Aortic Aneurysm, ThoracicRelayPro-ANCT02818972
RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft in Subjects With Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers
A study testing RelayPro in people with Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic and Penetrating Ulcer, run by Bolton Medical at 35 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Investigate the safety and effectiveness of the RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Grafts in subjects with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAU) of the descending thoracic aorta. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Penetrating Ulcer
- What is being tested?
- RelayPro
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- 35 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 10 May 2017to Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject must be ≥ 18 years of age
- Subject has specified disease in his/her descending thoracic aorta.
- Subject have anatomical compliance for the device specified for both access vessels and treatment area.
- Subject must be willing to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule.
- Subject (or Legally Authorized Representative) agrees an Informed Consent Form prior to treatment.
Who cannot join
- Subject has specified disease of the thoracic aorta which is not included in the trial, for example: aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, traumatic injury or transection, aortic false aneurysm, ruptured aneurysm.
- Subject anatomy with significant stenosis, calcification, thrombus or tortuosity.
- Subjects with specified compromised circulation.
- Subjects with specified prior procedures.
- Subjects with allergy to contrast media or device components.
- Subjects with disease, for example: suspected connective tissue disorder, specified coagulation disorders, specified coronary artery disease, severe congestive heart failure, stroke and/or Myocardial Infarction (MI) as specified, specified pulmonary disease, specified renal failure.
- Subjects that are pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
35 sites in 2 countries.
35 sites in 2 countries
United States24 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Alabama-Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center / Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University Hospitals
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06102
Indiana University Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
St. Vincent Heart Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260
University of Iowa Hospital and Clinic
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of California, Irvine
Irvine, California, 92868
Long Beach Memorial Hospital
Long Beach, California, 90806
Centennial Heart & Vascular Institute Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112
University of Pennsylvania Medical Center / Penn Presbyterian
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Arizona Heart Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Plano The Heart Hospital
Plano, Texas, 75093
Baystate Medical Center
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199
Baylor Scot & White Medical Center - Temple
Temple, Texas, 76508
Lankenau Medical Center
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Japan11 sites
Hiroshima University Hospital
Hiroshima, Hiroshima
Morinomiya Hospital
Joto-ku, Osaka
Nara Medical University Hospital
Kashihara, Nara
Jikei University Hospital
Minato-Ku, Tokyo
Nagoya University Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken
Niigata University Medical & Dental Hospital
Niigata, Niigata
Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center
Ōmiya, Saitama
Teine Keihinkai Hospital
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Keio University Hospital
Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo
National Cerebral & Cardiovascular Center
Suita, Osaka
Oita University Hospital
Yufu, Oita Prefecture
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Blinded, Non-Randomized Study of the RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft in Subjects With Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers
Investigate the safety and effectiveness of the RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Grafts in subjects with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAU) of the descending thoracic aorta.
Read the detailed description
The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Grafts in subjects with thoracic aortic aneurysms and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta.
- Conditions
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Penetrating Ulcer
- Being tested
- RelayPro
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RelayProDevice
Endovascular treatment with investigational device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RelayPro | Experimental | Endovascular treatment with the investigational device. Receives: Device: RelayPro |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following MAEs occurring through 30 days:
- Death
- Stroke (excluding transient ischemic attack)
- Paralysis (excludes paraparesis)
Measured: 30 days
Technical success
Primary effectiveness rate as measured by the technical success through 24 hours, defined as:
- Successful delivery of the device through the vasculature;
- Successful deployment of the device at the intended location; Absence of Type I or III endoleaks; Patent stent-graft without significant stenosis.
Measured: 24 hours
Stent graft patency
Primary effectiveness as measured by the rate of stent-graft patency through 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Aneurysm rupture
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of aneurysm rupture through 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Absence of Type I and III endoleak through 12 months;
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of Type I and III endoleak through 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Absence of stent fractures in the attachment zone through 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of stent fractures in the attachment zone through 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Absence of open or endovascular secondary interventions
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of open or endovascular secondary interventions related to the device or treated pathology through 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Absence of aneurysm expansion (> 5 mm diameter increase)
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of aneurysm expansion (> 5 mm diameter increase) through 12 months, compared to the first post-procedural computed tomographic (CT) imaging study.
