AzTrials
AzTrials

Tachycardia, VentricularRADIATE-VTNCT05765175

Cardiac RADIoablation Versus Repeat Catheter Ablation: a Pivotal Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy for Patients With High-risk Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia (RADIATE-VT)

A study testing Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA) and Catheter Ablation (CA) in people with Tachycardia, Ventricular, run by Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company at 12 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

RADIATE-VT is a pivotal, multicenter, randomized trial comparing safety and efficacy between cardiac radioablation (CRA) using the Varian CRA System and repeat catheter ablation (CA), for patients with high-risk refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) who have experienced VT recurrence after CA and are candidates for… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tachycardia, Ventricular
What is being tested?
Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA) and Catheter Ablation (CA)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
380 participants
Where
12 sitesUnited States
Study dates
21 Apr 2023to May 2032
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • High-risk refractory VT, defined as:
  • Ischemic and/or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and
  • Recurrent sustained monomorphic VT, defined as at least one of the following below, documented by ICD interrogation or ECG in the prior 6 months, and having occurred after the last VT ablation:
  • A: ≥3 episodes of monomorphic VT treated with anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) at least one of which is symptomatic
  • B: ≥1 appropriate ICD shock
  • C: ≥3 episodes of sustained monomorphic VT within 24 hours treated with ICD shock or ATP
Show all 17Show fewer
  • D: sustained monomorphic VT below detection rate of ICD documented by ECG, and
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤49% and
  • Previously underwent at least one standard of care CA for VT.
  • Presence of a clinical indication for a repeat CA procedure for scar-mediated VT in the judgement of the treating investigator.
  • Has failed amiodarone therapy or is intolerant to amiodarone:
  • Failed amiodarone therapy is defined as: appropriate ICD therapy or sustained monomorphic VT having occurred while the patient was taking amiodarone (minimum cumulative dose of 10 g).
  • Intolerant to amiodarone is defined as: previously tried or taken amiodarone but stopped due to medication related side effects or toxicities.
  • Deemed to be medically and technically a candidate for further CA by the electrophysiologist investigator.
  • Presence of an ICD.
  • At least 18 years of age (or meets local age of majority).
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign an IRB approved written informed consent document.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindication to a CA procedure for VT (e.g., presence of mobile LV thrombus, active systemic infection, active ischemic or other reversible causes of VT).
  • Patients with expected, right ventricular scar only.
  • Any prior radiation to the thorax region of the body.
  • Known medical conditions associated with higher risk of radiotherapy complications in the judgement of the radiation oncologist (i.e., active connective tissue disorders, interstitial lung disease, etc.) that would preclude safe delivery of CRA.
  • Current use of inotropes.
  • Presence of a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD).
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Scheduled for LVAD or heart transplant procedures.
  • Presence of a systemic illness likely to limit survival to < 1 year.
  • VT ablation procedure performed within the prior 2 weeks.
  • Polymorphic VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF) as the primary clinical heart rhythm, as indicated by 12-lead ECG and/or ICD interrogation.
  • >3 distinct clinical monomorphic VT morphologies on ICD interrogation since the prior CA, or >5 induced monomorphic VT morphologies during NIPS testing.
  • Incessant VT that is hemodynamically unstable.
  • Bundle branch reentry (BBR) VT.
  • Pregnant and/or breastfeeding. (Patient denial is sufficient for enrollment).
  • Patients of childbearing potential who:
  • are not on a medically effective means of birth control at the time of screening or do not start a medically effective means of birth control prior to randomization; or
  • do not agree to continue medically effective means of birth control until they have completed their assigned therapy; or
  • do not agree to be on a medically effective means of birth control if they are treated with CRA after their index CA procedure.
  • Patients enrolled in another clinical study the investigator believes to be in conflict with this clinical investigation.
  • Patients enrolled or planned to be enrolled in another cardiac radioablation clinical study or registry.
  • Patients with any other medical condition or laboratory value that would, at the discretion of the investigator, preclude the patient from participation in this clinical investigation.

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

12 sites in 1 country

United States12 sites, 12 recruiting
  • Brigham & Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

