AzTrials
AzTrials

Forearm Pronation Strength RecoveryNCT02595229

Pronator Quadratus Repair After Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures

A study testing Pronator quadratus repair in people with Forearm Pronation Strength Recovery, run by Technical University of Munich.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigation of the influence of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures with regard to the forearm pronation strength. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Forearm Pronation Strength Recovery
What is being tested?
Pronator quadratus repair
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
May 2010to Mar 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • isolated, closed fractures of the distal radius
  • fractures type A2 to B2 according to the AO fracture classification system
  • primary volar locking plate osteosynthesis within 7 days after trauma

Who cannot join

  • concomitant fractures of the affected upper extremity
  • intra-articular distal radius fractures ( type C)
  • concomitant neurovascular injuries
  • preexisting neurological illnesses
  • initial external fixation

About this study

Official title: Pronator Quadratus Repair After Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures or Not? - Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Investigation of the influence of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures with regard to the forearm pronation strength. During the early recovery period of 3 months an improvement of pronation strength and functional scorings was hypothesized for the PQ repair when compared to no repair.

Randomization of the patients in two groups ( PQ repair and no repair) and follow-up examinations after 6 and 12 weeks included bilateral isometric pronation strength measurement, range of motion, the QuickDASH and the Mayo-Wrist-Score, and a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Read the detailed description

Investigation of the influence of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures with special regards to the forearm pronation strength. During the early recovery period of 3 months an improvement of pronation strength and functional scorings was hypothesized for the PQ repair when compared to no repair.

Therefore the patients are randomized to group A = PQ repair and group B = no repair. Follow-up examinations after 6 and 12 weeks are scheduled included bilateral isometric pronation strength measurement, range of motion, the QuickDASH and the Mayo-Wrist-Score, and a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Being tested
Pronator quadratus repair

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pronator quadratus repairProcedure or surgery

    Suturing of the pronator quadratus muscle

Study groups in NCT02595229
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PQ (Pronator quadraus) repairActive comparatorFollowing volar plate osteosynthesis the pronator quadratus muscle is sutured with 3 to 5 U-shaped stitches using a polyfilament absorbable synthetic suture.
Receives: Procedure: Pronator quadratus repair
No PQ repairNo interventionFollowing volar plate osteosynthesis the pronator quadratus muscle is placed in its anatomical position without suture repair.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Isometric forearm pronation strength (N)

    Measurement of the isometric forearm pronation strength (N) using the IsoForce-Control EVO 2 dynamometer (MDS AG, Oberburg, Switzerland)

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperative

  2. Isometric forearm pronation strength (N)

    Measurement of the isometric forearm pronation strength (N) using the IsoForce-Control EVO 2 dynamometer (MDS AG, Oberburg, Switzerland)

    Measured: 12 weeks postoperative

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Quick DASH Score (Patient-reported evaluation score for disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand)

    The score is assessed on the basis of a questionnaire (11 questions about disabilities in the daily life and symptoms as pain, sleeplessness, paresthesia)

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperative

  2. Quick DASH Score (Patient-reported evaluation score for disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand)

    The score is assessed on the basis of a questionnaire (11 questions about disabilities in the daily life and symptoms as pain, sleeplessness, paresthesia)

    Measured: 12 weeks postoperative

  3. Visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Measurement of the pain level

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperative

  4. Visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Measurement of the pain level

    Measured: 12 weeks postoperative

  5. Mayo-Wrist-Score (Physician-based evaluation score of the wrist function)

    Assessment of the wrist function (grip strength, range of motion, pain intensity, functional status (return to work))

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperative

  6. Mayo-Wrist-Score (Physician-based evaluation score of the wrist function)

    Assessment of the wrist function (grip strength, range of motion, pain intensity, functional status (return to work))

    Measured: 12 weeks postoperative

  7. Assessment of the bilateral wrist motion (AO neutral-0-method)

    Measurement of the wrist motion using a goniometer, injured and uninjured hand (Pronation/ Supination, Ulnarabduction/ Radialabduction, Palmarflexion/ Dorsalextension)

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperative

  8. Assessment of the bilateral wrist motion (AO neutral-0-method)

    Measurement of the wrist motion using a goniometer, injured and uninjured hand (Pronation/ Supination, Ulnarabduction/ Radialabduction, Palmarflexion/ Dorsalextension)

    Measured: 12 weeks postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2010
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02595229
Sponsor's protocol ID
2759/10
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
25 Oct 2015
Last updated
3 Nov 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Haberle S, Sandmann GH, Deiler S, Kraus TM, Fensky F, Torsiglieri T, Rondak IC, Biberthaler P, Stockle U, Siebenlist S. Pronator quadratus repair after volar plating of distal radius fractures or not? Results of a prospective randomized trial. Eur J Med Res. 2015 Nov 25;20:93. doi: 10.1186/s40001-015-0187-4.

    PubMed 26607745

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pronator quadratus repair in people with Forearm Pronation Strength Recovery, run by Technical University of Munich.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Isometric forearm pronation strength (N) (time frame: 6 weeks postoperative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02595229, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in