Ventricular TachycardiaBERLIN VTNCT02501005
Preventive aBlation of vEntricular tachycaRdia in Patients With myocardiaL INfarction
A study testing VT ablation in people with Ventricular Tachycardia, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 5 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The BERLIN VT study is designed to evaluate the impact of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation on all-cause mortality and unplanned hospital admission for congestive heart failure or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VF) when compared to VT ablation after the third appropriate… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventricular Tachycardia
- What is being tested?
- VT ablation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 163 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- 20 Jul 2015to 20 Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- History of remote myocardial infarction
- Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 30 to ≤ 50 % as estimated by cardiac MRI, 3D-echocardiography or via ventriculography within 30 days before enrollment
- Documentation of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) by any kind of Electrocardiography (ECG) including 12 lead ECG, holter ECG, rhythm strip, event monitoring, event recorder or pacemaker within 30 days before enrollment
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indication for secondary prevention
- Patients who are planned to be implanted with BIOTRONIK ICDs (single, dual, triple chamber or DX device)
- Patient has provided written informed consent
- Patient accepts activation of Home Monitoring®
Who cannot join
- Age < 18 years or > 80 years
- Known arterial or venous thrombosis
- Class IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure
- Valvular heart disease or mechanical heart valve precluding access to the left ventricle
- Acute myocardial reinfarction or acute coronary syndrome
- Cardiac surgery involving cardiotomy within the past 2 months
Show all 17Show fewer
- Patients requiring chronic renal dialysis
- Thrombocytopenia or coagulopathy
- Incessant VT or electrical storm
- Bundle branch reentry tachycardia as the presenting VT
- Pre-existing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)
- Pregnancy or breast feeding women
- Acute illness or active systemic infection
- Other disease process likely to limit survival to less than 12 months
- Significant medical problem that in the opinion of the principal investigator would preclude enrollment in the study
- Unwillingness to participate or lack of availability for follow-up
- Participation in another interventional clinical investigation during the course of the study, i.e. the participation in a non-interventional clinical investigation is allowed.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
Germany5 sites
Universitätsklinikum Köln
Cologne, 50937
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099
Universitäres Herzzentrum Hamburg
Hamburg, 20246
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck
Lübeck, 23538
Klinikum der Universität München
München, 81377
About this study
The BERLIN VT study is designed to evaluate the impact of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation on all-cause mortality and unplanned hospital admission for congestive heart failure or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VF) when compared to VT ablation after the third appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock.
- Conditions
- Ventricular Tachycardia
- Being tested
- VT ablation
- Medical subject headings
- Tachycardia, Ventricular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VT ablationProcedure or surgery
Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group 1 (TG1) | Experimental | Prophylactic VT ablation prior to ICD implantation Receives: Procedure: VT ablation |
| Treatment Group 2 (TG2) | Other | ICD implantation and best medical care until the third appropriate ICD shock occurs and catheter ablation thereafter Receives: Procedure: VT ablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to first event comprising all-cause mortality, unplanned hospital admission for congestive heart failure and unplanned hospital admission for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ ventricular fibrillation (VF)
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Secondary outcomes (9)
Time to first sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ ventricular fibrillation (VF)
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months..
Time to first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to first inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to all-cause mortality
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to cardiac mortality
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to first unplanned all-cause hospitalization
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to first unplanned cardiac hospitalization
Measured: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Changes in quality of life / mental
This endpoint compares the changes in the mental component score of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire from enrollment to the 12-months follow-up. Additionally, descriptive statistics is calculated: absolute scores at enrollment, 3-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up, short-term changes in scores from enrollment to the 3-month follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Changes in quality of life / physical
This endpoint compares the changes in the physical component score of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire from enrollment to the 12-months follow-up. Additionally, descriptive statistics is calculated: absolute scores at enrollment, 3-month follow-up, and 12-month follow-up, short-term changes in scores from enrollment to the 3-month follow-up.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start20 Jul 2015
- Primary completion20 Jul 2018
- Study completion20 Jul 2018
Why it stopped: The study was stopped due to futility
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ventricular TachycardiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 163 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KG
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Karl-Heinz Kuck, Prof., Principal investigator, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg (Germany)Stephan Willems, Prof., Study chair, Universitäres Herzzentrum, Hamburg (Germany)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02501005
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EP028
- Acronym
- BERLIN VT
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 6 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Tilz RR, Kuck KH, Kaab S, Wegscheider K, Thiem A, Wenzel B, Willems S, Steven D. Rationale and design of BERLIN VT study: a multicenter randomised trial comparing preventive versus deferred ablation of ventricular tachycardia. BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e022910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022910.
