OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT02674386
Long-term Observational Study of Subjects From Tanezumab Studies Who Undergo a Total Knee, Hip or Shoulder Replacement
A Phase 3 study testing Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 79 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
A4091064 is a multicenter, long-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies (regardless of treatment group) who undergo a total knee, hip or shoulder replacement during participation in the study. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 154 participants
- Where
- 79 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Aug 2016to 15 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Personally signed and dated informed consent document.
- Randomized and treated with subcutaneous investigational product in a tanezumab study and has completed the study or been withdrawn from the study.
- Actual or planned total knee, hip or shoulder replacement surgery during the tanezumab study.
- Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures.
Who cannot join
- None.
Trial locations and contacts
79 sites in 15 countries.
79 sites in 15 countries
United States51 sites
Advanced Research Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, 92805
JEM Research Institute
Atlantis, Florida, 33462
Masters of Clinical Research, Inc.
Augusta, Georgia, 30909
Great Lakes Research Group, Incorporated
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
Northwest Clinical Research Center
Bellevue, Washington, 98007
Central Alabama Research
Birmingham, Alabama, 35209
Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, LLC
Birmingham, Alabama, 35235
Alabama Orthopaedic Surgeons
Birmingham, Alabama, 35235
Cahaba Research Inc.
Birmingham, Alabama, 35242
Injury Care Research
Boise, Idaho, 83713
Orthopedic Research Institute
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
Hope Clinical Research
Canoga Park, California, 91303
Chicago Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Orthopaedic Associates of West Florida
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Remington-Davis, Incorporated
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Optimed Research LTD
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
Spectrum Medical, Inc.
Danville, Virginia, 24541
Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49525
Drug Trials America
Hartsdale, New York, 10530
Abigail R. Neiman, MD, PA
Houston, Texas, 77024
Advances In Health
Houston, Texas, 77030
Mercury Clinical Research, Inc.
Houston, Texas, 77036
BI Research Center
Houston, Texas, 77084
Marvel Clinical Research, LLC
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516
Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
Clintex Research Group
Miami, Florida, 33135
Best Clinical Trials, LLC
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
George Stanley Walker, MD
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Renstar Medical Research
Ocala, Florida, 34470
American Family Medical
Ocala, Florida, 34471
Sunshine Research Center
Opa-locka, Florida, 33054
Advances in Medicine
Palm Desert, California, 92260
Founders Research Corporation
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114
ClinRx Research
Richardson, Texas, 75080
Clinical Trials Research
Sacramento, California, 95821
DCT - Stone Oak, LLC dba Discovery Clinical Trials
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
California Research Foundation
San Diego, California, 92123
CITrials
Santa Ana, California, 92705
Gulfcoast Research Institute, LLC
Sarasota, Florida, 34232-6028
Kennedy White Orthopaedic Center
Sarasota, Florida, 34232
Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Stedman Clinical Trials
Tampa, Florida, 33613
AC Clinical Research
Tiffin, Ohio, 44883
Noble Clinical Research
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Mercury Clinical Research
Webster, Texas, 77598
Professional Research Network of Kansas, LLC
Wichita, Kansas, 67205-1138
North Georgia Clinical Research
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
North Georgia Internal Medicine
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
Japan5 sites
Omuro Orthopedic Clinic
Himeji, Hyōgo, 670-0976
National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center
Kawachi-Nagano, Osaka, 586-8521
Marunouchi Hospital
Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8601
Nakajo Orthopedic Clinic
Sendai, Miyagi, 983-0862
Osaka University Hospital
Suita, Osaka, 565-0871
Canada4 sites
Dawson Road Medical Centre
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 1B1
Rebecca Medical Associates
Oakville, Ontario, L6K 1J6
Recherche Clinique Sigma inc
Québec, Quebec, G1G 3Y8
Centre de recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
New Zealand4 sites
South Pacific Clinical Trials
Auckland, 0610
Star Unit, North Shore Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board
Auckland, 0622
Southern Clinical Trials- Waitemata Ltd
Auckland, 0626
Clinical Horizons NZ Ltd
Tauranga, 3112
Sweden3 sites
Ladulaas Kliniska Studier
Boras, Sweden, SE-506 30
ProbarE I Lund AB
Lund, 222 22
ProbarE i Stockholm AB
Stockholm, 111 37
Slovakia2 sites
Kompan, s.r.o.
Dolný Kubín, 02601
Slovak Research Center Team Member, MUDr. Viliam Cibik, PhD, s.r.o.
