Osteoarthritis of the Knee or HipPhase 3FACT LTS & OANCT02683239
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study of Fasinumab in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee or Hip
A Phase 3 study testing Fasinumab in people with Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 149 sites in 21 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to describe the safety and tolerability of fasinumab, including adverse events of special interest (AESIs), in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed OA of the knee or hip. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
- What is being tested?
- Fasinumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 5,331 participants
- Where
- 149 sitesin 21 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Feb 2016to 15 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female ≥18 years of age at the screening visit
- Clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2) for the index joint at the screening visit
- Moderate to severe pain in the index joint defined as a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) average pain subscale score of ≥4
- A history of 12 weeks of analgesic use for OA of the knee or hip
- History of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain
Who cannot join
- History or presence at the screening visit of non OA inflammatory joint disease
- History or presence on imaging of arthropathy, stress fracture, recent stress fracture, neuropathic joint arthropathy, hip dislocation, knee dislocation, congenital hip dysplasia with degenerative joint disease, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of bone fragmentation or collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fracture during the screening period
- Signs or symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome within 6 months of screening
- Patient is not a candidate for MRI
- Is scheduled for a joint replacement surgery to be performed during the study period
- Systemic (i.e., oral or intramuscular) corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the screening visit.
Show all 11Show fewer
- History or presence at the screening visit of multiple sclerosis, autonomic neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, or other peripheral neuropathy, including reflex sympathetic dystrophy
- History or diagnosis of chronic autonomic failure syndrome including pure autonomic failure, multiple system atrophy
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Women of childbearing potential who have a positive pregnancy test result or do not have their pregnancy test result at baseline
- Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria apply
Trial locations and contacts
149 sites in 21 countries.
149 sites in 21 countries
United States50 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Akron, Ohio, 44311
Regeneron Investigational Site
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Regeneron Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Regeneron Investigational Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80014
Regeneron Investigational Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Regeneron Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35211
Regeneron Investigational Site
Carlsbad, California, 92008
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Regeneron Investigational Site (3 locations)
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Regeneron Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Regeneron Investigational Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Regeneron Investigational Site
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Regeneron Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43212
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Dallas, Texas, 75234
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Dallas, Texas, 75234
Regeneron Investigational Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Regeneron Investigational Site
Elkhorn, Nebraska, 68022
Regeneron Investigational Site
Evansville, Illinois, 47714
Regeneron Investigational Site
Frederick, Maryland, 21702
Regeneron Investigational Site
Fremont, Nebraska, 68025
Regeneron Investigational Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85308
Regeneron Investigational Site
Golden, Colorado, 80401
Regeneron Investigational Site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Regeneron Investigational Site
High Point, North Carolina, 27262
Regeneron Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77008
Regeneron Investigational Site
Jamaica, New York, 11432
Regeneron Investigational Site
Kansas City, Kansas, 64114
Regeneron Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
Regeneron Investigational Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Regeneron Investigational Site
Littleton, Colorado, 80127
Regeneron Investigational Site
Lubbock, Texas, 79424
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mesa, Arizona, 85213
Regeneron Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10036
Regeneron Investigational Site
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73119
Regeneron Investigational Site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68144
Regeneron Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32801
Regeneron Investigational Site (4 locations)
Phoenix, Arizona, 85018
Regeneron Investigational Site
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33781
Regeneron Investigational Site
Plano, Texas, 75093
Regeneron Investigational Site
Richfield, Minnesota, 55423
Regeneron Investigational Site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Regeneron Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103
Regeneron Investigational Site
San Marcos, California, 92078
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Regeneron Investigational Site
Tempe, Arizona, 85224
Regeneron Investigational Site (2 locations)
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Regeneron Investigational Site
Vista, California, 92083
Regeneron Investigational Site
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605
Mexico11 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City, 06100
Regeneron Investigational Site
Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City, 06700
Regeneron Investigational Site
Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62290
Regeneron Investigational Site
Culiacán, Sinaloa, 80000
Regeneron Investigational Site
