AzTrials
AzTrials

EndometriosisPhase 2EDELWEISSNCT02778399

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OBE2109 in Subjects With Endometriosis

A Phase 2 study testing OBE2109 in people with Endometriosis, run by ObsEva SA at 86 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a range of oral doses of OBE2109 versus placebo, in reducing endometriosis associated pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Endometriosis
What is being tested?
OBE2109
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
328 participants
Where
86 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Jul 2016to 1 Jul 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • The subject must have had her most recent surgical and - if available - histological, diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis up to 10 years before screening.
  • The subject has moderate to severe endometriosis-associated pain during the screening period.
  • The subject has regular menstrual cycles.
  • The subject has a BMI ≥ 18 kg/m2 at the screening visit.

Who cannot join

  • The subject is pregnant or breast feeding or is planning a pregnancy within the duration of the treatment period of the study.
  • The subject had an interventional surgery for endometriosis performed within a period of 60 days before screening.
  • The subject did not respond to prior treatment with gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or GnRH antagonists for endometriosis.
  • The subject has a history of, or known osteoporosis or other metabolic bone disease.
  • The subject has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis and requires chronic analgesic / therapy, or that would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis related pain.

Trial locations and contacts

86 sites in 4 countries.

86 sites in 4 countries

United States71 sites
  • Site reference ID 421

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Site reference ID 430

    Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Site reference ID 462

    Arcadia, California

  • Site reference ID 428

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Site reference ID 459

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Site reference ID 452

    Austin, Texas

  • Site reference ID 409

    Bay City, Michigan

  • Site reference ID 461

    Beaumont, Texas

  • Site reference ID 457

    Boca Raton, Florida

  • Site reference ID 408

    Bristol, Tennessee

  • Site reference ID 419

    Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania

  • Site reference ID 467

    Centreville, Virginia

  • Site reference ID 455

    Chandler, Arizona

  • Site reference ID 403

    Chattanooga, Tennessee

  • Site reference ID 405

    Chino, California

  • Site reference ID 418

    Clearwater, Florida

  • Site reference ID 476

    Columbia, South Carolina

  • Site reference ID 447

    Dallas, Texas

  • Site reference ID 460

    Dallas, Texas

  • Site reference ID 443

    Dayton, Ohio

  • Site reference ID 474

    Denver, Colorado

  • Site reference ID 422

    Draper, Utah

  • Site reference ID 445

    Fall River, Massachusetts

  • Site reference ID 471

    Fall River, Massachusetts

  • Site reference ID 464

    Fort Worth, Texas

  • Site reference ID 472

    Franklin, Ohio

  • Site reference ID 437

    Gainesville, Florida

  • Site reference ID 478

    Glen Burnie, Maryland

  • Site reference ID 436

    Greensboro, North Carolina

  • Site reference ID 413

    Houston, Texas

  • Site reference ID 434

    Houston, Texas

  • Site reference ID 479

    Houston, Texas

  • Site reference ID 463

    Huntington Park, California

  • Site reference ID 449

    Jenkintown, Pennsylvania

  • Site reference ID 458

    Jensen Beach, Florida

  • Site reference ID 450

    Lakewood, Colorado

  • Site reference ID 425

    Longmont, Colorado

  • Site reference ID 454

    Marrero, Louisiana

  • Site reference ID 453

    Metairie, Louisiana

  • Site reference ID 411

    Miami, Florida

  • Site reference ID 424

    Miami, Florida

  • Site reference ID 435

    Miami, Florida

  • Site reference ID 420

    Miami Lakes, Florida

  • Site reference ID 441

    Miami Springs, Florida

  • Site reference ID 433

    Morehead City, North Carolina

  • Site reference ID 475

    Nampa, Idaho

  • Site reference ID 429

    Nashville, Tennessee

  • Site reference ID 423

    New Port Richey, Florida

  • Site reference ID 466

    New York, New York

  • Site reference ID 407

    Norfolk, Virginia

  • Site refenrec ID 469

    Northridge, California

  • Site reference ID 465

    Oak Brook, Illinois

  • Site reference ID 412

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Site reference ID 417

    Richmond, Virginia

  • Site reference ID 468

    Saginaw, Michigan

  • Site reference ID 473

    Saginaw, Michigan

  • Site reference ID 451

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Site reference ID 431

    San Diego, California

  • Site reference ID 402

    Schertz, Texas

  • Site reference ID 439

    Scottsdale, Arizona

  • Site reference ID 406

    Seattle, Washington

  • Site reference ID 404

    Shawnee Mission, Kansas

  • Site reference ID 427

    Southfield, Michigan

  • Site reference ID 426

    Tampa, Florida

  • Site reference ID 415

    Tiffin, Ohio

  • Site reference ID 440

    Tustin, California

  • Site reference ID 410

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia

  • Site reference ID 432

    Webster, Texas

  • Site reference ID 442

    Wellington, Florida

  • Site reference ID 414

    Westerville, Ohio

  • Site reference ID 456

    Wichita, Kansas

Other trials in United States

Poland5 sites
  • Site reference ID 101

    Katowice

