InfluenzaNCT02487147
Evaluation of Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator
A study testing Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator and N95 Respirator in people with Influenza, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare the efficacy of the Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator (PAPR) system versus a N95 mask in preventing nasal detection of influenza following an exposure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 49 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Influenza
- What is being tested?
- Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator and N95 Respirator
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 58 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 Nov 2016to 12 Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 49 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-49 years of age
- Employee or student at Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Wake Forest University
Who cannot join
- Respiratory tract disorders and other chronic diseases, and medical conditions and treatments which are contraindications to mask usage
- Severe claustrophobia or inability to tolerate masks
- Contraindications to FluMist:
- Children younger than 18 years; proposed age range is 18-49
- Adults 50 years and older; proposed age range is 18-49
- People who have received the live attenuated influenza vaccine within 3 weeks of the exposure sessions
Show all 16Show fewer
- People with a history of severe allergic reaction to any component of the vaccine or to a previous dose of any influenza vaccine
- People who are allergic to eggs
- Pregnant women
- People with weakened immune systems (immunosuppression)
- People who have taken influenza antiviral drugs within the previous 48 hours
- People who care for severely immunocompromised persons who require a protective environment (or otherwise avoid contact with those persons for 7 days after getting the nasal spray vaccine)
- People of any age with asthma might be at increased risk for wheezing after getting the nasal spray vaccine
- The safety of the nasal spray vaccine has not been established in people with underlying medical conditions that place them at high risk of serious flu complications. This includes children and adults who have lung disease, heart disease (except isolated hypertension), kidney disease (like diabetes), kidney or liver disorders, neurologic/neuromuscular, or metabolic disorders. Moderate or severe acute illness with or without fever is a general precaution for vaccination
- Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS) within 6 weeks following a previous dose of influenza vaccine is considered a precaution for use of all influenza vaccines
- Treatment with nasal decongestants, nasal antibiotic and/or steroid preparations will not be allowed
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Wake Forest School Of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator System for Prevention of Influenza Transmission
This study will compare the efficacy of the Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator (PAPR) system versus a N95 mask in preventing nasal detection of influenza following an exposure. The investigators hypothesize the use of the Free Air PAPR system will be superior to a N95 respirator at interrupting the exposure of the study participants to aerosolized influenza virus particles.
Read the detailed description
Airborne transmission represents one of the most rapidly spreading and least understood dissemination mechanisms for pathogens. Public health strategies to prevent and control the often explosive outbreaks associated with such pathogens are: 1) vaccination and treatment, if available, 2) decontamination of the exposed areas and surfaces, and 3) isolation and barrier precautions such as face masks. Unfortunately, evidence of the efficacy of currently recommended barrier precautions is currently lacking.
Attempts to validate the effectiveness of personal protective equipment are limited to in vitro experiments with mannequin heads. This human exposure study will provide a much more accurate life-like exposure scenario. The use of live attenuated influenza virus vaccine has been proven to be safe.
Objectives: Evaluate the Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator (PAPR) versus an N95 face mask for preventing the airborne cross-transmission of aerosolized influenza in human participants.
Methods: Participants will be randomized to one of two arms: a) N95 respirator, or b) Free Air PAPR System. The primary outcome will be the rate of the transmission for the 2 study groups, so a nasal and nasopharyngeal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Being tested
- Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator, N95 Respirator
- Keywords
- Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (FluMist), Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator, N95 Respirator, Personal Protective Equipment, Viral Transmission
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Free Air Portable Air Powered RespiratorOther
Also called Free Air PAPR
The Free Air PAPR is a portable air powered respirator that you will wear like a backpack with a mask and tubing attached.
N95 RespiratorOther
The N95 respirator is a mask that is standardly used clinically at Wake Forest Baptist Health.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| N95 Respirator | Active comparator | Participants in this arm will wear an N95 respirator and safety goggles during Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure. Receives: Other: N95 Respirator |
| Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator | Experimental | Participants in this arm will wear a Free Air PAPR and safety goggles during Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure. Receives: Other: Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nasal Swabs
A nasal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
Measured: Immediately following Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure
Nasopharyngeal swabs
A nasopharyngeal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
Measured: Immediately following Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start14 Nov 2016
- Primary completion12 Dec 2016
- Study completion12 Dec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Wake Forest University Health SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Free Air
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Werner Bischoff, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Wake Forest University Health Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02487147
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00031388
- Status last verified
- Oct 2018
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 4 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Miller MA, Viboud C, Balinska M, Simonsen L. The signature features of influenza pandemics--implications for policy. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2595-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903906. Epub 2009 May 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 19423872Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel to Prevent Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Infections: Current Research Issues; Larson EL, Liverman CT, editors. Preventing Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Diseases: Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel: Update 2010. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209584/
PubMed 24983058Brankston G, Gitterman L, Hirji Z, Lemieux C, Gardam M. Transmission of influenza A in human beings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;7(4):257-65. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70029-4.
