum. Risk factors for hypospadias surgical complications have been extensively published and include: proximal urethral location, previous operation, glans width <14 mm, no urethroplasty coverage layers, surgeon learning curve, and age <4 years old.
The majority of hypospadias surgical complications need to be revised surgically and this results in significant financial and emotional burden for the family. The financial impact of hypospadias visits, repairs, and reoperations on society is largely unknown. A single study in 2000 noted that $16.6 million was spent on operative and outpatient hypospadias care and 17,000 total outpatient hypospadias visits were made that year. No recent studies are available and the cost to the patient per surgery and per surgical complication repair is also unknown. Multiple objective hypospadias surgical questionnaires have been developed to characterize postoperative appearance of the skin, meatus, urinary stream, and presence of fistula. These studies have only been validated by the same institution and data correlating questionnaire scores to complications is sparse.
Penile sensation is derived primarily from the dorsal nerve of the penis. Ventrally there is some innervation to the frenulum that is derived from the perineal nerve branches. The dorsal nerve of the penis is a branch of the pudendal nerve which is supplied from sacral nerves. Common methods for penile block, which are performed by the hypospadias surgeon, include dorsal nerve penile block (DNPB) or penile ring block. The DNPB involves infiltration of local anesthetic using a short beveled needle in the subpubic location at the 10 and 2 o'clock positions such that the dorsal nerve of the penis is blocked as it enters the base of the penis. The penile ring block is performed by infiltration of local anesthetic in the subcutaneous tissue at the base of the penis. One prospective study showed that DNPB was significantly better than ring block. Success rates of DNPB have been noted to be anywhere from 90-100% in children undergoing circumcision. Complications from DNPB are exceptionally rare at <0.1% including hematoma and local tissue edema.
Caudal block is a commonly performed regional block by anesthesiologists for hypospadias surgery. It involves blockade of the same nerve pathway described above, at a more proximal location, by infiltration of the caudal epidural space through the sacral hiatus. The procedure is performed usually in the lateral position. Anatomic landmarks are defined by an equilateral triangle formed by the bilateral posterior superior iliac spines, and the sacral hiatus. Initially a short beveled needle or small gauge angiocatheter is inserted into the sacral hiatus at a 45 degree angle and then once a "pop" is heard, the angle is "dropped" to 0 degrees and the needle is advanced. Aspiration is performed and in the absence of cerebrospinal fluid or blood, a local anesthetic is injected. Complications are exceptionally rare at the rate of <0.003% and include local anesthetic toxicity, neurological injury or infection and success rates of up to 96% have been reported.
Penile physiology and blood flow parameters after DNPB and caudal block are largely unknown. Very few studies show the effects of distal organ perfusion after regional blockade. One study looking at children undergoing caudal block for urologic procedures found that caudal block using 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivicaine increased the dorsalis pedis arterial parameters: increased peak velocity 24%, volume flow 76%, arterial diameter 20%. The authors proposed a sympatholytic mechanism as the reason for these physiologic changes. Another randomized controlled trial primarily looking at post-operative pain outcomes in hypospadias repair patients also found increased penile volumes of 27% in the caudal block arm, with the proposed mechanism also being sympatholytic. Finally, there have been case reports in which the sympatholytic effects of caudal blocks are used to treat glans ischemia after circumcision.
Penile analgesia after caudal block is approximately equal to that of DNPB. A meta-analysis of the circumcision analgesia literature, analyzing over 700 patients showed analgesic equivalence of caudal versus parenteral analgesia. Also in the meta-analysis, caudal block was found to be equivalent to DNPB with increased motor blockade found in the caudal block arm. One randomized controlled trial assessing analgesia requirements in children undergoing hypospadias repair after caudal block and penile block found that penile block resulted in superior pain control. However, another randomized controlled trial found that caudal block resulted in superior pain control as compared to penile block. After either bock, there are usually no significant alterations in mean arterial pressure.