PubMed 31072848Willems S, Tilz RR, Steven D, Kaab S, Wegscheider K, Geller L, Meyer C, Heeger CH, Metzner A, Sinner MF, Schluter M, Nordbeck P, Eckardt L, Bogossian H, Sultan A, Wenzel B, Kuck KH; BERLIN VT Investigators. Preventive or Deferred Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Defibrillator (BERLIN VT): A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2020 Mar 31;141(13):1057-1067. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043400. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
PubMed 32000514
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preventive aBlation of vEntricular tachycaRdia in Patients With myocardiaL INfarction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02501005
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BERLIN VT / EP028
- Conditions
- Ventricular Tachycardia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was stopped due to futility
- Enrolment
- 163 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Biotronik SE & Co. KGIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 20 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The BERLIN VT study is designed to evaluate the impact of prophylactic ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation on all-cause mortality and unplanned hospital admission for congestive heart failure or symptomatic ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VF) when compared to VT ablation after the third appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group 1 (TG1) | Experimental | Procedure: VT ablationProphylactic VT ablation prior to ICD implantation |
| Treatment Group 2 (TG2) | Other | Procedure: VT ablationICD implantation and best medical care until the third appropriate ICD shock occurs and catheter ablation thereafter |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of remote myocardial infarction
- Left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 30 to ≤ 50 % as estimated by cardiac MRI, 3D-echocardiography or via ventriculography within 30 days before enrollment
- Documentation of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) by any kind of Electrocardiography (ECG) including 12 lead ECG, holter ECG, rhythm strip, event monitoring, event recorder or pacemaker within 30 days before enrollment
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) indication for secondary prevention
- Patients who are planned to be implanted with BIOTRONIK ICDs (single, dual, triple chamber or DX device)
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Age < 18 years or > 80 years
- Known arterial or venous thrombosis
- Class IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure
- Valvular heart disease or mechanical heart valve precluding access to the left ventricle
- Acute myocardial reinfarction or acute coronary syndrome
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VT ablationCatheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia | Procedure or surgery | Treatment Group 1 (TG1), Treatment Group 2 (TG2) |
Primary outcome
Time to first event comprising all-cause mortality, unplanned hospital admission for congestive heart failure and unplanned hospital admission for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ ventricular fibrillation (VF)
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
9 secondary outcomes
Time to first sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ ventricular fibrillation (VF)
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months..
Time to first appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to first inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to all-cause mortality
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to cardiac mortality
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to first unplanned all-cause hospitalization
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Time to first unplanned cardiac hospitalization
Time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.
Changes in quality of life / mental
Time frame: 12 months
Changes in quality of life / physical
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was stopped due to futility). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2019.
- Background: PubMed 31072848Tilz RR, Kuck KH, Kaab S, Wegscheider K, Thiem A, Wenzel B, Willems S, Steven D. Rationale and design of BERLIN VT study: a multicenter randomised trial comparing preventive versus deferred ablation of ventricular tachycardia. BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e022910. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022910.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32000514Willems S, Tilz RR, Steven D, Kaab S, Wegscheider K, Geller L, Meyer C, Heeger CH, Metzner A, Sinner MF, Schluter M, Nordbeck P, Eckardt L, Bogossian H, Sultan A, Wenzel B, Kuck KH; BERLIN VT Investigators. Preventive or Deferred Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Implantable Defibrillator (BERLIN VT): A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2020 Mar 31;141(13):1057-1067. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043400. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
- Design PaperLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Ventricular Tachycardia
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With a Multi-Electrode Mapping Catheter
Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Markers of Cardiovascular Disease in Epilepsy
Epilepsy, Seizures
Recruiting
Cardiac RADIoablation Versus Repeat Catheter Ablation: a Pivotal Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy for Patients With High-risk Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia (RADIATE-VT)
Tachycardia, Ventricular
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karl-Heinz Kuck, Prof. principal investigator
Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Hamburg (Germany)
Stephan Willems, Prof. study chair
Universitäres Herzzentrum, Hamburg (Germany)
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VT ablation in people with Ventricular Tachycardia, run by Biotronik SE & Co. KG at 5 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was stopped due to futility). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to first event comprising all-cause mortality, unplanned hospital admission for congestive heart failure and unplanned hospital admission for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ ventricular fibrillation (VF) (time frame: From randomization until official study end or drop-out, patients will be followed and assessed for primary endpoint events and Time-to-Event Outcome Measures for an expected average of 30 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02501005, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2019.