PubMed 17376383Bischoff WE, Bassetti S, Bassetti-Wyss BA, Wallis ML, Tucker BK, Reboussin BA, D'Agostino RB Jr, Pfaller MA, Gwaltney JM Jr, Sherertz RJ. Airborne dispersal as a novel transmission route of coagulase-negative staphylococci: interaction between coagulase-negative staphylococci and rhinovirus infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;25(6):504-11. doi: 10.1086/502430.
PubMed 15242200Bischoff WE, Tucker BK, Wallis ML, Reboussin BA, Pfaller MA, Hayden FG, Sherertz RJ. Preventing the airborne spread of Staphylococcus aureus by persons with the common cold: effect of surgical scrubs, gowns, and masks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;28(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1086/520734. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
PubMed 17828691Gwaltney JM, Hendley JO. Respiratory transmission. In: Epidemiologic methods for the study of infectious diseases. (p.213-227) Thomas JC, Weber DJ (eds). Oxford University Press. 2001, New York, New York.
Bischoff WE. Novel Technique to Study Live Influenza and Common Cold Virus in Mono-Dispersed Aerosols. 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. San Francisco, CA, K-1615a, Sept. 12-15, 2009
Bischoff WE. Transmission route of rhinovirus type 39 in a monodispersed airborne aerosol. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;31(8):857-9. doi: 10.1086/655022.
PubMed 20569111Murayama S, Kawai R, Hirabuki N, Miura T, Mitomo M, Kozuka T, Usio Y. [Intra-arterial ACNU chemotherapy of malignant glioma]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1988 Feb 25;48(2):144-53. No abstract available. Japanese.
PubMed 3164472Bischoff WE, Swett K, Leng I, Peters TR. Exposure to influenza virus aerosols during routine patient care. J Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;207(7):1037-46. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis773. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PubMed 23372182Hayden FG, Albrecht JK, Kaiser DL, Gwaltney JM Jr. Prevention of natural colds by contact prophylaxis with intranasal alpha 2-interferon. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 9;314(2):71-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601093140202.
PubMed 3001519Ford CR, Peterson DE, Mitchell CR. An appraisal of the role of surgical face masks. Am J Surg. 1967 Jun;113(6):787-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(67)90348-0. No abstract available.
PubMed 6023917Ha'eri GB, Wiley AM. The efficacy of standard surgical face masks: an investigation using "tracer particles". Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 May;(148):160-2.
PubMed 7379387Mitchell NJ, Hunt S. Surgical face masks in modern operating rooms--a costly and unnecessary ritual? J Hosp Infect. 1991 Jul;18(3):239-42. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90148-2.
PubMed 1680906Huang C, Willeke K, Qian Y, Grinshpun S, Ulevicius V. Method for measuring the spatial variability of aerosol penetration through respirator filters. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Jul;59(7):461-5. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010208.
PubMed 9697293
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator System for Prevention of Influenza Transmission
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02487147
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00031388
- Conditions
- Influenza
- Keywords
- Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine (FluMist), Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator, N95 Respirator, Personal Protective Equipment, Viral Transmission
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 58 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Free Air
- Study start
- 14 Nov 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare the efficacy of the Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator (PAPR) system versus a N95 mask in preventing nasal detection of influenza following an exposure. The investigators hypothesize the use of the Free Air PAPR system will be superior to a N95 respirator at interrupting the exposure of the study participants to aerosolized influenza virus particles.
Detailed description
Airborne transmission represents one of the most rapidly spreading and least understood dissemination mechanisms for pathogens. Public health strategies to prevent and control the often explosive outbreaks associated with such pathogens are: 1) vaccination and treatment, if available, 2) decontamination of the exposed areas and surfaces, and 3) isolation and barrier precautions such as face masks. Unfortunately, evidence of the efficacy of currently recommended barrier precautions is currently lacking.
Attempts to validate the effectiveness of personal protective equipment are limited to in vitro experiments with mannequin heads. This human exposure study will provide a much more accurate life-like exposure scenario. The use of live attenuated influenza virus vaccine has been proven to be safe.
Objectives: Evaluate the Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator (PAPR) versus an N95 face mask for preventing the airborne cross-transmission of aerosolized influenza in human participants.
