AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoarthritis, KneePhase 3NCT02697773

Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Tanezumab Titration Dosing Regimen in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee

A Phase 3 study testing Tanezumab 2.5 mg and Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Pfizer at 87 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a titration arm of tanezumab in which treatment is started at a lower dose (2.5 mg) and increased to a higher dose (5 mg) at Week 8, compared to giving 2 doses of tanezumab 2.5 mg or 2 doses of placebo. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
What is being tested?
Tanezumab 2.5 mg and Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
698 participants
Where
87 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
21 Jan 2016to 14 May 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip confirmed by X-ray
  • Documented history that subject tried the following medications and had insufficient pain relief or is cannot take or tolerate them: acetaminophen, NSAIDs and either tramadol or opioids
  • Meet the protocol requirements for pain at screening and pain, physical function and patient global assessment of osteoarthritis at baseline
  • Willing to discontinue all pain medications except study medication and rescue medication during the course of the study and use those as directed per protocol
  • Women able to have children must agree to use 2 forms of contraception during the study

Who cannot join

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 39
  • History of diseases other than osteoarthritis in a shoulder, hip or knee (example, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, joint infections, osteonecrosis)
  • Patients with x-ray showing joint conditions such as osteonecrosis (dead bone) or certain types of fractures
  • Patients who have had significant trauma or surgery to a knee, hip or shoulder within the previous year
  • Planned surgical procedure during the study
  • Patients who are largely or wholly incapacitated (example bedridden or confined to a wheelchair, permitting little or no self-care)
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Patients who would be unwilling or unable to undergo joint replacement surgery if one eventually became necessary
  • Patients with significant conditions other than osteoarthritis that could interfere with assessment of pain in the joints (example fibromyalgia, lupus erythematosus)
  • Patients with significant heart, neurological or psychiatric diseases
  • Patients who had cancer other than certain skin cancers within the past 5 years
  • Patients with alcohol, analgesic (pain medications) or drug abuse within the past 2 years
  • Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intending to become pregnant or breast-feed during the course of the study.

Trial locations and contacts

87 sites in 3 countries.

87 sites in 3 countries

United States68 sites
  • New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Inc.

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106

  • Advanced Research Center, Inc

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • KRK Medical Research

    Arlington, Texas, 76012

  • Atlanta Center for Medical Research

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30331

  • Tekton Research, Inc

    Austin, Texas, 78745

  • Urgent Care MD's

    Baytown, Texas, 77521

  • Northwest Clinical Research Center

    Bellevue, Washington, 98007

  • Alabama Orthopaedic Surgeons

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35235

  • Cahaba Research, Inc.

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35242

  • Alpine Clinical Research Center

    Boulder, Colorado, 80301

  • New England Research Associates, LLC

    Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606

  • Investigators Research Group, LLC

    Brownsburg, Indiana, 46112

  • Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases

    Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320

  • Medex Healthcare Research Inc

    Chicago, Illinois, 60602

  • Chicago Clinical Research Institute, Inc.

    Chicago, Illinois, 60607

  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Great Lakes Clinical Trials

    Chicago, Illinois, 60640

  • Medvin Clinical Research

    Covina, California, 91722

  • Arthritis Care and Diagnostic Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Spectrum Medical, Inc

    Danville, Virginia, 24541

  • Plains Clinical Research Center, LLC

    Fargo, North Dakota, 58104

  • Arthritis and Osteoporosis Treatment and Research Center

    Flowood, Mississippi, 39232

  • Clinical Physiology Associates

    Fort Myers, Florida, 33912

  • T&R Clinic, PA

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76117

  • Prestige Clinical Research

    Franklin, Ohio, 45005

  • Arthritis And Osteoporosis Associates

    Freehold, New Jersey, 07728

  • St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare

    Fullerton, California, 92835

  • Center for Advanced Research & Education (CARE)

    Gainesville, Georgia, 30501

  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29601

  • Drug Trials America

    Hartsdale, New York, 10530

  • Eastern Research, Inc.

    Hialeah, Florida, 33013

  • East-West Medical Research Institute

    Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814

  • Centex Studies, Inc.

