AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisPhase 2NCT02683785

A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Inflammatory Hand Osteoarthritis

A Phase 2 study testing GSK3196165 in people with Osteoarthritis, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 16 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, Phase IIa, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study with the primary objective to assess the efficacy potential of GSK3196165 on pain, in subjects with active inflammatory hand osteoarthritis (HOA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
GSK3196165
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
44 participants
Where
16 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
17 Mar 2016to 29 Nov 2017
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >=18 years at the time of signing informed consent.
  • Meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification of osteoarthritis (OA) and have not responded to analgesics (level 1 and 2) or to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for at least 10 days in the past 3 months.
  • Active disease at screening and randomization with at least two swollen and tender proximal interphalangeal (PIP) and/or distal interphalangeal (DIP) joints in the affected hand.
  • Signs of inflammation such as synovitis in the MRI scan of the affected hand.
  • Must have a subject's self assessment of 24-hour average hand pain intensity at baseline of at least '5' on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10).
  • Weight >=45 kilogram (kg).
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Male or female subjects are eligible to participate so long as they meet and agree to abide by the contraceptive criteria.
  • Diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) >=70% predicted; forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) >=80% predicted.
  • No evidence of active or latent infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB).

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • History of any clinically significant inflammatory disease other than inflammatory HOA, especially, but not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis or spondylarthropathies.
  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, gout, calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease (CPPD), pseudogout, hemochromatosis or other inflammatory rheumatological or autoimmune disorders.
  • Clinical suspicion of, or previous investigation for CPPD or pseudogout, or history of chondrocalcinosis.
  • Any injury, medical or surgical procedure to the affected joint(s) that may interfere with evaluation of the target HOA joint(s).
  • History of infected joint prosthesis at any time, with the prosthesis still in situ. History of leg ulcers, catheters, chronic sinusitis or recurrent chest or urinary tract infections.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Any surgical procedure, including bone or joint surgery/synovectomy within 12 weeks prior to Day 1 or any planned surgery within the duration of the study or follow-up period.
  • History of any respiratory disease which (in the opinion of the investigator) would compromise subject safety or the ability of the subject to complete the study (e.g. significant interstitial lung disease, such as pulmonary fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), moderate-severe asthma, bronchiectasis, previous pulmonary alveolar proteinosis [PAP]).
  • Clinically-significant or unstable (in the opinion of the investigator) persistent cough or dyspnea that is unexplained.
  • Significant unstable or uncontrolled acute or chronic disease which, in the opinion of the investigator, could confound the results of the study or put the subject at undue risk.
  • A history of malignancy.
  • Hereditary or acquired immunodeficiency disorder, including immunoglobulin deficiency.
  • Current/previous Hepatitis B virus (HBV), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1 or 2 infection.

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 5 countries.

16 sites in 5 countries

Poland4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Bialystok, 15-879

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Nowa Sól, 67-100

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 00-660

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Warsaw, 03-291

Other trials in Poland

United Kingdom4 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Canterbury, Kent, CT1 3NG

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Derby, DE22 3NE

  • GSK Investigational Site

    North Shields, NE298NH

  • GSK Investigational Site

    York, YO31 8HE

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Erlangen, Bavaria, 91054

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Fulda, Hesse, 36043

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rendsburg, Schleswig-Holstein, 24768

Other trials in Germany

Netherlands3 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Enschede, 7511JX

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Rotterdam, 3015 CE

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sneek, 8601 ZK

Other trials in Netherlands

United States2 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Miami, Florida, 33015

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Multi-centre Phase IIa Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK3196165 in Subjects With Inflammatory Hand Osteoarthritis

This is a randomized, Phase IIa, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel group study with the primary objective to assess the efficacy potential of GSK3196165 on pain, in subjects with active inflammatory hand osteoarthritis (HOA).

Approximately 40 subjects will be enrolled into the study, following a screening period of up to 4 weeks. The total treatment period will be 12 weeks, with the follow up period completing at Week 22. At least 40 subjects will be randomized across the two treatment arms, to either placebo or GSK3196165 in a 1:1 ratio.

Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Being tested
GSK3196165, Placebo
Keywords
Pain intensity, Hand Osteoarthritis, GSK3196165, AUSCAN, GM-CSF, Numerical Rating Scale
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GSK3196165Drug

    GSK3196165 will be supplied as a liquid and will be administered as a subcutaneous injection. The drug will be administered weekly for 5 injections, then every other week for 3 further injections.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matching placebo will be administered as above.

