Acute PainPhase 3NCT02700815
Capsaicin + Diclofenac Gel in Acute Back Pain or Neck Pain
A Phase 3 study testing Diclofenac and Capsaicin in people with Acute Pain, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 18 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This randomised, controlled multi-centre parallel group trial will assess the efficacy and tolerability of a topical formulation gel of the combination of diclofenac and capsaicin in comparison to gels with diclofenac alone, capsaicin alone, and placebo for the treatment of acute back pain or neck pain Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Pain
- What is being tested?
- Diclofenac and Capsaicin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 746 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 9 May 2016to 21 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed and dated written informed consent at Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and local legislation
- Male or female patients >=18 years with current diagnosis of acute back pain or of neck pain for at least 24 hours, but less than 21 days
- Acute back pain or acute neck pain resulting in pain on movement (POM) >= 50 mm (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100) for at least one POM procedure out of 5 standardized procedures.
- Sensitivity to algometric pressure on the painful trigger point <= 25 N/cm2
- Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control
Who cannot join
- History of 3 or more episodes of back or neck pain in the last 6 months excluding the current episode
- Surgery due to back or neck pain or rehabilitation due to back or neck pain in the last 12 months
- Back or neck pain that is attributable to any specific identifiable cause (e.g. disc prolapse, spondylolisthesis, osteomalacia, inflammatory arthritis, metabolic, neurological diseases or tumour)
- Trauma or strains of the back or neck muscles within the last 3 months
- Prior use within the last 3 days before Visit 1 or concomitant use of any anti-inflammatory drugs, heparinoids, muscle relaxants or analgesics. Long-acting glucocorticoids must have been discontinued 10 days before study entry. Spinal injections should have been discontinued in due time (investigator's judgement) before patient enrolment to allow complete wash-out of the active ingredient based on investigator's judgment
- Non-pharmacological treatment (physiotherapy, heat treatment (e.g. heat patch, hot water bottle), or massage, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) or locally applied pharmacological product to the back or neck area 24 hours prior study entry and during the study period
Show all 16Show fewer
- Known severe hepatocellular insufficiency, severe renal insufficiency or Gilbert's syndrome (Morbus Meulengracht)
- Any other medical condition that would interfere with efficacy and safety assessments based on investigator's judgement or any on-going clinical condition that would jeopardize patient's or site personnel's safety or study compliance based on investigator judgement.
- Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to the active ingredients or any excipient(s).
- Patients in whom attacks of asthma, bronchospasm, rhinitis or urticaria were precipitated by the intake of Acetyl salicylic acid (ASS) or other NSAIDs
- Irritated skin (based on investigator's judgement), skin wounds, eczema or open injuries at application site
- Negative experience in the past with heat treatments for muscle complaints
- Patient not able to understand and comply with trial requirements based on investigators judgement
- Alcohol or drug abuse
- Participation in a clinical trial within the previous 30 days or simultaneous participation in another clinical trial
- Women who are pregnant, nursing, or who plan to become pregnant while in the trial
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 2 countries.
