Neonatal NeuroimagingNCT02785588
Development of a MR Scanner Capable of Being Sited in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (Firefly Sheffield)
A study testing 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner in people with Neonatal Neuroimaging, run by GE Healthcare at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This study investigates a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed by GEHC for imaging viable neonate and infant populations. This MR system has a smaller size and design features that may make it more feasible to locate the system in close proximity to care areas for neonates (birth - 1 month) and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 minute to 2 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Neonatal Neuroimaging
- What is being tested?
- 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2016to 20 Apr 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 minute to 2 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Currently admitted for treatment or observation at the investigational site at the time of enrolment;
- weight range less than 5.0 kg (<5.0 kg ) and more than 0.5 kg (>0.5 kg );
- Viable neonates (birth to 1 month of age) or infants (>1 month to two years of age);
- Able to safely undergo an MRI scan, as determined by medically qualified personnel;
- Have parent(s), guardian(s), or legally authorized representative(s) willing and able to provide written informed consent for the subject's participation;
- Are of appropriate size and shape to fit into the bore of the magnet, inclusive of all monitoring equipment, if any, necessary for the subject's routine clinical care based on standard of care measurement methods, in accordance with site policies :
- Maximum width (shoulder-to-shoulder measurement) less than eighteen (18 cm).
- Maximum length (head-to-foot measurement) less than sixty (60) cm.
Who cannot join
- Have parent(s), guardian(s), or legally authorized representative(s) that require that they accompany the subject into the MR environment that have contraindications to the MR environment or would otherwise be put at undue risk or discomfort, as determined by medically qualified personnel;
- Have any ferrous or electrical items or non-removable medical devices that are not compatible with MR scanning (including devices labelled as MR Unsafe, MR conditional for which the scanning conditions are not met, or without MR safety labelling that does not satisfy site MR safety requirements) that may pose hazards in the MR scanning or MR environment, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or medically qualified personnel in accordance with the site's MR Safety policy;
- Have any contraindications or could otherwise be expected to experience detrimental effects to safety, well-being, or medical care, as determined by the Principal Investigator or medically qualified personnel in accordance with the site's MR Safety policy;
- Require any scheduled standard of care procedures that are expected to be adversely impacted by participation in this study, in the opinion of the principal investigator or medically qualified personnel; and
- Have been previously enrolled AND undergone any study procedures under the current study protocol (i.e. the same subject cannot undergo study procedures, including swaddling and/or MR scanning, more than once).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital
Sheffield, S10 2JF
About this study
Official title: Development of a MR Scanner Capable of Being Sited in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
This study investigates a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed by GEHC for imaging viable neonate and infant populations. This MR system has a smaller size and design features that may make it more feasible to locate the system in close proximity to care areas for neonates (birth - 1 month) and infants (>1 month to two years), such as clinical neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and other infant and neonatal care departments.
Read the detailed description
This study investigates a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed by GEHC for imaging viable neonate and infant populations. This MR system has a smaller size and design features that may make it more feasible to locate the system in close proximity to care areas for neonates (birth - 1 month) and infants (>1 month to two years), such as clinical neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and other infant and neonatal care departments.
This is a two-phase prospective clinical study evaluating the performance and safety of the investigational MRI device for neonates and infants, including:
- Phase 1 - Initial feasibility assessment and optimization study (Phase 1) which may include hardware and software modifications. These studies are guided by a series of MR scanning procedures defined in sequential Sponsor-provided MR Procedure Documents
- Phase 2 - Controlled image and data collection study based on Phase 1 results, in which optimized scan procedure(s) according to MR Procedure Document(s) will be provided at the start of Phase 2 scanning and a fixed hardware and integrated software configuration will be applied for all subjects.
Investigator feedback on scanning conducted under each MR Procedure Document will be documented. Because the device is intended for use in viable neonate and infant populations, clinical data are required that cannot be conducted in any other populations or simulated on non-human models. Clinical images and associated data as well as assessments of image quality, workflow, and usability will be collected.
Images, associated image data, and subject data collected in both phases of this study may be used for future engineering development and activities that support MR product development, including Sponsor-authorized scientific and marketing activities. Summary evaluation of safety and performance from Phase 1 and Phase 2 may be used in support of regulatory submission, including filings for European CE mark.
- Conditions
- Neonatal Neuroimaging
- Being tested
- 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner
- Keywords
- MRI Scanner, NICU
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3.0 T Neonatal MRI scannerDevice
eligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner | Other | All subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner. Receives: Device: 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 1
Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable.
Measured: 1 Day
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 1
Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 1.
Measured: 1 Day
Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 2
Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable.
Measured: 1 Day
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 2
Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 2.
Measured: 1 Day
Secondary outcomes (7)
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Scores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality.
Measured: 1 Day
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Scores range from 1-Very Poor image quality to 5-Excellent image quality.
Measured: 1 Day
Per Subject Workflow and Transport Information
Summary of means and standard deviations.
Measured: 1 Day
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
User survey results on a scale from 1 to 5, where 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree.
Question 1. I think that I would like to use this system frequently Question 2. I found the system unnecessarily complex Question 3. I thought the system was easy to use Question 4. I think that I would need support from a technician to be able to use this system Question 5. I found the various functions in this system were well integrated Question 6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system Question 7. I think that most people would learn to use this system very quickly Question 8. I found the system very cumbersome to use Question 9. I felt very confident using the system Question 10. I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system Question 11. I feel confident this system will meet my patient's needs Question 12. How likely is it that you would recommend this system to other professionals in your field?
Measured: 1 Day
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
A measure of bi-polar items (opposite items), rated on a scale from 1 to 7. Closer to 1 indicates a measure closer to the first item and closer to 7 indicates a measure closer to the second item.
