AzTrials
AzTrials

Retropharyngeal AbscessNCT02640456

Microbiology of Para- og Retropharyngeal Abscess

An observational study of Retropharyngeal Abscess, run by Tejs Ehlers Klug at 5 sites in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims of the study are: 1. Explore the bacteriology of para- and retropharyngeal abscess. 2. Validate the bacterial findings by exploring antibody development against F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum and S. pyogenes. 3. Compare bacteriologic findings in concomitant peritonsillar and parapharyngeal abscesses. 4. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Retropharyngeal Abscess
What is being tested?
Bacteriology, Type of surgery and Biochemistry
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
72 participants
Where
5 sitesDenmark
Study dates
Apr 2016to Jan 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Sixty patients with para- or retropharyngeal abscess. Twelve patients with neck abscess without relation to the pharynx or salivary glands (controls).

Who may be able to join

  • para- or retropharyngeal abscess

Who cannot join

  • refuse to participate

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

Tejs E Klug, MD contact

+45 51604046

tejklu@rm.dk

5 sites in 1 country

Denmark5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Aalborg University Hospital

    Aalborg, Aalborg, 9100

    Mirjana Ninn-Pedersen, MD, +45 40931367, mirjananinn@yahoo.dk

    Recruiting
  • Aarhus University Hospital

    Aarhus, Aarhus, 8000

    Tejs E Klug, MD, +45 51604046, tejklu@rm.dk

    Recruiting
  • Hospitalsenheden Vest

    Holstebro, Holstebro, 7500

    Anne-Loiuse B Christensen, MD, +45 29932046, Anne.Louise.Christensen@auh.rm.dk

    Recruiting
  • Odense University Hospital

    Odense, Odense, 5000

    Anette D Kjeldsen, PhD, +45 23379822, anette.kjeldsen@rsyd.dk

    Recruiting
  • Sygehus Lillebaelt

    Vejle, Vejle, 7100

    Soren Fast, MD, Soeren.Fast1@rsyd.dk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Mikrobiologi Ved Para- og Retropharyngeal Absces

The aims of the study are:

  1. Explore the bacteriology of para- and retropharyngeal abscess.
  2. Validate the bacterial findings by exploring antibody development against F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum and S. pyogenes.
  3. Compare bacteriologic findings in concomitant peritonsillar and parapharyngeal abscesses.
  4. Characterize patients with para- and retropharyngeal abscess.
  5. Compare the concentration of amylase in para- and retropharyngeal abscesses and neck abscesses without relation to the pharynx or salivary glands.
  6. Perform gene-sequencing of F. Necrophorum strains, and compare these with strains recovered from patients with acute tonsillitis, peritonsillar abscess, and Lemierre´s syndrome.
Read the detailed description

Patients:

Sixty patients aged 18 years or older with para- or retropharyngeal abscess and 12 patients with neck abscess without relation to the pharynx or salivary glands (controls) will be included at five Danish centers. Estimated time of inclusion: Four years.

Data:

Symptoms, findings, and other relevant information will be obtained at admission. Data regarding treatment and complications will be obtained after discharge.

Samples:

  1. Tonsillar surface swabs (bilaterally)
  2. Pus aspirate from para- or retropharyngeal abscess
  3. Pus aspirate from peritonsillar abscess, if present
  4. Biopsy or the entire tonsil (bilaterally)
  5. Blood samples (acute and convalescent)

Investigations:

  1. Bacterial cultures from tonsillar surface swabs, pus aspirates, and tonsillar tissues.
  2. Antibody development against F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum and S. pyogenes from the two sera.
  3. Gene-sequencing of F. Necrophorum strains.
  4. Measurement of amylase concentrations in pus aspirates.

Power calculations:

Patients needed to show significant increase in anti-F. necrophorum antibody development.

