AzTrials
AzTrials

Remote Ischaemic PreconditioningNCT02516072

Use of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in the Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy

A study testing RIPC in people with Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning and Contrast Induced Nephropathy, run by Changi General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

With an increasingly ageing population the incidence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is rising. With approximately one quarter of all PAD patients ultimately progressing to Critical Limb Ischaemia (CLI), increased demands are being placed on vascular imaging to accurately assess stenotic lesions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 99 years
What is being tested?
RIPC
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
Jan 2015to Sep 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Elective intra-arterial peripheral angiography/angioplasty;
  • Patients >21 years of age;
  • Patients with CKD as evidenced by eGFR levels of 30ml/min < eGFR < 60ml/min (moderate risk) or eGFR levels of >= 60ml/min (low risk).

Who cannot join

  • Severe renal impairment eGFR <30ml/min;
  • Evidence of acute renal failure or patients on dialysis;
  • History of previous CIN;
  • Contraindication to volume replacement therapy;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Patients on glibenclamide or nicorandil (these medications may interfere with RIPC).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Singapore1 site
  • Changi General Hospital

    Singapore, 529889

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: The Use of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in the Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Elective Diagnostic or Therapeutic Peripheral Angiography: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial

With an increasingly ageing population the incidence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is rising. With approximately one quarter of all PAD patients ultimately progressing to Critical Limb Ischaemia (CLI), increased demands are being placed on vascular imaging to accurately assess stenotic lesions. Early infrainguinal lesions (i.e. TASC A \& B) can be treated with angioplasty+/- stenting and accurate assessment relies on the imaging gold standard of angiography.

Patients with PAD often have concomitant co morbidities such as diabetes and chronic renal impairment placing them at increased risk of developing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) when exposed to iodinated contrast media. High risk individuals with decreased eGFR <60ml/min have a risk of between 20-30% of developing CIN. They have increased morbidity and mortality risks with a greater need for dialysis and prolonged in patient hospital stays. Ideally, the investigators should be searching for ways to decrease the incidence of CIN. Animal studies and more recently pilot human trials have shown that subjecting a remote vascular bed to a brief ischaemic stress, followed by a period of reperfusion; in what has been termed remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), may confer a protective benefit against the development of CIN. This study aims to determine if RIPC can protect against CIN in patients undergoing elective peripheral angiography for infrainguinal disease.

Read the detailed description

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects between 3-10% of the population with prevalence rates rising with age to 15-20% in patients over 70 [1]. Worldwide incidence rates are rising, with the trend likely to persist with rising obesity and diabetes levels. Increasing numbers of affected patients require angiography as either a diagnostic or a therapeutic modality to improve peripheral blood flow and relieve the symptoms of CLI. The use of iodinated contrast medium during either diagnostic or therapeutic procedures can lead to contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) by direct toxic effects on renal tubular cells or by the induction of renal ischemia. Contrast induced nephropathy is a leading cause of hospital acquired acute kidney injury (AKI) and is defined as an acute deterioration in renal function as defined by the relative increase in serum creatinine levels >=25% or by a factor >=0.5mg/dl above baseline within 48 hours of administration of iv contrast in absence of other causes of renal dysfunction [2],[3]. While the incidence of CIN in the general population is only 2%, it rises in high risk patients to as high as 20-30% [4],[5]. Important risk factors for the development of CIN include pre-existing impaired renal function, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, increased age and congestive cardiac failure [5]. Depending on the risks present varying percentages of patients will proceed to require temporary or permanent dialysis, with inherently higher morbidity and mortality rates [5],[6],[7]. The identification and appropriate management of these patients to prevent CIN is important to decrease the associated accompanying morbidity and mortality in this patient cohort. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to confer benefit in both animal studies and in patients undergoing coronary angiography.

A large cohort study of 5787 patients with advanced PAD found that both moderate and severe renal insufficiency were associated with increased odds of death. The 1 year mortality risk was noted to be higher in patients with severe renal insufficiency (GFR<30ml/min per 1.73m2) (OR: 2.97 95%CI: 2.39-3.69) and they also tended to have a higher risk of presenting with tissue damage (ischemic ulceration or gangrene) compared with individuals having normal renal function (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 0.64-2.98) [8].