Recently, the association between caudal block and hypospadias surgical complications has been theorized and has drawn international interest amongst pediatric urologists and anesthesiologists. A randomized controlled trial of 54 distal hypospadias repair patients, half assigned to caudal block and half to penile block, showed that all urethrocutaneous fistulas were seen in the caudal block arm. Even though the primary outcome was post-operative pain control between the groups, the authors theorized that caudal blocks lead to sympathetic blockade, penile engorgement, tissue edema, and increased hypospadias surgical complications. A nested case control series comparing 45 fistulas and 90 controls showed no association between fistulas and caudal block. The authors found fistula to be associated with proximal urethral location, penile epinephrine injection, and longer operative times. Unpublished data presented at the 2015 American Urologic Association in New Orleans by Routh et al. showed that in a retrospective single surgeon series of 452 primary hypospadias repair patients, half which had caudal block and half which had penile block, caudal blockade was highly associated with hypospadias surgical complications even after adjusting for operative time (OR 3.9 (1.3-12.1)); p= 0.0008. This is the only study to date that has been powered appropriately to assess the association between caudal block and hypospadias complications. Thus, there is clinical equipoise regarding the utilization of caudal block versus penile block for post-operative pain control and also in minimizing surgical complications in hypospadias repair.
- Conditions
- Hypospadias
- Being tested
- Caudal block anesthesia, Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesia
- Keywords
- Hypospadias, Caudal block, Dorsal penile nerve block, Anesthesia, Urethrocutaneous fistula, Urethral stricture, Meatal stenosis, Glanular dehiscence
- Medical subject headings
- Hypospadias, Urethral Stricture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Caudal block anesthesiaProcedure or surgery
After induction of general anesthesia, a caudal block will be performed using 0.75-1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine
Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesiaProcedure or surgery
After induction of general anesthesia, a dorsal penile nerve block will be performed using 0.75-1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Caudal block | Experimental | Local anesthetic will be administered into the caudal space Receives: Procedure: Caudal block anesthesia |
| Dorsal penile nerve block | Active comparator | Local anesthetic will be administered around the dorsal penile nerve Receives: Procedure: Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative hypospadias repair complications
Post-operative follow-up to evaluate for post-operative complications including urethrocutaneous fistula, glans dehiscence, meatal stenosis, and urethral stricture
Measured: 24 months post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (3)
Post-operative hypospadias repair pain
Post-operative pain will be assessed using the FLACC scale (faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale)
Measured: 1 hour post-operatively
Caudal block-related complications
Complications related to caudal block
Measured: 1 hour post-operatively
Dorsal penile nerve block-related complications
Complications related to dorsal penile nerve block
Measured: 1 hour post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2016
- Primary completion19 May 2023
- Study completion19 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HypospadiasStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor College of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicolette Janzen, Baylor College of Medicine
- Investigators
- Nicolette K Janzen, MD, Principal investigator, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of MedicineKara Toman, MPH, Study director, Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02851290
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-38540
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2016
- Last updated
- 22 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Caudal and Penile Block on Hypospadias Repair Complications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02851290
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-38540
- Conditions
- Hypospadias
- Keywords
- Hypospadias, Caudal block, Dorsal penile nerve block, Anesthesia, Urethrocutaneous fistula, Urethral stricture, Meatal stenosis, Glanular dehiscence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor College of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2016
- Primary completion
- 19 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hypospadias is one of the most common genitourinary (GU) malformations, seen in approximately 1 of 250 male live births. Common methods of local anesthesia administration for hypospadias surgery include caudal and dorsal penile nerve blocks. While both methods are known to be effective with minimal risk, the effect on post-operative complications is not well-established. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate if caudal versus dorsal penile nerve block results in higher rates of post-operative complications.