  • Site reference ID 102

    Katowice

  • Site reference ID 104

    Lublin

  • Site reference ID 105

    Lublin

  • Site reference ID 103

    Szczecin

Other trials in Poland

Russia5 sites
  • Site reference ID 201

    Moscow

  • Site reference ID 202

    Moscow

  • Site reference ID 203

    Moscow

  • Site reference ID 204

    Moscow

  • Site reference ID 205

    Saint Petersburg

Other trials in Russia

Ukraine5 sites
  • Site reference ID 305

    Ivano-Frankivsk

  • Site reefrence ID 303

    Kyiv

  • Site reference ID 301

    Kyiv

  • Site reference ID 302

    Kyiv

  • SIte reference ID 304

    Kyiv

Other trials in Ukraine

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 2b Dose-ranging Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of OBE2109 in Subjects With Endometriosis Associated Pain

The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of a range of oral doses of OBE2109 versus placebo, in reducing endometriosis associated pain.

Read the detailed description

The study is a prospective, dose-finding, randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b study investigating the efficacy and safety of OBE2109 in the treatment of 330 women with moderate-to-severe endometriosis associated pain.

Subject will be randomized to one of 6 treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1:1:1 ratio (1 placebo group, 5 dose groups with different dosage/regimen).

Eligible subjects will be offered the opportunity to continue treatment with OBE2109 in an extension phase. Subjects who do not continue in the extension will enter the treatment-free follow-up phase of the study.

Conditions
Endometriosis
Being tested
Placebo, OBE2109
Keywords
Pelvic Pain, Endometriosis, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia
Medical subject headings
Endometriosis, Pelvic Pain, Dysmenorrhea, Dyspareunia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo tablets for oral administration once daily

  • OBE2109Drug

    OBE2109 tablets for oral administration once daily

Study groups in NCT02778399
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OBE2109 50 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: OBE2109
OBE2109 75mg fixed dose (FD)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: OBE2109
OBE2109 75mg titrated dose (TD)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: OBE2109
OBE2109 100mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: OBE2109
OBE2109 200 mgExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: OBE2109
Placebo / OBE2109 100mgPlacebo comparatorParticipants received placebo for the first 12 weeks and were then crossed-over to active treatment with OBE2109 100mg for a further 12 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: OBE2109

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-3 VRS)

    The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean overall pelvic pain score, defined as the mean of daily pain scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-10 NRS)

    This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean overall pelvic pain score, defined as the mean of daily pain scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pelvic pain of 0 (no pelvic pain) to 10 (worst pelvic pain imaginable). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

  2. Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With Uterine Bleeding

    This endpoint corresponds to a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean pelvic pain score for days with uterine bleeding/spotting, defined as the mean of daily pain scores on days with uterine bleeding/spotting recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

  3. Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Pelvic Pain Scores (0-3 VRS) for Days With no Uterine Bleeding

    This endpoint corresponds to a response at Week 12, with response defined as a reduction of 30% or greater from baseline in the mean pelvic pain score for days with no uterine bleeding, defined as the mean of daily pain scores on days with no uterine bleeding recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period) on a Verbal Rating Scale for pelvic pain of 0 (no pain) to 3 (severe pain). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyspareunia Score (0-3 VRS)

    This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean dyspareunia score, defined as the mean of daily dyspareunia scores recorded in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a 0-3 Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) for dyspareunia, with 0 representing "No discomfort during sexual intercourse" and 3 representing "I avoided sexual intercourse because of pain". The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.

    The dyspareunia questionnaire also included an option "not applicable: I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse"; for scoring, answering "not applicable" was considered like a missing value.

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Dyschezia Score (0-10 NRS)

    This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to week 12 in the mean dyschezia score, defined as the mean of weekly dyschezia scores reported in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), assessed on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale for dyschezia, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing the worst pain imaginable. The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of weekly scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

  6. Percentage of Subjects With Any Analgesics Use at Week 12

    This endpoint corresponds to the percentage of subjects at week 12 who recorded at least one pain medication intake in electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period).

