Remote Ischaemic PreconditioningNCT02516072
Use of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in the Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy
A study testing RIPC in people with Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning and Contrast Induced Nephropathy, run by Changi General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
With an increasingly ageing population the incidence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is rising. With approximately one quarter of all PAD patients ultimately progressing to Critical Limb Ischaemia (CLI), increased demands are being placed on vascular imaging to accurately assess stenotic lesions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 99 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning, Contrast Induced Nephropathy
- What is being tested?
- RIPC
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Sep 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 99 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Elective intra-arterial peripheral angiography/angioplasty;
- Patients >21 years of age;
- Patients with CKD as evidenced by eGFR levels of 30ml/min < eGFR < 60ml/min (moderate risk) or eGFR levels of >= 60ml/min (low risk).
Who cannot join
- Severe renal impairment eGFR <30ml/min;
- Evidence of acute renal failure or patients on dialysis;
- History of previous CIN;
- Contraindication to volume replacement therapy;
- Pregnancy;
- Patients on glibenclamide or nicorandil (these medications may interfere with RIPC).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Use of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in the Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Elective Diagnostic or Therapeutic Peripheral Angiography: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
With an increasingly ageing population the incidence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is rising. With approximately one quarter of all PAD patients ultimately progressing to Critical Limb Ischaemia (CLI), increased demands are being placed on vascular imaging to accurately assess stenotic lesions. Early infrainguinal lesions (i.e. TASC A \& B) can be treated with angioplasty+/- stenting and accurate assessment relies on the imaging gold standard of angiography.
Patients with PAD often have concomitant co morbidities such as diabetes and chronic renal impairment placing them at increased risk of developing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) when exposed to iodinated contrast media. High risk individuals with decreased eGFR <60ml/min have a risk of between 20-30% of developing CIN. They have increased morbidity and mortality risks with a greater need for dialysis and prolonged in patient hospital stays. Ideally, the investigators should be searching for ways to decrease the incidence of CIN. Animal studies and more recently pilot human trials have shown that subjecting a remote vascular bed to a brief ischaemic stress, followed by a period of reperfusion; in what has been termed remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), may confer a protective benefit against the development of CIN. This study aims to determine if RIPC can protect against CIN in patients undergoing elective peripheral angiography for infrainguinal disease.
Read the detailed description
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects between 3-10% of the population with prevalence rates rising with age to 15-20% in patients over 70 [1]. Worldwide incidence rates are rising, with the trend likely to persist with rising obesity and diabetes levels. Increasing numbers of affected patients require angiography as either a diagnostic or a therapeutic modality to improve peripheral blood flow and relieve the symptoms of CLI. The use of iodinated contrast medium during either diagnostic or therapeutic procedures can lead to contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) by direct toxic effects on renal tubular cells or by the induction of renal ischemia. Contrast induced nephropathy is a leading cause of hospital acquired acute kidney injury (AKI) and is defined as an acute deterioration in renal function as defined by the relative increase in serum creatinine levels >=25% or by a factor >=0.5mg/dl above baseline within 48 hours of administration of iv contrast in absence of other causes of renal dysfunction [2],[3]. While the incidence of CIN in the general population is only 2%, it rises in high risk patients to as high as 20-30% [4],[5]. Important risk factors for the development of CIN include pre-existing impaired renal function, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, increased age and congestive cardiac failure [5]. Depending on the risks present varying percentages of patients will proceed to require temporary or permanent dialysis, with inherently higher morbidity and mortality rates [5],[6],[7]. The identification and appropriate management of these patients to prevent CIN is important to decrease the associated accompanying morbidity and mortality in this patient cohort. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to confer benefit in both animal studies and in patients undergoing coronary angiography.
A large cohort study of 5787 patients with advanced PAD found that both moderate and severe renal insufficiency were associated with increased odds of death. The 1 year mortality risk was noted to be higher in patients with severe renal insufficiency (GFR<30ml/min per 1.73m2) (OR: 2.97 95%CI: 2.39-3.69) and they also tended to have a higher risk of presenting with tissue damage (ischemic ulceration or gangrene) compared with individuals having normal renal function (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 0.64-2.98) [8].