18 sites in 2 countries
Germany14 sites
emovis GMBH, Berlin
Berlin, 10629
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Berlin, 12627
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Bochum, 44787
Sport- und Präventionsmedizinische Praxis, 50933 Köln
Cologne, 50933
Dünnwaldpraxis, Köln
Cologne, 51069
Praxis Dr. Steinebach, Essen
Essen, 45277
Praxis Dr. Schaefer, 45355 Essen
Essen, 45355
Unterfrintroper Hausarztzentrum
Essen, 45359
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Frankfurt, 60313
Praxis Dr. Pabst, Gilching
Gilching, 82205
Praxis Dr. Dahmen, 22415 Hamburg
Hamburg, 22415
Praxis Dr. Klein, Künzing
Künzing, 94550
Synexus Clinical Research GmbH
Leipzig, 04103
Anästhesiologie Rheinbach
Rheinbach, 53359
Russia4 sites
University Clinic of Headache, Private Practice, Moscow
Moscow, 129090
State Budget.Hlthcare Inst.City Outpatient dept #123,Therapy
Saint Petersburg, 192289
Medical Centre "Reavita", Therapy Dept., St. Petersburg
Saint Petersburg, 194325
St.Petersburg State Budget.Hlthcare Inst.City Outpat.dep#107
Saint Petersburg, 195030
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Controlled Multi-centre Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of a Topically Applied Combination Containing Diclofenac 2% + Capsaicin 0.075% (2 g Formulation Per Application; 2-times Daily for 5 Days) Compared to Placebo, as Well as to Diclofenac 2% and Capsaicin 0.075% in Patients With Acute Back or Neck Pain
This randomised, controlled multi-centre parallel group trial will assess the efficacy and tolerability of a topical formulation gel of the combination of diclofenac and capsaicin in comparison to gels with diclofenac alone, capsaicin alone, and placebo for the treatment of acute back pain or neck pain
- Conditions
- Acute Pain
- Being tested
- Diclofenac, Capsaicin, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DiclofenacDrug
CapsaicinDrug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diclofenac and capsaicin | Experimental | Fixed dose combination Receives: Drug: Diclofenac; Drug: Capsaicin |
| Diclofenac | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Diclofenac |
| Capsaicin | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Capsaicin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application
Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 centimeters (cm) wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in cm.
Measured: Baseline and Day 2
Secondary outcomes (7)
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h))
This is a key secondary endpoint. AUC for POMwp calculated from 0 to 72 h that is for first three treatment days using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time. The results presented here are adjusted mean and standard error for POMwp AUC (0-72 h) in centimeters (cm). The AUC represents POMwp as an average over the first 3 treatment days (Day 1 until Day 4 morning) - it is not meant here as a pharmacokinetics (PK) parameter (concentration over time).
Measured: 0 to 72 hours after start of treatment
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h))
This is a key secondary endpoint. AUC for POMwp calculated from 0 to 120 h that is for first five treatment days using the trapezoidal rule divided by the observation time. The results presented here are adjusted mean and standard error for POMwp AUC (0-120 h) in centimeters (cm). The AUC represents POMwp as an average over the first 5 treatment days (Day 1 until Day 6 morning) - it is not meant here as a PK parameter (concentration over time).
Measured: 0 to 120 hours after start of treatment
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% From Baseline
This outcome measures the pattern of number of patients with a decrease in POMwp of at least 30% from baseline at 1 hour after dosing on Day 2 evening.
Measured: Baseline and day 2
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 50% From Baseline
This outcome measures the pattern of number of patients with a decrease in POMwp of at least 50% from baseline at 1 hour after dosing on Day 2 evening.
Measured: Baseline and day 2
Change From Baseline in POMwp (cm) at Day 6 Morning
Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 cm wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in centimeters (cm).
Measured: Baseline and Day 6
Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 2 Evening, Before Drug Application
PA is a method described to determine pressure pain threshold (PPT) by applying controlled pressure to a given body point. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for PA.
Measured: Baseline and Day 2
Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 6 Morning
PA is a method described to determine pressure pain threshold (PPT) by applying controlled pressure to a given body point. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for PA.