Methods: Participants will be randomized to one of two arms: a) N95 respirator, or b) Free Air PAPR System. The primary outcome will be the rate of the transmission for the 2 study groups, so a nasal and nasopharyngeal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| N95 Respirator | Active comparator | Other: N95 RespiratorParticipants in this arm will wear an N95 respirator and safety goggles during Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure. |
| Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator | Experimental | Other: Free Air Portable Air Powered RespiratorParticipants in this arm will wear a Free Air PAPR and safety goggles during Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 49 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age 18-49 years of age
- Employee or student at Wake Forest University School of Medicine and Wake Forest University
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Respiratory tract disorders and other chronic diseases, and medical conditions and treatments which are contraindications to mask usage
- Severe claustrophobia or inability to tolerate masks
- Contraindications to FluMist:
- Children younger than 18 years; proposed age range is 18-49
- Adults 50 years and older; proposed age range is 18-49
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Free Air Portable Air Powered RespiratorAlso: Free Air PAPRThe Free Air PAPR is a portable air powered respirator that you will wear like a backpack with a mask and tubing attached. | Other | Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator |
| N95 RespiratorThe N95 respirator is a mask that is standardly used clinically at Wake Forest Baptist Health. | Other | N95 Respirator |
Primary outcome
Nasal Swabs
Time frame: Immediately following Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure
A nasal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
Nasopharyngeal swabs
Time frame: Immediately following Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure
A nasopharyngeal swab will be performed immediately following the exposure.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Mar 2022.
- Background: PubMed 19423872Miller MA, Viboud C, Balinska M, Simonsen L. The signature features of influenza pandemics--implications for policy. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2595-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903906. Epub 2009 May 7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24983058Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel to Prevent Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Infections: Current Research Issues; Larson EL, Liverman CT, editors. Preventing Transmission of Pandemic Influenza and Other Viral Respiratory Diseases: Personal Protective Equipment for Healthcare Personnel: Update 2010. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2011. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK209584/
- Background: PubMed 17376383Brankston G, Gitterman L, Hirji Z, Lemieux C, Gardam M. Transmission of influenza A in human beings. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;7(4):257-65. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70029-4.
- Background: PubMed 15242200Bischoff WE, Bassetti S, Bassetti-Wyss BA, Wallis ML, Tucker BK, Reboussin BA, D'Agostino RB Jr, Pfaller MA, Gwaltney JM Jr, Sherertz RJ. Airborne dispersal as a novel transmission route of coagulase-negative staphylococci: interaction between coagulase-negative staphylococci and rhinovirus infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;25(6):504-11. doi: 10.1086/502430.
- Background: PubMed 17828691Bischoff WE, Tucker BK, Wallis ML, Reboussin BA, Pfaller MA, Hayden FG, Sherertz RJ. Preventing the airborne spread of Staphylococcus aureus by persons with the common cold: effect of surgical scrubs, gowns, and masks. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Oct;28(10):1148-54. doi: 10.1086/520734. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
- BackgroundGwaltney JM, Hendley JO. Respiratory transmission. In: Epidemiologic methods for the study of infectious diseases. (p.213-227) Thomas JC, Weber DJ (eds). Oxford University Press. 2001, New York, New York.
- BackgroundBischoff WE. Novel Technique to Study Live Influenza and Common Cold Virus in Mono-Dispersed Aerosols. 49th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. San Francisco, CA, K-1615a, Sept. 12-15, 2009
- Background: PubMed 20569111Bischoff WE. Transmission route of rhinovirus type 39 in a monodispersed airborne aerosol. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;31(8):857-9. doi: 10.1086/655022.
- Background: PubMed 3164472Murayama S, Kawai R, Hirabuki N, Miura T, Mitomo M, Kozuka T, Usio Y. [Intra-arterial ACNU chemotherapy of malignant glioma]. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1988 Feb 25;48(2):144-53. No abstract available. Japanese.
- Background: PubMed 23372182Bischoff WE, Swett K, Leng I, Peters TR. Exposure to influenza virus aerosols during routine patient care. J Infect Dis. 2013 Apr;207(7):1037-46. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis773. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 3001519Hayden FG, Albrecht JK, Kaiser DL, Gwaltney JM Jr. Prevention of natural colds by contact prophylaxis with intranasal alpha 2-interferon. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 9;314(2):71-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601093140202.
- Background: PubMed 6023917Ford CR, Peterson DE, Mitchell CR. An appraisal of the role of surgical face masks. Am J Surg. 1967 Jun;113(6):787-90. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(67)90348-0. No abstract available.
- CDC Guidelines and Recommendations Prevention Strategies for Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Settings September 20, 2010. (Accessed January 28, 2011)Link provided by the sponsor.
- American National Standards Institute (ANSI)/ American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) 52.2 Method of Testing General Ventilation Air-Cleaning Devices for Removal Efficiency by Particle Size. (Accessed Dec1,2011)Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Influenza
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Immunogenicity of Chimeric Hemagglutinin mRNA Vaccine Candidates
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
pH1N1 Blinded Challenge Study
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Werner Bischoff, MD, PhD principal investigator
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Free Air Portable Air Powered Respirator and N95 Respirator in people with Influenza, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nasal Swabs (time frame: Immediately following Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine exposure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02487147, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2022.