AzTrials
AzTrials

Depressive DisorderPhase 2NCT02498392

An Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of JNJ-42165279 in Participants With Major Depressive Disorder With Anxious Distress

A Phase 2 study testing JNJ-42165279 in people with Depressive Disorder and Anxiety, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 32 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety and tolerability of JNJ-42165279 in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) with anxiety symptoms who have had inadequate response to treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonergic/noradrenergic reuptake… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Depressive Disorder, Anxiety
What is being tested?
JNJ-42165279
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
161 participants
Where
32 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
7 Oct 2015to 4 Feb 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant must meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) or 5 diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) with Anxious Distress
  • Participants with a diagnosis of comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, or Panic Disorder may be included, if the investigator considers MDD with Anxious Distress to be the primary diagnosis (confirmed by an independent central rater at screening)
  • Participants must have been treated with an approved SSRI/SNRI antidepressants for at least 6 continuous weeks, validated by an independent central rater contracted by the sponsor
  • A 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) total score greater than or equal to (>=)18 and a HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor score >=7 at screening, assessed by a site rater and reviewed by an independent central rater on Day 1
  • Participant must be willing and able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions
  • Participant Body mass index (BMI = weight/height2) must be between 18 and 35 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2) inclusive

Who cannot join

  • Has other psychiatric condition, including, but not limited to, MDD with psychotic features, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, eating disorder, or schizophrenia
  • Has a length of current Major Depressive Episode (MDE) greater than (>) 6 months
  • Has more than 1 failed antidepressant treatment of adequate dose and duration in the current MDE, Not including the inadequate response to the current selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonergic/noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant
  • Has initiated psychotherapy specific for MDD (such as cognitive behavioral, behavioral, or interpersonal therapy) for the current episode of depression within 6 weeks prior to Screening
  • Has a current or recent history of clinically significant suicidal ideation within the past 6 months, or a history of suicidal behavior within the past year

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 6 countries.

32 sites in 6 countries

United States8 sites
  • Study site

    Allentown, Pennsylvania

  • Study site

    Cedarhurst, New York

  • Study site

    Costa Mesa, California

  • Study site

    Miami, Florida

  • Study site

    Natick, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Oceanside, California

  • Study site

    Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Salt Lake City, Utah

Other trials in United States

Ukraine7 sites
  • Study site

    Hlevakha

  • Study site

    Kharkiv

  • Study site

    Kherson

  • Study site

    Kyiv

  • Study site

    Lviv

  • Study site

    Smila

  • Study site

    Uzhhorod

Other trials in Ukraine

United Kingdom6 sites
  • Study site

    Barnsley

  • Study site

    Blackpool

  • Study site

    Liverpool

  • Study site

    Manchester

  • Study site

    South Staffordshire

  • Study site

    Stourton

Other trials in United Kingdom

Russia5 sites
  • Study site

    Orenburg

  • Study site

    Saint Petersburg

  • Study site

    Saratov

  • Study site

    Tomsk

  • Study site

    Yekaterinburg

Other trials in Russia

Spain5 sites
  • Study site

    Alicante

  • Study site

    Barcelona

  • Study site

    Bilbao

  • Study site

    Sant Boi de Llobregat

  • Study site

    Zamora

Other trials in Spain

Moldova1 site
  • Study site

    Chisinau

Other trials in Moldova

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multi-center Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-42165279 in Subjects With Major Depressive Disorder With Anxious Distress

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety and tolerability of JNJ-42165279 in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) with anxiety symptoms who have had inadequate response to treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonergic/noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI).

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows the treatment that the participant receives), placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study in participants with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with Anxious Distress. Participants who had treatment initiated with a SSRI/SNRI allowed by the protocol will be evaluated at the investigation site. The site assessment will be reviewed and validated by an independent central rater. The review will include the clinical history of MDD, SSRI/SNRI treatment of adequate dose and duration for the current episode of depression, and current symptom severity on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17). Enrolled participants will be maintained on SSRI/SNRI treatment throughout the study to determine whether additional treatment with JNJ-4216579 can reduce the symptoms of MDD with anxious distress.The study will consist of 3 phases: a Screening Phase of up to 4 weeks, an 11-week double-blind Treatment Phase, and a 3-week post-treatment (follow up) Phase. The double-blind treatment Phase of the trial will consist of 3 periods. The first period is a placebo lead-in of double-blind duration, after which participants will enter the treatment period when they will be randomly assigned to JNJ-42165279 or continuation on placebo for 6 weeks. Participants who successfully complete the treatment period prior to the end of Week 11, will be treated with placebo for the remaining time of the double-blind phase of the study, which will vary depending on the duration of the placebo lead-in for the specific participant. The total study duration for each participant will be approximately 18 weeks. Efficacy and safety of JNJ-42165279 will be evaluated. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

Being tested
JNJ-42165279, Placebo
Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder, Depression, Anxiety symptoms, JNJ-42165279
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Major, Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • JNJ-42165279Drug

    JNJ-42165279 will be administered orally at a dose of 25 milligrams (mg) tablet once daily for 6 weeks.