Measured: Baseline and Day 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start9 May 2016
- Primary completion13 Jul 2017
- Study completion21 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boehringer IngelheimThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 746 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Boehringer Ingelheim, Study chair, Boehringer Ingelheim
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02700815
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1358.1
- Other IDs
- 2015-000404-25, 2015
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 6 May 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Predel HG, Ebel-Bitoun C, Peil B, Weiser TW, Lange R. Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac + Capsaicin Gel in Patients with Acute Back/Neck Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study. Pain Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):279-296. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00161-9. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
PubMed 32221866
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Controlled Multi-centre Parallel Group Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Doses of a Topically Applied Combination Containing Diclofenac 2% + Capsaicin 0.075% (2 g Formulation Per Application; 2-times Daily for 5 Days) Compared to Placebo, as Well as to Diclofenac 2% and Capsaicin 0.075% in Patients With Acute Back or Neck Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02700815
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1358.1
- Conditions
- Acute Pain
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 746 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boehringer IngelheimIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 May 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Jul 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 21 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 May 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomised, controlled multi-centre parallel group trial will assess the efficacy and tolerability of a topical formulation gel of the combination of diclofenac and capsaicin in comparison to gels with diclofenac alone, capsaicin alone, and placebo for the treatment of acute back pain or neck pain
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diclofenac and capsaicin | Experimental | Drug: Diclofenac, Drug: CapsaicinFixed dose combination |
| Diclofenac | Active comparator | Drug: Diclofenac |
| Capsaicin | Active comparator | Drug: Capsaicin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Signed and dated written informed consent at Visit 1 in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and local legislation
- Male or female patients >=18 years with current diagnosis of acute back pain or of neck pain for at least 24 hours, but less than 21 days
- Acute back pain or acute neck pain resulting in pain on movement (POM) >= 50 mm (Visual Analogue Scale 0-100) for at least one POM procedure out of 5 standardized procedures.
- Sensitivity to algometric pressure on the painful trigger point <= 25 N/cm2
- Women of childbearing potential must be ready and able to use highly effective methods of birth control
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- History of 3 or more episodes of back or neck pain in the last 6 months excluding the current episode
- Surgery due to back or neck pain or rehabilitation due to back or neck pain in the last 12 months
- Back or neck pain that is attributable to any specific identifiable cause (e.g. disc prolapse, spondylolisthesis, osteomalacia, inflammatory arthritis, metabolic, neurological diseases or tumour)
- Trauma or strains of the back or neck muscles within the last 3 months
- Prior use within the last 3 days before Visit 1 or concomitant use of any anti-inflammatory drugs, heparinoids, muscle relaxants or analgesics. Long-acting glucocorticoids must have been discontinued 10 days before study entry. Spinal injections should have been discontinued in due time (investigator's judgement) before patient enrolment to allow complete wash-out of the active ingredient based on investigator's judgment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diclofenac | Drug | Diclofenac, Diclofenac and capsaicin |
| Capsaicin | Drug | Capsaicin, Diclofenac and capsaicin |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application
Time frame: Baseline and Day 2
Pain on movement (POM) was used to assess pain measurement for back and neck pain. The standardized movements have been established for which the measurement was taken. POMwp was the POM measure that gave the highest score at baseline; i.e. POM of worst procedure. Pain intensity was assessed at rest after standing in an upright position relatively motionless for 1 minute. The pain was evaluated by asking patient 'How would you rate your pain right now?' and by using a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0-10 centimeters (cm) wherein 0 cm = no pain to 10 cm = worst pain possible. The results presented here are adjusted mean change from baseline and standard error for POMwp in cm.
7 secondary outcomes
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 72 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-72 h))
Time frame: 0 to 72 hours after start of treatment
POMwp Area Under the Curve (AUC) Calculated From 0 to 120 Hours (h) (POMwp AUC(0-120 h))
Time frame: 0 to 120 hours after start of treatment
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 30% From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and day 2
Number of Patients With Decrease in POMwp of at Least 50% From Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and day 2
Change From Baseline in POMwp (cm) at Day 6 Morning
Time frame: Baseline and Day 6
Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 2 Evening, Before Drug Application
Time frame: Baseline and Day 2
Change From Baseline in Pressure Algometry (PA) at Day 6 Morning
Time frame: Baseline and Day 6
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32221866Predel HG, Ebel-Bitoun C, Peil B, Weiser TW, Lange R. Efficacy and Safety of Diclofenac + Capsaicin Gel in Patients with Acute Back/Neck Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study. Pain Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):279-296. doi: 10.1007/s40122-020-00161-9. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Acute Pain
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Boehringer Ingelheim study chair
Boehringer Ingelheim
18 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Diclofenac and Capsaicin in people with Acute Pain, run by Boehringer Ingelheim at 18 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in Germany, Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in POM Between Baseline and Day 2 Evening, 1 Hour After Drug Application (time frame: Baseline and Day 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02700815, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2019.