    Houston, Texas, 77058

  • BI Research Center

    Houston, Texas, 77084

  • Irvine Center for Clinical Research

    Irvine, California, 92614

  • Robert L Freed, M.D., F.A.C.R / Clinical Interventions Research Institute

    Irvine, California, 92618

  • Office Of Stephen H. Miller, M.D.

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144

  • Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • South Florida Research Center, Inc.

    Miami, Florida, 33135

  • New Horizon Research Center

    Miami, Florida, 33175

  • Miami Dade Medical Research Institute, LLC

    Miami, Florida, 33176

  • Quality Medical Research

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37211

  • George Stanley Walker, MD

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115

  • Tristan Medical Enterprises, PC dba Regeneris Medical

    North Attleboro, Massachusetts, 02760

  • Providence Clinical Research

    North Hollywood, California, 91606

  • NPC Research

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109

  • Hillcrest Clinical Research

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73119

  • Compass Research, LLC

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • Ormond Beach Clinical Research

    Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174

  • Arizona Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85023

  • The Pain Relief Center

    Plano, Texas, 75024

  • Wake Research Associates, LLC

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612

  • Health Concepts

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702

  • National Clinical Research - Richmond, Inc

    Richmond, Virginia, 23294

  • Michigan Orthopaedic & Spine Surgeons

    Rochester Hills, Michigan, 48307

  • Artemis Institute for Clinical Research

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • California Research Foundation

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Stamford Therapeutics Consortium

    Stamford, Connecticut, 06905

  • University Orthopedics Center

    State College, Pennsylvania, 16801

  • Clinical Research Institute of Arizona, LLC

    Surprise, Arizona, 85374

  • Phoenix Clinical Research, LLC

    Tamarac, Florida, 33321

  • Bioclinica Research

    The Villages, Florida, 32162

  • AC Clinical Research

    Tiffin, Ohio, 44883

  • Tucson Orthopaedic Institute

    Tucson, Arizona, 85714

  • University of Arizona Clinical and Translational Science Research Center

    Tucson, Arizona, 85724

  • Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.

    Upland, California, 91786

  • Integrated Clinical Trial Services, Inc.

    West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265

  • Professional Research Network of Kansas, LLC

    Wichita, Kansas, 67205-1138

Other trials in United States

Canada17 sites
  • Aggarwal and Associates Limited

    Brampton, Ontario, L6T 0G1

  • Manna Research Inc. (Burlington south)

    Burlington, Ontario, L7R 1A4

  • Dawson Road Medical Centre

    Guelph, Ontario, N1H 1B1

  • Adachi Medicine Professional Corporation

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2

  • K-W Musculoskeletal Research Inc.

    Kitchener, Ontario, N2M 5N6

  • Western Center for Public Health and Family Medicine

    London, Ontario, N6G 2M1

  • Malton Medical Centre

    Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1P1

  • Diex Recheche Montreal, Inc.

    Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 1S1

  • Rebecca Medical Associates

    Oakville, Ontario, L6K 1J6

  • King Street Medical Clinic

    Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 1G6

  • Recherche Clinique Sigma inc

    Québec, Quebec, G1G 3Y8

  • Diex Recherche Quebec Inc.

    Québec, Quebec, G1S 2L6

  • G.R.M.O. (Groupe de recherche en maladies osseuses) Inc.

    Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7

  • Centre de recherche Saint-Louis

    Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4

  • Alpha Recherche Clinique

    Québec, Quebec, G3K 2P8

  • Bluewater Clinical Research Group

    Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3

  • Diex Research Sherbrooke Inc.

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1L 0H8

Other trials in Canada

Puerto Rico2 sites
  • Puerto Rico Medical Research Inc.

    Ponce, PR, 00717

  • Mindful Medical Research

    San Juan, 00918

Other trials in Puerto Rico

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A DOSE TITRATION REGIMEN FOR THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a titration arm of tanezumab in which treatment is started at a lower dose (2.5 mg) and increased to a higher dose (5 mg) at Week 8, compared to giving 2 doses of tanezumab 2.5 mg or 2 doses of placebo. The study also evaluates the safety of the treatment regimens.