Distrito Federal, Mexico City, 03100
Regeneron Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160
Regeneron Investigational Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44660
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mérida, Yucatán, 97000
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mérida, Yucatán, C.P. 97070
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mexicali, Baja Californina, 21100
Regeneron Investigational Site
Mexico City, Mexico City, 11850
South Africa11 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Bloemfontein, 9301
Regeneron Investigational Site
Cape Town, 7530
Regeneron Investigational Site
Kempton Park, 1619
Regeneron Investigational Site
Parow, 7500
Regeneron Investigational Site
Port Elizabeth, 6001
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0184
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Pretoria, Gauteng, 0184
Regeneron Investigational Site
Pretoria, 0122
Regeneron Investigational Site
Roodepoort, 1724
Regeneron Investigational Site
Somerset West, 7130
Regeneron Investigational Site
Soweto, 1818
United Kingdom10 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Birmingham, B15 2SQ
Regeneron Investigational Site
Chorley, PR7 7NA
Regeneron Investigational Site
Glasgow, G20 0SP
Regeneron Investigational Site
Hexham, NE46 1QJ
Regeneron Investigational Site
Liverpool, L22 0LG
Regeneron Investigational Site
Manchester, M15 6SE
Regeneron Investigational Site
Middlesex, HA6 2RN
Regeneron Investigational Site
Reading, RG2 0TG
Regeneron Investigational Site
Romford, RM1 3PJ
Regeneron Investigational Site
Sidcup, DA14 6LT
Poland9 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Gdansk, 80-382
Regeneron Investigational Site
Gdynia, 81-537
Regeneron Investigational Site
Katowice, 40-040
Regeneron Investigational Site
Krakow, 31-501
Regeneron Investigational Site
Lodz, 90-368
Regeneron Investigational Site
Poznan, 60-702
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Warsaw, 01-192
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Warsaw, 01-192
Regeneron Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 50-381
Sweden8 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Borås, 50630
Regeneron Investigational Site
Gothenburg, 413 45
Regeneron Investigational Site
Helsingborg, 25220
Regeneron Investigational Site
Linköping, 587 58
Regeneron Investigational Site
Lund, 222 22
Regeneron Investigational Site
Malmö, Skåne County, 211 52
Regeneron Investigational Site
Uppsala, 75237
Regeneron Investigational Site
Vällingby, 16268
Bulgaria7 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Burgas, 8000
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Plovdiv, 4000
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Plovdiv, 4002
Regeneron Investigational Site #3
Plovdiv, 4004
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Sofia, 1000
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Sofia, 1612
Regeneron Investigational Site
Stara Zagora, 6000
Russia6 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Kazan', 420012
Regeneron Investigational Site
Novosibirsk, 630091
Regeneron Investigational Site
Samara, 443095
Regeneron Investigational Site
Tomsk, 634050
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Yaroslavl, 150003
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Yaroslavl, 150007
Germany5 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Berlin, 1267
Regeneron Investigational Sites
Bochum, 44787
Regeneron Investigational Site
Frankfurt, 60313
Regeneron Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103
Regeneron Investigational Site
Magdeburg, 39120
Hungary5 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Budapest, 1036
Regeneron Investigational Site
Debrecen, 4025
Regeneron Investigational Site
Gyula, 5700
Regeneron Investigational Site
Hatvan, 3000
Regeneron Investigational Site
Zalaegerszeg, 8900
Ukraine5 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Cherkasy, 18009
Regeneron Investigational Site #3
Kyiv, 02002
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Kyiv, 03037
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Kyiv, 03049
Regeneron Investigational Site
Lviv, 79495
Lithuania4 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Alytus, LT-62114
Regeneron Investigational Site
Kaunas, 48259
Regeneron Investigational Site
Šiauliai, LT-76231
Regeneron Investigational Site
Vilnius, 10323
Spain4 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
A Coruña, 15006
Regeneron Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08025
Regeneron Investigational Site
Madrid, 28100
Regeneron Investigational Site
Seville, 41010
Denmark3 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Aalborg, 9000
Regeneron Investigational Site
Ballerup Municipality, 2750
Regeneron Investigational Site
Vejle, DK 7100
Colombia2 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Bogotá, 110221
Regeneron Investigational Site
Medellín, 50003
Estonia2 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Paide, 72713
Regeneron Investigational Site
Tallinn, 10128
Italy2 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site
Florence, 50139
Regeneron Investigational Site
Naples, 80138
Romania2 sites
Regeneron Investigational Site #2
Bucharest, 021611
Regeneron Investigational Site #1
Bucharest, 30463
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and the Efficacy of Fasinumab in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
The primary objective of the study is to describe the safety and tolerability of fasinumab, including adverse events of special interest (AESIs), in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed OA of the knee or hip.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
- Being tested
- Fasinumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FasinumabDrug
Also called REGN475
Participants will receive sub-cutaneous (SC) injections of fasinumab
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive sub-cutaneous (SC) injections of matching placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fasinumab dosing regimen 1 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Fasinumab |
| Fasinumab dosing regimen 2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Fasinumab |
| Placebo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Measured: Baseline up to week 52
Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE
Measured: Baseline up to week 52
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72
