Acute PainPhase 4NCT02497911
A Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Catheter and Intraarticular Catheter Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Phase 4 study testing Adductor Canal Catheter, Intraarticular Catheter and Ropivicaine in people with Acute Pain and Regional Anesthesia Morbidity, run by Thomas Jefferson University.
Trial summary
The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing intraarticular catheters and adductor canal catheters for postoperative analgesia following a primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Pain, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
- What is being tested?
- Adductor Canal Catheter, Intraarticular Catheter and Ropivicaine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 110 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 40-85
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) 1-3.
- Undergoing Unilateral, Primary, Total Knee Arthroplasty
- English as native language
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal
- History of opioid dependence
- Contraindication to peripheral nerve block
- Pre-existing significant neuropathy
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC) and Intra-articular Catheter (IAC) Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing intraarticular catheters and adductor canal catheters for postoperative analgesia following a primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).
Read the detailed description
The study is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two methods of postoperative analgesia following primary TKA. Eligible primary TKA patients must be ASA I - III and require less than 20 mg oxycodone daily (or its equivalent). Exclusion criteria are: allergy to anesthetics, contraindication to regional anesthesia, sensory/motor disorder involving operative limb, non-english speaking, ASA IV or greater, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, incarceration, renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0 and hepatic failure. When patients agree to participate in the study the following data will be collected by the research staff: ASA physical status, age, height, weight, gender, quantitative opiate use, numeric pain score with visual descriptors, painDETECT score (form included), WOMAC score (form included) and baseline Pain Management Questionnaire. When designated through randomization, intra-articular catheters will be placed intraoperatively by the surgeons, per usual protocol. ACC's will be placed postoperatively in the PACU. The catheters will exit the bandage in a similar fashion to blind the personnel collecting data, postoperatively. Those collecting data will not be blinded from identifying patients in the control group, as no catheter will exit the bandage. Potential risks for each procedure, which will be explained to the patient, include: bleeding, local infection, local anesthetic toxicity in the form of seizure and cardiac arrest and neuropathy. The preceding are commonly listed though infrequent complications of both procedures. Continuous ultrasound will guide the placement of the ACC.
- Conditions
- Acute Pain, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
- Being tested
- Adductor Canal Catheter, Intraarticular Catheter, Ropivicaine, Bupivicaine
- Keywords
- Adductor Canal Catheter, Intraarticular Catheter, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Adductor Canal CatheterProcedure or surgery
0.5% Ropivicaine for primary block and 0.2% Ropivicaine infusion by OnQ Pump
Intraarticular CatheterProcedure or surgery
0.5% Bupivicaine for primary block and 0.125% Bupivicaine infusion by OnQ Pump
RopivicaineDrug
BupivicaineDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal Catheter | Experimental | Postoperatively, patients will be brought to the PACU. The needle insertion site, approximately 10cm proximal to their operative knee, will be exposed. A sterile field will be utilized and the femoral artery is identified with a high frequency linear transducer proximal to the operative knee. 18g insulated Tuohy needle will be inserted in an out-of-plane approach through the sartorius muscle to a final location in close proximity to the saphenous nerve. Once satisfied with needle placement and following negative aspiration, 15 cc's of 0.5% ropivicaine will be injected through the needle under visualization. A 20-g multi-orifice catheter will be inserted approximately 4 cm beyond the needle tip and secured. Receives: Procedure: Adductor Canal Catheter; Drug: Ropivicaine |
| Intraarticular Catheter | Experimental | Intra-articular catheters will be placed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure, before wound closure. A bupivacaine 0.5% infusion will be admin through the On-Q system and continued for 48 hours postoperatively. Receives: Procedure: Intraarticular Catheter; Drug: Bupivicaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative pain
postoperative pain as measured by Visual Analog Scale at rest and with movement
Measured: immediately postoperative period to post-operative day # 2
Secondary outcomes (3)
Postoperative opioid consumption
Opioid consumption within hospitalization
Measured: immediat postoperative period to postoperative day # 2
Chronic post-surgical pain
Assess post-surgical pain and function as measured by PainDetect and WOMAC questionnaires at 6-8 weeks post-operative compared to preoperative pain and function
Measured: 6-8 weeks post-operative
Participation in Physical therapy
Physical therapy benchmarks such as active and passive range of motion
Measured: immediate postoperative period to postoperative day #2
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionNov 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Thomas Jefferson UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Thomas Jefferson University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jaime Baratta, Thomas Jefferson University
- Investigators
- Jaime L Baratta, MD, Principal investigator, Sidney Kimmel Medical Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02497911
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00002109
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H; PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1105-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
PubMed 18627367Charous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Mariano ER, Donohue MC, Dutton PH, Ferguson EJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. Anesthesiology. 2011 Oct;115(4):774-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182124dc6.
PubMed 21394001Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
PubMed 22221014Kazak Bengisun Z, Aysu Salviz E, Darcin K, Suer H, Ates Y. Intraarticular levobupivacaine or bupivacaine administration decreases pain scores and provides a better recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0970-x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
PubMed 20571832Essving P, Axelsson K, Aberg E, Spannar H, Gupta A, Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
PubMed 21821506
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Adductor Canal Catheter (ACC) and Intra-articular Catheter (IAC) Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02497911
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 00002109
- Conditions
- Acute Pain, Regional Anesthesia Morbidity
- Keywords
- Adductor Canal Catheter, Intraarticular Catheter, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 110 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Thomas Jefferson UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing intraarticular catheters and adductor canal catheters for postoperative analgesia following a primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).
