NeutropeniaPhase 3ADVANCENCT02643420
SPI-2012 vs Pegfilgrastim in the Management of Neutropenia in Participants With Breast Cancer With Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (ADVANCE)
A Phase 3 study testing SPI-2012, Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel in people with Neutropenia and Breast Cancer, run by Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc at 81 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single dose of SPI-2012 versus pegfilgrastim in participants with early-stage breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC), as measured by the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neutropenia, Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- SPI-2012, Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 406 participants
- Where
- 81 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 19 Jan 2016to 31 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- New diagnosis of histologically confirmed early-stage breast cancer (ESBC), defined as operable Stage I to Stage IIIA breast cancer
- Candidate for adjuvant or neoadjuvant TC chemotherapy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤ 2
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5×10^9/L
- Platelet count ≥ 100×10^9/L
- Hemoglobin > 9 g/dL
Show all 10Show fewer
- Creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min
- Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 mg/dL
- Aspartate Aminotransferase per Serum Glutamic-Oxaloacetic Transaminase (AST/SGOT) and Alanine Aminotransferase per Serum Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (ALT/SGPT) ≤ 2.5× Upper Limit of Normal (ULN).
- Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.0×ULN
Who cannot join
- Active concurrent malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) or life-threatening disease
- Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
- Known sensitivity to E. coli -derived products or to any products to be administered during dosing
- Concurrent adjuvant cancer therapy
- Previous exposure to filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or other G-CSF products in clinical development within 12 months prior to the administration of study drug
- Active infection, receiving anti-infectives, or any serious underlying medical condition that would impair ability to receive protocol treatment
Show all 10Show fewer
- Prior bone marrow or stem cell transplant
- Use of any investigational drugs, biologics, or devices within 30 days prior to study treatment or plans to use any of these during the course of the study
- Radiation therapy within 30 days prior to enrollment
- Major surgery within 30 days prior to enrollment
Trial locations and contacts
81 sites in 3 countries.
81 sites in 3 countries
United States76 sites
Pacific Cancer Medical Center, Inc.
Anaheim, California, 92801
AnMed Health Cancer Center
Anderson, South Carolina, 29621
Ashland-Bellefonte Cancer Center
Ashland, Kentucky, 41101
CBCC Global Research, Inc. at Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center
Bakersfield, California, 93309
Alta Bates Summit Medical Center
Berkeley, California, 94704
RCCA MD LLC/The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
St. Vincent Frontier Cancer Center
Billings, Montana, 59102
Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center
Boise, Idaho, 83706
New Jersey Hematology Oncology Associates
Brick, New Jersey, 08724
CHI St. Joseph Health Cancer Center
Bryan, Texas, 77802
Aultman Hospital
Canton, Ohio, 44710
Gabrail Cancer Center Research
Canton, Ohio, 44718
Waverly Hematology Oncology
Cary, North Carolina, 27518
Clintell, Inc/Swedish Covenant Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60625
Precision Research Institute, LLC
Chula Vista, California, 91910
The Lindner Research Center at the Christ Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
John B Amos Cancer Center
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Cookeville Regional Medical Center
Cookeville, Tennessee, 38501
Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group, Inc.
Corona, California, 92879
Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330
Pontchartrain Cancer Center
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Texas Oncology -Methodist Dallas Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75203
Omega Research Consultants LLC
DeBary, Florida, 32713
North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates
East Setauket, New York, 11733
Dwight D. Eisenhower Army Medical Center
Fort Gordon, Georgia, 30905
Compassionate Care Research Group, Inc.