Measured: 12 months
Absence of stent-graft migration
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of stent-graft migration (> 10 mm) through 12 months, compared to the first post-procedural CT.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Loss of stent-graft patency
Loss of stent-graft patency will be assessed with CT scans, or MRIs for subjects unable to tolerate contrast media.
Measured: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of aneurysm rupture
The rate of aneurysm rupture through 1 month and 6 months will be assessed by review of CT or MRI imaging, in addition to site reported adverse events.
Measured: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of endoleaks of all types
Persistence of blood flow outside the lumen of the stent-graft but within the native aorta or adjacent vascular segment being treated by the stent-graft will be assessed by CT scans or MRIs for subjects unable to tolerate contrast media.
Measured: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months
Rate of stent fractures in the attachment zone
Stent fractures in the attachment zone will be assessed at each follow-up visit with CT scans, or MRIs for subjects unable to tolerate contrast media.
Measured: 1 month and 6 months
Incidence of open or endovascular secondary interventions
Secondary effectiveness will be measured by the incidence of open or endovascular secondary interventions related to the device or treated pathology (ie, interventions to treat malperfusion, rupture, aneurysm formation, or aortic expansion).
Measured: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of aneurysm expansion
The rate of aneurysm expansion (> 5 mm diameter increase) assessed by comparison of follow-up imaging to the first post-procedural CT
Measured: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of stent-graft migration
The rate of stent-graft migration (> 10 mm) assessed by comparison of follow-up imaging to the first post-procedural CT.
Measured: 1 month and 6 months
Individual outcomes of composite MAEs
Secondary effectiveness as measured by the individual outcomes of the composite safety endpoints (death, stroke, paralysis), as well as myocardial infarction (MI), renal failure, respiratory failure, bowel ischemia, and procedural blood loss >1,000 cc.
Measured: 6 months and 12 months
Rate of vascular access complications
Secondary effectiveness as measured by the rate of vascular access complications reported during the Treatment visit (stent-graft implant). Outcome measures include successful delivery and deployment of the device, as well as withdrawal of the delivery system.
Measured: During the initial implant attempt
Duration of implant procedure
Duration of the initial implant procedure captured as the number of minutes from introduction of device to removal of delivery system.
Measured: Treatment Visit
Number of blood transfusions
Number of transfusions (units) required from the time of implant through hospital discharge.
Measured: Treatment Visit through Discharge Visit
Duration of hospitalization
Length of hospital stay defined as number of days subject was hospitalized for the initial implant procedure.
Measured: Treatment Visit through Discharge Visit
Time in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Duration of time in hours that subject was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) following the implant procedure.
Measured: Treatment Visit through Discharge Visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Study start10 May 2017
- Primary completion24 Jun 2022
- Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aortic Aneurysm, ThoracicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bolton Medical
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wilson Szeto, MD, Principal investigator, Penn PresbyterianVenkatesh Ramaiah, MD, Principal investigator, Arizona Heart Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02818972
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IP-0015-16
- Acronym
- RelayPro-A
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2016
- Last updated
- 31 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Szeto WY, Vallabhajosyula P, Matsuda H, Moainie SL, Sharafuddin MJ, Corvera J, Smolock CJ, Miyamoto S, Naslund T, Ramaiah V; RelayPro-A Investigators. One-year results with a low-profile endograft in subjects with thoracic aortic aneurysm and ulcer pathologies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May;163(5):1739-1750.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.071. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
PubMed 35241276
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multicenter, Non-Blinded, Non-Randomized Study of the RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft in Subjects With Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms and Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02818972
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RelayPro-A / IP-0015-16
- Conditions
- Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic, Penetrating Ulcer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Bolton MedicalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 10 May 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 Jun 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Investigate the safety and effectiveness of the RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Grafts in subjects with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAU) of the descending thoracic aorta.
Detailed description
The objective of this study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Grafts in subjects with thoracic aortic aneurysms and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers of the descending thoracic aorta.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RelayPro | Experimental | Device: RelayProEndovascular treatment with the investigational device. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subject must be ≥ 18 years of age
- Subject has specified disease in his/her descending thoracic aorta.
