AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT02674386

Long-term Observational Study of Subjects From Tanezumab Studies Who Undergo a Total Knee, Hip or Shoulder Replacement

A Phase 3 study testing Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 79 sites in 15 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A4091064 is a multicenter, long-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies (regardless of treatment group) who undergo a total knee, hip or shoulder replacement during participation in the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
154 participants
Where
79 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
23 Aug 2016to 15 Jul 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Personally signed and dated informed consent document.
  • Randomized and treated with subcutaneous investigational product in a tanezumab study and has completed the study or been withdrawn from the study.
  • Actual or planned total knee, hip or shoulder replacement surgery during the tanezumab study.
  • Willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures.

Who cannot join

  • None.

Trial locations and contacts

79 sites in 15 countries.

79 sites in 15 countries

United States51 sites
  • Advanced Research Center, Inc.

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • JEM Research Institute

    Atlantis, Florida, 33462

  • Masters of Clinical Research, Inc.

    Augusta, Georgia, 30909

  • Great Lakes Research Group, Incorporated

    Bay City, Michigan, 48706

  • Northwest Clinical Research Center

    Bellevue, Washington, 98007

  • Central Alabama Research

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35209

  • Alabama Clinical Therapeutics, LLC

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35235

  • Alabama Orthopaedic Surgeons

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35235

  • Cahaba Research Inc.

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35242

  • Injury Care Research

    Boise, Idaho, 83713

  • Orthopedic Research Institute

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472

  • Hope Clinical Research

    Canoga Park, California, 91303

  • Chicago Clinical Research Institute, Inc.

    Chicago, Illinois, 60607

  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Orthopaedic Associates of West Florida

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Remington-Davis, Incorporated

    Columbus, Ohio, 43215

  • Optimed Research LTD

    Columbus, Ohio, 43235

  • Spectrum Medical, Inc.

    Danville, Virginia, 24541

  • Orthopaedic Associates of Michigan, PC

    Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49525

  • Drug Trials America

    Hartsdale, New York, 10530

  • Abigail R. Neiman, MD, PA

    Houston, Texas, 77024

  • Advances In Health

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Mercury Clinical Research, Inc.

    Houston, Texas, 77036

  • BI Research Center

    Houston, Texas, 77084

  • Marvel Clinical Research, LLC

    Huntington Beach, California, 92647

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Physician Research Collaboration, LLC