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
The West Clinic, PC, d/b/a West Cancer Center
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Arizona Center for Cancer Care
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Saint Francis Cancer Treatment Center
Grand Island, Nebraska, 68803
Bon Secours Saint Francis Cancer
Greenville, South Carolina, 29607
Forrest General Hospital
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39401
Pasco Pinellas Cancer Center
Holiday, Florida, 34691
Genesis Cancer Center
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Oncology Consultants
Houston, Texas, 77030
Franciscan St. Francis Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
Joliet Oncology Hematology Associates
Joliet, Illinois, 60435
NEA Baptist Clinic | Fowler Family Center for Cancer Care
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
Freeman Health Systems
Joplin, Missouri, 64804
Southeast Nebraska Hematology & Oncology Consultants, PC
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
Long Beach, California, 90806
Pacific Shores Medical Group
Long Beach, California, 90813
Texas Oncology, PA
McAllen, Texas, 78503
AMPM Research Clinic
Miami, Florida, 33133
Lakes Research, LLC
Miami Lakes, Florida, 33014
West Virginia University
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Floyd Memorial Cancer Center of Indiana
New Albany, Indiana, 47150
Northern Utah Associates
Ogden, Utah, 84403
Mid Florida Hematology and Oncology Centers
Orange City, Florida, 32763
Ventura County Hematology-Oncology Specialists
Oxnard, California, 93030
West Ky Hematology & Oncology Group, PSC
Paducah, Kentucky, 42003
Oncology Specialists, SC
Park Ridge, Illinois, 60068
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
Florida Cancer Research Institute
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Valley Medical Oncology Consultants
Pleasanton, California, 94588
Delta Oncology Associates
Portsmouth, Virginia, 23704
Emad Ibrahim, MD, Inc.
Redlands, California, 92373
Methodist Richardson Medical Center- Cancer Center
Richardson, Texas, 75082
Compassionate Cancer Care Medical Group, Inc
Riverside, California, 92501
Carolina Blood and Cancer Care
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732
Swedish American Cancer Center
Rockford, Illinois, 61114
Penobscot Bay Medical Center
Rockport, Maine, 04856
Quest Research Institute
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
St Joseph Heritage Healthcare Institution
Santa Rosa, California, 95403
Memorial Health University Medical Center
Savannah, Georgia, 31404
Highland Clinic
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105
Northwest Medical Specialties, PLLC
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Arizona Clinical Research Center/ ACRC
Tucson, Arizona, 85715
Associates in Hematology and Oncology, PC
Upland, Pennsylvania, 19013
Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Wellness Oncology Hematology
West Hills, California, 91307
Northern Indiana Cancer Research Consortium
Westville, Indiana, 46391
Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
Whittier, California, 90603
Bond Clinic, P.A.
Winter Haven, Florida, 33881
Reliant Medical Group
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01608v
Mercy Health Youngstown LLC DBA
Youngstown, Ohio, 44504 44501
Yuma Regional Medical Center
Yuma, Arizona, 85364
Canada3 sites
CISSS de la Montérégie-Centre
Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
CHU de Quebec - Universite Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
South Korea2 sites
Cha Bundang Medical Center
Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13496
Severance Hospital
Sinchon-dong, Seoul, 03722
About this study
Official title: RAnDomized Trial of SPI-2012 Versus Pegfilgrastim in the Management of Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia in Breast CANCEr Patients Receiving Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) (ADVANCE)
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single dose of SPI-2012 versus pegfilgrastim in participants with early-stage breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC), as measured by the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1.
Read the detailed description
This was a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPI-2012 vs pegfilgrastim in participants with breast cancer treated with TC chemotherapy.
Each cycle was 21 days. Four cycles were evaluated in this study. On Day 1 of each cycle, participants received TC chemotherapy. On Day 2 of each cycle, participants received study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim).
- Conditions
- Neutropenia, Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- SPI-2012, Pegfilgrastim, Docetaxel, Cyclophosphamide
- Keywords
- Neutropenia, Breast Cancer, Long-acting Myeloid Growth Factor, Early Stage Breast Cancer, Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Neutropenia, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SPI-2012Drug
Also called Rolontis®, Eflapegrastim, (HM10460A)
Single-use syringes for subcutaneous injection, administered on Day 2 of each cycle
PegfilgrastimDrug
Also called Neulasta®
Single-dose subcutaneous injection administered on Day 2 of each cycle
DocetaxelDrug
Also called Taxotere
Standard therapy
CyclophosphamideDrug
Also called Cytoxan
Standard therapy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: SPI-2012 and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) | Experimental | Participants received SPI-2012 13.2 milligram (mg)/0.6 milliliter (mL) (3.6 mg Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor [G-CSF]) fixed-dose subcutaneous (SC) injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle and included Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care. Receives: Drug: SPI-2012; Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
| Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) | Experimental | Participants received pegfilgrastim 6 mg SC injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy on Day 1 of each cycle included Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 IV infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care. Receives: Drug: Pegfilgrastim; Drug: Docetaxel; Drug: Cyclophosphamide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1
DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <0.5×10^9/L), after the administration of study drug in Cycle 1.