- Subject have anatomical compliance for the device specified for both access vessels and treatment area.
- Subject must be willing to comply with the follow-up evaluation schedule.
- Subject (or Legally Authorized Representative) agrees an Informed Consent Form prior to treatment.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subject has specified disease of the thoracic aorta which is not included in the trial, for example: aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, traumatic injury or transection, aortic false aneurysm, ruptured aneurysm.
- Subject anatomy with significant stenosis, calcification, thrombus or tortuosity.
- Subjects with specified compromised circulation.
- Subjects with specified prior procedures.
- Subjects with allergy to contrast media or device components.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RelayProEndovascular treatment with investigational device. | Device | RelayPro |
Primary outcome
Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time frame: 30 days
Primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following MAEs occurring through 30 days: * Death * Stroke (excluding transient ischemic attack) * Paralysis (excludes paraparesis)
Technical success
Time frame: 24 hours
Primary effectiveness rate as measured by the technical success through 24 hours, defined as: * Successful delivery of the device through the vasculature; * Successful deployment of the device at the intended location; Absence of Type I or III endoleaks; Patent stent-graft without significant stenosis.
Stent graft patency
Time frame: 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the rate of stent-graft patency through 12 months.
Aneurysm rupture
Time frame: 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of aneurysm rupture through 12 months.
Absence of Type I and III endoleak through 12 months;
Time frame: 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of Type I and III endoleak through 12 months.
Absence of stent fractures in the attachment zone through 12 months
Time frame: 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of stent fractures in the attachment zone through 12 months.
Absence of open or endovascular secondary interventions
Time frame: 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of open or endovascular secondary interventions related to the device or treated pathology through 12 months.
Absence of aneurysm expansion (> 5 mm diameter increase)
Time frame: 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of aneurysm expansion (> 5 mm diameter increase) through 12 months, compared to the first post-procedural computed tomographic (CT) imaging study.
Absence of stent-graft migration
Time frame: 12 months
Primary effectiveness as measured by the absence of stent-graft migration (> 10 mm) through 12 months, compared to the first post-procedural CT.
13 secondary outcomes
Loss of stent-graft patency
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of aneurysm rupture
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of endoleaks of all types
Time frame: 1 month, 6 months and 12 months
Rate of stent fractures in the attachment zone
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months
Incidence of open or endovascular secondary interventions
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of aneurysm expansion
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months
Rate of stent-graft migration
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months
Individual outcomes of composite MAEs
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Rate of vascular access complications
Time frame: During the initial implant attempt
Duration of implant procedure
Time frame: Treatment Visit
Number of blood transfusions
Time frame: Treatment Visit through Discharge Visit
Duration of hospitalization
Time frame: Treatment Visit through Discharge Visit
Time in Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
Time frame: Treatment Visit through Discharge Visit
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35241276Szeto WY, Vallabhajosyula P, Matsuda H, Moainie SL, Sharafuddin MJ, Corvera J, Smolock CJ, Miyamoto S, Naslund T, Ramaiah V; RelayPro-A Investigators. One-year results with a low-profile endograft in subjects with thoracic aortic aneurysm and ulcer pathologies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 May;163(5):1739-1750.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.10.071. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic
Recruiting
Treatment in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Surgery vs Surveillance
Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Enlargement, Ascending Aorta Aneurysm
Recruiting
GORE® TAG® Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis Zone 0/1 Post-Approval Study
Aortic Arch Dissection, Aortic Arch Aneurysm
RecruitingPhase 4
Effect of Remimazolam Versus Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Thoracic or Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Repair
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Remimazolam on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Neuroinflammatory Biomarkers in Patients Undergoing Aortic Arch Surgery
Aortic Aneurysm of the Proximal Arch, Aortic Aneurysms Arch
Enrolling by invitation
Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms, Dissecting, Aneurysm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wilson Szeto, MD principal investigator
Penn Presbyterian
Venkatesh Ramaiah, MD principal investigator
Arizona Heart Institute
35 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RelayPro in people with Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic and Penetrating Ulcer, run by Bolton Medical at 35 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 35 sites in United States, Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02818972, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2025.