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68516

  • Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205

  • Clintex Research Group

    Miami, Florida, 33135

  • Best Clinical Trials, LLC

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115

  • George Stanley Walker, MD

    New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115

  • Renstar Medical Research

    Ocala, Florida, 34470

  • American Family Medical

    Ocala, Florida, 34471

  • Sunshine Research Center

    Opa-locka, Florida, 33054

  • Advances in Medicine

    Palm Desert, California, 92260

  • Founders Research Corporation

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19114

  • ClinRx Research

    Richardson, Texas, 75080

  • Clinical Trials Research

    Sacramento, California, 95821

  • DCT - Stone Oak, LLC dba Discovery Clinical Trials

    San Antonio, Texas, 78258

  • California Research Foundation

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • CITrials

    Santa Ana, California, 92705

  • Gulfcoast Research Institute, LLC

    Sarasota, Florida, 34232-6028

  • Kennedy White Orthopaedic Center

    Sarasota, Florida, 34232

  • Stamford Therapeutics Consortium

    Stamford, Connecticut, 06905

  • Stedman Clinical Trials

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

  • AC Clinical Research

    Tiffin, Ohio, 44883

  • Noble Clinical Research

    Tucson, Arizona, 85704

  • Mercury Clinical Research

    Webster, Texas, 77598

  • Professional Research Network of Kansas, LLC

    Wichita, Kansas, 67205-1138

  • North Georgia Clinical Research

    Woodstock, Georgia, 30189

  • North Georgia Internal Medicine

    Woodstock, Georgia, 30189

Other trials in United States

Japan5 sites
  • Omuro Orthopedic Clinic

    Himeji, Hyōgo, 670-0976

  • National Hospital Organization Osaka Minami Medical Center

    Kawachi-Nagano, Osaka, 586-8521

  • Marunouchi Hospital

    Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8601

  • Nakajo Orthopedic Clinic

    Sendai, Miyagi, 983-0862

  • Osaka University Hospital

    Suita, Osaka, 565-0871

Other trials in Japan

Canada4 sites
  • Dawson Road Medical Centre

    Guelph, Ontario, N1H 1B1

  • Rebecca Medical Associates

    Oakville, Ontario, L6K 1J6

  • Recherche Clinique Sigma inc

    Québec, Quebec, G1G 3Y8

  • Centre de recherche Saint-Louis

    Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4

Other trials in Canada

New Zealand4 sites
  • South Pacific Clinical Trials

    Auckland, 0610

  • Star Unit, North Shore Hospital, Waitemata District Health Board

    Auckland, 0622

  • Southern Clinical Trials- Waitemata Ltd

    Auckland, 0626

  • Clinical Horizons NZ Ltd

    Tauranga, 3112

Other trials in New Zealand

Sweden3 sites
  • Ladulaas Kliniska Studier

    Boras, Sweden, SE-506 30

  • ProbarE I Lund AB

    Lund, 222 22

  • ProbarE i Stockholm AB

    Stockholm, 111 37

Other trials in Sweden

Slovakia2 sites
  • Kompan, s.r.o.

    Dolný Kubín, 02601

  • Slovak Research Center Team Member, MUDr. Viliam Cibik, PhD, s.r.o.

    Pruské, 018 52

Other trials in Slovakia

Spain2 sites
  • Instituto de Ciencias Medicas

    Alicante, 03004

  • Hospital del Mar

    Barcelona, 08003

Other trials in Spain

Australia1 site
  • CMAX Clinical Research Pty Ltd

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5000

Other trials in Australia

Germany1 site
  • Rheumazentrum Prof. Dr. med Gunther Neeck

    Bad Doberan, 18209

Other trials in Germany

Hungary1 site
  • Tolna Megyei Balassa Janos Korhaz, Ortopediai Osztaly

    Szekszárd, 7100

Other trials in Hungary

Italy1 site
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria E Policlinico Umberto I

    Rome, 00161

Other trials in Italy

Lithuania1 site
  • Saules seimos medicinos centras

    Kaunas, LT-49449

Other trials in Lithuania

Portugal1 site
  • Hospital Conde de Bertiandos

    Ponte de Lima, Viana do Castelo District, 4990-041

Other trials in Portugal

Russia1 site
  • Medical Technologies Ltd.

    Saint Petersburg, 191025

Other trials in Russia

Serbia1 site
  • Institute of Rheumatology

    Belgrade, 11000

Other trials in Serbia

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 3, MULTICENTER, LONG-TERM OBSERVATIONAL STUDY OF SUBJECTS FROM TANEZUMAB STUDIES WHO UNDERGO A TOTAL KNEE, HIP OR SHOULDER REPLACEMENT

A4091064 is a multicenter, long-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies (regardless of treatment group) who undergo a total knee, hip or shoulder replacement during participation in the study. The study is designed with a total duration of subject follow-up of 24 weeks after the total joint replacement surgery. There will be two methods of data collection utilized in this study: interview by site staff via the telephone and interactive web-response system (or paper if the subject has no access to the internet).

Read the detailed description

A4091064 is a long-term observational follow up study of subjects from tanezumab interventional studies A4091056, A4091057 or A4091058.

Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Being tested
Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent studyDrug

    IMP as administered in parent study. IMP would have been either placebo, tanezumab, celecoxib, naproxen or diclofenac administered in parent study.