    Christine Pellegrini, 617-732-5241, cpellegrini@bwh.harvard.edu

    Deborah Manuelian, 617-732-5087, dmanuelian@bwh.harvard.edu

    Recruiting
  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

    843-792-5998

    Jeffrey Winterfield, MD

    Recruiting
  • University of Missouri

    Columbia, Missouri, 65211

    Nadine Kallas, 573-884-2194, nkallas@health.missouri.edu

    Rahul Jain, MD

    Recruiting
  • The Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

    Adrianne Miller, 614-688-8252, adrianne.miller3@osumc.edu

    EP Research Phone, 614-685-4394, _cardiologyepresearchnurses_@osumc.edu

    Recruiting
  • Hartford Hospital

    Hartford, Connecticut, 06102

    Megan Scalzo, 860-972-4268, megan.scalzo@hhchealth.org

    Jennifer Rossi, 860-972-5311, jennifer.rossi@hhchealth.org

    Recruiting
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90048

    Kelsey Duggin, 310-967-8408, kelsey.duggin@csmns.org

    Goran Stankovic, (310)967-8408, goran.stankovic@cshs.org

    Recruiting
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

    Terry Weyand, 615-322-9349, terry.l.weyand@vumc.org

    William G Stevenson, MD

    Recruiting
  • Yale University

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06511

    Margaret Leiss, RN, 203-737-9519, Margaret.leiss@yale.edu

    Kenneth Roberts, MD

    Recruiting
  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

    Karen Tang, 267-299-9618, Karen.Tang1@Pennmedicine.upenn.edu

    Keith Cengel, MD

    Recruiting
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260

    Eric Pasquantonio, 412-647-8210, pasquantonioej@upmc.edu

    Krishna Kancharla, MD

    Recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905

    Brian Liddell, 507-255-8717, liddell.brian@mayo.edu

    Study Team Heart Rhythm Services, 5072550774

    Recruiting
  • Washington University

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

    Kaitlin Moore, kaitlin.m.moore@wustl.edu

    Daniel Cooper, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Cardiac RADIoablation Versus Repeat Catheter Ablation: a Pivotal Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy for Patients With High-risk Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

RADIATE-VT is a pivotal, multicenter, randomized trial comparing safety and efficacy between cardiac radioablation (CRA) using the Varian CRA System and repeat catheter ablation (CA), for patients with high-risk refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) who have experienced VT recurrence after CA and are candidates for additional CA.

Being tested
Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA), Catheter Ablation (CA)
Keywords
Cardiac radioablation, Ventricular tachycardia, Catheter ablation, Refractory ventricular tachycardia, High risk, SBRT
Medical subject headings
Tachycardia, Ventricular

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA)Device

    Subjects randomized to CRA will be treated with the Varian CRA system according to a uniform CRA protocol. A dose of 25 Gy in a single fraction is prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV), and delivered using a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) technique.

  • Catheter Ablation (CA)Procedure or surgery

    Subjects randomized to the CA arm will be treated according to a uniform CA protocol.

Study groups in NCT05765175
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Repeat catheter ablation (CA)Active comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Catheter Ablation (CA)
Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Co-primary safety endpoint: freedom from treatment-attributed (i.e., probably or definitely related) serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Freedom from treatment-attributed (i.e., probably or definitely related) serious adverse events (SAEs), evaluated from treatment through 12 months post-treatment.

    Measured: Treatment through 12 months post-treatment

  2. Co-primary efficacy endpoint: Freedom from death, and appropriate ICD shock, and VT storm.

    Freedom from death, and appropriate ICD shock, and VT storm, where death will be counted from randomization through 12 months, and shock and storm will be counted starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization and continuing through 12 months post randomization.

    Measured: Death will be counted from randomization through 12 months, and shock and storm will be counted starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization and continuing through 12 months post randomization

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change in quality of life at 6 weeks post treatment:

    Change in quality of life at 6 weeks post treatment measured by the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Health Change Question. This item asks the subject to rate their health in general compared to one year ago in a 5-point scale of 1 (much better), 2 (somewhat better), 3 (about the same), 4 (somewhat worse), 5 (much worse).

    Measured: From baseline through 6 weeks post treatment

  2. VT burden reduction

    VT burden reduction measured as a ≥75% reduction in appropriate ICD therapies (ATP, shock), comparing a 6-month period before randomization and a 6-month period starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization.

    Measured: From 6 months before randomization through to a 6 month period starting after a 30-day period immediately post-randomization

  3. Change in quality of life (Social Functioning) at 6 weeks post treatment

    Change in quality of life (Social Functioning) measured by the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) Social Functioning item (social activities in past 4 weeks). This item asks the subject to rate how much of the time their physical health or emotional problems interfered with their social activities in the past 4 weeks in a 5-point scale of 1 (All of the time), 2 (Most of the time), 3 (Some of the time), 4 (A little bit of the time), 5 (None of the time).

    Measured: From baseline through 6 weeks post treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Mar 2023
  2. Study start21 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completionOct 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The Varian CRA trial is a multicenter, international, pivotal, 2-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT). Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to CRA or repeat CA. Randomization will be stratified by (1) enrolling institution and (2) NYHA class I/II vs. III/IV. Blinding will not be used in this trial, as the different interventions cannot be blinded.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
380 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT05765175
Sponsor's protocol ID
VAR-2022-01
Acronym
RADIATE-VT
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
15 Feb 2023
Last updated
30 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Varian Cardiac Radioablation (CRA) and Catheter Ablation (CA) in people with Tachycardia, Ventricular, run by Varian, a Siemens Healthineers Company at 12 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Claire McCann, PhD (437.240.4531, claire.mccann@varian.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Co-primary safety endpoint: freedom from treatment-attributed (i.e., probably or definitely related) serious adverse events (SAEs) (time frame: Treatment through 12 months post-treatment). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in