Measured: 1 Day
Technical Issues and Malfunctions
Number and type of technical issues and device malfunctions
Measured: 1 Day
Subject Change in Temperature
Measured: 1 Day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2016 (estimated)
- Study start22 Mar 2016
- Primary completion20 Aug 2017
- Study completion20 Apr 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Neonatal NeuroimagingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GE HealthcareThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GE Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Wellcome Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul Griffiths, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Sheffield
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02785588
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 114-2014-GES-0035
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 19 May 2016
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development of a MR Scanner Capable of Being Sited in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02785588
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 114-2014-GES-0035
- Conditions
- Neonatal Neuroimaging
- Keywords
- MRI Scanner, NICU
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GE HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Wellcome Trust
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Aug 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Apr 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Sep 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigates a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed by GEHC for imaging viable neonate and infant populations. This MR system has a smaller size and design features that may make it more feasible to locate the system in close proximity to care areas for neonates (birth - 1 month) and infants (>1 month to two years), such as clinical neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and other infant and neonatal care departments.
Detailed description
This study investigates a novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed by GEHC for imaging viable neonate and infant populations. This MR system has a smaller size and design features that may make it more feasible to locate the system in close proximity to care areas for neonates (birth - 1 month) and infants (>1 month to two years), such as clinical neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and other infant and neonatal care departments.
This is a two-phase prospective clinical study evaluating the performance and safety of the investigational MRI device for neonates and infants, including:
- Phase 1 - Initial feasibility assessment and optimization study (Phase 1) which may include hardware and software modifications. These studies are guided by a series of MR scanning procedures defined in sequential Sponsor-provided MR Procedure Documents
- Phase 2 - Controlled image and data collection study based on Phase 1 results, in which optimized scan procedure(s) according to MR Procedure Document(s) will be provided at the start of Phase 2 scanning and a fixed hardware and integrated software configuration will be applied for all subjects.
Investigator feedback on scanning conducted under each MR Procedure Document will be documented. Because the device is intended for use in viable neonate and infant populations, clinical data are required that cannot be conducted in any other populations or simulated on non-human models. Clinical images and associated data as well as assessments of image quality, workflow, and usability will be collected.
Images, associated image data, and subject data collected in both phases of this study may be used for future engineering development and activities that support MR product development, including Sponsor-authorized scientific and marketing activities. Summary evaluation of safety and performance from Phase 1 and Phase 2 may be used in support of regulatory submission, including filings for European CE mark.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner | Other | Device: 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scannerAll subjects who participate in this study will be scanned using the 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 minute to 2 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Currently admitted for treatment or observation at the investigational site at the time of enrolment;
- weight range less than 5.0 kg (<5.0 kg ) and more than 0.5 kg (>0.5 kg );
- Viable neonates (birth to 1 month of age) or infants (>1 month to two years of age);
- Able to safely undergo an MRI scan, as determined by medically qualified personnel;
- Have parent(s), guardian(s), or legally authorized representative(s) willing and able to provide written informed consent for the subject's participation;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have parent(s), guardian(s), or legally authorized representative(s) that require that they accompany the subject into the MR environment that have contraindications to the MR environment or would otherwise be put at undue risk or discomfort, as determined by medically qualified personnel;
- Have any ferrous or electrical items or non-removable medical devices that are not compatible with MR scanning (including devices labelled as MR Unsafe, MR conditional for which the scanning conditions are not met, or without MR safety labelling that does not satisfy site MR safety requirements) that may pose hazards in the MR scanning or MR environment, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or medically qualified personnel in accordance with the site's MR Safety policy;
- Have any contraindications or could otherwise be expected to experience detrimental effects to safety, well-being, or medical care, as determined by the Principal Investigator or medically qualified personnel in accordance with the site's MR Safety policy;
- Require any scheduled standard of care procedures that are expected to be adversely impacted by participation in this study, in the opinion of the principal investigator or medically qualified personnel; and
- Have been previously enrolled AND undergone any study procedures under the current study protocol (i.e. the same subject cannot undergo study procedures, including swaddling and/or MR scanning, more than once).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scannereligible subjects will undergo neonatal MRI scan procedure | Device | 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner |
Primary outcome
Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 1
Time frame: 1 Day
Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable.
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 1
Time frame: 1 Day
Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 1.
Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 2
Time frame: 1 Day
Number of subject whose images were rated as Evaluable.
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event in Phase 2
Time frame: 1 Day
Safety will be assessed based on the number of Adverse Events in Phase 2.
7 secondary outcomes
Summary of Image Quality and Assessment for Phase 1
Time frame: 1 Day
Summary of Image Quality and Assessments for Phase 2
Time frame: 1 Day
Per Subject Workflow and Transport Information
Time frame: 1 Day
Overall Experience With the Neonatal MR Scanner Device Summary
Time frame: 1 Day
Bi-polar Product Description Scale
Time frame: 1 Day
Technical Issues and Malfunctions
Time frame: 1 Day
Subject Change in Temperature
Time frame: 1 Day
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Neonatal Neuroimaging
RecruitingObservational study
Neurocognitive Function and Neuroimaging Features in Patients With Glycogen Storage Diseases
Glycogen Storage Disease
Active, not recruiting
Serial Brain MRI in Hospitalized Preterm Infants
Preterm Birth Complication
RecruitingObservational study
Neuroradiological Features of Noonan Syndrome and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations
Noonan Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
MEMRI: Memory Emergence Using MRI
Not Applicable - Healthy Participants, Focus is the Memory System
RecruitingObservational study
Baby Brain Recovery Study
Perinatal Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Griffiths, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Sheffield
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 3.0 T Neonatal MRI scanner in people with Neonatal Neuroimaging, run by GE Healthcare at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Image Diagnostic Quality for Phase 1 (time frame: 1 Day). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2019.