Study groups in NCT02674386
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1Otherlong-term observational study of subjects from tanezumab parent study
Receives: Drug: Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Surgeon's Assessment of Procedural Difficulty

    Following the TJR surgery on Day 1, the orthopedic surgeon was asked to answer the following question: "taking into consideration the participant's medical history and physical condition prior to surgery would you classify the operative procedure as Uneventful, Minor complications or Major complications." Participants were reported based on these categories for knee, hip and shoulder joint. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Day 1

  2. Number of Participants With Overall Satisfaction With Surgery as Assessed by the Self-Administered Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) Scale at Week 24

    SAPS contained four questions; How satisfied are you with the 1) results of your surgery 2) results of surgery for improving pain 3) results of surgery for improving ability to do home or yard work, and 4) results of surgery for improving your ability to do recreational activities. Items scored on a 4-point Likert scale with response of 'very satisfied' (100 points), 'somewhat satisfied' (75 points), 'somewhat dissatisfied' (50 points), and 'very dissatisfied' (25 points). The scale score calculated as mean of the scores of individual items, ranging from 25 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction. Here, number of participants are summarized as, satisfied (very satisfied and somewhat satisfied categories combined) and dissatisfied (somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied categories combined). Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Week 24

  3. Number of Participants With Post-Surgical Complications Upto Week 24

    Post-surgical complications are adverse events occurring after TJR surgery that were considered clinically significant as assessed by investigator and attributable to the total joint replacement procedure. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  4. Number of Participants With Additional or Corrective Procedures Related to Total Joint Replacement Upto Week 24

    Participants were asked whether they had been told by their orthopedic surgeon that additional or corrective procedures were necessary for their total joint replacement. Participants, who responded as yes have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  5. Number of Participants Who Participated in Physical Rehabilitation Activities Related to Total Joint Replacement Upto Week 24

    Participants responded with a yes or no to the following question ''are you participating in physical rehabilitation activities related to your replaced joint''. Participants responded with a yes, have been reported here. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in to be Replaced or Replaced Joints at Week 24

    Participants assessed their average pain in to be replaced (pre-surgery) knee/ hip joint or in the replaced joint (post-surgery) in the past 24 hours using an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  7. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 24

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to OA of to be replaced/replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions. Scores for each question and WOMAC Pain subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  8. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 24

    WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to OA in the replaced/to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC stiffness subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 24

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire, which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to OA in replaced/ to be replaced index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, which may not be a whole (integer) number, scored on a NRS. Scores for each question and WOMAC physical function subscale score on NRS ranged from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Participants may have been counted more than once if they had TJR surgery in more than one joint.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) Score at Week 24

    SPADI: self-administered questionnaire to measure pain and disability associated with shoulder pathology in participants with shoulder pain. It consists of two dimensions pain and function. Pain dimension:5 questions regarding severity of pain, scores ranged from 0=no pain to 10=worst pain imaginable, higher scores indicated extreme pain. Functional activities:8 questions to measure degree of difficulty with various activities of daily living that require upper extremity use, scores ranged from 0=no difficulty to 10=so difficult it requires help, higher scores=extreme difficulty. Pain and disability dimension score was calculated as the sum of non-missing scores divided by the maximum possible score (50 [for pain] and 80 [for disability]) multiplied by 100. A total score was calculated as the mean of two dimensions, ranged from 0=best to 100=worst, higher scores indicated worsening of condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  11. Number of Participants Who Used Concomitant Analgesic Medications

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start23 Aug 2016
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2019
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
154 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02674386
Sponsor's protocol ID
A4091064
Other IDs
2013-002549-12, TJR FOLLOW-UP
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
11 Nov 2015
Last updated
30 Jul 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Mont MA, Carrino JA, Nemeth MA, Burr A, Yamabe T, Viktrup L, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Postoperative Outcome of Patients Who Underwent Total Joint Replacement During the Tanezumab Phase 3 Osteoarthritis Development Program: A 24-Week Observational Study. Surg Technol Int. 2021 May 20;38:467-477. doi: 10.52198/21.STI.38.OS1439.

    PubMed 34043229

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Investigational Medical Product (IMP) administered in parent study in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 79 sites in 15 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 79 sites in United States, Japan, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Surgeon's Assessment of Procedural Difficulty (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 11 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02674386, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in