AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoarthritis of KneeEIAIETNKOANCT02722772

Efficacy of Intra-Articular Injection of Etanercept for Moderate and Severe Knee Osteoarthritis

A study testing Etanercept and Health education, exercise and diet guidance in people with Osteoarthritis of Knee, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary aim: evaluate efficacy of intra-articular injection of etanercept for moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis. Second aim: investigate the potentiality of serum cytokines (TNF-α, Interleukin 1-α (IL1-α), IL1-β, matrix metalloproteinases1 (MMP1), MMP13) to predict the response of intra-articular injection of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis of Knee
What is being tested?
Etanercept and Health education, exercise and diet guidance
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Feb 2016to Aug 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Willing and able to give full consent;
  • According with classification of "Clinical Image" of 1986 American college of rheumatology criteria in osteoarthritis of the knee ;
  • Grade II-III of Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading system, revealing synovial inflammation or synovial fluid by combining ultrasound and/or MRI
  • Knee pain for at least 1 Month and Pain VAS Score>4 during the last week;
  • Fertile women agreed to adopt effective contraceptive measures during the test.

Who cannot join

  • Allergic to pharmaceutical ingredients;
  • Received Tumor Necrosis Factor inhibitor (TNFI) or other biologics preparation within 3 months;
  • Received physical therapy or articular injection, taking antidepressants or antispasmodic, opioids within 3 months ;
  • Patients with history of knee surgery or upcoming surgery within 10 years;
  • Patients accompanied by other complications or joint disease (such as septic arthritis, osteonecrosis,haemochromatosis, ochronosis, etc.);
  • Patients with serious joint deformation or joint deformities;
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Patients with active or a history of recurrent infections;
  • Patients existing active tuberculosis (TB) or has a history of active TB;
  • Patients with positive on hepatitis b surface antigen or hepatitis c antibody;
  • Patients with a history of severe lung disease, tumor;
  • Patients with severely abnormal function on liver and kidney (liver enzyme > = 2 times normal, creatinine > = normal);
  • Patients with pregnancy, ready for pregnancy or lactation;
  • Patients with other conditions which not suitable for use of Etanercept.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Yifang Mei, M.D contact

+86-451-85552350

myfyxd@163.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

    Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150001

    Zhiyi Zhang, Ph.D, +86-451-85552350, Zhiyizhang_rheu@163.com

    Yifang Mei, M.D, +86-451-85552350, myfyxd@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Primary aim: evaluate efficacy of intra-articular injection of etanercept for moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis.