Being tested
Placebo, Tanezumab 2.5 mg, Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg
Keywords
osteoarthritis of the knee, osteoarthritis of the hip, nerve growth factor inhibitor, tanezumab
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboOther

    Patient receives one dose of placebo to match tanezumab subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of placebo to match tanezumab subcutaneously at Week 8.

  • Tanezumab 2.5 mgBiological

    Patient receives one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously at Week 8.

  • Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mgBiological

    Also called Titration Arm

    Patient receives one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of tanezumab 5 mg subcutaneously at Week 8.

Study groups in NCT02697773
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorplacebo administered subcutaneously at day 0 and week 8
Receives: Other: Placebo
Tanezumab 2.5 mgExperimentaltanezumab 2.5 mg administered subcutaneously at day 0 and week 8
Receives: Biological: Tanezumab 2.5 mg
Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mgExperimentaltanezumab 2.5 mg administered subcutaneously at day 0 and tanezumab 5 mg administered subcutaneously at week 8
Receives: Biological: Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16

    PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip (index joint) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worsening of condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

Secondary outcomes (55)
  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  2. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 24

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  4. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 24

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty/worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

    PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip (index joint) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12

  6. Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 24

    PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip (index joint) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  7. Percentage of Participants Meeting Outcomes Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index

    Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responders: if the change (improvement) from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent and greater or equal to (>=) 2 units in either WOMAC pain subscale or physical function subscale score; if change (improvement) from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [extreme pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [extreme difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Missing data was imputed using mixed baseline/last observation carried forward (BOCF/LOCF).

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  8. Percentage of Participants Achieving Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Reduction >= 30 Percent (%), >=50%, >=70% and >=90% Response

    Percentage of participants with reduction in WOMAC pain intensity of at least (>=) 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 compared to baseline were classified as responders to WOMAC pain subscale and are reported here. WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  9. Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Percent Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0% ; >= 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline to Week 16 were reported, participants (%) are reported more than once in categories specified. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Reduction >= 30 Percent (%), >=50%, >=70% and >=90% Response

    Percentage of participants with reduction in WOMAC physical function of at least (>=) 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 compared to baseline were classified as responders to WOMAC physical function subscale. WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. WOMAC physical function subscale: 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours,calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  11. Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Percent Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function: participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. WOMAC physical function subscale: 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours, calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty),higher scores indicate extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0 %; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC physical function subscale from Baseline to Week 16 were reported. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  12. Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement of >=2 Points in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis

    PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where, 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points from Baseline in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24

  13. Change From Baseline for Average Pain Score in the Index Joint at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16

    Participants assessed their average pain in the index hip/knee in the past 24 hours using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. Data represents averages of the values reported during the 4-week interval up to and including the given week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16

  14. Change From Baseline for Average Pain Score in the Index Joint at Weeks 20 and 24

    Participants assessed their average pain in the index hip/knee in the past 24 hours using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) weekly beginning at Week 16. Higher scores indicated higher pain. Data represents averages of the values reported during the 4-week interval up to and including the given week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20 and 24

  15. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  16. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 24

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  17. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [extreme pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [extreme difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [extreme stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse response.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  18. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 24

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [extreme pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [extreme difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [extreme stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse response.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  19. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  20. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 24

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  21. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  22. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Week 24

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  23. Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Osteoarthritis (WPAI:OA) Scores at Baseline

    WPAI is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the impact of osteoarthritis on absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity, and daily activity impairment for a period of 7 days prior to a visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism), overall work impairment (work productivity) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are expressed as an impairment percentage (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

    Measured: Baseline

  24. Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Osteoarthritis (WPAI:OA) Scores at Week 16

    WPAI is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the impact of osteoarthritis on absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity, and daily activity impairment for a period of 7 days prior to a visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism), overall work impairment (work productivity) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are expressed as an impairment percentage (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 16

  25. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Dimensions Score

    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The health utility score for a patient with no problems in all 5 items is 1 for all countries (except for Zimbabwe where it is 0.9), and is reduced where a patient reports greater levels of problems across the five dimensions.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  26. European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Overall Health Utility Score/Index Value

    EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. Responses from the five domains were used to calculate a single utility index (the Overall health utility score) where values are <=1. The Overall health utility score for a patient with no problems in all 5 items is 1 for all countries (except for Zimbabwe where it is 0.9), and is reduced where a patient reports greater levels of problems across the five dimensions.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16

  27. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Visits of Services Directly Related to Osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Visits of services directly related to osteoarthritis evaluated were: visits to primary care physician, neurologist, rheumatologist, physician assistant or nurse practitioner, pain specialist, orthopedist, physical therapist, chiropractor, alternative medicine or therapy, podiatrist, nutritionist/dietitian, radiologist, home healthcare services and other practitioner.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  28. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Visited the Emergency Room Due to Osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of participants who visited the emergency room due to osteoarthritis (OA).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  29. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Visits to the Emergency Room Due to Osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of visits to the emergency room due to OA.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  30. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Hospitalized Due to Osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of participants who were hospitalized due to OA.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  31. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Nights Stayed in the Hospital Due to Osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of nights stayed in the hospital due to OA.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  32. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Used Any Aids/Devices for Doing Things

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of participants who used any aids/devices for doing things. Aids such as walking aid, wheelchair, device or utensil for dress/bathe/eat and any other aids/devices.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  33. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Quit Job Due to Osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage (during 3 months prior to baseline) at baseline, Week 24 and Week 40. Domain evaluated was number of participants who quit job due to OA.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  34. Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Duration Since Quitting Job Due to Osteoarthritis

    Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage (during 3 months prior to baseline) at baseline, Week 24 and Week 40. Domain evaluated was duration since quitting job due to OA.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  35. Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Number of participants who withdrew from treatment due to lack of efficacy have been reported here.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  36. Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was defined as the time interval from the date of first study drug administration up to the date of discontinuation of participant from treatment due to lack of efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  37. Number of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication During Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    In case of inadequate pain relief, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication between day 1 and week 16. Number of participants with any use of rescue medication during the particular study week were summarized.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

  38. Number of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication During Week 24

    In case of inadequate pain relief, after Week 16, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 7 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication and use was reported weekly via diary. Number of participants with any use of rescue medication during the 4 weeks up to the particular study week were summarized.

    Measured: Week 24

  39. Number of Days of Rescue Medication Use at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    In case of inadequate pain relief during the treatment period, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication. Number of days the participants used the rescue medication during the particular study weeks were summarized.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16

  40. Number of Days of Rescue Medication Use at Week 24

    In case of inadequate pain relief, after Week 16, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 7 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication and use was reported weekly via diary. Number of days per week the participants used the rescue medication during the 4 weeks up to the particular study week were summarized.

    Measured: Week 24

  41. Amount of Rescue Medication Taken at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16

    In case of inadequate pain relief , acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in milligrams used during the specified week were summarized.

    Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16

  42. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 40 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 40

  43. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 40 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 40

  44. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities With Regard to Normal Baseline

    Primary Abnormality criteria: hemoglobin; hematocrit; RBC count [less than{<}0.8* lower limit of normal[LLN]; Ery. mean corpuscular volume/ hemoglobin/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN); white blood cell count<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; Lymphocytes,Leukocytes,Neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes >1.2*ULN; Prothrombin time/Intl. normalized ratio >1.1*ULN; total bilirubin>1.5*ULN; aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT,LDH, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; total protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, Cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; Urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN;Hemoglobin A1C >1.3*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN, specific gravity <1.003, >1.030; pH<4.5, >8; Urine Leukocytes >=20.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 40

  45. Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities With Regard to Abnormal Baseline

    Primary Abnormality criteria: hemoglobin; hematocrit; RBC count < 0.8*LLN; Ery. mean corpuscular volume/ hemoglobin/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN); white blood cell count<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; Lymphocytes, Leukocytes, Neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes >1.2*ULN; Prothrombin time/Intl. normalized ratio >1.1*ULN; total bilirubin>1.5*ULN; aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT,LDH, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; total protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, Cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; Urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; Hemoglobin A1C >1.3*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN; Urine erythrocytes >=20.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 40

  46. Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 40

    Measurement of BP included sitting systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP).