Detailed description
Hypospadias is a one of the most common genitourinary (GU) malformations, seen in approximately 1 of 250 male live births, characterized by proximal location of the urethral meatus, dorsal hooded foreskin with incomplete ventral fusion, and ventral curvature of the penis. Hypospadias repair includes several standard steps including urethroplasty, mobilization of adjacent flaps for urethroplasty coverage, rotation of penile skin flaps and circumcision. In order for the surgeon to operate in a clean and relatively bloodless field, tourniquets and local epinephrine injection have been used. In a rabbit hypospadias repair model, the authors used both tourniquet and local epinephrine infiltration to maintain a clear surgical field, and showed increased apoptotic urethral myocytes on TUNNEL assay and collagen deposition in the epinephrine cohort. The study also showed structural changes in the mitochondria on scanning electron microscopy in the epinephrine cohort. This is the only hypospadias study demonstrating pathologic changes in the urethra after tourniquet or epinephrine injection. While single stage hypospadias surgical techniques have standardized significantly over the two decades, surgical complications can still occur in up to 28% of patients. Complications include urethrocutaneous fistulas, meatal stenosis, glans dehiscence, urethral strictures, and urethral diverticulum. Risk factors for hypospadias surgical complications have been extensively published and include: proximal urethral location, previous operation, glans width <14 mm, no urethroplasty coverage layers, surgeon learning curve, and age <4 years old.
The majority of hypospadias surgical complications need to be revised surgically and this results in significant financial and emotional burden for the family. The financial impact of hypospadias visits, repairs, and reoperations on society is largely unknown. A single study in 2000 noted that $16.6 million was spent on operative and outpatient hypospadias care and 17,000 total outpatient hypospadias visits were made that year. No recent studies are available and the cost to the patient per surgery and per surgical complication repair is also unknown. Multiple objective hypospadias surgical questionnaires have been developed to characterize postoperative appearance of the skin, meatus, urinary stream, and presence of fistula. These studies have only been validated by the same institution and data correlating questionnaire scores to complications is sparse.
Penile sensation is derived primarily from the dorsal nerve of the penis. Ventrally there is some innervation to the frenulum that is derived from the perineal nerve branches. The dorsal nerve of the penis is a branch of the pudendal nerve which is supplied from sacral nerves. Common methods for penile block, which are performed by the hypospadias surgeon, include dorsal nerve penile block (DNPB) or penile ring block. The DNPB involves infiltration of local anesthetic using a short beveled needle in the subpubic location at the 10 and 2 o'clock positions such that the dorsal nerve of the penis is blocked as it enters the base of the penis. The penile ring block is performed by infiltration of local anesthetic in the subcutaneous tissue at the base of the penis. One prospective study showed that DNPB was significantly better than ring block. Success rates of DNPB have been noted to be anywhere from 90-100% in children undergoing circumcision. Complications from DNPB are exceptionally rare at <0.1% including hematoma and local tissue edema.
Caudal block is a commonly performed regional block by anesthesiologists for hypospadias surgery. It involves blockade of the same nerve pathway described above, at a more proximal location, by infiltration of the caudal epidural space through the sacral hiatus. The procedure is performed usually in the lateral position. Anatomic landmarks are defined by an equilateral triangle formed by the bilateral posterior superior iliac spines, and the sacral hiatus. Initially a short beveled needle or small gauge angiocatheter is inserted into the sacral hiatus at a 45 degree angle and then once a "pop" is heard, the angle is "dropped" to 0 degrees and the needle is advanced. Aspiration is performed and in the absence of cerebrospinal fluid or blood, a local anesthetic is injected. Complications are exceptionally rare at the rate of <0.003% and include local anesthetic toxicity, neurological injury or infection and success rates of up to 96% have been reported.
Penile physiology and blood flow parameters after DNPB and caudal block are largely unknown. Very few studies show the effects of distal organ perfusion after regional blockade. One study looking at children undergoing caudal block for urologic procedures found that caudal block using 1.5 ml/kg of 0.15% ropivicaine increased the dorsalis pedis arterial parameters: increased peak velocity 24%, volume flow 76%, arterial diameter 20%. The authors proposed a sympatholytic mechanism as the reason for these physiologic changes. Another randomized controlled trial primarily looking at post-operative pain outcomes in hypospadias repair patients also found increased penile volumes of 27% in the caudal block arm, with the proposed mechanism also being sympatholytic. Finally, there have been case reports in which the sympatholytic effects of caudal blocks are used to treat glans ischemia after circumcision.