Second aim: investigate the potentiality of serum cytokines (TNF-α, Interleukin 1-α (IL1-α), IL1-β, matrix metalloproteinases1 (MMP1), MMP13) to predict the response of intra-articular injection of etanercept for moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description
  1. Background: Osteoarthritis (osteoarthritis, OA) is a common joint disease. It is characterized by recurrent joint pain, swelling, increasing of disease status, joint deformity and activity disorders. [1] The pathogenesis of OA has not been fully understood. It may be associated with a variety of factors, such as: mechanics, biochemistry, genetics, and so on. Its main feature is the imbalance between synthesis and catabolism of articular cartilage cells. The imbalance may refer to cell aging, cell apoptosis, local inflammatory factor in joints as well as stress mechanism and so on. [2] OA usually develops in burdened and active joints, such as: the knee, the spine (cervical and lumbar spine), hip and ankle, hand joints, etc. The first session of The National Health and Nutrition Survey (The first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANESI) found that 12% of people in The United States have at least one joint in accordance with the clinical diagnosis of OA. [3] Radiographic result shows that rate of American adults knee OA prevalence is 14% and 37%, and women are more common (4-6). A large study found that at least one joint in people over 55 years have radiographic hand OA, and female prevalence is 67%, male is 55% [7]. The OA in Chinese are more likely happened in elder women than men. Prevalence rate could up to 50% in people over the age of 60, and 80% in 75 years old. Osteoarthritis patients suffer huge pain, and it cause huge economic burden to the society, and it becomes a serious impact on social productivity and lead to huge economic burden [8]. In the United States, OA cost $ 1,855 billion per year and in 27 million patients, and women spend $ 6212 per year, male $ 4730 per year [2]; OA cost 1% ~ 2.5% of gross domestic product (GDP) in the United States, Britain, France, Canada, Australia and other developed countries. There is no burden of economic data of OA in China [9]. Classification criteria of knee osteoarthritis According to the affected areas, OA can be divided into knee OA, hip OA, hand OA (distal interphalangeal joints, the first wrist palm joints), foot OA (first plantar toe joints, heel), etc. Knee OA is the most common disease in clinical disease. The classification of the knees OA contains clinical criteria, and also clinical and imaging criteria in the modified American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria in osteoarthritis classification criteria [10]. Knee osteoarthritis usually occurs with obvious fricatives, bony enlargement, Baker cyst expansion and joint effusion is generally not associated with skin redness. The most common deformity comes out with varus in severe cases, but also it may appear in the early mild disease. That clinically obvious varus may be a predictive factor during the disease progression [11]. That quadriceps become weak is a changeable risk factor for early knees OA disease progression, especially in women (12-13). Muscle atrophy occurs in late stage of disease progression [14] [15]. And it brings huge burden of disease to patients. Treatment of knee OA The aim of the treatment is to relieve pain, prevent and delay the progress of disease, protect the joints function, improve the quality of life. The treatment should be individualized. Full consideration to the patient' illness risk factors should be given, including: joint structure changing, the degree of inflammation and pain, concurrent disease status and other specific situation and condition. Treatment should be given priority to combine non-drug therapy with drug therapy. Operation should be performed when it is necessary [16]. Non-drug therapy include psychosocial intervention [16], decreasing weight [17], reasonable exercise [18], physical therapy which includes heat therapy, spa therapy, etc.), etc. Drug therapy mainly includes drugs using external, drugs using in whole body and drugs intra-articular injections [16]. Topical drugs include: capsaicin [19], non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) for external use [20] and lidocaine for external use only. Systemic medicine include: a: non-opiate drug. Acetaminophen is the first choice of OA treatment, and the main reason is that the less side effects and good curative effect [21].b: NSAIDS. There are two effect of NSAIDS: anti-pain and anti-inflammatory, which is the most commonly used for the control of OA symptoms. The main adverse reactions are gastrointestinal symptoms, renal or liver damage, effect on platelet function, and it may increase the risk of cardiovascular adverse events [22]. c: opioid analgesics. It can be considered if Pain still difficult to control after non-drug and drug treatment. Drugs injection intra-articular, including: intra-articular injection of glucocorticoid and hyaluronic acid derivatives [23]. Research of TNF-α application in OA: TNF-α and IL1 play an important role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis, IL1 - beta often express highly in middle to late course of OA [24 to 27]. In the OA flare course, TNF-α and IL1 alpha will increase significantly; TNF-α has been considered to be one of the important factors associated with the degree of OA inflammatory, and the IL1 alpha has a significant relation with the start of OA inflammatory [27].
  2. Aims: Primary: evaluate efficacy of intra-articular injection of etanercept for moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis Second: investigate the potentiality of serum cytokines (TNF-α, L1-α, IL1-β, MMP1, MMP13) to predict the response of intra-articular injection of etanercept for moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis.
  3. Patients: Recruit Patients of moderate and severe knee osteoarthritis, totally 60 patients (According with classification of "Clinical Image" of 1986 American college of rheumatology criteria in osteoarthritis of the knee )
  4. Study Design: A 12-week, multi-center, open-labeled, randomized study. Moderately and severe knee osteoarthritis patients, total 60 patients (consider expulsion rate 15%)(According with classification of "Clinical Image" of 1986 American college of rheumatology criteria in osteoarthritis of the knee ) The 60 patients will be randomly assigned into two groups: Etanercept treatment group: Intra-articular injection of etanercept of 25mg/w/joint and health education, exercise and diet guidance; treatment: 5 weeks Routine care group: Health education, exercise and diet guidance; treatment: 5 weeks (If both knees are involved, the more significant symptomatic side is chosen for injection by etanercept) This study has two stages:
  5. Screening/baseline period: - 4 weeks ~ 0 weeks; Patients should have signed informed consent form (ICF) before participating the study Obtain the history before treatment, medical records, disease history and demographic information of patients. And also perform pregnancy test (optional), HIV testing (optional), hepatitis B virus (HBV) detection (optional), hepatitis C virus (HCV) detection (optional), electrocardiogram examination, chest radiograph, tuberculin test (PPD) test, vital signs, physical examination, blood routine, urine routine and blood biochemical examination, imaging examination (anteroposterior/lateral of X-ray in knee joint, horizontal position/lateral projection/side lateral projection of ultrasound in knee, supine position in knee joint of MRI (optional, sagittal and coronary are commonly used), measure the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C reactive protein (CRP) and store serum in - 80 ℃ to detect serum protein markers level during baseline period, at the same time, keep the plasma to - 80 ℃.(refer to "9.3 lab operation"). Collect disease assessment result in baseline, and record the Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS) pain score, MOS 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF12) score, the knee injury and osteoarthritis score (KOOS score), 30 s - Chair Stand Test (CST) score, 40 m Fast-paced Walk Test (FPWT) score, ultrasonic relative index score and MRI relative index score.
  6. Follow-up:baseline to 12 weeks, during this period, two groups of participants will be treated with Intra-articular injection of etanercept of 25 mg/w/joint, health education, exercise and diet guidance or just health education, exercise and diet guidance separately. During this period 4 times follow-up will be performed at 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th week. At 2nd week, vital signs will be recorded, pain VAS score, SF12 score, KOOS score, condition of drug combination and adverse events will be recorded. At 4th week, vital signs will be recorded, and blood routine, urine routine, blood biochemical, the ESR and CRP will be examined and recorded, imaging examination (horizontal position/lateral projection/side lateral projection of ultrasound in knee), and collect basic evaluation results such as: pain VAS score, SF12 score, KOOS score, 30 s - CST score, 40 m FPWT score, ultrasonic relative index score and condition of drug combination and adverse events will be recorded. At 8th week, 12th week, vital signs, blood routine, urine routine and blood biochemical will be examined and recorded and imaging examination will be performed (horizontal position/lateral projection/side lateral projection of ultrasound in knee or supine position of MRI in knee joint, (optional, and sagittal and coronary will be used as usual)). Measure the ESR and CRP and store serum in - 80 ℃ to detect serum protein markers level during baseline to 8th week and 12th week, at the same time, store plasma to - 80 ℃.(refer to "9.3 lab operation"). Collect disease assessment result, and record the pain VAS score, SF12 score, KOOS score, 30 s - CST score, 40 m FPWT score, ultrasonic index score and MRI relative index score (optional). And condition of drug combination and adverse events will be recorded.
  7. Laboratory tests Main laboratory examination: Detect the level of TNF-α, L1-α, IL1-β, MMP1, MMP13 levels in patients peripheral blood at baseline period and 4th week, 8th week by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
  8. The curative effect evaluation/check points: The primary checkpoint: at 8th week and 12th week, changes of pain VAS score, KOOS score relative to the baseline. The Secondary checkpoints: at 8 weeks and 12 weeks changes of SF12 score, 30s-CST score, 40 m FPWT score, ultrasound score, MRI score, level of TNF alpha, IL1 alpha, IL1 - beta, MMP1, MMP13 in serum relative to the baseline.
  9. Statistical methods:

Based on the curative effect data of patients, analysis by using R software or Statistical Analysis System (SAS) statistical software:

Calculate the measurement data using t-test and rank test; and rate is calculated using chi-square test.

Perform single factor and multiple factors regression analysis on indicators of baseline prognostic factors of patients (protein markers) and curative effect.

Being tested
Etanercept, Health education, exercise and diet guidance
Keywords
Intra-Articular Injection, Etanercept, TNF-α, IL-1, Osteoarthritis of Knee
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EtanerceptDrug

    Intra-articular injection of etanercept of 25mg/w/joint for 5 weeks.

  • Health education, exercise and diet guidanceOther

    Health education, exercise and diet guidance in patient; treatment: 5 weeks

Study groups in NCT02722772
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Etanercept treatment groupExperimentalIntra-articular injection of etanercept of 25 mg/w/joint and Health education, exercise and diet guidance; treatment: 5 weeks (If both knees are involved, the more significant symptomatic side is chosen for injection by etanercept)
Receives: Drug: Etanercept; Other: Health education, exercise and diet guidance
Routine care groupPlacebo comparatorHealth education, exercise and diet guidance; treatment: 5 weeks
Receives: Other: Health education, exercise and diet guidance

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain VAS score(Pain Visual Analogue Scale/Score)

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate the treatment efficacy

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  2. KOOS score(The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Score)

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate the treatment efficacy

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. 30s-CST score(30 seconds Sit/chair Test)

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate the activity of knee joint

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  2. 40m FPWT score(40 meters fast walking test)

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate the activity of knee joint

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  3. Assessment score under ultrasound

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate the changes of patients' inner-structure of knee

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  4. Assessment score under MRI

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate the changes of patients' inner-structure of knee

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  5. TNF-α (pg/ml) level in serum

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate patients' inflammatory level

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  6. IL1-α (pg/ml) level in serum

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate patients' inflammatory level

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  7. IL1-β (pg/ml) level in serum

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate patients' inflammatory level

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  8. MMP1 (ng/ml) level in serum

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate patients' inflammatory level

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  9. MMP13 (ng/ml) level in serum

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate patients' inflammatory level

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

  10. SF-12 score(MOS 12-item Short Form Health Survey)

    Changes from the baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks to evaluate patients' health condition

    Measured: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2016
  3. Primary completionJul 2017 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2017 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02722772
Sponsor's protocol ID
IAI-ETN-KOA-201613
Acronym
EIAIETNKOA
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
24 Mar 2016
Last updated
8 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided: The investigators have not yet decided whether to share participants' data or not.