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 40

  47. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12,16, 24, 40

    Heart rate was measured at sitting position.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 40

  48. Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Weeks 16 and 40

    A 12-lead ECG was recorded after participants had rested for at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment. All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QTcF, QTcB, QTcF, RR intervals) were collected.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 16, 40

  49. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate (as Assessed by ECG) at Weeks 16 and 40

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 40

  50. Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Joint Safety Outcomes

    Incidence of participants with any of the joint safety adjudication outcomes of primary osteonecrosis, rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (OA) (type 1 and type 2), subchondral insufficiency fracture (or SPONK), or pathological fracture.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 40

  51. Percentage of Participants With Total Joint Replacements

    Percentage of participants who underwent total knee, hip or shoulder joint replacement surgery.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 40

  52. Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8,12,16, 24 and 40

    NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate participant for signs of peripheral neuropathy. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, from both the left and right side, where 24 items scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score indicated higher abnormality/impairment and 13 items scored from 0 (normal), 1 (decreased) and 2 (absent), higher score indicated higher impairment. NIS possible overall score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12,16, 24 and 40

  53. Number of Participants With Confirmed Orthostatic Hypotension

    Orthostatic hypotension was defined as postural change (supine to standing) that met the following criteria: For systolic BP <=150 mmHg (mean supine): Reduction in systolic BP>=20 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP>=10 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. For systolic BP >150 mmHg (mean supine): Reduction in systolic BP>=30 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP>=15 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. If the 1 minute or 3 minute standing BP in a sequence met the orthostatic hypotension criteria, then that sequence was considered positive. If 2 of 2 or 2 of 3 sequences were positive, then orthostatic hypotension was considered confirmed.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 40

  54. Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptom (SAS) Scores at Weeks 24 and 40

    The SAS is a 12 item (11 for females) questionnaire, from which the total number of symptoms (0-12 for males and 0-11 for females) is calculated. Each positive symptom is rated from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a lot). The total impact score was the sum of all symptom rating scores, with 0 assigned where the participant did not have the particular symptom. The range for the total impact score is 0-60 for males and 0-55 for females, higher scores indicating higher impact.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40

  55. Number of Participants With Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies

    Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using a semi quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Participants listed as having anti-tanezumab antibodies had ADA titer level >=3.32. Less than 3.32 was considered below the limit of quantitation.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8,16, 24 and 40

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion5 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion14 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
698 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02697773
Sponsor's protocol ID
A4091056
Other IDs
2013-002222-23, OA TITRATION STUDY
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
11 Feb 2016
Last updated
3 May 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Schnitzer TJ, Conaghan PG, Berenbaum F, Abraham L, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Viktrup L, Yang R, Brown MT. Effect size varies based on calculation method and may affect interpretation of treatment effect: an illustration using randomised clinical trials in osteoarthritis. Adv Rheumatol. 2024 Apr 22;64(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s42358-024-00358-y.

    PubMed 38650049
  • Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Kompel AJ, Diaz LE, Crema MD, Brown MT, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Viktrup L, Fountaine RJ, Burr A, Sherlock SP, West CR. Inter-Reader Consistency and Exclusionary Findings During Radiographic Screening for Phase 3 Trials of Tanezumab in Patients With Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Imaging. 2022 Sep-Dec;2(3-4):100082. doi: 10.1016/j.ostima.2022.100082. Epub 2022 Nov 15.

    PubMed 38343426
  • Ren J, Bushmakin AG, Cislo PR, Abraham L, Cappelleri JC, Dworkin RH, Farrar JT. Meaningful within-patient change for clinical outcome assessments: model-based approach versus cumulative distribution functions. J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Aug;35(5):826-838. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2281575. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

    PubMed 37982583
  • Carrino JA, McAlindon TE, Schnitzer TJ, Guermazi A, Hochberg MC, Conaghan PG, Brown MT, Burr A, Fountaine RJ, Pixton GC, Viktrup L, Verburg KM, West CR. Characterization of adverse joint outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis treated with subcutaneous tanezumab. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 Dec;31(12):1612-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 29.