Zaraca et al. in a recent systematic review reported on incidence of CIN of 9.2% in patients undergoing vascular surgery [9]. Identifiable risk factors included age >70yrs, high contrast volume, pre exisiting renal disease and the use of antihypertensive medication.
Ischaemic preconditioning is an endogenous mammalian mechanism whereby a brief period of ischaemia and reperfusion confers resistance to subsequent prolonged ischaemic insults. First observed in the canine heart, subsequent investigators noted that brief ischaemia in remote organs e.g. skeletal muscle induced protection in key central organs e.g. the heart. This remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) does not require direct interference with the target organs' blood supply. It can be induced using blood pressure cuffs to produce brief episodes of upper limb ischaemia and reperfusion. It confers protection upon numerous organs simultaneously. RIPC reduces myocardial injury following aortic aneurysm repair, cardiac surgery and angioplasty. It also reduces adverse ischaemic events up to six months following percutaneous coronary intervention, implying some medium-term effect.
To date ischaemic conditioning has been applied primarily to the heart however animal studies have shown pre conditioning to offer renal protection [11],[12]. Although direct application of renal ischaemia is impractical, remote ischaemic conditioning applied prior to or during angiography procedures may offer protection to the kidneys against CIN. Whittaker and Przyklenk in 2011 explored this concept retrospectively using data from patients who had undergone emergency angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction [13]. The original trial was a RCT which examined the protective effect of postconditioning on myocardial ischemia [14]. The authors retrospectively examined if study patients treated with multiple coronary balloon inflations had better renal function than patients not exposed to this remote conditioning. They concluded that patients in the conditioning group received 25% more contrast volume than the control group and showed no decline in renal function as demonstrated by examination of glomerular filtration rate at day 3 post procedure in comparison to the control group which saw a significant decline in renal function. Fikret et al in 2012 in the Renal Protection Trial demonstrated a protective benefit with RIPC from the development of CIN in high risk patients undergoing elective coronary angiography [15]. The need for contrast-based procedures is rising, especially in vascular surgery with increasing numbers of patients undergoing endovascular procedures, as is the incidence of post-contrast renal failure, which has a reported mortality of 34% [16]. The potential use of RIPC therefore to reduce the risk of kidney damage demands s further investigation in patients with advanced peripheral arterial disease who are at an increased risk of developing CIN.
- Being tested
- RIPC
- Keywords
- remote ischemic preconditioning
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RIPCOther
IV hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR + RIPC
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Patients will receive iv hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR. |
| Remote Ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) | Experimental | Patients will receive iv hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR. Additionally, patients will receive RIPC; a blood pressure cuff will be placed around one arm of the patient, it will then be inflated to a pressure of 250mmHg for 5 minutes. The cuff will then be deflated and the arm allowed to reperfuse for 5 minutes. This will be repeated so that each patient receives a total of 3 ischaemia-reperfusion cycles immediately prior to the procedure. Receives: Other: RIPC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Reduction in the prevalence of contrast medium-induced nephropathy
Reduction is defined as an increase in the serum creatinine (serC) concentration of >25% from the baseline value within the 72-hour period after primary angiography.
Measured: At 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure and 4-week post procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
NGAL levels
mean NGAL level at 2-hour post procedure
Measured: At 2, 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure
Cystatin C levels
Mean changes of Cystatin C levels over 3 time points
Measured: At 2, 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completion30 Dec 2016
- Study completionSep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Remote Ischaemic PreconditioningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Changi General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University College Hospital Galway
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tjun Yip Tang, Principal investigator, Changi General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02516072
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CGH-RIPC
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Liang F, Liu S, Liu G, Liu H, Wang Q, Song B, Yao L. Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 16;1(1):CD008472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008472.pub3.