Measured: Day 1 and Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 1
Time to ANC Recovery was defined as the time from chemotherapy administration until ANC increased to ≥1.5×10^9/L after the expected nadir within Cycle 1. Time to ANC recovery was assigned as 0 for participants whose ANC value never dropped below 1.5 x10^9/L.
Measured: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Depth of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Nadir in Cycle 1
Depth of ANC Nadir was defined as the lowest ANC value after administration of study drug (SPI-2012 or Pegfilgrastim) in Cycle 1.
Measured: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 1
FN was defined as an oral temperature > 38.3 degrees Celsius (C) (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit [F]) or two consecutive readings of >=38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) for 2 hours and ANC <1.0×10^9/L.
Measured: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Duration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4
DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (ANC <0.5×10^9 /L) from the first occurrence of an ANC below the threshold in Cycles 2, 3, and 4.
Measured: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 in cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 1
Neutropenic complications refer to hospitalizations due to neutropenic events and/or the use of anti-infectives due to neutropenia.
Measured: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4
FN was defined as an oral temperature > 38.3 degrees C (101.0 degrees Fahrenheit [F]) or two consecutive readings of >=38.0 degrees C (100.4 degrees F) for 2 hours and ANC <1.0×10^9/L.
Measured: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4
RDI was defined as the percentage of the planned dose that each participant actually received during the study, expressed as the total dose received, divided by the total dose planned and multiplied by 100. The planned dose was defined as the dose that would be given if no doses were missed and/or no dose reductions were made for the number of cycles started. The total planned dose was the sum of planned doses over all cycles.
Measured: Cycles 1 to 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or study procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A TEAE for Treatment Period is defined as adverse event with an onset date on or after the date of study drug administration through the end of treatment. TEAE for follow up is defined as any new onset or ongoing AE at the end of Treatment. SAE is defined as any AE which meets any of the following criteria: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in a persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in a congenital anomaly/birth defect, includes important medical events.
Measured: From the first dose of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) until 12 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 34 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study start19 Jan 2016
- Primary completion24 Jan 2018
- Study completion31 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for NeutropeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 406 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02643420
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPI-GCF-301
- Acronym
- ADVANCE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- RAnDomized Trial of SPI-2012 Versus Pegfilgrastim in the Management of Chemotherapy Induced Neutropenia in Breast CANCEr Patients Receiving Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) (ADVANCE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02643420
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADVANCE / SPI-GCF-301
- Conditions
- Neutropenia, Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Neutropenia, Breast Cancer, Long-acting Myeloid Growth Factor, Early Stage Breast Cancer, Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) chemotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 406 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, IncIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 19 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Jan 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Mar 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a single dose of SPI-2012 versus pegfilgrastim in participants with early-stage breast cancer receiving docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC), as measured by the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1.
Detailed description
This was a Phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPI-2012 vs pegfilgrastim in participants with breast cancer treated with TC chemotherapy.