Measured: Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72
Measured: Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)
Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
Measured: Baseline up to week 52 and week 72
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.
Measured: Baseline up to week 52 and week 72
Number of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation
Any participant with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an adverse event of special interest (AESI).
Measured: Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction
Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
Measured: Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery
All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause at weeks 52 and 72. An end of study phone contact was also conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug.
Measured: Baseline up to weeks 52, 72, and end of study (52 weeks post last dose)
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Measured: Baseline to week 52
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the post-treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Measured: End of treatment up to week 72
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72
Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses \& titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than (<) 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, greater than or equal to (≥) 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the fasinumab ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
Measured: Baseline up to week 72
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis
The PGA of OA is a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very good; 2 = good; 3 = fair; 4 = poor; and 5 = very poor).
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Number of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations. Participants who achieved a response, where response was defined as an improvement by ≥30% in WOMAC pain subscale score
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start17 Feb 2016
- Primary completion1 Dec 2020
- Study completion15 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis of the Knee or HipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 5,331 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02683239
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R475-PN-1523
- Other IDs
- 2015-003783-36, 2015
- Acronym
- FACT LTS & OA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2016
- Last updated
- 13 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
DiMartino SJ, Cicirello H, Magyar A, Eng S, Ho T, Manvelian G, Patel Y, Pervin K, Trinh N, Fetell M, Braunstein N, Geba GP, Dakin P. A phase III, randomised, double-blind, multi-dose, placebo- and naproxen-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fasinumab in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. RMD Open. 2026 Jan 16;12(1):e006436. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006436.
PubMed 41545313DiMartino SJ, Gao H, Neogi T, Fuerst T, Zaim S, Eng S, Ho T, Manvelian G, Braunstein N, Geba GP, Dakin P. Prevalence of preexisting articular bone pathology in patients with osteoarthritis screened for fasinumab clinical trials identified by X-ray or magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2024 Dec;32(12):1601-1609. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
PubMed 39004211
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety and the Efficacy of Fasinumab in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02683239
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FACT LTS & OA / R475-PN-1523
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5,331 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
- Study start
- 17 Feb 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 13 Oct 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to describe the safety and tolerability of fasinumab, including adverse events of special interest (AESIs), in patients with pain due to radiographically-confirmed OA of the knee or hip.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fasinumab dosing regimen 1 | Experimental | Drug: Fasinumab |
| Fasinumab dosing regimen 2 | Experimental | Drug: Fasinumab |
| Placebo | Experimental | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Male or female ≥18 years of age at the screening visit
- Clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2) for the index joint at the screening visit
- Moderate to severe pain in the index joint defined as a Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) average pain subscale score of ≥4
- A history of 12 weeks of analgesic use for OA of the knee or hip
- History of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History or presence at the screening visit of non OA inflammatory joint disease
- History or presence on imaging of arthropathy, stress fracture, recent stress fracture, neuropathic joint arthropathy, hip dislocation, knee dislocation, congenital hip dysplasia with degenerative joint disease, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of bone fragmentation or collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fracture during the screening period
- Signs or symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome within 6 months of screening
- Patient is not a candidate for MRI
- Is scheduled for a joint replacement surgery to be performed during the study period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FasinumabAlso: REGN475Participants will receive sub-cutaneous (SC) injections of fasinumab | Drug | Fasinumab dosing regimen 1, Fasinumab dosing regimen 2 |
| PlaceboParticipants will receive sub-cutaneous (SC) injections of matching placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
Time frame: Baseline up to week 52
Number of Participants With Any Serious TEAE
Time frame: Baseline up to week 52
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) up to Week 72
Time frame: Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With Any Serious AE up to Week 72
Time frame: Baseline up to week 72
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA)
Time frame: Baseline up to week 52 and week 72
Adjudicated arthropathy (AA) is a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive OA type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
Time frame: Baseline up to week 52 and week 72
DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.