Penile analgesia after caudal block is approximately equal to that of DNPB. A meta-analysis of the circumcision analgesia literature, analyzing over 700 patients showed analgesic equivalence of caudal versus parenteral analgesia. Also in the meta-analysis, caudal block was found to be equivalent to DNPB with increased motor blockade found in the caudal block arm. One randomized controlled trial assessing analgesia requirements in children undergoing hypospadias repair after caudal block and penile block found that penile block resulted in superior pain control. However, another randomized controlled trial found that caudal block resulted in superior pain control as compared to penile block. After either bock, there are usually no significant alterations in mean arterial pressure.
Recently, the association between caudal block and hypospadias surgical complications has been theorized and has drawn international interest amongst pediatric urologists and anesthesiologists. A randomized controlled trial of 54 distal hypospadias repair patients, half assigned to caudal block and half to penile block, showed that all urethrocutaneous fistulas were seen in the caudal block arm. Even though the primary outcome was post-operative pain control between the groups, the authors theorized that caudal blocks lead to sympathetic blockade, penile engorgement, tissue edema, and increased hypospadias surgical complications. A nested case control series comparing 45 fistulas and 90 controls showed no association between fistulas and caudal block. The authors found fistula to be associated with proximal urethral location, penile epinephrine injection, and longer operative times. Unpublished data presented at the 2015 American Urologic Association in New Orleans by Routh et al. showed that in a retrospective single surgeon series of 452 primary hypospadias repair patients, half which had caudal block and half which had penile block, caudal blockade was highly associated with hypospadias surgical complications even after adjusting for operative time (OR 3.9 (1.3-12.1)); p= 0.0008. This is the only study to date that has been powered appropriately to assess the association between caudal block and hypospadias complications. Thus, there is clinical equipoise regarding the utilization of caudal block versus penile block for post-operative pain control and also in minimizing surgical complications in hypospadias repair.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Caudal block | Experimental | Procedure: Caudal block anesthesiaLocal anesthetic will be administered into the caudal space |
| Dorsal penile nerve block | Active comparator | Procedure: Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesiaLocal anesthetic will be administered around the dorsal penile nerve |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 months to 4 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 4 months to 4 years
- ASA score I and II
- Primary hypospadias repair in one stage including distal, midshaft, and proximal repairs
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age <4 months or >4 years
- ASA score >II
- Genetic syndromes
- Previous hypospadias operations
- Staged hypospadias repair operations
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Caudal block anesthesiaAfter induction of general anesthesia, a caudal block will be performed using 0.75-1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine | Procedure or surgery | Caudal block |
| Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesiaAfter induction of general anesthesia, a dorsal penile nerve block will be performed using 0.75-1 mL/kg of 0.2% ropivacaine without epinephrine | Procedure or surgery | Dorsal penile nerve block |
Primary outcome
Post-operative hypospadias repair complications
Time frame: 24 months post-operatively
Post-operative follow-up to evaluate for post-operative complications including urethrocutaneous fistula, glans dehiscence, meatal stenosis, and urethral stricture
3 secondary outcomes
Post-operative hypospadias repair pain
Time frame: 1 hour post-operatively
Caudal block-related complications
Time frame: 1 hour post-operatively
Dorsal penile nerve block-related complications
Time frame: 1 hour post-operatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 May 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hypospadias
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Oxybutynin on Opioid Use After Urologic Surgery in Children
Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction, Hypospadias
Recruiting
Worldwide Yearly Screening for Hypospadias
Hypospadias
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Emerging Indications for Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment
Post-COVID-19 Condition, Ulcerative Colitis
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Perioperative Bleeding During Recurrent Hypospadias Repair.
Perioperative Bleeding During Recurrent Hypospadias Repair
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of PRF in Hypospadias Repair
Hypospadias
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicolette K Janzen, MD principal investigator
Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine
Kara Toman, MPH study director
Texas Children's Hospital/Baylor College of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Caudal block anesthesia and Dorsal penile nerve block anesthesia in people with Hypospadias, run by Baylor College of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative hypospadias repair complications (time frame: 24 months post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2023.