    PubMed 37652258
  • Shoji S, Suzuki A, Nouri P, Cai CH, Gaitonde P, Marshall S. Prediction of relative change in free nerve growth factor following subcutaneous administration of tanezumab, a novel monoclonal antibody to nerve growth factor. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;12(9):1358-1370. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13015. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

    PubMed 37470295
  • Brown MT, Cornblath DR, Koltzenburg M, Gorson KC, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Gaitonde P, Viktrup L, West CR. Peripheral Nerve Safety of Nerve Growth Factor Inhibition by Tanezumab: Pooled Analyses of Phase III Clinical Studies in Over 5000 Patients with Osteoarthritis. Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Jul;43(7):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01286-3. Epub 2023 Jul 18.

    PubMed 37460782
  • Colloca L, Dworkin RH, Farrar JT, Tive L, Yang J, Viktrup L, Dasic G, West CR, Whalen E, Brown MT, Gilbert SA, Verburg KM. Predicting Treatment Responses in Patients With Osteoarthritis: Results From Two Phase III Tanezumab Randomized Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Apr;113(4):878-886. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2842. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

    PubMed 36621827
  • Hunter DJ, Schnitzer TJ, Hall J, Semel D, Davignon I, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Abraham L. Time to first and sustained improvement in WOMAC domains among patients with osteoarthritis receiving tanezumab. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 Jul 2;4(3):100294. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100294. eCollection 2022 Sep.

    PubMed 36474952
  • Atkinson J, Edwards RA, Bonfanti G, Barroso J, Schnitzer TJ. A Two-Step, Trajectory-Focused, Analytics Approach to Attempt Prediction of Analgesic Response in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis. Adv Ther. 2023 Jan;40(1):252-264. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02336-6. Epub 2022 Oct 27.

    PubMed 36301512
  • Mease P, Kuritzky L, Wright WL, Mallick-Searle T, Fountaine R, Yang R, Sadrarhami M, Faison W, Johnston E, Viktrup L. Efficacy and safety of tanezumab, NSAIDs, and placebo in patients with moderate to severe hip or knee osteoarthritis and a history of depression, anxiety, or insomnia: post-hoc analysis of phase 3 trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1909-1922. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2113689. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

    PubMed 35980115
  • Schnitzer TJ, Bonfanti G, Atkinson J, Donevan S, Viktrup L, Barroso J, Whalen E, Edwards RA. Characterizing 16-Week Responder Profiles Using Group-Based Trajectory Modeling in Over 4300 Clinical Trial Participants Receiving Pharmaceutical Treatment for Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis. Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4742-4756. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02290-3. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

    PubMed 35960482
  • Conaghan PG, Dworkin RH, Schnitzer TJ, Berenbaum F, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Viktrup L, Abraham L. WOMAC Meaningful Within-patient Change: Results From 3 Studies of Tanezumab in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee. J Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;49(6):615-621. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.210543. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

    PubMed 35232805
  • Conaghan PG, Abraham L, Viktrup L, Cislo P. Impact of tanezumab on health status, non-work activities and work productivity in adults with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 1;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05029-x.

    PubMed 35105318
  • Berenbaum F, Schnitzer T, Kivitz A, Viktrup L, Johnston E, Yang R, Whalen E, Tive L, Semel D. Gender, age, disease severity, body mass index and diabetes may not affect response to subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with osteoarthritis after 16 weeks of treatment. A subgroup analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;75(12):e14975. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14975. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

    PubMed 34626502
  • Berenbaum F, Schnitzer TJ, Kivitz AJ, Viktrup L, Hickman A, Pixton G, Brown MT, Davignon I, West CR. General Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Tanezumab for Osteoarthritis: A Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Jun;74(6):918-928. doi: 10.1002/acr.24637. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

    PubMed 33973384

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Tanezumab 2.5 mg and Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Pfizer at 87 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 87 sites in United States, Canada, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02697773, which also lists 17 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in