Assumptions:

  1. The found anti-F. necrophorum antibody levels will be compared to previous findings in electively tonsillectomized patients (9 of 47 patients had two-fold or higher increase in anti-F. necrophorum antibody levels).
  2. Level of statistical significance: P = 0.05
  3. Power: 90%.
  4. Part of F. necrophorum-positive para- or retropharyngeal patients WHO develop two-fold or higher anti-F. necrophorum antibody levels: 73%.
  5. Part of para- or retropharyngeal patients with F. necrophorum: 20%. Number of para- or retropharyngeal patients needed: 60.

Concerning comparison of amylase concentrations between patients with para- or retropharyngeal abscess and patients with neck abscesses without relation to the pharynx or salivary glands:

Assumptions:

  1. Amylase concentration > 20 U/L in 0% of controls.
  2. Amylase-concentration > 20 U/L in 50% af patients with para- or retropharyngeal abscess .
  3. Inclusion of controls 1:3 compared to patients with para- or retropharyngeal abscess .
  4. Level of statistical significance: P = 0.05
  5. Power: 90%. Number of para- or retropharyngeal patients needed: 36. Number of controls needed: 12.
Being tested
Bacteriology, Type of surgery, Biochemistry, Serology
Keywords
retropharyngeal abscess, parapharyngeal abscess, peritonsillar abscess, bacteriology, Fusobacterium necrophorum
Medical subject headings
Retropharyngeal Abscess, Peritonsillar Abscess

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BacteriologyBiological

    Tonsillar surface swabs, tonsillar tissues, and pus aspirates.

  • Type of surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Surgical approach and complications.

  • BiochemistryBiological

    Amylase concentration i pus aspirates.

  • SerologyBiological

    Levels of antibodies against selected bacteria (F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum, and Group A streptococci) in acute and convalescent sera.

Study groups in NCT02640456
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Para- or retropharyngeal abscessPatients with para- or retropharyngeal abscess.
Receives: Biological: Bacteriology; Procedure: Type of surgery; Biological: Biochemistry; Biological: Serology
Neck abscessPatients with neck abscess without relation to the pharynx or salivary glands.
Receives: Biological: Biochemistry

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bacterial findings in aerobic and anaerobic cultures and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry from para- and retropharyngeal abscesses

    Prevalence of potential bacterial pathogens (F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum, Prevotella species, Group A streptococcus, Group C/G streptococcus (large colony forming), S. aureus, H. influenzae, and Viridans streptococci) recovered from aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures from pus aspirates.

    Measured: Within eight hours of patient admission

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Antibody Development against F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum, and S. pyogenes in patients with para- and retropharyngeal abscess

    Prevalence of patients with antibody development (at least two-fold increase of antibody level) against selected bacteria (F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum, and Group A streptococci)

    Measured: Within eight hours of patient admission (serum 1) and two to four weeks after admission (serum 2)

  2. Amylase concentrations in para- and retropharyngeal abscesses vs neck abscesses without relation to the pharynx or salivary glands

    Comparison of amylase concentration i pus aspirates between patients with para- and retropharyngeal abscess versus patients with neck abscess not related to the pharynx or salivary glands (controls).

    Measured: Within eight hours of patient admission.

  3. Comparison of bacterial recoveries in aerobic and anaerobic cultures from patients with concomitant peritonsillar and para-retropharyngeal abscess.

    Comparison of prevalence of potential bacterial pathogens (F. necrophorum, F. nucleatum, Prevotella species, Group A streptococcus, Group C/G streptococcus (large colony forming), S. aureus, H. influenzae, and Viridans streptococci) recovered from aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures from pus aspirates between concomitant peritonsillar and para-retropharyngeal abscesses.

    Measured: Within eight hours of patient admission.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Dec 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2016
  3. Primary completionJan 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02640456
Sponsor's protocol ID
51440
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
15 Dec 2015
Last updated
27 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Retropharyngeal Abscess, run by Tejs Ehlers Klug at 5 sites in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tejs E Klug, MD (+45 51604046, tejklu@rm.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bacterial findings in aerobic and anaerobic cultures and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry from para- and retropharyngeal abscesses (time frame: Within eight hours of patient admission). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in