Zaraca et al. in a recent systematic review reported on incidence of CIN of 9.2% in patients undergoing vascular surgery [9]. Identifiable risk factors included age >70yrs, high contrast volume, pre exisiting renal disease and the use of antihypertensive medication.

Ischaemic preconditioning is an endogenous mammalian mechanism whereby a brief period of ischaemia and reperfusion confers resistance to subsequent prolonged ischaemic insults. First observed in the canine heart, subsequent investigators noted that brief ischaemia in remote organs e.g. skeletal muscle induced protection in key central organs e.g. the heart. This remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) does not require direct interference with the target organs' blood supply. It can be induced using blood pressure cuffs to produce brief episodes of upper limb ischaemia and reperfusion. It confers protection upon numerous organs simultaneously. RIPC reduces myocardial injury following aortic aneurysm repair, cardiac surgery and angioplasty. It also reduces adverse ischaemic events up to six months following percutaneous coronary intervention, implying some medium-term effect.

To date ischaemic conditioning has been applied primarily to the heart however animal studies have shown pre conditioning to offer renal protection [11],[12]. Although direct application of renal ischaemia is impractical, remote ischaemic conditioning applied prior to or during angiography procedures may offer protection to the kidneys against CIN. Whittaker and Przyklenk in 2011 explored this concept retrospectively using data from patients who had undergone emergency angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction [13]. The original trial was a RCT which examined the protective effect of postconditioning on myocardial ischemia [14]. The authors retrospectively examined if study patients treated with multiple coronary balloon inflations had better renal function than patients not exposed to this remote conditioning. They concluded that patients in the conditioning group received 25% more contrast volume than the control group and showed no decline in renal function as demonstrated by examination of glomerular filtration rate at day 3 post procedure in comparison to the control group which saw a significant decline in renal function. Fikret et al in 2012 in the Renal Protection Trial demonstrated a protective benefit with RIPC from the development of CIN in high risk patients undergoing elective coronary angiography [15]. The need for contrast-based procedures is rising, especially in vascular surgery with increasing numbers of patients undergoing endovascular procedures, as is the incidence of post-contrast renal failure, which has a reported mortality of 34% [16]. The potential use of RIPC therefore to reduce the risk of kidney damage demands s further investigation in patients with advanced peripheral arterial disease who are at an increased risk of developing CIN.

Being tested
RIPC
Keywords
remote ischemic preconditioning

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RIPCOther

    IV hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR + RIPC

Study groups in NCT02516072
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlNo interventionPatients will receive iv hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR.
Remote Ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC)ExperimentalPatients will receive iv hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR. Additionally, patients will receive RIPC; a blood pressure cuff will be placed around one arm of the patient, it will then be inflated to a pressure of 250mmHg for 5 minutes. The cuff will then be deflated and the arm allowed to reperfuse for 5 minutes. This will be repeated so that each patient receives a total of 3 ischaemia-reperfusion cycles immediately prior to the procedure.
Receives: Other: RIPC

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction in the prevalence of contrast medium-induced nephropathy

    Reduction is defined as an increase in the serum creatinine (serC) concentration of >25% from the baseline value within the 72-hour period after primary angiography.

    Measured: At 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure and 4-week post procedure

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. NGAL levels

    mean NGAL level at 2-hour post procedure

    Measured: At 2, 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure

  2. Cystatin C levels

    Mean changes of Cystatin C levels over 3 time points

    Measured: At 2, 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02516072
Sponsor's protocol ID
CGH-RIPC
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
3 Aug 2015
Last updated
27 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Liang F, Liu S, Liu G, Liu H, Wang Q, Song B, Yao L. Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 16;1(1):CD008472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008472.pub3.

    PubMed 36645250

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing RIPC in people with Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning and Contrast Induced Nephropathy, run by Changi General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction in the prevalence of contrast medium-induced nephropathy (time frame: At 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure and 4-week post procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02516072, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in