PubMed 36645250
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Use of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning in the Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Elective Diagnostic or Therapeutic Peripheral Angiography: a Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02516072
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CGH-RIPC
- Keywords
- remote ischemic preconditioning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Changi General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University College Hospital Galway
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With an increasingly ageing population the incidence of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is rising. With approximately one quarter of all PAD patients ultimately progressing to Critical Limb Ischaemia (CLI), increased demands are being placed on vascular imaging to accurately assess stenotic lesions. Early infrainguinal lesions (i.e. TASC A \& B) can be treated with angioplasty+/- stenting and accurate assessment relies on the imaging gold standard of angiography.
Patients with PAD often have concomitant co morbidities such as diabetes and chronic renal impairment placing them at increased risk of developing contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) when exposed to iodinated contrast media. High risk individuals with decreased eGFR <60ml/min have a risk of between 20-30% of developing CIN. They have increased morbidity and mortality risks with a greater need for dialysis and prolonged in patient hospital stays. Ideally, the investigators should be searching for ways to decrease the incidence of CIN. Animal studies and more recently pilot human trials have shown that subjecting a remote vascular bed to a brief ischaemic stress, followed by a period of reperfusion; in what has been termed remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC), may confer a protective benefit against the development of CIN. This study aims to determine if RIPC can protect against CIN in patients undergoing elective peripheral angiography for infrainguinal disease.
Detailed description
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects between 3-10% of the population with prevalence rates rising with age to 15-20% in patients over 70 [1]. Worldwide incidence rates are rising, with the trend likely to persist with rising obesity and diabetes levels. Increasing numbers of affected patients require angiography as either a diagnostic or a therapeutic modality to improve peripheral blood flow and relieve the symptoms of CLI. The use of iodinated contrast medium during either diagnostic or therapeutic procedures can lead to contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) by direct toxic effects on renal tubular cells or by the induction of renal ischemia. Contrast induced nephropathy is a leading cause of hospital acquired acute kidney injury (AKI) and is defined as an acute deterioration in renal function as defined by the relative increase in serum creatinine levels >=25% or by a factor >=0.5mg/dl above baseline within 48 hours of administration of iv contrast in absence of other causes of renal dysfunction [2],[3]. While the incidence of CIN in the general population is only 2%, it rises in high risk patients to as high as 20-30% [4],[5]. Important risk factors for the development of CIN include pre-existing impaired renal function, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, increased age and congestive cardiac failure [5]. Depending on the risks present varying percentages of patients will proceed to require temporary or permanent dialysis, with inherently higher morbidity and mortality rates [5],[6],[7]. The identification and appropriate management of these patients to prevent CIN is important to decrease the associated accompanying morbidity and mortality in this patient cohort. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to confer benefit in both animal studies and in patients undergoing coronary angiography.
A large cohort study of 5787 patients with advanced PAD found that both moderate and severe renal insufficiency were associated with increased odds of death. The 1 year mortality risk was noted to be higher in patients with severe renal insufficiency (GFR<30ml/min per 1.73m2) (OR: 2.97 95%CI: 2.39-3.69) and they also tended to have a higher risk of presenting with tissue damage (ischemic ulceration or gangrene) compared with individuals having normal renal function (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 0.64-2.98) [8].
Zaraca et al. in a recent systematic review reported on incidence of CIN of 9.2% in patients undergoing vascular surgery [9]. Identifiable risk factors included age >70yrs, high contrast volume, pre exisiting renal disease and the use of antihypertensive medication.
Ischaemic preconditioning is an endogenous mammalian mechanism whereby a brief period of ischaemia and reperfusion confers resistance to subsequent prolonged ischaemic insults. First observed in the canine heart, subsequent investigators noted that brief ischaemia in remote organs e.g. skeletal muscle induced protection in key central organs e.g. the heart. This remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) does not require direct interference with the target organs' blood supply. It can be induced using blood pressure cuffs to produce brief episodes of upper limb ischaemia and reperfusion. It confers protection upon numerous organs simultaneously. RIPC reduces myocardial injury following aortic aneurysm repair, cardiac surgery and angioplasty. It also reduces adverse ischaemic events up to six months following percutaneous coronary intervention, implying some medium-term effect.
