AzTrials
AzTrials

Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus AureusPhase 4NCT06982105

Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. Clindamycin for the Treatment of Children With Invasive MRSA Infections

A Phase 4 study testing Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole in people with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and Osteomyelitis Acute, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) works to treat invasive infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in children. It will also learn about the safety of TMP-SMX in the treatment of children with invasive MRSA infections. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 months to 18 years
What is being tested?
Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 May 2025to Jun 2027
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 months to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • 60 days to 18 years of age (inclusive) at the time of oral step down treatment
  • Diagnosed by the clinical team with OAI or HNI:
  • OAI- at least 1 focal finding and 1 systemic finding OR radiographic confirmation of OAI
  • Focal finding- pain/swelling over a bone/joint, or restricted movement/failure to bear weight
  • Systemic finding- fever >38oC, or elevated c-reactive protein (CRP) or elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. (ESR) or elevated white blood cell count (WBC) or elevated WBC in synovial fluid OR
  • Radiographic confirmation- findings consistent with osteomyelitis or septic arthritis - Plain radiograph, MRI, CT or ultrasound, bone scan result indicating abnormal bone, subperiosteal or bone marrow findings consistent with infection
Show all 15Show fewer
  • HNI- at least 1 focal finding and 1 systemic finding OR radiographic confirmation of HNI
  • Focal finding- facial pain or redness, eye pain or proptosis, neck or throat pain or swelling, ear pain or proptosis
  • Systemic finding- fever >38oC, or elevated CRP or elevated ESR or elevated WBC OR
  • Radiographic confirmation- findings consistent with facial/orbital cellulitis, cervical lymphadenitis, mastoiditis, or deep neck infection/abscess (including peritonsillar, retro- and para-pharyngeal. Plain radiograph, MRI, CT or ultrasound, bone scan result indicating abnormal findings consistent with infection
  • Treated by the clinical team for confirmed MRSA or suspected MRSA infection
  • Confirmed MRSA- positive culture for MRSA from a sterile body fluid (e.g., blood, abscess, bone, synovial fluid, or other surgical specimen)
  • Suspected MRSA- treatment for MRSA by the clinical team without microbiologic confirmation (e.g., negative cultures)
  • Currently ready or planned to be transitioned to oral antibiotic therapy by the clinical team
  • OAI or HNI symptoms < 14 days at the time of hospital admission

Who cannot join

  • Enrollment in another interventional study or receipt of investigational drug as part of a research trial within the past 30 days.
  • Known cancer, acquired or primary (including sickle cell anemia or G6PD deficiency) immunodeficiency
  • Underlying bone disease, presence of hardware /implantable device in affected bone/joint
  • Infection (OAI or HNI) resulting from penetrating wounds, open fractures, major trauma, foreign body or post-operative infection.
  • Spinal osteomyelitis
  • Underlying chronic renal, gastrointestinal, liver, or heart disease that would be expected to potentially affect absorption or the metabolism of assigned drug
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Inability to take medicine by mouth, gastrostomy, jejunostomy or nasogastric tube
  • Received intravenous antibiotic therapy as the treatment for OAI or HNI >14 days.
  • Inability or unwilling to consent
  • Any social or medical conditions judged by the study clinician to preclude participation because it could negatively affect the participant.
  • Allergy to both TMP-SMX and clindamycin
  • Known MRSA isolate resistant to both TMP-SMX and clindamycin
  • Patient is known to be pregnant at the time of enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Mary Stumpf contact

317-274-8801

mestumpf@iu.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Riley Hospital for Children

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

    James B Wood, MD, woodjb@iu.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Comparing Optimal Step-down Therapy for Children With Invasive MRSA Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole vs. Clindamycin for the Treatment of Children With Invasive MRSA Infections

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) works to treat invasive infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in children. It will also learn about the safety of TMP-SMX in the treatment of children with invasive MRSA infections. The main questions it aims to answer are:

-Is TMP-SMX effective at successfully treating children with invasive infections due to MRSA? What are the side effects of TMP-SMX in children taking it for invasive infections due to MRSA?

Read more

Researchers will compare TMP-SMX to a clindamycin (a commonly prescribed antibiotic for the treatment of MRSA in children) to see if TMP-SMX works better, worse or the same as clindamycin for children with invasive infections due to MRSA.

Participants will:

Take TMP-SMX or clindamycin for the treatment of their invasive infection due to MRSA.

Will follow up with the provider treating their invasive infection at the discretion of the treating provider.

Keep a diary of their symptoms and any side effects of the medicine

Being tested
Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole
Keywords
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Osteomyelitis, Septic Arthritis, Osteoarticular infection, Head and Neck infection, Trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, clindamycin, pediatric
Medical subject headings
Arthritis, Infectious, Orbital Cellulitis, Mastoiditis, Retropharyngeal Abscess, Peritonsillar Abscess, Osteomyelitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Trimethoprim SulfamethoxazoleDrug

    • For osteoarticular infections- 4-5 mg/kg/dose (based on TMP) PO every 8 hours (max dose 320mg/dose)
    • For head and neck infections- 5-6 mg/kg/dose (based on TMP PO every 12 hours (max dose 320mg/dose)

    Duration will be at the discretion of the treating provider

Study groups in NCT06982105
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TMP-SMXExperimentalTrimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole * For osteoarticular infections- 4-5 mg/kg/dose (based on TMP) PO every 8 hours (max dose 320mg/dose) * For head and neck infections- 5-6 mg/kg/dose (based on TMP PO every 12 hours (max dose 320mg/dose) Duration will be at the discretion of the treating provider
Receives: Drug: Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole
ClindamycinActive comparator13 mg/kg/dose PO every 8 hours (max 600mg/dose) Duration will be at the discretion of the treating provider
Receives: Drug: Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants with Treatment Success

    Compare number of participants with treatment success vs. failure at 6 months post hospitalization

    Measured: 6 months post hospitalization

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of Participants with Treatment Success at 6 weeks post-hospitalization

    Compare number of participants with treatment success vs. failure at 6 weeks

    Measured: 6 weeks post hospitalization

  2. Number of Participants who experience an antibiotic-related adverse events (AEs)

    Compare number and severity of AEs between groups graded based on common terminology criteria for adverse events v5.0

    Measured: 6 months post hospitalization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 May 2025
  2. Study start20 May 2025
  3. Primary completionJun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06982105
Sponsor's protocol ID
26098
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
28 Mar 2025
Last updated
29 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Trimethoprim Sulfamethoxazole in people with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and Osteomyelitis Acute, run by Indiana University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mary Stumpf (317-274-8801, mestumpf@iu.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants with Treatment Success (time frame: 6 months post hospitalization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in