    Measured: Up to week 12

  7. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Mean Score of Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Pain Domain

    This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean score of pain dimension of the EHP-30. The EHP-30 questionnaire was answered on electronic diary after activation by site staff during subject's monthly visits at site.

    The EHP-30 pain dimension consists of 11 items each addressing the effect of pain on various activities in the past 4 weeks and each assessed on a 5-point scale (0=Never through to 4=Always). Scaled score was equalled to total of raw score of each item in scale divided by the maximum possible raw score of all the items in the dimension, multiplied by 100, resulting in a score on a scale from 0 (best possible health status) to 100 (worst possible health status).

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

  8. Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score at Week 12

    The PGIC questionnaire consists of one question rated on a seven point scale (1="Very Much Improved" to 7="Very Much Worse"), with which the subject had to qualify her overall status since the start of the study. The PGIC was answered on electronic diary after activation by site staff during Week 12 visit at site.

    This endpoint corresponds to the percentage of subjects with an "improvement" in the PGIC score, which includes all subjects who answered "Very much improved" or "Much improved" or "Minimally improved" at Week 12.

    Measured: Up to week 12

  9. Percentage of Subjects With an Endometriosis Severity Score of "Severe" at Week 12

    Subject was asked monthly on electronic diary to assess their impression of endometriosis severity, considering the preceding 4-weeks, with following possible answers: no symptoms, very mild, mild, moderate, severe. This question was programmed to raise automatically every 4 weeks on the subject electronic diary. Result reported here is the percentage of subjects who answered "severe" at week 12.

    Measured: Up to week 12

  10. Change From Baseline to Week 12 in the Difficulty in Doing Daily Activities Mean Score

    This endpoint corresponds to the change from baseline to Week 12 in the mean of daily scores for "difficulty in doing daily activities", assessed via electronic diary during the preceding 28 days (4-week period), on a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of 0 (no difficulty doing daily activities) to 10 (unable to do daily activities). The baseline mean score was calculated as the mean of daily scores recorded in electronic diary over the two complete menstrual cycles performed during the screening period.

    The relevant time points are Baseline and Week 12.

    Measured: From baseline to week 12

  11. Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

    Change from baseline to Week 24 in BMD assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan of LUMBAR SPINE.

    Measured: From baseline up to week 24

  12. Number of Non Benign Endometrial Biopsies at Week 24

    Any pathological changes in the endometrium at week 24 were assessed from endometrial biopsies. The number of non benign biopsies at Week 24 is presented per treatment arm.

    Note: an isolated case of hyperplasia (without atypia) was observed at week 12 in the 200 mg group in a subject whose screening biopsy results were normal. A follow-up biopsy at week 24 revealed no abnormalities.

    Measured: Week 24

  13. Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Endometrial Thickness Measured by Transvaginal Ultrasound (TVUS)

    The endometrium thickness was measured by TVUS at screening and at Week 24 visit by the gynaecologist and result was recorded in mm. This endpoint reports the changes from baseline to Week 24 in the endometrial thickness.

    Measured: From baseline up to week 24

  14. Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in the Clinical Laboratory Assessments: LDL

    This endpoint reports the change from baseline up to Week 24 in the clinical laboratory assessments: LDL cholesterol.

    Measured: From baseline up to week 24

  15. Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: HDL

    This endpoint reports the change from baseline to week 24 in clinical laboratory assessments: HDL cholesterol.

    Measured: From Baseline up to week 24

  16. Percentage Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Clinical Laboratory Assessments: Triglycerides

    This endpoint reports the change from baseline to week 24 in clinical laboratory assessments: triglycerides.

    Measured: From baseline up to week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2016
  3. Primary completionApr 2018
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
328 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02778399
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-OBE2109-001
Acronym
EDELWEISS
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
3 May 2016
Last updated
21 Jul 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Donnez J, Taylor HS, Taylor RN, Akin MD, Tatarchuk TF, Wilk K, Gotteland JP, Lecomte V, Bestel E. Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with linzagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2020 Jul;114(1):44-55. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.02.114. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

    PubMed 32505383

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing OBE2109 in people with Endometriosis, run by ObsEva SA at 86 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 86 sites in United States, Poland, Russia, Ukraine. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Subjects With 30% or Greater Reduction From Baseline to Week 12 in Mean Overall Pelvic Pain Score (0-3 VRS) (time frame: From baseline to week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02778399, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in