Detailed description
The study is a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing two methods of postoperative analgesia following primary TKA. Eligible primary TKA patients must be ASA I - III and require less than 20 mg oxycodone daily (or its equivalent). Exclusion criteria are: allergy to anesthetics, contraindication to regional anesthesia, sensory/motor disorder involving operative limb, non-english speaking, ASA IV or greater, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, incarceration, renal insufficiency with Cr > 2.0 and hepatic failure. When patients agree to participate in the study the following data will be collected by the research staff: ASA physical status, age, height, weight, gender, quantitative opiate use, numeric pain score with visual descriptors, painDETECT score (form included), WOMAC score (form included) and baseline Pain Management Questionnaire. When designated through randomization, intra-articular catheters will be placed intraoperatively by the surgeons, per usual protocol. ACC's will be placed postoperatively in the PACU. The catheters will exit the bandage in a similar fashion to blind the personnel collecting data, postoperatively. Those collecting data will not be blinded from identifying patients in the control group, as no catheter will exit the bandage. Potential risks for each procedure, which will be explained to the patient, include: bleeding, local infection, local anesthetic toxicity in the form of seizure and cardiac arrest and neuropathy. The preceding are commonly listed though infrequent complications of both procedures. Continuous ultrasound will guide the placement of the ACC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal Catheter | Experimental | Procedure: Adductor Canal Catheter, Drug: RopivicainePostoperatively, patients will be brought to the PACU. The needle insertion site, approximately 10cm proximal to their operative knee, will be exposed. A sterile field will be utilized and the femoral artery is identified with a high frequency linear transducer proximal to the operative knee. 18g insulated Tuohy needle will be inserted in an out-of-plane approach through the sartorius muscle to a final location in close proximity to the saphenous nerve. Once satisfied with needle placement and following negative aspiration, 15 cc's of 0.5% ropivicaine will be injected through the needle under visualization. A 20-g multi-orifice catheter will be inserted approximately 4 cm beyond the needle tip and secured. |
| Intraarticular Catheter | Experimental | Procedure: Intraarticular Catheter, Drug: BupivicaineIntra-articular catheters will be placed by the surgeon at the end of the procedure, before wound closure. A bupivacaine 0.5% infusion will be admin through the On-Q system and continued for 48 hours postoperatively. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 40-85
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) 1-3.
- Undergoing Unilateral, Primary, Total Knee Arthroplasty
- English as native language
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient refusal
- History of opioid dependence
- Contraindication to peripheral nerve block
- Pre-existing significant neuropathy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal Catheter0.5% Ropivicaine for primary block and 0.2% Ropivicaine infusion by OnQ Pump | Procedure or surgery | Adductor Canal Catheter |
| Intraarticular Catheter0.5% Bupivicaine for primary block and 0.125% Bupivicaine infusion by OnQ Pump | Procedure or surgery | Intraarticular Catheter |
| Ropivicaine | Drug | Adductor Canal Catheter |
| Bupivicaine | Drug | Intraarticular Catheter |
Primary outcome
Post-operative pain
Time frame: immediately postoperative period to post-operative day # 2
postoperative pain as measured by Visual Analog Scale at rest and with movement
3 secondary outcomes
Postoperative opioid consumption
Time frame: immediat postoperative period to postoperative day # 2
Chronic post-surgical pain
Time frame: 6-8 weeks post-operative
Participation in Physical therapy
Time frame: immediate postoperative period to postoperative day #2
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 18627367Fischer HB, Simanski CJ, Sharp C, Bonnet F, Camu F, Neugebauer EA, Rawal N, Joshi GP, Schug SA, Kehlet H; PROSPECT Working Group. A procedure-specific systematic review and consensus recommendations for postoperative analgesia following total knee arthroplasty. Anaesthesia. 2008 Oct;63(10):1105-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05565.x. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 21394001Charous MT, Madison SJ, Suresh PJ, Sandhu NS, Loland VJ, Mariano ER, Donohue MC, Dutton PH, Ferguson EJ, Ilfeld BM. Continuous femoral nerve blocks: varying local anesthetic delivery method (bolus versus basal) to minimize quadriceps motor block while maintaining sensory block. Anesthesiology. 2011 Oct;115(4):774-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182124dc6.
- Background: PubMed 22221014Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
- Background: PubMed 20571832Kazak Bengisun Z, Aysu Salviz E, Darcin K, Suer H, Ates Y. Intraarticular levobupivacaine or bupivacaine administration decreases pain scores and provides a better recovery after total knee arthroplasty. J Anesth. 2010 Oct;24(5):694-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-010-0970-x. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
- Background: PubMed 21821506Essving P, Axelsson K, Aberg E, Spannar H, Gupta A, Lundin A. Local infiltration analgesia versus intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2011 Oct;113(4):926-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182288deb. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
Related trials for Acute Pain
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of MK-6916 in Participants With Pain After Bunion Removal Surgery (MK-6916-007)
Pain Management
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Not yet recruiting
Post-operative Pain and Clinical Outcome After Single-cone Obturation With a Calcium Silicate-based Versus Epoxy Resin Sealer
Post Operative Pain, Acute, Irreversible Pulpitis (Toothache)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jaime L Baratta, MD principal investigator
Sidney Kimmel Medical Center at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Adductor Canal Catheter, Intraarticular Catheter and Ropivicaine in people with Acute Pain and Regional Anesthesia Morbidity, run by Thomas Jefferson University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative pain (time frame: immediately postoperative period to post-operative day # 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02497911, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2015.