Pruské, 018 52
Spain2 sites
Instituto de Ciencias Medicas
Alicante, 03004
Hospital del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Australia1 site
CMAX Clinical Research Pty Ltd
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Hungary1 site
Tolna Megyei Balassa Janos Korhaz, Ortopediai Osztaly
Szekszárd, 7100
Italy1 site
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria E Policlinico Umberto I
Rome, 00161
Portugal1 site
Hospital Conde de Bertiandos
Ponte de Lima, Viana do Castelo District, 4990-041
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, LONG-TERM OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF SUBJECTS FROM TANEZUMAB STUDIES WHO UNDERGO A TOTAL KNEE, HIP OR SHOULDER REPLACEMENT
A4091064 is a multicenter, long-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies (regardless of treatment group) who undergo a total knee, hip or shoulder replacement during participation in the study. The study is designed with a total duration of subject follow-up of 24 weeks after the total joint replacement surgery. There will be two methods of data collection utilized in this study: interview by site staff via the telephone and interactive web-response system (or paper if the subject has no access to the internet).
Read the detailed description
A4091064 is a long-term observational follow up study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies A4091056, A4091057 or A4091058.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent studyDrug
IMP as administered in parent study. IMP would have been either placebo, tanezumab, celecoxib, naproxen or diclofenac administered in parent study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Other | long-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab parent study Receives: Drug: Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Surgeon's Assessment of Procedural Difficulty
Following the TJR surgery on Day 1, the orthopedic surgeon was asked to answer the following question: "taking into consideration the participant's medical history and physical condition prior to surgery would you classify the operative procedure as Uneventful, Minor complications or Major complications." Participants were reported based on these categories for knee, hip and shoulder joint. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Day 1
Number of Participants With Overall Satisfaction With Surgery as Assessed by the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) Scale at Week 24
SAPS contained four questions; How satisfied are you with the 1) results of your surgery 2) results of surgery for improving pain 3) results of surgery for improving ability to do home or yard work, and 4) results of surgery for improving your ability to do recreational activities. Items scored on a 4-point Likert scale with response of 'very satisfied' (100 points), 'somewhat satisfied' (75 points), 'somewhat dissatisfied' (50 points), and 'very dissatisfied' (25 points). The scale score calculated as mean of the scores of individual items, ranging from 25 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Here, number of participants are summarized as, satisfied (very satisfied and somewhat satisfied categories combined) and dissatisfied (somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied categories combined). Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With Post-Surgical Complications Upto Week 24
Post-surgical complications are adverse events occurring after TJR surgery that were considered clinically significant as assessed by investigator and attributable to the total joint replacement procedure. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Additional or Corrective Procedures Related to Total Joint Replacement Upto Week 24
Participants were asked whether they had been told by their orthopedic surgeon that additional or corrective procedures were necessary for their total joint replacement. Participants, who responded as yes have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Number of Participants Who Participated in Physical Rehabilitation Activities Related to Total Joint Replacement Upto Week 24
Participants responded with a yes or no to the following question ''are you participating in physical rehabilitation activities related to your replaced joint''. Participants responded with a yes, have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in to be Replaced or Replaced Joints at Week 24
Participants assessed their average pain in to be replaced (pre-surgery) knee/ hip joint or in the replaced joint (post-surgery) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA of to be replaced/replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions. Scores for each question and WOMAC Pain subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the replaced/to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC stiffness subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in replaced/ to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, which may not be a whole (integer) number, scored on a NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC physical function subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Score at Week 24
SPADI: self-administered questionnaire to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder pathology in participants with shoulder pain. It consists of two dimensions pain and function. Pain dimension:5 questions regarding severity of pain, scores ranged from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable, higher scores indicated extreme pain. Functional activities:8 questions to measure degree of difficulty with various activities of daily living that require upper extremity use, scores ranged from 0=no difficulty to 10=so difficult it requires help, higher scores=extreme difficulty. Pain and disability dimension score was calculated as the sum of non-missing scores divided by the maximum possible score (50 [for pain] and 80 [for disability]) multiplied by 100. A total score was calculated as the mean of two dimensions, ranged from 0=best to 100=worst, higher scores indicated worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Number of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medications
Measured: Baseline up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study start23 Aug 2016
- Primary completion15 Jul 2019
- Study completion15 Jul 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02674386
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A4091064
- Other IDs
- 2013-002549-12, TJR FOLLOW-UP
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 30 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Mont MA, Carrino JA, Nemeth MA, Burr A, Yamabe T, Viktrup L, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Postoperative Outcome of Patients Who Underwent Total Joint Replacement During the Tanezumab Phase 3 Osteoarthritis Development Program: A 24-Week Observational Study. Surg Technol Int. 2021 May 20;38:467-477. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.OS1439.