Publications

  • Ge Z, Hu Y, Heng BC, Yang Z, Ouyang H, Lee EH, Cao T. Osteoarthritis and therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Jun 15;55(3):493-500. doi: 10.1002/art.21994. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16739189
  • Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):1697-707. doi: 10.1002/art.34453. Epub 2012 Mar 5. No abstract available.

    PubMed 22392533
  • Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, Arnold LM, Choi H, Deyo RA, Gabriel S, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Jordan JM, Katz JN, Kremers HM, Wolfe F; National Arthritis Data Workgroup. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan;58(1):26-35. doi: 10.1002/art.23176.

    PubMed 18163497
  • Dillon CF, Rasch EK, Gu Q, Hirsch R. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the United States: arthritis data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1991-94. J Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;33(11):2271-9. Epub 2006 Oct 1.

    PubMed 17013996
  • Felson DT, Naimark A, Anderson J, Kazis L, Castelli W, Meenan RF. The prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in the elderly. The Framingham Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 1987 Aug;30(8):914-8. doi: 10.1002/art.1780300811.

    PubMed 3632732
  • Jordan JM, Helmick CG, Renner JB, Luta G, Dragomir AD, Woodard J, Fang F, Schwartz TA, Abbate LM, Callahan LF, Kalsbeek WD, Hochberg MC. Prevalence of knee symptoms and radiographic and symptomatic knee osteoarthritis in African Americans and Caucasians: the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project. J Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;34(1):172-80.

    PubMed 17216685
  • Dahaghin S, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Ginai AZ, Pols HA, Hazes JM, Koes BW. Prevalence and pattern of radiographic hand osteoarthritis and association with pain and disability (the Rotterdam study). Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 May;64(5):682-7. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.023564. Epub 2004 Sep 16.

    PubMed 15374852
  • McCarberg B, Tenzer P. Complexities in the pharmacologic management of osteoarthritis pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 May;29(5):539-48. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.785391. Epub 2013 Apr 3.

    PubMed 23489409
  • Kotlarz H, Gunnarsson CL, Fang H, Rizzo JA. Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3546-53. doi: 10.1002/art.24984.

    PubMed 19950287
  • Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, et al. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986 Aug;29(8):1039-49. doi: 10.1002/art.1780290816.

    PubMed 3741515
  • Chang A, Hochberg M, Song J, Dunlop D, Chmiel JS, Nevitt M, Hayes K, Eaton C, Bathon J, Jackson R, Kwoh CK, Sharma L. Frequency of varus and valgus thrust and factors associated with thrust presence in persons with or at higher risk of developing knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010 May;62(5):1403-11. doi: 10.1002/art.27377.

    PubMed 20213800
  • Segal NA, Glass NA, Torner J, Yang M, Felson DT, Sharma L, Nevitt M, Lewis CE. Quadriceps weakness predicts risk for knee joint space narrowing in women in the MOST cohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010 Jun;18(6):769-75. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Feb 11.

    PubMed 20188686
  • Baker KR, Xu L, Zhang Y, Nevitt M, Niu J, Aliabadi P, Yu W, Felson D. Quadriceps weakness and its relationship to tibiofemoral and patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis in Chinese: the Beijing osteoarthritis study. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Jun;50(6):1815-21. doi: 10.1002/art.20261.

    PubMed 15188358
  • Slemenda C, Brandt KD, Heilman DK, Mazzuca S, Braunstein EM, Katz BP, Wolinsky FD. Quadriceps weakness and osteoarthritis of the knee. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jul 15;127(2):97-104. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-2-199707150-00001.

    PubMed 9230035
  • Ikeda S, Tsumura H, Torisu T. Age-related quadriceps-dominant muscle atrophy and incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10(2):121-6. doi: 10.1007/s00776-004-0876-2.

    PubMed 15815857

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Etanercept and Health education, exercise and diet guidance in people with Osteoarthritis of Knee, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhiyi Zhang, Ph.D (+86-451-85552350, zhangzhiyi_rheu@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain VAS score(Pain Visual Analogue Scale/Score) (time frame: baseline to 8 weeks and 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02722772, which also lists 26 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in