To date ischaemic conditioning has been applied primarily to the heart however animal studies have shown pre conditioning to offer renal protection [11],[12]. Although direct application of renal ischaemia is impractical, remote ischaemic conditioning applied prior to or during angiography procedures may offer protection to the kidneys against CIN. Whittaker and Przyklenk in 2011 explored this concept retrospectively using data from patients who had undergone emergency angioplasty for ST elevation myocardial infarction [13]. The original trial was a RCT which examined the protective effect of postconditioning on myocardial ischemia [14]. The authors retrospectively examined if study patients treated with multiple coronary balloon inflations had better renal function than patients not exposed to this remote conditioning. They concluded that patients in the conditioning group received 25% more contrast volume than the control group and showed no decline in renal function as demonstrated by examination of glomerular filtration rate at day 3 post procedure in comparison to the control group which saw a significant decline in renal function. Fikret et al in 2012 in the Renal Protection Trial demonstrated a protective benefit with RIPC from the development of CIN in high risk patients undergoing elective coronary angiography [15]. The need for contrast-based procedures is rising, especially in vascular surgery with increasing numbers of patients undergoing endovascular procedures, as is the incidence of post-contrast renal failure, which has a reported mortality of 34% [16]. The potential use of RIPC therefore to reduce the risk of kidney damage demands s further investigation in patients with advanced peripheral arterial disease who are at an increased risk of developing CIN.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Patients will receive iv hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR. |
| Remote Ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) | Experimental | Other: RIPCPatients will receive iv hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR. Additionally, patients will receive RIPC; a blood pressure cuff will be placed around one arm of the patient, it will then be inflated to a pressure of 250mmHg for 5 minutes. The cuff will then be deflated and the arm allowed to reperfuse for 5 minutes. This will be repeated so that each patient receives a total of 3 ischaemia-reperfusion cycles immediately prior to the procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Elective intra-arterial peripheral angiography/angioplasty;
- Patients >21 years of age;
- Patients with CKD as evidenced by eGFR levels of 30ml/min < eGFR < 60ml/min (moderate risk) or eGFR levels of >= 60ml/min (low risk).
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Severe renal impairment eGFR <30ml/min;
- Evidence of acute renal failure or patients on dialysis;
- History of previous CIN;
- Contraindication to volume replacement therapy;
- Pregnancy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RIPCIV hydration prior to procedure dependent on classification of risk as per eGFR + RIPC | Other | Remote Ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) |
Primary outcome
Reduction in the prevalence of contrast medium-induced nephropathy
Time frame: At 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure and 4-week post procedure
Reduction is defined as an increase in the serum creatinine (serC) concentration of >25% from the baseline value within the 72-hour period after primary angiography.
2 secondary outcomes
NGAL levels
Time frame: At 2, 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure
Cystatin C levels
Time frame: At 2, 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36645250Liang F, Liu S, Liu G, Liu H, Wang Q, Song B, Yao L. Remote ischaemic preconditioning versus no remote ischaemic preconditioning for vascular and endovascular surgical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 16;1(1):CD008472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008472.pub3.
Related trials for Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Ischemic Preconditioning Therapy Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Reducing the Recurrence of Ischemic Events in Symptomatic Moyamoya Disease
Moya Moya Disease, Moyamoya Syndrome
Recruiting
Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning at Different Time Phases in Patients Undergoing Heart Valve Surgery
Heart Valve Surgery, Acute Kidney Injury
Recruiting
Effectiveness of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Prevention of Contrast Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiograms.
Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury (CI-AKI) Following Coronary Angiogram (CI-AKI), Contrast-induced Nephropathy Following Coronary Angiogram (CIN)
Recruiting
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Aute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery
Aortic Dissection Type A
Not yet recruiting
Prevention of Ischemia in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Through Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tjun Yip Tang principal investigator
Changi General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing RIPC in people with Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning and Contrast Induced Nephropathy, run by Changi General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Reduction in the prevalence of contrast medium-induced nephropathy (time frame: At 24, 48 and 72 hours post procedure and 4-week post procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02516072, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2020.