  • PlaceboOther

    Matching Placebo will be administered orally.

Study groups in NCT02498392
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Responders-PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants who responded in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with Matching Placebo orally.
Receives: Other: Placebo
Responders-JNJ-42165279ExperimentalParticipants who responded in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with JNJ-42165279 orally at a dose of 25 milligrams (mg) tablets once daily for 6 weeks.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-42165279
Non Responders-PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants who did not respond in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with Matching Placebo orally.
Receives: Other: Placebo
Non Responders-JNJ-42165279ExperimentalParticipants who did not respond in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with JNJ-42165279 orally at a dose of 25 mg tablets once daily for 6 weeks.
Receives: Drug: JNJ-42165279

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  2. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    HDRS17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of the 17 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale which used a rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. HDRS17 total score is calculated as sum of 17 item scores and ranges from 0 to 52. For each item as well as the total score, higher scores indicate greater severity of depression.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Subscale (HAM-A6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) which consists of 5 psychic anxiety symptoms (anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview), as well as one somatic item (muscular tension). Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  2. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-A6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) which consists of 5 psychic anxiety symptoms (anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview), as well as one somatic item (muscular tension). Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  3. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Subscale (HAM-D6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    HAM-D6 is a 6-item subscale derived from HDRS17 and consists of depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and somatics symptoms (tiredness and pain), rated on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not present, and 1-4 represent increasingly severe symptoms. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatic is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 is calculated from summing the 6 items and the score ranges from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  4. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    HAM-D6 is a 6-item subscale derived from HDRS17 and consists of depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and somatic symptoms (tiredness and pain), rated on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not present, and 1-4 represent increasingly severe symptoms. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatic is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 is calculated from summing the 6 items and the score ranges from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  5. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety; and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  6. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety; and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  7. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of 6 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale with rating of 0:absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe and is calculated as sum of 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms for each item as well as total score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  8. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of 6 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale with rating of 0:absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe and is calculated as sum of 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms for each item as well as total score.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 6

  9. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had >=30% improvement (responders) on HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Measured: Week 6

  10. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30 % Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had >=30% improvement (responders) on HDRS17 total score at Week 6 was reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Measured: Week 6

  11. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had >=50% improvement (responders) in HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Measured: Week 6

  12. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had >=50% improvement (responders) in HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Measured: Week 6

  13. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had >= 30% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Week 6

  14. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had >= 30% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Week 6

  15. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had >= 50% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Week 6

  16. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had >= 50% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Week 6

  17. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7 at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    Percentage of participants with HDRS17 total score <= 7 were considered as remitters. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point(0-2) or 5-point(0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Measured: Week 6

  18. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score <= 7 at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    Percentage of participants with HDRS17 total score <= 7 were considered as remitters. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point(0-2) or 5-point(0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Measured: Week 6

  19. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The percentage of participants with a CGI-I score of very much improved or much improved at Week 6 was reported. CGI-I is a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Week 6

  20. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The percentage of participants with a CGI-I score of very much improved or much improved at Week 6 was reported. CGI-I is a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Week 6

  21. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-42165279

    Cmax is defined as maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-42165279. The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate Cmax.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77

  22. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Zero to Dosing Intervals (AUC[0-tau]) of JNJ-42165279

    AUC(0-tau) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to t hours post dosing (time t is the dosing interval). The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate AUC(0-tau).

    Measured: Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77

  23. Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-42165279

    Tmax is defined as time to reach the maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-42165279. The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate Tmax.

    Measured: Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start7 Oct 2015
  3. Primary completion4 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion4 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
161 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02498392
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR107733
Other IDs
2015-002007-29, 42165279MDD2001, 2015
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
13 Jul 2015
Last updated
29 Apr 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing JNJ-42165279 in people with Depressive Disorder and Anxiety, run by Janssen Research & Development, LLC at 32 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in United States, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Russia, Spain and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Apr 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population) (time frame: Baseline and Week 6). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in