Number of Participants With at Least One Peripheral Sensory Event That Required a Neurology Consultation
Time frame: Baseline up to week 72
Any participant with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an adverse event of special interest (AESI).
Number of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction
Time frame: Baseline up to week 72
Potential events of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
Number of Participants With at Least One All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery
Time frame: Baseline up to weeks 52, 72, and end of study (52 weeks post last dose)
All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause at weeks 52 and 72. An end of study phone contact was also conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values up to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline to week 52
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Abnormal Laboratory Values Post-Treatment up to Week 72
Time frame: End of treatment up to week 72
Number of participants with potentially clinically significant abnormal values in hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis during the post-treatment period were reported. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) up to Week 72
Time frame: Baseline up to week 72
Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses \& titers. Responses categories: Negative - ADA negative response at all time points, regardless of missing samples; Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses less than (<) 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, greater than or equal to (≥) 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response in the fasinumab ADA assay post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
The WOMAC index is comprised of 24 parameters grouped in 3 subscales (pain-5 questions, physical function -17 questions and stiffness - 2 questions), with 0-10 grading of each question. The scores for each subscale are summed up, divided by number of questions, and each subscale is reported using Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. In addition to subscales, a total score is provided as the sum of normalized subscale scores divided by three, and reported using a Numerical Rating Scale score of 0-10. Higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations.
2 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Number of Participants With ≥30% Reduction From Baseline to Week 16 in the WOMAC Pain Subscale Score
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Oct 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41545313DiMartino SJ, Cicirello H, Magyar A, Eng S, Ho T, Manvelian G, Patel Y, Pervin K, Trinh N, Fetell M, Braunstein N, Geba GP, Dakin P. A phase III, randomised, double-blind, multi-dose, placebo- and naproxen-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fasinumab in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. RMD Open. 2026 Jan 16;12(1):e006436. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2025-006436.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39004211DiMartino SJ, Gao H, Neogi T, Fuerst T, Zaim S, Eng S, Ho T, Manvelian G, Braunstein N, Geba GP, Dakin P. Prevalence of preexisting articular bone pathology in patients with osteoarthritis screened for fasinumab clinical trials identified by X-ray or magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2024 Dec;32(12):1601-1609. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Telerehabilitation and Usual Rehabilitation After Knee or Hip Surgery
Orthopedic Surgery, Rehabilitation
Active, not recruiting
Conversations in Health Literacy Using AI Technology for Osteoarthritis Patients
Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
Recruiting
Evaluation of Choose to Move Replacement Ready (CTM-RR)
Osteoarthritis (OA), Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Test-Retest Reliability of a Submaximal Exercise Test in Patients With Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of a Prehabilitation Program for Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Surgery.
Prehabilitation, Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
149 sites in 21 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Fasinumab in people with Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 149 sites in 21 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 149 sites in United States, Mexico, South Africa, United Kingdom, Poland and 16 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Oct 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Any Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) (time frame: Baseline up to week 52). The study lists 14 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02683239, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Oct 2023.