Each cycle was 21 days. Four cycles were evaluated in this study. On Day 1 of each cycle, participants received TC chemotherapy. On Day 2 of each cycle, participants received study drug (SPI-2012 or pegfilgrastim).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: SPI-2012 and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) | Experimental | Drug: SPI-2012, Drug: Docetaxel, Drug: CyclophosphamideParticipants received SPI-2012 13.2 milligram (mg)/0.6 milliliter (mL) (3.6 mg Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor [G-CSF]) fixed-dose subcutaneous (SC) injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy was administered on Day 1 of each cycle and included Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 intravenous (IV) infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care. |
| Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) | Experimental | Drug: Pegfilgrastim, Drug: Docetaxel, Drug: CyclophosphamideParticipants received pegfilgrastim 6 mg SC injection once per cycle on Day 2 of each cycle up to Cycle 4 (each cycle was 21 days), approximately 24-26 hours after TC chemotherapy administration. TC chemotherapy on Day 1 of each cycle included Docetaxel 75 mg/m^2 IV infusion and Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m^2 IV infusion per institute's standard of care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- New diagnosis of histologically confirmed early-stage breast cancer (ESBC), defined as operable Stage I to Stage IIIA breast cancer
- Candidate for adjuvant or neoadjuvant TC chemotherapy
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≤ 2
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5×10^9/L
- Platelet count ≥ 100×10^9/L
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Active concurrent malignancy (except non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix) or life-threatening disease
- Locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
- Known sensitivity to E. coli -derived products or to any products to be administered during dosing
- Concurrent adjuvant cancer therapy
- Previous exposure to filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, or other G-CSF products in clinical development within 12 months prior to the administration of study drug
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SPI-2012Also: Rolontis®, Eflapegrastim, (HM10460A)Single-use syringes for subcutaneous injection, administered on Day 2 of each cycle | Drug | Arm 1: SPI-2012 and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) |
| PegfilgrastimAlso: Neulasta®Single-dose subcutaneous injection administered on Day 2 of each cycle | Drug | Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) |
| DocetaxelAlso: TaxotereStandard therapy | Drug | Arm 1: SPI-2012 and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC), Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) |
| CyclophosphamideAlso: CytoxanStandard therapy | Drug | Arm 1: SPI-2012 and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC), Arm 2: Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide (TC) |
Primary outcome
Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1
Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
DSN was defined as the number of days of severe neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <0.5×10^9/L), after the administration of study drug in Cycle 1.
8 secondary outcomes
Time to Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Recovery in Cycle 1
Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Depth of Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Nadir in Cycle 1
Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia (FN) in Cycle 1
Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Duration of Severe Neutropenia in Cycle 2, 3 and 4
Time frame: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 in cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Neutropenic Complications in Cycle 1
Time frame: Day 1 and Days 4, 15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Febrile Neutropenia in Cycles 2, 3, and 4
Time frame: Days 1, 4, 7, 10, and 15 of Cycles 2, 3, and 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Relative Dose Intensity (RDI) of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) in Cycles 1 to 4
Time frame: Cycles 1 to 4 (each cycle was 21 days)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From the first dose of TC (Docetaxel + Cyclophosphamide) until 12 months after the last dose of study treatment (up to approximately 34 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Mar 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neutropenia
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Screening for Hematology Branch Protocols
Hematologic Disease and Disorders, Donors
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Study to Validate a Novel System to Non-Invasively Detect Severe Neutropenia
Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma, Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 4
Adjustment of Antibiotic Dosage in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia and Augmented Renal Clearance
Febrile Neutropenia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of Granulocyte-colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) Dosage Reduction in Mavorixafor-treated Participants With Acquired Primary Autoimmune and Idiopathic Chronic Neutropenia Disorders
Acquired Primary Autoimmune and Idiopathic Chronic Neutropenia Disorders, Chronic Neutropenia
Not yet recruiting
Diagnostic Accuracy, Clinical Utility and Implementation of Point-of-Care Absolute Neutrophil Count in Suspected Neutropenic Fever (DUCATIS) - Diagnostic Accuracy (S1)
Suspected Neutropenic Fever, Confirmed Neutropenic Fever
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
81 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing SPI-2012, Pegfilgrastim and Docetaxel in people with Neutropenia and Breast Cancer, run by Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc at 81 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 81 sites in United States, Canada, South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Mar 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of Severe Neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1 (time frame: Day 1 and Days 4-15 in Cycle 1 (each cycle was 21 days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Mar 2022.