PubMed 34043229
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, LONG-TERM OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF SUBJECTS FROM TANEZUMAB STUDIES WHO UNDERGO A TOTAL KNEE, HIP OR SHOULDER REPLACEMENT
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02674386
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A4091064
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 154 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Study start
- 23 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Jul 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A4091064 is a multicenter, long-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies (regardless of treatment group) who undergo a total knee, hip or shoulder replacement during participation in the study. The study is designed with a total duration of subject follow-up of 24 weeks after the total joint replacement surgery. There will be two methods of data collection utilized in this study: interview by site staff via the telephone and interactive web-response system (or paper if the subject has no access to the internet).
Detailed description
A4091064 is a long-term observational follow up study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies A4091056, A4091057 or A4091058.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Other | Drug: Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent studylong-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab parent study |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Personally signed and dated informed consent document.
- Randomized and treated with subcutaneous investigational product in a tanezumab study and has completed the study or been withdrawn from the study.
- Actual or planned total knee, hip or shoulder replacement surgery during the tanezumab study.
- Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent studyIMP as administered in parent study. IMP would have been either placebo, tanezumab, celecoxib, naproxen or diclofenac administered in parent study. | Drug | Cohort 1 |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Surgeon's Assessment of Procedural Difficulty
Time frame: Day 1
Following the TJR surgery on Day 1, the orthopedic surgeon was asked to answer the following question: "taking into consideration the participant's medical history and physical condition prior to surgery would you classify the operative procedure as Uneventful, Minor complications or Major complications." Participants were reported based on these categories for knee, hip and shoulder joint. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Number of Participants With Overall Satisfaction With Surgery as Assessed by the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) Scale at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
SAPS contained four questions; How satisfied are you with the 1) results of your surgery 2) results of surgery for improving pain 3) results of surgery for improving ability to do home or yard work, and 4) results of surgery for improving your ability to do recreational activities. Items scored on a 4-point Likert scale with response of 'very satisfied' (100 points), 'somewhat satisfied' (75 points), 'somewhat dissatisfied' (50 points), and 'very dissatisfied' (25 points). The scale score calculated as mean of the scores of individual items, ranging from 25 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Here, number of participants are summarized as, satisfied (very satisfied and somewhat satisfied categories combined) and dissatisfied (somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied categories combined). Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Number of Participants With Post-Surgical Complications Upto Week 24
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Post-surgical complications are adverse events occurring after TJR surgery that were considered clinically significant as assessed by investigator and attributable to the total joint replacement procedure. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Number of Participants With Additional or Corrective Procedures Related to Total Joint Replacement Upto Week 24
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants were asked whether they had been told by their orthopedic surgeon that additional or corrective procedures were necessary for their total joint replacement. Participants, who responded as yes have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Number of Participants Who Participated in Physical Rehabilitation Activities Related to Total Joint Replacement Upto Week 24
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Participants responded with a yes or no to the following question ''are you participating in physical rehabilitation activities related to your replaced joint''. Participants responded with a yes, have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in to be Replaced or Replaced Joints at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Participants assessed their average pain in to be replaced (pre-surgery) knee/ hip joint or in the replaced joint (post-surgery) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA of to be replaced/replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions. Scores for each question and WOMAC Pain subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the replaced/to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC stiffness subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in replaced/ to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, which may not be a whole (integer) number, scored on a NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC physical function subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.
Change From Baseline in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
SPADI: self-administered questionnaire to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder pathology in participants with shoulder pain. It consists of two dimensions pain and function. Pain dimension:5 questions regarding severity of pain, scores ranged from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable, higher scores indicated extreme pain. Functional activities:8 questions to measure degree of difficulty with various activities of daily living that require upper extremity use, scores ranged from 0=no difficulty to 10=so difficult it requires help, higher scores=extreme difficulty. Pain and disability dimension score was calculated as the sum of non-missing scores divided by the maximum possible score (50 [for pain] and 80 [for disability]) multiplied by 100. A total score was calculated as the mean of two dimensions, ranged from 0=best to 100=worst, higher scores indicated worsening of condition.
Number of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medications
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jul 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34043229Mont MA, Carrino JA, Nemeth MA, Burr A, Yamabe T, Viktrup L, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Postoperative Outcome of Patients Who Underwent Total Joint Replacement During the Tanezumab Phase 3 Osteoarthritis Development Program: A 24-Week Observational Study. Surg Technol Int. 2021 May 20;38:467-477. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.OS1439.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Active, not recruiting
Effectiveness of Therapeutic Exercises on Spinopelvic Mobility
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
79 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 79 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 79 sites in United States, Japan, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Surgeon's Assessment of Procedural Difficulty (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02674386, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2020.