Study groups in NCT02683785
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GSK3196165ExperimentalSubjects will receive a total of 8 doses of GSK3196165 over a 12-week treatment period.
Receives: Drug: GSK3196165
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorSubjects will receive a total of 8 doses of placebo over a 12-week treatment period.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in 24-hour Average Hand Pain Intensity, Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Week 6

    Participants were required to complete a daily pain NRS based on their 24-hour average hand pain intensity with the anchors "0" (no pain) and "10" (worst imaginable pain), which was averaged over the 7 days prior to assessment visit. The 7 day average score was calculated as sum of daily 24 hours average hand pain NRS scores in the 7 days prior to assessment visit, divided by number of entries recorded in those 7 days. Baseline visit was at Day 1 and Baseline value was defined as the average of the 7 days prior to baseline visit (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value. Intent-To-Treat Population comprised of all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (GSK3196165 or placebo).

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose) and Week 6

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Change From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each Visit

    Participants were required to complete a daily pain NRS based on their 24-hour average hand pain intensity with the anchors "0" (no pain) and "10" (worst imaginable pain), which was averaged over the 7 days prior to assessment visit. The 7 day average score is calculated by sum of daily 24 hours average hand pain NRS scores in the 7 days prior to assessment visit, divided by number of entries recorded in those 7 days. Baseline visit was at Day 1 and Baseline value was defined as the average of the 7 days prior to baseline visit (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

  2. Change From Baseline of Worst Hand Pain Intensity Over 24 Hours Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Each Visit

    Participants were required to complete a daily pain NRS based on their 24-hour worst hand pain intensity with the anchors "0" (no pain) and "10" (worst imaginable pain), which was averaged over the 7 days prior to assessment visit. The score is calculated as sum of daily 24 hours worst hand pain NRS scores in the 7 days prior to assessment visit, divided by number of entries recorded in those 7 days. Baseline visit was at Day 1 and Baseline value was defined as the average of the 7 days prior to baseline visit (Day 1 pre-dose). Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving a 30 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity at Each Visit

    Participants were required to complete average pain NRS daily and rate the average hand pain over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants who achieved at least 30 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours average hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is reported.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Average Hand Pain Intensity at Each Visit

    Participants were required to complete average pain NRS daily and rate the average hand pain over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants who achieved at least 50 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours average hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving a 30 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Worst Hand Pain Intensity at Each Visit

    Participants were required to complete worst pain NRS daily and rate the hand pain at its worst over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants achieving at least 30 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours worst hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving a 50 Percentage Reduction From Baseline in 24 Hours Worst Hand Pain Intensity at Each Visit

    Participants were required to complete worst pain NRS daily and rate the hand pain at its worst over last 24 hours on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The percentage of participants achieving at least 50 percentage reduction from Baseline in the 24-hours worst hand pain intensity as measured by daily NRS and averaged over 7 days prior to each visit is presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Pre-dose, Day 1), Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and follow up (Week 22)

  7. Change From Baseline in Australian Canadian Hand Osteoarthritis Index (AUSCAN) 3.1 NRS Scores at Each Visit.

    The AUSCAN Index is a self-administered questionnaire consisting of a 15-item scale which measures pain (5 items), stiffness (1 item) and degree of disability/physical function (9 items) during the preceding 48 hours. All items are rated on NRS scale with anchors "0" (none) to "10" (extreme). The scores for the pain and physical function components were calculated as simple summation of the item scores relating to that domain, so the Pain component ranges from 0 (i.e. all pain item scores are scored 0 [none]) to 50 (i.e. all pain item scores are scored 10 [extreme]), and the Physical Function component ranges from 0 (i.e. all physical function item scores are scored 0 [none]) to 90 (i.e. all physical function item scores are scored 10 [extreme]). The total AUSCAN score was calculated as simple summation of the 15 item scores and therefore ranges from 0 to 150. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  8. Change From Baseline in Number of Soft Tissue Swollen Hand Joints at Each Visit

    Swollen Hand Joint Count was measured by the total number of soft tissue swollen hand joints out of a possible 30 joints: 8 distal interphalangeal, 8 proximal interphalangeal, 2 interphalangeal joints, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, 2 carpometacarpal joint across both hands. In case of missing observations for soft tissue swollen hand joints then the remaining observations were assessed and weighted by dividing the number presented by the number of non-missing, and by multiplying by 30 for the joint count. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  9. Change From Baseline in Number of Tender Hand Joints at Each Visit

    Tender Hand Joint Count was measured by the total number of tender joints out of a possible 30 joints: 8 distal interphalangeal, 8 proximal interphalangeal, 2 interphalangeal joints, 10 metacarpophalangeal joints, 2 carpometacarpal joints across both hands. A joint was considered tender if it was scored >0 on the tender joint severity scale. Joints were rated 0=no pain/tenderness, 1=mild pain, 2=moderate pain and 3=severe pain. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12

  10. Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) of Disease Activity

    Physicians were required to complete the global assessment of disease activity using single PhGA item with a NRS ranging from 0 (none) to 10 (extremely active). Baseline was defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose), Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  11. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity

    Participants were required to complete the global assessment of disease activity using single PtGA item with an NRS ranging from 0 (very well) to 10 (very poor). Baseline was defined as Day 1 pre-dose value. Change from Baseline is equal to post-dose visit value minus Baseline value.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12

  12. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment or events associated with liver injury and impaired liver function were categorized as SAE. All participants who received at least one dose of study treatment (GSK3196165 or placebo) were included in Safety Population.

    Measured: Up to Week 22

  13. Number of Participants With Infections

    Adverse events of special interest (AESI) included serious infections like serious respiratory infections and tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections. Number of participants with infections has been reported.

    Measured: Up to Week 22

  14. Number of Participants With Pulmonary Events

    Pulmonary events like pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP), persistent (for 3 consecutive weeks) reduction in diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) > 15 percentage, persistent (for 3 consecutive weeks) cough and/or dyspnea and non- life threatening pulmonary changes related to surfactant accumulation is presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 22

  15. Number of Participants With Anti-GSK3196165 Binding Antibodies

    Serum samples were collected at indicated time points for anti-drug antibody (ADA) measurements. Anti-GSK3196165 binding antibody detection assay using tiered testing schema: screening, confirmation and titration steps was used for immunogenicity analysis. Samples taken after dosing with GSK3196165 that have a value at or above the cut-point were considered treatment-emergent ADA-positive. The number of participants with change from Baseline to any time post Baseline in the results of immunogenicity assessment as indicated by: negative to positive, positive to positive, positive to negative and negative to negative are presented.

    Measured: Up to Week 22

  16. Apparent Clearance After Subcutaneous Administration (CL/F) of GSK3196165

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points and CL/F was estimated using population PK analysis. Participants in the 'Safety' population who have at least one valid PK assessment were included Pharmacokinetic (PK) Population.

    Measured: Day 3 and Pre-dose on Week 1, Week 4, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 22

  17. Apparent Steady State Volume of Distribution After Subcutaneous Administration (Vss/F) of GSK3196165

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points and Vss/F was estimated using population PK analysis.

    Measured: Day 3 and Pre-dose on Week 1, Week 4, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 22

  18. Absoption Rate Constant (Ka) of GSK3196165

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points and Ka was estimated using population PK analysis.

    Measured: Day 3 and Pre-dose on Week 1, Week 4, Week 6, Week 12 and Week 22

  19. Serum Concentration of GSK3196165 by Visit

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for pharmacokinetic analysis.

    Measured: Pre-dose on Day 3, Weeks 1, 4, 6, 12, follow up (Week 22)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start17 Mar 2016
  3. Primary completion29 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion29 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02683785
Sponsor's protocol ID
204851
Other IDs
2015-003089-96, 2015
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
21 Jan 2016
Last updated
11 Jan 2021
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD for this study is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

Publications

  • Georg Schett, Chris Bainbridge, Mario Berkowitz, Katherine Davy, Sofia Fernandes, Eduard Griep, Stephen Harrison, James Lloyd-Hughes, Alexandra Morgan-Roberts, Mark Layton, Nonna Anna Nowak, Jatin Patel, Jürgen Rech, Sarah Watts, Paul P. Tak. A Phase IIa, randomised study of the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical activity of the anti-GM-CSF antibody GSK3196165 in patients with hand osteoarthritis. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020; DOI: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30171-5

  • Schett G, Bainbridge C, Berkowitz M, Davy K, Fernandes S, Griep E, Harrison S, Gupta A, Lloyd-Hughes J, Roberts A, Layton M, Nowak NA, Patel J, Rech J, Smith JE, Watts S, Tak PP. Anti-granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor antibody otilimab in patients with hand osteoarthritis: a phase 2a randomised trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;2(10):e623-e632. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30171-5. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

    PubMed 38273625

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing GSK3196165 in people with Osteoarthritis, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 16 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in Poland, United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Dec 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in 24-hour Average Hand Pain Intensity, Averaged Over the 7 Days Prior to Week 6 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1 Pre-dose) and Week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02683785, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jan 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in